Linux-kernel mailing list archive 2003-02, by author

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ]

Starting: Thu 01 Jan 1970 - 00:11:06 EET
Ending: Sun 19 Jan 2003 - 14:13:60 EET
Messages: 1922

• 20030113152110.GA19931@wotan.suse.de
  • 20030113152110.GA19931@wotan.suse.de 20030113152110.GA19931@wotan.suse.de
• 957BD1C2BF3CD411B6C500A0C944CA2602CB5E31@pdsmsx32.pd.intel.com
  • 957BD1C2BF3CD411B6C500A0C944CA2602CB5E31@pdsmsx32.pd.intel.com 957BD1C2BF3CD411B6C500A0C944CA2602CB5E31@pdsmsx32.pd.intel.com
• =?ISO-8859-2?Q?Tomasz_K=B3oczko?=
  • Re: Nvidia and its choice to read the GPL "differently" Tue, 14 Jan 2003 23:20:35 +0100 (CET)
• =?ISO-8859-7?b?tuPj5evv8iDP6erv7e/s/PDv9evv8g==?=
  • Re: [ANNOUNCE] contest benchmark v0.60 Wed, 15 Jan 2003 14:08:13 +0200
• Aaron Lehmann
  • Re: any chance of 2.6.0-test*? Sun, 12 Jan 2003 14:52:28 -0800
  • Re: any chance of 2.6.0-test*? Sun, 12 Jan 2003 14:18:49 -0800
  • Re: any chance of 2.6.0-test*? Sun, 12 Jan 2003 14:18:02 -0800
  • Re: any chance of 2.6.0-test*? Sun, 12 Jan 2003 13:49:37 -0800
• Abramo Bagnara
  • Re: [OFFTOPIC] RMS and reactions to him Wed, 15 Jan 2003 09:42:36 +0100
  • Re: [OFFTOPIC] RMS and reactions to him Tue, 14 Jan 2003 21:27:42 +0100
  • Re: [OFFTOPIC] RMS and reactions to him Tue, 14 Jan 2003 21:15:42 +0100
• Adam Belay
  • Re: ALSA and isapnp cards Fri, 17 Jan 2003 14:13:15 +0000
  • Re: ALSA and isapnp cards Fri, 17 Jan 2003 11:18:54 +0000
  • Re: [2.5.58][PnP] Some small points. Fri, 17 Jan 2003 11:18:38 +0000
  • Re: 2.5.57 missing isapnp_card_protocol Mon, 13 Jan 2003 18:48:48 +0000
  • Re: [PATCH] PnP update - drivers Mon, 13 Jan 2003 18:43:03 +0000
  • Re: Linux v2.5.57 Mon, 13 Jan 2003 17:45:57 +0000
  • Re: [PATCH] PnP update - drivers Mon, 13 Jan 2003 17:39:06 +0000
• Adam J. Richter
  • Re: Patch?: linux-2.5.59/sound/soundcore.c referenced non-existant errno variable Sat, 18 Jan 2003 20:14:39 -0800
  • Re: Patch: linux-2.5.59/fs/devfs shrink Fri, 17 Jan 2003 21:08:49 -0800
  • Patch: linux-2.5.59/fs/devfs shrink Fri, 17 Jan 2003 19:02:14 -0800
  • Patch?: linux-2.5.59/sound/soundcore.c referenced non-existant errno variable Fri, 17 Jan 2003 15:57:17 -0800
  • Re: 2.5.59 vmlinux.lds.S change broke modules Fri, 17 Jan 2003 05:27:23 -0800
  • Re: Patch: linux-2.5.58/drivers/base/bus.c ignored pre-existing devices Wed, 15 Jan 2003 14:01:36 -0800
  • Patch: linux-2.5.58/drivers/base/bus.c ignored pre-existing devices Wed, 15 Jan 2003 02:52:56 -0800
  • Re: [PATCH] Proposed module init race fix. Wed, 15 Jan 2003 00:46:26 -0800
  • Re: usb broken in 2.5? Tue, 14 Jan 2003 11:35:42 -0800
  • Re: 2.5.57 missing isapnp_card_protocol Mon, 13 Jan 2003 15:12:37 -0800
  • 2.5.57 missing isapnp_card_protocol Mon, 13 Jan 2003 14:09:49 -0800
  • Re: Honest does not pay here ... Sun, 12 Jan 2003 16:18:07 -0800
  • Re: Honest does not pay here ... Sun, 12 Jan 2003 01:27:10 -0800
• Adam Kropelin
  • Re: any chance of 2.6.0-test*? Sun, 12 Jan 2003 16:59:49 -0500
• Adam Scislowicz
  • 2.4.20 (ramdisk device naming at boot time(/dev/ramdisk/<n>) vs. Wed, 15 Jan 2003 09:56:33 -0800
• Adrian Bunk
  • [2.5 patch] remove #if'd kernel 2.0 code from misc net drivers Sat, 18 Jan 2003 20:47:50 +0100
  • [2.5 patch] small cleanup for drivers/scsi/*53c8xx* Sat, 18 Jan 2003 20:31:13 +0100
  • [2.5 patch] small cleanup for drivers/scsi/inia100.* Sat, 18 Jan 2003 18:10:10 +0100
  • [2.5 patch] small cleanup in drivers/scsi/i91uscsi.h Sat, 18 Jan 2003 17:58:09 +0100
  • [2.5 patch] remove #if'd kernel 2.0 and 2.2 code from wan code Sat, 18 Jan 2003 17:36:45 +0100
  • [2.5 patch] MegaRAID driver: remove kernel 2.0 and 2.2 code Sat, 18 Jan 2003 17:22:43 +0100
  • [2.5 patch] ALSA: remove #if'd kernel 2.2 code Fri, 17 Jan 2003 16:56:55 +0100
  • Re: Linux 2.5.59 Fri, 17 Jan 2003 12:37:57 +0100
  • Re: Linux 2.5.59 Fri, 17 Jan 2003 10:59:21 +0100
  • Re: Detecting changes in a directory tree Fri, 17 Jan 2003 01:59:41 +0100
  • Re: [OFFTOPIC] RMS and reactions to him Fri, 17 Jan 2003 00:12:43 +0100
  • Re: [BUG] 2.4.21pre2 trident / ali5451 Thu, 16 Jan 2003 22:54:24 +0100
  • Re: [BUG] 2.4.21pre2 trident / ali5451 Wed, 15 Jan 2003 00:11:42 +0100
  • Re: Docs to a beginner Tue, 14 Jan 2003 20:05:07 +0100
  • Re: IPMI Tue, 14 Jan 2003 15:46:32 +0100
  • Re: Linux v2.5.58 Tue, 14 Jan 2003 08:55:35 +0100
  • Re: Bugs and Releases Numbers Mon, 13 Jan 2003 16:07:08 +0100
  • Re: 2.5.56: Two global symbols "io" Mon, 13 Jan 2003 11:10:13 +0100
  • 2.5.56: Two global symbols "io" Sun, 12 Jan 2003 14:12:44 +0100
  • [patch] remove outdated fs/ChangeLog Sun, 12 Jan 2003 11:18:08 +0100
  • 2.5.56: undefined reference to `_ebss' from drivers/mtd/maps/uclinux.c Sun, 12 Jan 2003 10:55:59 +0100
  • Re: 2.5.55: static compilation of mxser.c doesn't work Sun, 12 Jan 2003 10:32:05 +0100
  • [2.5 patch] small cleanups for sound/oss/* Sun, 12 Jan 2003 10:12:22 +0100
  • [2.5 patch] remove kernel 2.0 code from mcfserial.h Sun, 12 Jan 2003 09:49:47 +0100
  • Re: two more oddities with the fs/Kconfig file Sun, 12 Jan 2003 08:34:06 +0100
  • Re: [PATCH] (revised) fix net/irda warnings for 2.4.21-pre3 Sun, 12 Jan 2003 08:24:09 +0100
• Adriano Carvalho
  • Ethernet Conexant LANfinity doesnt send anything Fri, 17 Jan 2003 01:16:37 -0200
• Alan Cox
  • Re: Linux 2.4.21-pre3-ac4 13 Jan 2003 21:05:51 +0000
  • Re: Linux 2.4.21-pre3-ac4 Mon, 13 Jan 2003 14:46:01 -0500 (EST)
  • Re: 2.4.20 Promise IDE RAID Locks up (gcc 3.2.1!) 13 Jan 2003 18:59:26 +0000
  • Re: any chance of 2.6.0-test*? 13 Jan 2003 18:33:31 +0000
  • Re: patch for errno-issue (with soundcore) 13 Jan 2003 15:13:59 +0000
  • Re: ide-scsi bug hard locks machine 13 Jan 2003 15:02:53 +0000
  • Re: Linux 2.4.21pre3-ac2 13 Jan 2003 15:01:33 +0000
  • Re: any chance of 2.6.0-test*? 13 Jan 2003 14:59:20 +0000
  • Re: Nervous with 2.4.21-pre3 and -pre3-ac* 13 Jan 2003 14:52:53 +0000
  • Re: any chance of 2.6.0-test*? 12 Jan 2003 23:21:52 +0000
  • Re: Linux 2.4.21-pre3-ac4 12 Jan 2003 20:51:23 +0000
  • Re: any chance of 2.6.0-test*? 12 Jan 2003 20:44:24 +0000
  • Re: Linux 2.4.21-pre3-ac4 12 Jan 2003 20:40:54 +0000
  • Re: Nervous with 2.4.21-pre3 and -pre3-ac* 12 Jan 2003 20:18:38 +0000
  • Re: [PATCH] add explicit Pentium II support 12 Jan 2003 20:16:04 +0000
  • Linux 2.4.21-pre3-ac4 Sun, 12 Jan 2003 13:07:26 -0500 (EST)
  • Re: Intel And Kenrel Programming (was: Nvidia is a great company) 12 Jan 2003 17:54:07 +0000
  • Re: any chance of 2.6.0-test*? 12 Jan 2003 16:55:27 +0000
  • Re: UnitedLinux violating GPL? 12 Jan 2003 16:50:43 +0000
  • Re: Intel And Kenrel Programming (was: Nvidia is a great company) 12 Jan 2003 16:45:24 +0000
  • Re: make AT_SYSINFO platform-independent 12 Jan 2003 00:21:39 +0000
  • Re: 2.4.20 Promise IDE RAID Locks up (gcc 3.2.1!) 12 Jan 2003 00:17:20 +0000
• Albert D. Cahalan
  • Re: any chance of 2.6.0-test*? Mon, 13 Jan 2003 17:37:48 -0500 (EST)
• Alessandro Suardi
  • Re: Why kernel 2.5.58 only mounts / (not home etc) Sat, 18 Jan 2003 16:48:44 -0800 (GMT-08:00)
  • Re: 2.5.59 broke CONFIG_PACKET=m ? Fri, 17 Jan 2003 16:10:26 +0100
  • Re: Dell Latitude CPi keyboard problems since 2.5.42 Thu, 16 Jan 2003 14:33:11 +0100
  • Re: radeonfb almost there.. but not quite! :) Thu, 16 Jan 2003 14:27:32 +0100
  • Re: Kernel 2.5.55 failed to boot with ACPI support Sun, 12 Jan 2003 16:51:27 -0800 (PST)
  • Re: [2.5.55, PCI, PCMCIA, XIRCOM] Sun, 12 Jan 2003 14:58:39 -0800 (PST)
  • Re: Kernel 2.5.55 failed to boot with ACPI support Sun, 12 Jan 2003 14:48:45 -0800 (PST)
• Alex
  • Dynamic memory stack? Wed, 15 Jan 2003 20:04:54 -0500
• Alexander Hoogerhuis
  • Re: 2.5.59 - Compaq 900z - No Go.. 18 Jan 2003 16:35:17 +0100
  • Re: 2.5.59 - Compaq 900z - No Go.. 18 Jan 2003 16:20:41 +0100
• Alexander Kellett
  • Re: any chance of 2.6.0-test*? -> goto example Mon, 13 Jan 2003 17:10:45 +0100
• Alexander Puchmayr
  • Re: USB-Printer status flags question Mon, 13 Jan 2003 09:09:08 +0100
  • USB-Printer status flags question Sun, 12 Jan 2003 11:17:41 +0100
• Alistair Strachan
  • Re: [PATCH] emu10k1 forward port (2.4.20 to 2.5.56) Wed, 15 Jan 2003 13:40:39 +0000
• Anders Gustafsson
  • Re: Linux 2.5.59 Fri, 17 Jan 2003 05:20:41 +0100
  • Re: Linux 2.5.59 Fri, 17 Jan 2003 05:16:28 +0100
• Andi Kleen
  • Re: [RFC] Changes to the LSM file-related hooks for 2.5.58 15 Jan 2003 09:49:48 +0100
  • Re: Fixing the tty layer was Re: any chance of 2.6.0-test*? Mon, 13 Jan 2003 08:25:39 +0100
  • Fixing the tty layer was Re: any chance of 2.6.0-test*? 12 Jan 2003 10:56:37 +0100
• Andre Hedrick
  • PBS reporting Linux Story! This is a gut buster! Sat, 18 Jan 2003 23:44:28 -0800 (PST)
  • Linux in the News! WooHoo! Sat, 18 Jan 2003 20:55:47 -0800 (PST)
  • Re: [patch] IDE OnTrack remap for 2.5.58 Thu, 16 Jan 2003 10:28:22 -0800 (PST)
  • Re: [V. OFFTOPIC] RMS and reactions to him (MARMITE?) Wed, 15 Jan 2003 08:48:28 -0800 (PST)
  • Re: [OFFTOPIC] RMS and reactions to him (YAWN) Wed, 15 Jan 2003 06:21:16 -0800 (PST)
  • Re: Linux 2.4.21-pre3-ac4 Tue, 14 Jan 2003 21:07:39 -0800 (PST)
  • Re: [OFFTOPIC] RMS and reactions to him Tue, 14 Jan 2003 14:46:56 -0800 (PST)
  • Re: [OFFTOPIC] RMS and reactions to him Tue, 14 Jan 2003 13:51:41 -0800 (PST)
  • Re: [OFFTOPIC] RMS and reactions to him Tue, 14 Jan 2003 13:42:31 -0800 (PST)
  • Re: Nvidia and its choice to read the GPL "differently" Tue, 14 Jan 2003 13:32:35 -0800 (PST)
  • Re: Sata on Intel D845PEBT2 motherboard Tue, 14 Jan 2003 13:23:21 -0800 (PST)
  • Re: Linux 2.4.21-pre3-ac4 Tue, 14 Jan 2003 13:17:28 -0800 (PST)
  • Re: PATCH: [2.4.21-pre3] IDE error recovery Mon, 13 Jan 2003 23:23:21 -0800 (PST)
  • Re: Linux 2.4.21-pre3-ac4 Mon, 13 Jan 2003 17:44:13 -0800 (PST)
  • Re: Why is Nvidia given GPL'd code to use in non-freedrivers? Sun, 12 Jan 2003 16:28:02 -0800 (PST)
• Andrea Arcangeli
  • Re: lots of calls to __write/read_lock_failed Fri, 17 Jan 2003 17:17:01 +0100
  • Re: 2.4.21pre2aa2 Tue, 14 Jan 2003 17:12:18 +0100
• andrea.glorioso@binary-only.com
  • Re: [OFFTOPIC] RMS and reactions to him Sat, 18 Jan 2003 15:23:49 +0100
  • Re: Are linux network drivers really affected by this? Mon, 13 Jan 2003 10:54:46 +0100
  • Re: Linux VM Documentation - Draft 1 Sun, 12 Jan 2003 19:03:15 +0100
• Andreas Hartmann
  • [i2c-piix4.o: IBM Laptop detected; this module may corrupt your serial Thu, 16 Jan 2003 14:45:12 +0100
• Andreas Jellinghaus
  • Re: any brand recomendation for a linux laptop ? Thu, 16 Jan 2003 19:19:30 +0100
• Andreas Schwab
  • Re: Changing argv[0] under Linux. Wed, 15 Jan 2003 22:26:48 +0100
• Andrew McGregor
  • Re: Partially closed source module, more of gcc/ld question. Thu, 16 Jan 2003 22:01:25 +1300
  • Re: Dell Latitude CPi keyboard problems since 2.5.42 Thu, 16 Jan 2003 15:50:49 +1300
  • Re: Dell Latitude CPi keyboard problems since 2.5.42 Wed, 15 Jan 2003 23:43:58 +1300
  • Dell Laptop PCI wierdness, was: Re: Weird sound problems on Dell Wed, 15 Jan 2003 22:42:06 +1300
  • Re: Weird sound problems on Dell Latitude C840 resolved.. Tue, 14 Jan 2003 20:50:48 +1300
  • Re: any chance of 2.6.0-test*? Tue, 14 Jan 2003 08:17:47 +1300
  • Re: Nvidia and its choice to read the GPL "differently" Mon, 13 Jan 2003 00:13:38 +1300
  • Re: dell precision m50 _very_ slow paging/swapping Mon, 13 Jan 2003 00:09:15 +1300
  • Re: Honest does not pay here ... Sun, 12 Jan 2003 23:25:14 +1300
• Andrew Morgan
  • Re: execve setting capabilities incorrectly ? Tue, 14 Jan 2003 10:18:41 -0800
• Andrew Morton
  • Re: Why kernel 2.5.58 only mounts / (not home etc) Sat, 18 Jan 2003 16:48:05 -0800
  • Re: Why kernel 2.5.58 only mounts / (not home etc) Sat, 18 Jan 2003 15:44:14 -0800
  • Re: [BENCHMARK] 2.5.59{-mm2} with contest Sat, 18 Jan 2003 13:47:01 -0800
  • Re: Patch?: linux-2.5.59/sound/soundcore.c referenced non-existant Sat, 18 Jan 2003 12:40:51 -0800
  • Re: reading from devices in RAW mode Sat, 18 Jan 2003 10:50:37 -0800
  • Re: recent change to exit_mmap Sat, 18 Jan 2003 02:44:56 -0800
  • Re: Is the BitKeeper network protocol documented? Sat, 18 Jan 2003 00:25:34 -0800
  • 2.5.59-mm2 Sat, 18 Jan 2003 00:20:27 -0800
  • Re: recent change to exit_mmap Sat, 18 Jan 2003 00:15:46 -0800
  • Re: recent change to exit_mmap Fri, 17 Jan 2003 23:53:17 -0800
  • Re: recent change to exit_mmap Fri, 17 Jan 2003 23:00:14 -0800
  • Re: recent change to exit_mmap Fri, 17 Jan 2003 22:44:44 -0800
  • Re: Is the BitKeeper network protocol documented? Fri, 17 Jan 2003 21:02:21 -0800
  • [patch 2.4] Fix ext3 scheduling storm and lockup Fri, 17 Jan 2003 17:05:16 -0800
  • Re: [OSDL][BENCHMARK] Database results 2.4 versus 2.5 Fri, 17 Jan 2003 13:37:18 -0800
  • Re: [OSDL][BENCHMARK] Database results 2.4 versus 2.5 Fri, 17 Jan 2003 13:00:46 -0800
  • Re: [PATCH][2.5] per-CPU task runqueues Fri, 17 Jan 2003 01:47:11 -0800
  • Re: 2.5.59-mm1 Fri, 17 Jan 2003 01:06:58 -0800
  • Re: 2.5.59-mm1 Fri, 17 Jan 2003 00:30:50 -0800
  • Re: [PATCH][2.5] fix for_each_cpu compilation on UP Thu, 16 Jan 2003 21:54:30 -0800
  • Re: [PATCH][2.5] smp_call_function_mask Thu, 16 Jan 2003 21:44:24 -0800
  • Re: [patch] Make prof_counter use per-cpu areas patch 1/4 -- x86 Thu, 16 Jan 2003 12:18:37 -0800
  • Re: 2.5.57 IO slowdown with CONFIG_PREEMPT enabled Thu, 16 Jan 2003 03:51:09 -0800
  • Re: [BENCHMARK] 2.5.5{4,5,6,7,8} with contest Thu, 16 Jan 2003 03:45:19 -0800
  • Re: big ext3 sequential write improvement in 2.5.51-mm1 gone in Wed, 15 Jan 2003 22:31:09 -0800
  • Re: [PATCH] counting bug in svc_tcp_recvfrom causes panic for TCP Wed, 15 Jan 2003 16:57:24 -0800
  • Re: [PATCH] counting bug in svc_tcp_recvfrom causes panic for TCP Wed, 15 Jan 2003 15:28:44 -0800
  • Re: 2.5.57 IO slowdown with CONFIG_PREEMPT enabled Wed, 15 Jan 2003 14:33:13 -0800
  • Re: 2.5.57 IO slowdown with CONFIG_PREEMPT enabled Wed, 15 Jan 2003 11:18:34 -0800
  • Re: 2.5.57 IO slowdown with CONFIG_PREEMPT enabled Wed, 15 Jan 2003 10:01:02 -0800
  • Re: (OT) Re: [PATCH] 2.5.56 sound/oss/sb_mixer.c bounds check Tue, 14 Jan 2003 22:44:41 -0800
  • Re: [PATCH] 2.5.56 sound/oss/sb_mixer.c bounds check Tue, 14 Jan 2003 20:36:35 -0800
  • Re: How to setup a buffer_head in a driver Tue, 14 Jan 2003 15:14:35 -0800
  • Re: [PATCH] ptrace, kernel 2.5.56 Tue, 14 Jan 2003 00:47:25 -0800
  • 2.5.58-mm1 Mon, 13 Jan 2003 23:43:53 -0800
  • Re: intense disk or tty activity SEGV's X Mon, 13 Jan 2003 22:43:31 -0800
  • Re: IDE DMA disabled with via82cxxx on kernels >= 2.5.35 Mon, 13 Jan 2003 19:47:08 -0800
  • Re: [patch] Make prof_counter use per-cpu areas patch 1/4 -- x86 arch Mon, 13 Jan 2003 12:10:47 -0800
  • Re: updated CDROMREADAUDIO DMA patch Sun, 12 Jan 2003 17:16:43 -0800
  • Re: 2.5.56 panics PostgreSQL Sun, 12 Jan 2003 11:37:07 -0800
• Andrew Theurer
  • Re: [Lse-tech] NUMA sched -> pooling scheduler (inc HT) Sat, 18 Jan 2003 16:13:37 -0800
  • Re: [PATCH] (0/3) NUMA aware scheduler Thu, 16 Jan 2003 13:48:19 -0600
  • Re: [Lse-tech] Re: NUMA scheduler 2nd approach Tue, 14 Jan 2003 08:52:47 -0800
  • Re: [Lse-tech] Re: NUMA scheduler 2nd approach Mon, 13 Jan 2003 20:45:08 -0800
• Andrew Walrond
  • Re: any brand recomendation for a linux laptop ? Thu, 16 Jan 2003 14:14:27 +0000
  • Re: 2.5.bk no longer boots from NFS root after bk pull this morning Wed, 15 Jan 2003 11:59:48 +0000
  • Re: 2.5.bk no longer boots from NFS root after bk pull this morning Wed, 15 Jan 2003 10:22:39 +0000
  • Re: 2.5.bk no longer boots from NFS root after bk pull this morning Tue, 14 Jan 2003 16:24:06 +0000
  • Re: 2.5.bk no longer boots from NFS root after bk pull this morning Tue, 14 Jan 2003 10:30:09 +0000
  • 2.5.bk no longer boots from NFS root after bk pull this morning Tue, 14 Jan 2003 10:03:51 +0000
  • Re: any chance of 2.6.0-test*? Mon, 13 Jan 2003 13:40:49 +0000
  • Re: Moderated forum for linux-kernel Sun, 12 Jan 2003 23:57:15 +0000
  • Re: Moderated forum for linux-kernel Sun, 12 Jan 2003 23:13:20 +0000
  • Moderated forum for linux-kernel Sun, 12 Jan 2003 22:31:30 +0000
• Andrey Borzenkov
  • [PATCH] 2.4.20 fix file_readahead for ide-cd and ide-floppy Sun, 12 Jan 2003 13:14:13 +0300
• Andries Brouwer
  • Re: hda has changed heads Thu, 16 Jan 2003 22:21:09 +0100
  • Re: [patch] IDE OnTrack remap for 2.5.58 Thu, 16 Jan 2003 20:56:53 +0100
  • Re: BLKBSZSET still not working on 2.4.18 ? Mon, 13 Jan 2003 16:26:34 +0100
• Andries.Brouwer@cwi.nl
  • Re: sysfs Tue, 14 Jan 2003 02:09:06 +0100 (MET)
  • Re: [PATCH] sd.c Sun, 12 Jan 2003 12:20:38 +0100 (MET)
  • [PATCH] sd.c Sun, 12 Jan 2003 03:07:09 +0100 (MET)
• Andy Pfiffer
  • [2.5.59][KEXEC] Success Report 17 Jan 2003 13:52:58 -0800
  • [2.5.58][KEXEC] Success! (using 2.5.54 version + kexec tools 1.8) 15 Jan 2003 11:43:40 -0800
• Aniruddha M Marathe
  • [BENCHMARK] TIObench performance for 2.5.57 Tue, 14 Jan 2003 11:01:06 +0530
  • [BENCHMARK] Lmbench results for 2.5.57 Tue, 14 Jan 2003 10:54:13 +0530
  • [BENCHMARK] 2.5.56 Lmbench results Mon, 13 Jan 2003 11:11:54 +0530
  • [BENCHMARK] TIObench results for 2.5.56 Mon, 13 Jan 2003 10:58:11 +0530
• Anthony Heading
  • Prism wireless lan card is causing time-travel Fri, 17 Jan 2003 00:10:48 +0900
• Anthony Lau
  • Re: Kernel Oops with HIMEM+VM in 2.4.19,20: More INFO Thu, 16 Jan 2003 00:34:48 -0800
• antivirus@cirsa.com
  • Virus Alert Sun, 12 Jan 2003 11:40:04 +0100
• Anton Altaparmakov
  • [ANN] ntfsprogs (formerly Linux-NTFS) 1.7.0beta released Sat, 18 Jan 2003 16:44:17 +0000 (GMT)
• Anton Blanchard
  • Re: recent change to exit_mmap Sat, 18 Jan 2003 18:23:31 +1100
  • recent change to exit_mmap Sat, 18 Jan 2003 17:05:22 +1100
  • Re: 2.5.59-mm1 Fri, 17 Jan 2003 19:46:00 +1100
  • Re: 48GB NUMA-Q boots, with major IO-APIC hassles Wed, 15 Jan 2003 23:32:09 +1100
  • Re: 48GB NUMA-Q boots, with major IO-APIC hassles Wed, 15 Jan 2003 22:24:12 +1100
• Antonino Daplas
  • [PATCH][FBDEV]: rivafb fixes 18 Jan 2003 02:54:04 +0800
• Antoniu-George SAVU
  • Patch pci_ids.h [2.5.56] Mon, 13 Jan 2003 19:47:53 +0100
• Arador
  • Re: [BUG/WARNING?] 2.5.57 ALSA sound/core/pcm_lib.c Wed, 15 Jan 2003 01:52:40 +0100
  • Re: Moderated forum for linux-kernel Mon, 13 Jan 2003 01:19:23 +0100
• Arjan van de Ven
  • Re: ANN: LKMB (Linux Kernel Module Builder) version 0.1.16 18 Jan 2003 23:55:25 +0100
  • Re: silly kernel taint question 15 Jan 2003 14:06:34 +0100
  • Re: [PATCH] don't create regular files in devfs (fwd) 14 Jan 2003 17:50:17 +0100
  • Re: IPMI 14 Jan 2003 13:36:07 +0100
  • Re: [PATCH] Check compiler version, SMP and PREEMPT. 13 Jan 2003 10:59:48 +0100
• Arnaud Quette
  • 2.5.58: headers fbcon[*].h are missing in include/video/ Wed, 15 Jan 2003 21:27:31 +0100
• Arnd Bergmann
  • Re: radeonfb almost there.. but not quite! :) Fri, 17 Jan 2003 16:46:43 +0100
  • Re: radeonfb almost there.. but not quite! :) Thu, 16 Jan 2003 22:07:40 +0100
• Art Haas
  • [PATCH] PnP fix for latest BK Kernel Mon, 13 Jan 2003 12:39:30 -0600
• axel@pearbough.net
  • Re: Moderated forum for linux-kernel Mon, 13 Jan 2003 00:33:28 +0100
  • Re: Moderated forum for linux-kernel Mon, 13 Jan 2003 00:03:12 +0100
• Bas Vermeulen
  • Re: [BUG] cardbus/hotplugging still broken in 2.5.56 Mon, 13 Jan 2003 09:43:09 +0100 (CET)
• Benjamin Herrenschmidt
  • Re: Linux 2.4.21-pre3-ac4 15 Jan 2003 01:23:17 +0100
  • Re: Linux 2.4.21-pre3-ac4 14 Jan 2003 18:52:49 +0100
  • Re: Linux 2.4.21-pre3-ac4 14 Jan 2003 18:38:13 +0100
  • Re: Linux 2.4.21-pre3-ac4 14 Jan 2003 15:35:28 +0100
  • Re: Linux 2.4.21-pre3-ac4 14 Jan 2003 10:18:23 +0100
  • Re: Linux 2.4.21-pre3-ac4 14 Jan 2003 10:06:06 +0100
  • Re: Linux 2.4.21-pre3-ac4 13 Jan 2003 23:07:20 +0100
  • Re: Linux 2.4.21-pre3-ac4 13 Jan 2003 23:02:17 +0100
  • Re: Linux 2.4.21-pre3-ac4 13 Jan 2003 21:56:50 +0100
  • Re: Linux 2.4.21-pre3-ac4 13 Jan 2003 20:03:29 +0100
  • Re: any chance of 2.6.0-test*? 13 Jan 2003 19:36:26 +0100
  • Re: Linux 2.4.21-pre3-ac4 13 Jan 2003 17:56:06 +0100
  • Re: Linux 2.4.21-pre3-ac4 12 Jan 2003 21:02:57 +0100
  • Re: Linux 2.4.21-pre3-ac4 12 Jan 2003 20:57:24 +0100
  • Re: Linux 2.4.21-pre3-ac4 12 Jan 2003 20:51:14 +0100
  • Re: Linux 2.4.21-pre3-ac4 12 Jan 2003 20:29:56 +0100
  • Re: [PATCH] sl82c105 driver update 12 Jan 2003 00:12:07 +0100
• Bernard Pidoux
  • Re: [RFC][PATCH] mkiss.[ch] Tue, 14 Jan 2003 13:05:20 +0100
• Bernd Driegert
  • [RFC][PATCH] mkiss.[ch] Sun, 12 Jan 2003 15:26:42 +0100
• Bernd Petrovitsch
  • How to avoid the woord 'goto' (was Re: any chance of 2.6.0-test*?) Mon, 13 Jan 2003 12:08:55 +0100
• Bertrand VIEILLE [Bébert]
  • Re: Linux 2.4.21pre3-ac2 Mon, 13 Jan 2003 15:32:29 +0100
• big@boss.com
  • Re: Sample Sun, 12 Jan 2003 2:40:57 --0800
• Bill Davidsen
  • [2.5] initrd/mkinitrd still not working Sat, 18 Jan 2003 14:46:53 -0500 (EST)
  • Re: [BK PATCH] USB changes for 2.5.58 Fri, 17 Jan 2003 09:43:43 -0500 (EST)
  • Re: [patch] IDE OnTrack remap for 2.5.58 Fri, 17 Jan 2003 09:40:31 -0500 (EST)
  • [BENCHMARK] ctxbench 2.5.58 compared to recent and 2.4.20 Thu, 16 Jan 2003 17:26:32 -0500 (EST)
  • Re: [BK PATCH] USB changes for 2.5.58 Thu, 16 Jan 2003 15:14:39 -0500 (EST)
  • Re: 2.5.58 Oops when booting from initrd - kobject_del Thu, 16 Jan 2003 15:04:13 -0500 (EST)
  • [2.5] new modules and initrd - when? Or perhaps how? Tue, 14 Jan 2003 02:04:21 -0500 (EST)
  • Re: ISO-9660 Rock Ridge gives different links different inums Mon, 13 Jan 2003 17:16:08 -0500 (EST)
  • Re: [PATCH] add explicit Pentium II support Mon, 13 Jan 2003 13:46:26 -0500 (EST)
  • Re: 2.5.55/.56 instant reboot problem on 486 Sun, 12 Jan 2003 23:20:04 -0500 (EST)
  • Re: [BUG] 2.5.5x can't find my printer Sun, 12 Jan 2003 22:36:33 -0500 (EST)
  • Re: Linux 2.4.21pre3-ac2 Sun, 12 Jan 2003 22:33:07 -0500 (EST)
• Billy Rose
  • RH7.3 + 2.5.56 Mon, 13 Jan 2003 08:47:48 -0600
  • Re: any chance of 2.6.0-test*? Sun, 12 Jan 2003 22:53:39 -0600
  • Re: any chance of 2.6.0-test*? Sun, 12 Jan 2003 22:37:01 -0600
• Bob Miller
  • [Trivial 2.5.58] Remove compile warning from net/ipv4/netfilter/ip_nat_helper.c Fri, 17 Jan 2003 13:48:58 -0800
  • [Trivial 2.5.58] Remove compile warning from fs/xfs/support/move.c Fri, 17 Jan 2003 13:48:04 -0800
  • [Trivial 2.5.58] Remove compile warning from fs/ncpfs/inode.c Fri, 17 Jan 2003 13:46:39 -0800
  • Re: Changing argv[0] under Linux. Tue, 14 Jan 2003 15:11:41 -0800
  • Re: Changing argv[0] under Linux. Tue, 14 Jan 2003 15:04:18 -0800
• Bob Taylor
  • Re: any chance of 2.6.0-test*? Mon, 13 Jan 2003 15:23:07 -0800
• Bob_Trac
  • Got questions about new 2.5 features? Fri, 17 Jan 2003 07:48:10 -0600 (CST)
  • Re: patch for errno-issue (with soundcore) Mon, 13 Jan 2003 08:04:59 -0600 (CST)
• Bongani Hlope
  • Re: 2.4.20 kernel modules will not load Sat, 18 Jan 2003 08:16:34 +0200
• boydj money
  • get paypal, make money free, no catch... Tue, 14 Jan 2003 03:04:18 -0800
• Brad Hards
  • Re: proposed changes for CDCEther module? Sun, 12 Jan 2003 15:30:16 +1100
• Bret Indrelee
  • Forcing PCI-PCI bridge to have memory resources Wed, 15 Jan 2003 17:23:24 -0600 (CST)
• Brian Gerst
  • Re: 2.5.59 vmlinux.lds.S change broke modules Fri, 17 Jan 2003 08:44:52 -0500
  • Re: anyone have a 16-bit x86 early_printk? Tue, 14 Jan 2003 08:13:15 -0500
  • [PATCH] Cleanup vm86 fault handling Mon, 13 Jan 2003 01:33:09 -0500
  • [PATCH] Fix PnP BIOS fault handling Mon, 13 Jan 2003 01:29:51 -0500
  • 2.5.56 aic7xxx boot failure Sun, 12 Jan 2003 10:32:01 -0500
  • Re: 2.5.55/.56 instant reboot problem on 486 Sun, 12 Jan 2003 02:13:01 -0500
• Brian Jackson
  • Re: 2.4.20 (ramdisk device naming at boot time(/dev/ramdisk/<n>) vs. after devfs is mounted(/dev/rd/<n>)) Wed, 15 Jan 2003 12:29:16 -0600
• Brian Kelly
  • Re: How to setup a buffer_head in a driver Thu, 16 Jan 2003 06:59:33 +0000
  • How to setup a buffer_head in a driver Tue, 14 Jan 2003 17:35:45 -0500
• Brian M. Hunt
  • CONFIG_SOUND_ICH=m does not compile ac97_audio 17 Jan 2003 14:54:34 -0400
• Brian Tinsley
  • Re: any chance of 2.6.0-test*? Tue, 14 Jan 2003 01:12:17 -0600
  • Re: qla2300 driver stability, (was Re: 2.4.20, .text.lock.swap cpu Mon, 13 Jan 2003 00:01:59 -0600
  • Re: 2.4.20, .text.lock.swap cpu usage? (ibm x440) [rescued] Sun, 12 Jan 2003 21:41:35 -0600
• brian@worldcontrol.com
  • Re: usb-storage problem with >2.4.19 Mon, 13 Jan 2003 14:44:43 -0800
• Brice Goglin
  • Dealing with 2.5.x subarch headers Wed, 15 Jan 2003 11:48:14 +0100
• Bruce Harada
  • (OT) Re: [PATCH] 2.5.56 sound/oss/sb_mixer.c bounds check Wed, 15 Jan 2003 14:34:36 +0900
  • Re: Unable to boot off kernel built on different machine Wed, 15 Jan 2003 10:01:19 +0900
  • Re: IPMI Tue, 14 Jan 2003 22:07:50 +0900
  • Re: IPMI Tue, 14 Jan 2003 20:55:56 +0900
  • Re: any chance of 2.6.0-test*? Tue, 14 Jan 2003 15:52:56 +0900
• Bryan Andersen
  • Re: 2.4.21-pre3-ac4 oops in free_pages_ok Fri, 17 Jan 2003 18:05:39 -0600
• Byron Albert
  • hw tcp v4 csum failed ???? Thu, 16 Jan 2003 23:05:27 -0500
• Capaul Giachen F
  • RE: [Question] Assinging of IRQ to an ethernet card Tue, 14 Jan 2003 19:13:50 +0100
  • [Question] Assinging of IRQ to an ethernet card Tue, 14 Jan 2003 13:31:46 +0100
• Carl Gherardi
  • RE: Linux 2.5.59 Fri, 17 Jan 2003 12:06:03 +0800
• Chris Friesen
  • Re: timing an application Tue, 14 Jan 2003 15:07:01 -0500
• Chris Funderburg
  • Re: [OFFTOPIC] RMS and reactions to him Tue, 14 Jan 2003 21:51:07 +0000
  • Re: mbox archive of linux-kernel ? Tue, 14 Jan 2003 13:33:46 +0000
• Chris Mason
  • Re: [2.4] VFS locking problem during concurrent link/unlink 16 Jan 2003 11:22:32 -0500
  • Re: [2.4] VFS locking problem during concurrent link/unlink 16 Jan 2003 11:02:08 -0500
  • Re: [2.4] VFS locking problem during concurrent link/unlink 16 Jan 2003 10:39:41 -0500
  • Re: 2.5.56 panics PostgreSQL 12 Jan 2003 20:15:09 -0500
• Chris Sykes
  • [Oops] linux-2.4.21-pre3-ac3 Sun, 12 Jan 2003 15:05:42 +0000
• Christian Axelsson
  • Re: restricting nfs Thu, 16 Jan 2003 22:21:19 +0100
• Christian Boon
  • I/O error 14 Jan 2003 20:25:11 +0100
• Christian Guggenberger
  • 2.4.20 and CONFIG_DRM_I810_XFREE_41 Fri, 17 Jan 2003 11:56:56 +0100
• Christoph Dohmen
  • Intel E7205 Mon, 13 Jan 2003 19:52:29 +0100
• Christoph Hellwig
  • Re: [PATCH 2.5.58] new NUMA scheduler: fix Thu, 16 Jan 2003 19:10:09 +0000
  • [PATCH] cciss/cpqarray/md should use generic BLKGETSIZE Thu, 16 Jan 2003 16:40:28 -0500
  • Re: XFS problems (hard lockup and oops on startup) with 2.5.5{6,7} Wed, 15 Jan 2003 20:21:34 +0000
  • [PATCH] umode_t changes from Adam's mini-devfs Wed, 15 Jan 2003 21:17:04 +0100
  • Re: [PATCH] more procfs bits for !CONFIG_MMU Wed, 15 Jan 2003 17:11:56 +0100
  • Re: [RFC] Changes to the LSM file-related hooks for 2.5.58 Wed, 15 Jan 2003 16:04:49 +0000
  • Re: [RFC] Changes to the LSM file-related hooks for 2.5.58 Wed, 15 Jan 2003 15:56:24 +0000
  • Re: [PATCH] via686a sensors support Wed, 15 Jan 2003 06:15:50 +0000
  • Re: [PATCH 2.5.58] new NUMA scheduler: fix Tue, 14 Jan 2003 16:51:08 +0000
  • Re: [Lse-tech] [PATCH 2.5.58] new NUMA scheduler Tue, 14 Jan 2003 16:07:39 +0000
  • Re: [PATCH] don't create regular files in devfs (fwd) Tue, 14 Jan 2003 13:50:33 +0100
  • Re: [PATCH] don't create regular files in devfs (fwd) Tue, 14 Jan 2003 11:31:35 +0100
  • Re: [Lse-tech] Re: NUMA scheduler 2nd approach Mon, 13 Jan 2003 15:26:42 +0000
  • Re: NUMA scheduler 2nd approach Mon, 13 Jan 2003 08:02:08 +0000
  • Re: any chance of 2.6.0-test*? Sun, 12 Jan 2003 19:41:00 +0000
  • Re: [PATCH] via686a sensors support Sun, 12 Jan 2003 18:34:38 +0000
  • Re: any chance of 2.6.0-test*? Sun, 12 Jan 2003 17:17:44 +0000
• Christopher Faylor
  • Re: 2.5.59 vmlinux.lds.S change broke modules Sat, 18 Jan 2003 00:45:04 -0500
• Cliff White
  • Re: [OSDL][BENCHMARK] Database results 2.4 versus 2.5 Fri, 17 Jan 2003 13:23:11 -0800
  • [OSDL][BENCHMARK] Database results 2.4 versus 2.5 Fri, 17 Jan 2003 11:21:28 -0800
  • Re: 2.5 BK broken? Wed, 15 Jan 2003 15:57:56 -0800
  • 2.5 BK broken? Wed, 15 Jan 2003 15:29:58 -0800
  • Re: [ANNOUNCE] contest benchmark v0.60 Wed, 15 Jan 2003 11:28:56 -0800
  • Re: [ANNOUNCE] contest benchmark v0.60 Wed, 15 Jan 2003 09:04:27 -0800
• Con Kolivas
  • [BENCHMARK] 2.4.{19,20,20-ac2} with contest Fri, 17 Jan 2003 13:53:14 +1100
  • Re: [BENCHMARK] 2.5.58-mm1 with contest Fri, 17 Jan 2003 00:37:16 +1100
  • [BENCHMARK] 2.5.58-mm1 with contest Fri, 17 Jan 2003 00:23:42 +1100
  • [BENCHMARK] 2.5.5{4,5,6,7,8} with contest Thu, 16 Jan 2003 21:14:04 +1100
  • $299.95 /mo Max/Max 10 GB $119 /GB Charged Thu, 16 Jan 2003 11:43:26 +1100
  • should be: cannot allocate memory : fork error on 2.5.58 Thu, 16 Jan 2003 11:47:28 +1100
  • Re: [ANNOUNCE] contest benchmark v0.60 Wed, 15 Jan 2003 15:39:34 +1100
  • Re: [ANNOUNCE] contest benchmark v0.60 Wed, 15 Jan 2003 14:16:48 +1100
  • [ANNOUNCE] contest benchmark v0.60 Tue, 14 Jan 2003 10:28:03 +1100
• Corey Minyard
  • Re: IPMI Tue, 14 Jan 2003 21:55:05 -0600
  • Re: timing an application Tue, 14 Jan 2003 14:38:32 -0600
  • Re: IPMI Tue, 14 Jan 2003 08:29:33 -0600
  • Re: IPMI Tue, 14 Jan 2003 08:35:17 -0600
  • [PATCH] Version 17 of the IPMI driver Mon, 13 Jan 2003 13:19:25 -0600
• Cort Dougan
  • Re: [OFFTOPIC] RMS and reactions to him Tue, 14 Jan 2003 15:54:28 -0700
• dada1
  • Re: [RFC] Consolidate vmlinux.lds.S files Mon, 13 Jan 2003 11:19:58 +0100
• Damian =?ISO-8859-2?Q?Ko=B3kowski?=
  • [BUG] 2.5.5{7,8} QM_MODULES: Function not implemented... Wed, 15 Jan 2003 22:33:56 +0100
• Damian Kolkowski
  • Re: [BUG] QM_MODULES: Function not implemented... [ No bug! ] Thu, 16 Jan 2003 08:31:22 +0100
• Dan Aloni
  • Re: Linux v2.5.57 Wed, 15 Jan 2003 21:25:20 +0200
• Daniel Barlow
  • 2.4.x, can't ptrace a task created with clone() ? Wed, 15 Jan 2003 16:34:58 +0000
• Daniel Egger
  • Re: any brand recomendation for a linux laptop ? 18 Jan 2003 12:31:01 +0100
  • Re: any brand recomendation for a linux laptop ? 16 Jan 2003 17:14:13 +0100
• Daniel Franke
  • APM failure Sun, 12 Jan 2003 13:39:37 -0500
• Daniel Jacobowitz
  • Re: 2.4.x, can't ptrace a task created with clone() ? Wed, 15 Jan 2003 15:27:51 -0500
  • Re: [PATCH] Check compiler version, SMP and PREEMPT. Mon, 13 Jan 2003 10:19:01 -0500
• Daniel Ritz
  • [PATCH 2.5] sound/isa/opl3sa2.c compile fix Tue, 14 Jan 2003 16:30:57 +0100
• Dave Hansen
  • lots of calls to __write/read_lock_failed Wed, 15 Jan 2003 20:18:13 -0800
  • [PATCH] allow non-PMD-aligned PAGE_OFFSET Tue, 14 Jan 2003 12:37:13 -0800
  • Re: anyone have a 16-bit x86 early_printk? Tue, 14 Jan 2003 08:29:45 -0800
• Dave Jones
  • Re: 2.5.59 - Compaq 900z - No Go.. Sat, 18 Jan 2003 15:21:40 +0000
  • Re: perfctr-2.4.4 released Sat, 18 Jan 2003 14:33:54 +0000
  • Re: 2.5.59 - Compaq 900z - No Go.. Sat, 18 Jan 2003 13:28:08 +0000
  • Re: eepro100 - 802.1q - mtu size Fri, 17 Jan 2003 17:27:19 +0000
  • Re: any brand recomendation for a linux laptop ? Thu, 16 Jan 2003 11:38:25 +0000
  • Re: [2.5] X losing keyboard Thu, 16 Jan 2003 11:30:41 +0000
  • Re: [PATCH] Re: [BUG] cardbus/hotplugging still broken in 2.5.56 Wed, 15 Jan 2003 20:23:21 +0000
  • Re: VIA C3 and random SIGTRAP or segfault Wed, 15 Jan 2003 13:23:01 +0000
  • Re: VIA C3 and random SIGTRAP or segfault Wed, 15 Jan 2003 12:23:24 +0000
  • Re: new CPUID bit Wed, 15 Jan 2003 12:18:15 +0000
  • Re: [PATCH] don't create regular files in devfs (fwd) Tue, 14 Jan 2003 17:40:03 +0000
  • Re: Is linux kernel is available for any AMD processors? Tue, 14 Jan 2003 12:41:52 +0000
  • Re: drivers/char/Kconfig:640: can't open file "drivers/char/ipmi/Kconfig" Tue, 14 Jan 2003 04:02:14 +0000
  • Re: Is linux kernel is available for any AMD processors? Mon, 13 Jan 2003 14:08:55 +0000
  • Re: UnitedLinux violating GPL? Mon, 13 Jan 2003 13:12:42 +0000
  • Re: any chance of 2.6.0-test*? Mon, 13 Jan 2003 13:08:42 +0000
  • Re: some curiosities on the filesystems layout in kernel config Mon, 13 Jan 2003 12:36:35 +0000
  • Re: more thoughts on kernel config organization Mon, 13 Jan 2003 12:32:43 +0000
  • Re: [BK/PATCH] better i386 compiler flags Sun, 12 Jan 2003 14:52:52 +0000
  • Re: [BK/PATCH] better i386 compiler flags Sun, 12 Jan 2003 00:06:02 +0000
  • Re: Linux v2.5.56 Sun, 12 Jan 2003 00:02:53 +0000
• Dave Olien
  • [TRIVIAL PATCH] Fix compiler warning from asound.h Fri, 17 Jan 2003 12:07:42 -0800
  • [PATCH] linux2.5.56 patch to DAC960 driver for error retry Mon, 13 Jan 2003 09:36:14 -0800
• davej@codemonkey.org.uk
  • Ye olde fix task state reporting patch. Tue, 14 Jan 2003 15:34:00 GMT
• daveman@bellatlantic.net
  • Re: any brand recomendation for a linux laptop ? Thu, 16 Jan 2003 22:38:10 -0500
• David Brownell
  • Re: 2.5.56 won't boot (but 2.5.53 will) Tue, 14 Jan 2003 11:17:50 -0800
  • Re: 2.5.56 won't boot (but 2.5.53 will) Sun, 12 Jan 2003 15:22:57 -0800
• David Ford
  • BusLogic error handling, 2.5 Tue, 14 Jan 2003 15:45:51 -0500
  • Kconfig broken in 2.5.58? Tue, 14 Jan 2003 15:02:23 -0500
  • Re: 2.5.56 panics PostgreSQL Sun, 12 Jan 2003 20:37:01 -0500
  • Re: 2.5.56 panics PostgreSQL Sun, 12 Jan 2003 20:33:13 -0500
  • Re: any chance of 2.6.0-test*? Sun, 12 Jan 2003 16:49:16 -0500
  • Re: any chance of 2.6.0-test*? Sun, 12 Jan 2003 15:34:20 -0500
  • Re: any chance of 2.6.0-test*? Sun, 12 Jan 2003 15:20:31 -0500
  • Re: any chance of 2.6.0-test*? Sun, 12 Jan 2003 14:58:13 -0500
  • Re: 2.5.56 panics PostgreSQL Sun, 12 Jan 2003 14:52:52 -0500
  • 2.5.56 panics PostgreSQL Sun, 12 Jan 2003 13:47:21 -0500
• David Gibson
  • Squash warnings in init/do_mounts.c Wed, 15 Jan 2003 18:38:46 +1100
  • Re: [PATCH] __cacheline_aligned_in_smp? Mon, 13 Jan 2003 20:41:12 +1100
• David Lang
  • Re: any chance of 2.6.0-test*? Sun, 12 Jan 2003 17:26:48 -0800 (PST)
• David Luyer
  • Two ataraid suggestions Sat, 18 Jan 2003 16:21:31 +1100
• David Mansfield
  • aic7xxx fails to boot in 2.5.58 Thu, 16 Jan 2003 16:24:56 -0500 (EST)
• David Mosberger
  • Re: recent change to exit_mmap Sat, 18 Jan 2003 00:15:52 -0800
  • Re: recent change to exit_mmap Fri, 17 Jan 2003 23:58:18 -0800
  • Re: recent change to exit_mmap Fri, 17 Jan 2003 23:42:44 -0800
  • Re: [PATCH] improved boot time TSC synchronization Thu, 16 Jan 2003 09:54:37 -0800
  • RE: timing an application Tue, 14 Jan 2003 13:34:15 -0800
  • Re: [RFC] Consolidate vmlinux.lds.S files Mon, 13 Jan 2003 13:17:25 -0800
  • Re: [RFC] Consolidate vmlinux.lds.S files Mon, 13 Jan 2003 11:37:35 -0800
• David S. Miller
  • Re: Bug? Sparc linux defines MAP_LOCKED == MAP_GROWSDOWN Sat, 18 Jan 2003 03:49:49 -0800 (PST)
  • Re: Bug? Sparc linux defines MAP_LOCKED == MAP_GROWSDOWN Sat, 18 Jan 2003 00:12:18 -0800 (PST)
  • Re: [PATCH] fix up RTM_SETLINK handling Wed, 15 Jan 2003 23:37:02 -0800 (PST)
  • Re: [PATCH] __cacheline_aligned_in_smp? Wed, 15 Jan 2003 23:21:04 -0800 (PST)
  • Re: [RFC] Migrating net/sched to new module interface 15 Jan 2003 20:25:30 -0800
  • Re: [PATCH] fix up RTM_SETLINK handling Wed, 15 Jan 2003 17:23:58 -0800 (PST)
  • Re: [PATCH] fix up RTM_SETLINK handling Wed, 15 Jan 2003 16:13:37 -0800 (PST)
  • Re: [PATCH] fix up RTM_SETLINK handling Wed, 15 Jan 2003 16:07:16 -0800 (PST)
  • Re: [BK-2.5] Update the generic DMA API to take GFP_ flags on Tue, 14 Jan 2003 07:30:23 -0800 (PST)
  • Re: [patch] Make prof_counter use per-cpu areas patch 4/4 -- sparc Tue, 14 Jan 2003 03:46:22 -0800 (PST)
  • Re: [BK-2.5] Update arm implementation of DMA API to include GFP_ Mon, 13 Jan 2003 22:36:41 -0800 (PST)
  • Re: [BK-2.5] Update the generic DMA API to take GFP_ flags on Mon, 13 Jan 2003 22:35:51 -0800 (PST)
  • Re: [PATCH] __cacheline_aligned_in_smp? Mon, 13 Jan 2003 22:32:53 -0800 (PST)
  • Re: [PATCH 2.5.56] net/ipv4/route.c doesn't compile without /proc Mon, 13 Jan 2003 00:09:03 -0800 (PST)
  • Re: [PATCH] fix locking in /net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c Mon, 13 Jan 2003 00:02:40 -0800 (PST)
  • Re: [PATCH] __cacheline_aligned_in_smp? Sun, 12 Jan 2003 23:35:13 -0800 (PST)
• David Schwartz
  • Re: Is the BitKeeper network protocol documented? Fri, 17 Jan 2003 23:23:36 -0800
  • Re: Is the BitKeeper network protocol documented? Fri, 17 Jan 2003 20:57:18 -0800
• David Truog
  • Re: Moderated forum for linux-kernel Sun, 12 Jan 2003 14:45:51 -0800 (PST)
  • Re: any chance of 2.6.0-test*? Sun, 12 Jan 2003 10:02:31 -0800 (PST)
• David van Hoose
  • Oops in modutils Fri, 17 Jan 2003 08:14:52 -0600
  • Available for testing Wed, 15 Jan 2003 00:49:54 -0600
• David Woodhouse
  • Re: ANN: LKMB (Linux Kernel Module Builder) version 0.1.16 Fri, 17 Jan 2003 13:12:24 +0000
  • Re: [module-init-tools] fix weak symbol handling Fri, 17 Jan 2003 09:32:09 +0000
  • Re: Linux 2.5.59 Fri, 17 Jan 2003 09:30:08 +0000
  • Re: [module-init-tools] fix weak symbol handling Fri, 17 Jan 2003 07:34:14 +0000
  • Re: [patch] IDE OnTrack remap for 2.5.58 Thu, 16 Jan 2003 22:40:24 +0000
  • Re: why the new config process is a *big* step backwards Thu, 16 Jan 2003 11:47:48 +0000
  • Re: 2.5.58 - bttv broken? Wed, 15 Jan 2003 00:20:57 +0000
  • Re: any chance of 2.6.0-test*? Sun, 12 Jan 2003 21:22:00 +0000
  • Re: this is what i had in mind for fs/Kconfig Sun, 12 Jan 2003 12:36:22 +0000
• Dax Kelson
  • [OFFTOPIC] RMS and reactions to him Tue, 14 Jan 2003 12:56:39 -0700 (MST)
  • Re: [PATCH] Secure user authentication for NFS using RPCSEC_GSS Mon, 13 Jan 2003 11:06:40 -0700 (MST)
  • Re: [PATCH] Secure user authentication for NFS using RPCSEC_GSS 12 Jan 2003 22:56:31 -0700
• Dean McEwan
  • Re: [WAY OFFTOPIC] RMS and reactions to him (best viewed in times new roman) Wed, 15 Jan 2003 16:33:08 0000
  • Re: [V. OFFTOPIC] RMS and reactions to him (MARMITE?) Wed, 15 Jan 2003 16:16:47 0000
  • Re: [OFFTOPIC] RMS and reactions to him (YAWN) Wed, 15 Jan 2003 12:52:31 0000
  • Re: [ANNOUNCE] New modem driver made [CANCELLED] Tue, 14 Jan 2003 18:18:44 0000
• Dee
  • Re: Nervous with 2.4.21-pre3 and -pre3-ac* Mon, 13 Jan 2003 02:25:02 -0600
• Denis Vlasenko
  • Re: 2.4.20-pre11: PCI Wavelan card loses connection Wed, 15 Jan 2003 10:06:04 +0200
  • 2.4.20-pre11: PCI Wavelan card loses connection Mon, 13 Jan 2003 10:20:14 +0200
• Derek Glidden
  • 2.4.20-aa1 breaks integrit 16 Jan 2003 15:51:36 -0500
• DervishD
  • Re: argv0 revisited... Fri, 17 Jan 2003 12:20:35 +0100
  • Re: Tar'ing /proc ??? Fri, 17 Jan 2003 11:50:30 +0100
  • Re: Changing argv[0] under Linux. Fri, 17 Jan 2003 11:08:24 +0100
  • Re: argv0 revisited... Fri, 17 Jan 2003 11:58:54 +0100
  • Re: argv0 revisited... Fri, 17 Jan 2003 11:55:04 +0100
  • Re: argv0 revisited... Thu, 16 Jan 2003 12:27:45 +0100
  • Re: Changing argv[0] under Linux. Thu, 16 Jan 2003 11:32:58 +0100
  • Re: Changing argv[0] under Linux. Wed, 15 Jan 2003 23:03:17 +0100
  • Re: argv0 revisited... Wed, 15 Jan 2003 21:22:54 +0100
  • Re: argv0 revisited... Wed, 15 Jan 2003 20:19:42 +0100
  • Re: argv0 revisited... Wed, 15 Jan 2003 19:44:55 +0100
  • argv0 revisited... Wed, 15 Jan 2003 19:17:28 +0100
  • Changing argv[0] under Linux. This MUST work... Wed, 15 Jan 2003 18:36:56 +0100
  • Re: Changing argv[0] under Linux. Wed, 15 Jan 2003 17:57:53 +0100
  • Re: Changing argv[0] under Linux. Wed, 15 Jan 2003 17:22:19 +0100
  • Re: Changing argv[0] under Linux. Wed, 15 Jan 2003 12:35:33 +0100
  • Re: Changing argv[0] under Linux. Wed, 15 Jan 2003 12:28:31 +0100
  • Re: Changing argv[0] under Linux. Wed, 15 Jan 2003 12:41:30 +0100
  • Re: Changing argv[0] under Linux. Tue, 14 Jan 2003 23:00:53 +0100
  • Re: Changing argv[0] under Linux. Tue, 14 Jan 2003 23:04:01 +0100
  • Re: Changing argv[0] under Linux. Tue, 14 Jan 2003 20:50:05 +0100
  • Re: Changing argv[0] under Linux. Tue, 14 Jan 2003 20:14:20 +0100
  • Changing argv[0] under Linux. Tue, 14 Jan 2003 19:59:34 +0100
  • [PATCH][TRIVIAL] mmap.c corner case fix Tue, 14 Jan 2003 10:39:02 +0100
• DevilKin
  • Irda connectivity problems since 2.4.20 Thu, 16 Jan 2003 16:16:05 +0100
• Dick Streefland
  • Re: 2.4.19 - 2.4.20 : Boot parameter MEM= doesn't work anymore Tue, 14 Jan 2003 15:38:54 +0100
• Dieter Nützel
  • 2.4.20 (-aa1): System hang during second (?) /dev/fd0 access Tue, 14 Jan 2003 00:33:59 +0100
• Dimitrie O. Paun
  • Re: any chance of 2.6.0-test*? Sun, 12 Jan 2003 15:59:51 -0500
• Dipankar Sarma
  • Re: lots of calls to __write/read_lock_failed Thu, 16 Jan 2003 12:29:41 +0530
  • Re: Fixing the tty layer was Re: any chance of 2.6.0-test*? Mon, 13 Jan 2003 15:06:32 +0530
  • Re: Fixing the tty layer was Re: any chance of 2.6.0-test*? Mon, 13 Jan 2003 13:42:33 +0530
  • Re: Fixing the tty layer was Re: any chance of 2.6.0-test*? Mon, 13 Jan 2003 12:11:31 +0530
  • Re: 2.5.56-mm1 Mon, 13 Jan 2003 11:55:03 +0530
• Dirk Arnold
  • cardbus modem not handled by the serial driver Tue, 14 Jan 2003 12:57:12 +0100
• Dominik Brodowski
  • Re: Initcall / device model meltdown? Fri, 17 Jan 2003 21:48:58 +0100
  • Re: [PATCH] linux-2.5.59_timer-tsc-cleanup_A0 Fri, 17 Jan 2003 10:02:37 +0100
  • [PATCH 2.5.58] cpufreq: fix compilation, name of gx-suspmod driver Wed, 15 Jan 2003 19:45:05 +0100
  • [PATCH 2.5.57] cpufreq: add driver for NatSemi Geode / Cyrix MediaGX Mon, 13 Jan 2003 21:52:29 +0100
  • [PATCH 2.5.57] cpufreq: add sysfs interface Mon, 13 Jan 2003 21:53:46 +0100
  • [PATCH 2.5.57] cpufreq: per-CPU initialization Mon, 13 Jan 2003 21:54:46 +0100
  • Re: Kernel 2.5.55 failed to boot with ACPI support Mon, 13 Jan 2003 16:11:59 +0100
  • [PATCH 2.5.56-bk3] cpufreq: per-CPU initialization in x86 + ACPI drivers Mon, 13 Jan 2003 16:02:25 +0100
  • [PATCH 2.5.56-bk3] cpufreq: per-CPU initialization Mon, 13 Jan 2003 15:50:49 +0100
  • [PATCH 2.5.56-bk3, updated#2] cpufreq: add sysfs interface Mon, 13 Jan 2003 15:30:33 +0100
  • [PATCH 2.5.56] cpufreq: add driver for NatSemi Geode / Cyrix MediaGX Mon, 13 Jan 2003 14:45:18 +0100
  • Re: Kernel 2.5.55 failed to boot with ACPI support Mon, 13 Jan 2003 00:08:46 +0100
  • [PATCH 2.5.56-bk2, updated] cpufreq: sysfs interface Sun, 12 Jan 2003 23:25:34 +0100
• Don Cohen
  • Re: execve setting capabilities incorrectly ? Tue, 14 Jan 2003 10:47:17 -0800
  • execve setting capabilities incorrectly ? Tue, 14 Jan 2003 10:00:32 -0800
• Dorin Lazar
  • Re: Changing argv[0] under Linux. Thu, 16 Jan 2003 11:19:35 +0200
• Dow, Benjamin
  • RE: [OFFTOPIC] RMS and reactions to him Tue, 14 Jan 2003 15:53:12 -0500
• Ducrot Bruno
  • Re: eepro100 - 802.1q - mtu size Fri, 17 Jan 2003 18:48:34 +0100
  • Re: any brand recomendation for a linux laptop ? Thu, 16 Jan 2003 14:45:24 +0100
  • Re: Which FB to use instead of vesafb? Tue, 14 Jan 2003 21:13:28 +0100
  • Re: [ACPI] acpi_wakeup fixes: Patch? Tue, 14 Jan 2003 20:52:35 +0100
  • Re: ACPI errors (2.4.21-pre3-ac4) Mon, 13 Jan 2003 15:30:16 +0100
• Ed Tomlinson
  • 2.5.58bk pdc20267 ide problems Thu, 16 Jan 2003 07:59:37 -0500
  • Re: usb mouse and 2.5.56bk Tue, 14 Jan 2003 08:44:17 -0500
  • usb mouse and 2.5.56bk Sun, 12 Jan 2003 22:42:01 -0500
  • link error bk-currect (isapnp_card_protocol undefined) Sun, 12 Jan 2003 20:20:00 -0500
  • Re: make xconfig broken in bk current Sun, 12 Jan 2003 15:12:59 -0500
• Ed Vance
  • Re: [OFFTOPIC] RMS and reactions to him Tue, 14 Jan 2003 14:14:57 -0800
• ednei_gp
  • Kernel patch Wed, 15 Jan 2003 07:11:33 -0300 (ART)
• Edward Kuns
  • Kernel oops in 2.4.21-pre3-ac2 12 Jan 2003 17:47:31 -0600
• Edward Tandi
  • Re: Linux 2.4.21-pre3-ac3 and KT400 -high memory now works! 14 Jan 2003 22:11:46 +0000
  • Re: Linux 2.4.21-pre3-ac3 and KT400 -high memory now works! 14 Jan 2003 21:49:03 +0000
  • Re: Linux 2.4.21-pre3-ac3 and KT400 13 Jan 2003 23:18:47 +0000
  • Re: Linux 2.4.21-pre3-ac3 and KT400 13 Jan 2003 22:38:44 +0000
  • Re: Linux 2.4.21-pre3-ac3 and KT400 13 Jan 2003 21:12:37 +0000
  • Linux 2.4.21-pre3-ac3 and KT400 13 Jan 2003 20:19:43 +0000
• edward.kuns@rockwellfirstpoint.com
  • Re: i845PE chipset and 20276 Promise Controller boot failure with 2.4.20-ac2 Wed, 15 Jan 2003 14:11:25 -0600
  • Re: i810 sound starts and stops for 2.4.XX and i845PE chipset Wed, 15 Jan 2003 13:59:43 -0600
• Eli Carter
  • Re: Docs to a beginner Tue, 14 Jan 2003 09:42:04 -0600
• Emiliano Gabrielli
  • Re: any chance of 2.6.0-test*? Mon, 13 Jan 2003 17:51:57 +0100
  • Re: any chance of 2.6.0-test*? Mon, 13 Jan 2003 00:57:26 +0100 (CET)
  • Re: any chance of 2.6.0-test*? Mon, 13 Jan 2003 00:45:51 +0100 (CET)
  • Re: any chance of 2.6.0-test*? Mon, 13 Jan 2003 00:45:47 +0100 (CET)
  • Re: any chance of 2.6.0-test*? Mon, 13 Jan 2003 00:39:37 +0100 (CET)
  • Re: any chance of 2.6.0-test*? Mon, 13 Jan 2003 00:05:22 +0100 (CET)
  • Re: any chance of 2.6.0-test*? Sun, 12 Jan 2003 23:36:13 +0100 (CET)
  • Re: any chance of 2.6.0-test*? Sun, 12 Jan 2003 22:58:48 +0100 (CET)
• Eric E. Bowles
  • 2.4.20 crashes when incoming/outgoing interfaces differ Wed, 15 Jan 2003 22:22:46 +0900
• Eric W. Biederman
  • Re: 2.5.59 vmlinux.lds.S change broke modules 17 Jan 2003 20:08:08 -0700
  • Re: Open source hardware 17 Jan 2003 09:32:43 -0700
  • Re: 2.5.59 vmlinux.lds.S change broke modules 17 Jan 2003 09:13:14 -0700
  • Re: [RFC] Consolidate vmlinux.lds.S files 15 Jan 2003 17:19:38 -0700
  • Re: [ANNOUNCE] kexec-tools-1.8 13 Jan 2003 18:57:50 -0700
  • Re: [RFC] Consolidate vmlinux.lds.S files 13 Jan 2003 18:54:20 -0700
  • Re: [RFC] Consolidate vmlinux.lds.S files 13 Jan 2003 12:10:11 -0700
  • Re: [RFC] Consolidate vmlinux.lds.S files 13 Jan 2003 04:24:33 -0700
  • Re: any chance of 2.6.0-test*? 13 Jan 2003 04:09:41 -0700
• Erich Focht
  • [patch] tunable rebalance rates for sched-2.5.59-B0 Sat, 18 Jan 2003 14:31:21 +0100
  • Re: [patch] sched-2.5.59-A2 Fri, 17 Jan 2003 19:11:29 +0100
  • Re: [patch] sched-2.5.59-A2 Fri, 17 Jan 2003 16:30:22 +0100
  • Re: [patch] sched-2.5.59-A2 Fri, 17 Jan 2003 15:35:21 +0100
  • Re: [PATCH 2.5.58] new NUMA scheduler: fix Fri, 17 Jan 2003 12:10:03 +0100
  • Re: [PATCH 2.5.58] new NUMA scheduler: fix Thu, 16 Jan 2003 17:47:14 +0100
  • Re: [PATCH 2.5.58] new NUMA scheduler: fix Wed, 15 Jan 2003 16:10:43 +0100
  • [PATCH 2.5.58] new NUMA scheduler: fix Tue, 14 Jan 2003 17:43:25 +0100
  • [PATCH 2.5.58] new NUMA scheduler: fix Tue, 14 Jan 2003 17:23:29 +0100
  • [PATCH 2.5.58] new NUMA scheduler Tue, 14 Jan 2003 16:55:06 +0100
  • Re: [Lse-tech] Re: NUMA scheduler 2nd approach Tue, 14 Jan 2003 16:13:27 +0100
  • Re: [Lse-tech] Re: NUMA scheduler 2nd approach Tue, 14 Jan 2003 12:14:12 +0100
  • Re: NUMA scheduler 2nd approach Tue, 14 Jan 2003 11:56:17 +0100
  • Re: [Lse-tech] Re: NUMA scheduler 2nd approach Mon, 13 Jan 2003 16:46:10 +0100
  • Re: NUMA scheduler 2nd approach Mon, 13 Jan 2003 12:32:40 +0100
  • NUMA scheduler 2nd approach Mon, 13 Jan 2003 00:55:28 +0100
  • Re: [Lse-tech] Minature NUMA scheduler Mon, 13 Jan 2003 00:35:00 +0100
  • Re: [Lse-tech] Minature NUMA scheduler Mon, 13 Jan 2003 00:24:48 +0100
• Erik Logtenberg
  • flaw in documentation drivers/net/dummy.c Fri, 17 Jan 2003 16:26:02 +0100 (CET)
• Ernst Herzberg
  • Re: Linux 2.5.59 Sat, 18 Jan 2003 05:03:49 +0100
• Ezra Nugroho
  • raid 5 algorithm docs 16 Jan 2003 11:53:52 -0500
• fadugis@Argentina.com
  • Curso GIS y Teledeteccion Wed, 15 Jan 2003 11:25:07 -0300
  • Curso GIS y Teledeteccion Wed, 15 Jan 2003 11:25:19 -0300
• fcorneli@elis.rug.ac.be
  • [PATCH] ptrace, kernel 2.5.56 Tue, 14 Jan 2003 09:25:41 +0100 (CET)
• Feldman, Scott
  • RE: [BUG FIX] e100 initialization issue on STL2 motherboard Tue, 14 Jan 2003 23:09:17 -0800
• Felipe Contreras
  • Tulip problem with linux > 2.5.56 Wed, 15 Jan 2003 23:39:33 -0600
• Felix von Leitner
  • rivafb still broken in 2.5.59 Tue, 14 Jan 2003 04:09:32 +0100
  • Re: usb broken in 2.5? Tue, 14 Jan 2003 05:09:01 +0100
  • "PCI BIOS passed nonexistant PCI bus 0" Tue, 14 Jan 2003 03:52:46 +0100
  • usb broken in 2.5? Tue, 14 Jan 2003 03:44:35 +0100
  • kernel nfsd module depmod error Tue, 14 Jan 2003 01:33:24 +0100
• Ferry van Steen
  • Partially closed source module, more of gcc/ld question. Thu, 16 Jan 2003 08:29:31 +0100 (CET)
• Fleischer, Julie N
  • RE: [BUG - HRT patch] disabling timer hangs system when multiple Wed, 15 Jan 2003 16:12:45 -0800
  • [BUG - HRT patch] disabling timer hangs system when multiple over Mon, 13 Jan 2003 10:26:46 -0800
• Florent CHANTRET
  • [INTEL PII BUG] Still SMBALERT# spontaneous shutdown on VAIO Serie F Sat, 18 Jan 2003 21:30:13 +0100
  • Re: SMBALERT# thermal sensor signal for Intel PII in the kernel ? Wed, 15 Jan 2003 12:20:02 +0100
  • SMBALERT# thermal sensor signal for Intel PII in the kernel ? Tue, 14 Jan 2003 15:43:41 +0100
• Florian Lohoff
  • Re: eepro100 - 802.1q - mtu size Fri, 17 Jan 2003 20:25:43 +0100
  • eepro100 - 802.1q - mtu size Fri, 17 Jan 2003 15:53:58 +0100
• Folkert van Heusden
  • RE: reading from devices in RAW mode Sat, 18 Jan 2003 18:09:13 +0100
  • RE: reading from devices in RAW mode Sat, 18 Jan 2003 17:03:39 +0100
  • RE: Are linux network drivers really affected by this? Sat, 18 Jan 2003 15:09:37 +0100
  • RE: reading from devices in RAW mode Sat, 18 Jan 2003 15:00:25 +0100
  • RE: reading from devices in RAW mode Sat, 18 Jan 2003 14:58:53 +0100
  • reading from devices in RAW mode Sat, 18 Jan 2003 14:16:10 +0100
  • RE: any chance of 2.6.0-test*? Sat, 18 Jan 2003 14:04:09 +0100
  • restricting nfs Thu, 16 Jan 2003 20:53:14 +0100
• freaky
  • Promise IDE RAID controllers Sat, 18 Jan 2003 14:46:22 +0100
• Freyr Gunnar Ólafsson
  • amilo-a laptop lockup netcard problem Tue, 14 Jan 2003 18:21:59 +0000
• Fu, Michael
  • RE: [ANNOUNCE] kexec-tools-1.8 Tue, 14 Jan 2003 09:16:30 +0800
• Gabriel Gomiz
  • Re: NCR 7452/3 POS - Retail CMOS NVRAM Driver Thu, 16 Jan 2003 17:00:24 -0300
  • NCR 7452/3 POS - Retail CMOS NVRAM Driver Wed, 15 Jan 2003 21:11:04 -0300
• Gabriel Paubert
  • [PATCH] Cleanup of the lcall7/lcall27 entry path. Wed, 15 Jan 2003 18:48:45 +0100 (CET)
• Gary_Lerhaupt@Dell.com
  • Devlabel: static device naming via symlinks (improved) Fri, 17 Jan 2003 16:15:08 -0600
• Gaël Le Mignot
  • Re: [OFFTOPIC] RMS and reactions to him Wed, 15 Jan 2003 13:47:26 +0100
  • Re: Nvidia and its choice to read the GPL "differently" Wed, 15 Jan 2003 13:44:18 +0100
• Geert Uytterhoeven
  • Re: Linux 2.5.59 Fri, 17 Jan 2003 13:28:10 +0100 (MET)
  • Re: Is linux kernel is available for any AMD processors? Tue, 14 Jan 2003 13:18:39 +0100 (MET)
• george anzinger
  • Re: [BUG - HRT patch] disabling timer hangs system when multiple Tue, 14 Jan 2003 14:26:37 -0800
• Gerd Knorr
  • [bk patch] v4l: move some files around Tue, 14 Jan 2003 12:47:48 +0100
• German Gomez Garcia
  • Tekram DC390U4W support Tue, 14 Jan 2003 12:25:24 +0100
• GertJan Spoelman
  • [PATCH] (2/3) i2c-isa, via686a and w8378x series sensors support for 2.5.58 Thu, 16 Jan 2003 21:52:30 +0100
  • [PATCH] (3/3) i2c-isa, via686a and w8378x series sensors support for 2.5.58 Thu, 16 Jan 2003 21:52:47 +0100
  • [PATCH] (1/3) i2c-isa, via686a and w8378x series sensors support for 2.5.58 Thu, 16 Jan 2003 21:52:01 +0100
  • Re: [PATCH] via686a sensors support Thu, 16 Jan 2003 21:37:22 +0100
  • Re: [PATCH] via686a sensors support Tue, 14 Jan 2003 23:50:43 +0100
  • [PATCH] via686a sensors support Sun, 12 Jan 2003 19:25:14 +0100
• ghugh Song
  • Re: Kernel Oops with HIMEM+VM in 2.4.19,20: More INFO Sat, 18 Jan 2003 12:28:41 -0500 (EST)
  • Re: Kernel Oops with HIMEM+VM in 2.4.19,20: More INFO Fri, 17 Jan 2003 17:17:26 -0500 (EST)
  • Re: Nervous with 2.4.21-pre3 and -pre3-ac* Thu, 16 Jan 2003 02:18:37 -0500 (EST)
  • Re: Nervous with 2.4.21-pre3 and -pre3-ac* Mon, 13 Jan 2003 00:21:51 -0500 (EST)
  • Nervous with 2.4.21-pre3 and -pre3-ac* Sun, 12 Jan 2003 13:55:00 -0500 (EST)
• Gianni Tedesco
  • Re: any brand recomendation for a linux laptop ? 17 Jan 2003 16:17:53 +0000
• Giuliano Pochini
  • RE: inefficient RT vs efficient non-RT Mon, 13 Jan 2003 10:38:51 +0100 (CET)
• Glen Turner
  • Re: VIA C3 and random SIGTRAP or segfault Thu, 16 Jan 2003 16:23:12 +1030
• GrandMasterLee
  • Re: Two on the kernel. - Please Respond. 17 Jan 2003 16:32:49 -0600
  • Two on the kernel. 17 Jan 2003 14:50:39 -0600
• Greg KH
  • Re: [RFC] Migrating net/sched to new module interface Thu, 16 Jan 2003 17:04:16 -0800
  • Re: [PATCH] LSM changes for 2.5.58 Thu, 16 Jan 2003 15:26:16 -0800
  • Re: [PATCH] LSM changes for 2.5.58 Thu, 16 Jan 2003 15:25:58 -0800
  • Re: [PATCH] LSM changes for 2.5.58 Thu, 16 Jan 2003 15:25:41 -0800
  • [PATCH] LSM changes for 2.5.58 Thu, 16 Jan 2003 15:25:26 -0800
  • [BK PATCH] LSM changes for 2.5.58 Thu, 16 Jan 2003 15:24:05 -0800
  • Re: [BK PATCH] USB changes for 2.5.58 Thu, 16 Jan 2003 12:25:06 -0800
  • [BK PATCH] USB changes for 2.4.21-pre3 Thu, 16 Jan 2003 10:54:30 -0800
  • Re: [PATCH-2.4.20] PCI-X hotplug support for Compaq driver Thu, 16 Jan 2003 10:35:53 -0800
  • Re: 2.4.20/2.4.21-pre3 usb Oops Wed, 15 Jan 2003 15:33:03 -0800
  • [BK PATCH] USB changes for 2.5.58 Wed, 15 Jan 2003 15:24:34 -0800
  • Re: [PATCH-2.4.20] PCI-X hotplug support for Compaq driver Wed, 15 Jan 2003 15:05:54 -0800
  • Re: usb mouse and 2.5.56bk Wed, 15 Jan 2003 00:02:01 -0800
  • Re: USB: Sony clie does not word with recent 2.5 Tue, 14 Jan 2003 23:24:45 -0800
  • Re: [PATCH] TTY changes for 2.5.58 Tue, 14 Jan 2003 17:14:58 -0800
  • [PATCH] TTY changes for 2.5.58 Tue, 14 Jan 2003 17:14:10 -0800
  • [BK PATCH] TTY changes for 2.5.58 Tue, 14 Jan 2003 17:13:12 -0800
  • [PATCH] PCI hotplug changes for 2.5.58 Tue, 14 Jan 2003 14:19:44 -0800
  • [BK PATCH] PCI hotplug changes for 2.5.58 Tue, 14 Jan 2003 14:18:40 -0800
  • Re: [RFC] add module reference to struct tty_driver Tue, 14 Jan 2003 14:08:59 -0800
  • Re: usb broken in 2.5? Tue, 14 Jan 2003 06:55:29 -0800
  • Re: usb mouse and 2.5.56bk Mon, 13 Jan 2003 17:23:20 -0800
  • Re: sysfs Mon, 13 Jan 2003 16:57:56 -0800
  • Re: sysfs Mon, 13 Jan 2003 16:56:05 -0800
  • Re: [PATCH] PnP update - drivers Mon, 13 Jan 2003 15:03:59 -0800
  • [BK PATCH] USB changes for 2.5.57 Mon, 13 Jan 2003 14:53:58 -0800
  • Re: [2.5.56] (partial known) bugs/compile errors Mon, 13 Jan 2003 12:23:06 -0800
  • Re: [2.5.56] (partial known) bugs/compile errors Mon, 13 Jan 2003 11:41:09 -0800
  • Re: Problems with USB Mon, 13 Jan 2003 11:09:35 -0800
  • Re: [2.5.56] (partial known) bugs/compile errors Mon, 13 Jan 2003 11:01:06 -0800
  • Re: Problems with USB Mon, 13 Jan 2003 09:20:06 -0800
  • Re: [RFC] add module reference to struct tty_driver Mon, 13 Jan 2003 09:12:56 -0800
  • Re: Fixing the tty layer was Re: any chance of 2.6.0-test*? Sun, 12 Jan 2003 22:45:44 -0800
  • Re: any chance of 2.6.0-test*? Sun, 12 Jan 2003 22:23:00 -0800
  • Re: Problems with USB Sun, 12 Jan 2003 21:55:52 -0800
  • [RFC] add module reference to struct tty_driver Sun, 12 Jan 2003 21:47:09 -0800
  • Re: any chance of 2.6.0-test*? Sun, 12 Jan 2003 01:27:06 -0800
  • Re: Greg KH: "Re: Problems accessing USB Mass Storage" Sun, 12 Jan 2003 01:24:27 -0800
• Greg Ungerer
  • [PATCH]: linux-2.5.58-uc0 (MMU-less fix ups) Wed, 15 Jan 2003 12:15:54 +1000
  • [PATCH]: linux-2.5.57-uc0 (MMU-less fix ups) Tue, 14 Jan 2003 11:58:27 +1000
  • Re: 2.5.56: undefined reference to `_ebss' from drivers/mtd/maps/uclinux.c Mon, 13 Jan 2003 17:23:21 +1000
  • [PATCH]: linux-2.5.56-uc0 (MMU-less fix ups) Mon, 13 Jan 2003 14:16:14 +1000
  • Re: exception tables in 2.5.55 Mon, 13 Jan 2003 13:49:42 +1000
  • Re: exception tables in 2.5.55 Mon, 13 Jan 2003 13:12:25 +1000
  • Re: [2.5 patch] remove kernel 2.0 code from mcfserial.h Mon, 13 Jan 2003 10:52:18 +1000
• Gregoire Favre
  • atyfb don't build under 2.5.59 Fri, 17 Jan 2003 10:29:36 +0100
• Grover, Andrew
  • RE: [ACPI] 2.5.58 hangs at boot Thu, 16 Jan 2003 13:38:52 -0800
  • mpparse.c is a mess (was: APIC version) Tue, 14 Jan 2003 15:41:49 -0800
• Guillaume Allard
  • Re: 2.4.19 - 2.4.20 : Boot parameter MEM= doesn't work anymore Tue, 14 Jan 2003 22:16:42 +0100
  • 2.4.19 - 2.4.20 : Boot parameter MEM= doesn't work anymore Tue, 14 Jan 2003 14:39:44 +0100
• Guillaume Boissiere
  • [STATUS 2.5] January 15, 2003 Wed, 15 Jan 2003 17:36:38 -0500
• Hanasaki JiJi
  • NForce Chipset support in which kernels? Fri, 17 Jan 2003 15:11:36 -0600
• Hanna Linder
  • review: 2.5.59 patches to fix bug 282 Sat, 18 Jan 2003 12:36:07 -0800
• Helge Hafting
  • Re: Repeatable scheduling oddity in 2.5.5x? SOLVED Wed, 15 Jan 2003 13:44:38 +0100
  • Repeatable scheduling oddity in 2.5.5x? Tue, 14 Jan 2003 15:46:13 +0100
  • Re: any chance of 2.6.0-test*? -> goto example Tue, 14 Jan 2003 11:36:30 +0100
  • Re: any chance of 2.6.0-test*? Mon, 13 Jan 2003 12:07:41 +0100
• Henning P. Schmiedehausen
  • Re: any brand recomendation for a linux laptop ? Fri, 17 Jan 2003 13:54:02 +0000 (UTC)
  • Re: [OFFTOPIC] RMS and reactions to him Tue, 14 Jan 2003 22:13:38 +0000 (UTC)
• Henrique Gobbi
  • Re: [RFC] add module reference to struct tty_driver Wed, 15 Jan 2003 09:09:30 +0000
• Herman Oosthuysen
  • Re: Open source hardware Thu, 16 Jan 2003 14:48:58 -0700
• Horacio de Oro
  • 2.4.21-pre3-ac4 - kernel BUG at page_alloc.c:100 Sat, 18 Jan 2003 15:25:45 -0300
  • oops 2.5.58-mm1while 'apt-get dselect-upgrade' Thu, 16 Jan 2003 21:14:04 -0300
• Horst von Brand
  • Re: argv0 revisited... Thu, 16 Jan 2003 12:04:18 +0100
  • Re: IPMI Wed, 15 Jan 2003 21:46:28 +0100
  • Re: [OFFTOPIC] RMS and reactions to him Wed, 15 Jan 2003 17:39:33 +0100
  • Nits on 2.5.58 menuconfig Tue, 14 Jan 2003 16:04:24 +0100
  • Re: Linux 2.4.21pre3-ac2 Tue, 14 Jan 2003 12:17:02 +0100
  • Re: any chance of 2.6.0-test*? Mon, 13 Jan 2003 21:01:52 +0100
  • Re: exception tables in 2.5.55 Mon, 13 Jan 2003 22:03:27 +0100
  • Re: any chance of 2.6.0-test*? Mon, 13 Jan 2003 11:54:59 +0100
  • gotos in kernel [Was: Re: any chance of 2.6.0-test*?] Mon, 13 Jan 2003 11:32:17 +0100
  • Re: UnitedLinux violating GPL? Sun, 12 Jan 2003 14:23:50 +0100
• Howell, David P
  • RE: timing an application Tue, 14 Jan 2003 12:37:05 -0800
• Hubert Mantel
  • Re: UnitedLinux violating GPL? Sun, 12 Jan 2003 14:15:35 +0100
• Hubert Tonneau
  • NONBLOCK to USB printer on 2.4.20 Tue, 14 Jan 2003 03:05:40 GMT
• Hugo Haas
  • Re: Bug report : i810_audio, compaq evo 410c, 2.4.20 Tue, 14 Jan 2003 10:22:07 +0100
• iain d broadfoot
  • Re: [OT] Whole thing about GNU/Linux and Linux Sat, 18 Jan 2003 21:56:31 +0000
• Ian Collier
  • Re: Dell precision M50 and _very_ slow process startup Mon, 13 Jan 2003 16:41:03 +0000
• Ian Wienand
  • Re: [ANNOUNCE] contest benchmark v0.60 Wed, 15 Jan 2003 16:24:00 +1100
  • Re: [ANNOUNCE] contest benchmark v0.60 Wed, 15 Jan 2003 15:15:24 +1100
• Ingo Molnar
  • Re: [patch] sched-2.5.59-A2 Fri, 17 Jan 2003 16:11:59 +0100 (CET)
  • Re: [PATCH 2.5.58] new NUMA scheduler: fix Fri, 17 Jan 2003 15:07:51 +0100 (CET)
  • [patch] sched-2.5.59-A2 Fri, 17 Jan 2003 09:47:43 +0100 (CET)
  • Re: [PATCH 2.5.58] new NUMA scheduler: fix Fri, 17 Jan 2003 08:23:40 +0100 (CET)
  • Re: [PATCH 2.5.58] new NUMA scheduler: fix Thu, 16 Jan 2003 21:19:22 +0100 (CET)
  • Re: [PATCH 2.5.58] new NUMA scheduler: fix Thu, 16 Jan 2003 20:44:01 +0100 (CET)
  • Re: [PATCH 2.5.58] new NUMA scheduler: fix Thu, 16 Jan 2003 20:07:09 +0100 (CET)
• Ingo Oeser
  • Re: [i2c-piix4.o: IBM Laptop detected; this module may corrupt your serial eeprom! Refusing to load module!] on xSeries 232 -Server Thu, 16 Jan 2003 18:29:20 +0100
  • Re: [PATCH] 2.5.56-bug Mon, 13 Jan 2003 00:49:40 +0100
  • Re: [RFC] Consolidate vmlinux.lds.S files Mon, 13 Jan 2003 00:36:32 +0100
• Ivan G.
  • 2.5.58: Kernel BUG at fs/devfs/base.c Wed, 15 Jan 2003 03:59:26 -0700
  • Re: 2.5.58 Oops when booting from initrd - kobject_del Tue, 14 Jan 2003 22:32:53 -0700
  • 2.5.58 Oops when booting from initrd - kobject_del Tue, 14 Jan 2003 02:47:40 -0700
• Ivan Kokshaysky
  • Re: [patch 2.5] 2-pass PCI probing, generic part Tue, 14 Jan 2003 19:39:57 +0300
• Ivanovich
  • 2.5.58 - bttv broken? Tue, 14 Jan 2003 20:06:25 -0100
• iw2lsi
  • I/O access question Thu, 16 Jan 2003 19:52:30 +0100
• J Sloan
  • Re: 2.5.59 vmlinux.lds.S change broke modules Fri, 17 Jan 2003 22:14:14 -0800
  • [OT] Re: any chance of 2.6.0-test*? Sun, 12 Jan 2003 19:06:08 -0800
• J.A. Magallon
  • Re: 2.4.21pre2aa2 Tue, 14 Jan 2003 17:58:01 +0100
  • Re: updated CDROMREADAUDIO DMA patch Mon, 13 Jan 2003 00:16:06 +0100
• Jacek Kawa
  • Re: 2.4.20/2.4.21-pre3 usb Oops Thu, 16 Jan 2003 18:14:51 +0100
  • Re: 2.4.20/2.4.21-pre3 usb Oops Wed, 15 Jan 2003 20:43:42 +0100
  • 2.4.20/2.4.21-pre3 usb Oops Wed, 15 Jan 2003 12:12:35 +0100
• Jack Bowling
  • Re: initio driver needs updating Sun, 12 Jan 2003 23:55:17 -0800
• Jakob Oestergaard
  • Re: argv0 revisited... Thu, 16 Jan 2003 15:59:08 +0100
  • Re: Changing argv[0] under Linux. Wed, 15 Jan 2003 17:47:31 +0100
  • Re: Changing argv[0] under Linux. Wed, 15 Jan 2003 14:16:17 +0100
• James Bottomley
  • Re: [PATCH][2.5] fix for_each_cpu compilation on UP Fri, 17 Jan 2003 10:03:55 -0500
  • Re: [PARISC] kernel 2.5.58 doesn't compile Thu, 16 Jan 2003 12:45:44 -0500
  • Re: [BK-2.5] Update the generic DMA API to take GFP_ flags on Tue, 14 Jan 2003 10:51:01 -0500
  • Re: [BK-2.5] Update arm implementation of DMA API to include GFP_ Tue, 14 Jan 2003 10:41:51 -0500
  • Re: [BK-2.5] Update the generic DMA API to take GFP_ flags on Tue, 14 Jan 2003 10:30:15 -0500
  • [PATCH] 4 patches to allow dma_alloc_coherent to use GFP_ flags Mon, 13 Jan 2003 12:54:11 -0500
  • [PATCH] fix broken kallsyms on non-x86 archs Sun, 12 Jan 2003 13:40:22 -0500
• James Cleverdon
  • Question about xAPIC lowest priority delivery Mon, 13 Jan 2003 16:50:34 -0800
• James H. Cloos Jr.
  • [PATCH][RESEND w/ reasonable Subject] alsa before oss in Kconfig 15 Jan 2003 16:46:12 -0500
  • Re: [PATCH] Re: Linux 2.5.57, i8k driver versions.. 15 Jan 2003 16:44:38 -0500
  • [PATCH] Re: Linux 2.5.57, i8k driver versions.. 14 Jan 2003 16:24:27 -0500
  • Re: new CPUID bit 14 Jan 2003 13:41:01 -0500
  • Re: any chance of 2.6.0-test*? 13 Jan 2003 20:39:37 -0500
• James Simmons
  • Re: atyfb don't build under 2.5.59 Fri, 17 Jan 2003 16:05:59 +0000 (GMT)
  • Re: radeonfb almost there.. but not quite! :) Fri, 17 Jan 2003 16:01:19 +0000 (GMT)
  • Re: radeonfb almost there.. but not quite! :) Fri, 17 Jan 2003 15:59:11 +0000 (GMT)
  • Re: 2.5 BK broken? Wed, 15 Jan 2003 23:43:09 +0000 (GMT)
  • Re: Which FB to use instead of vesafb? Wed, 15 Jan 2003 00:39:13 +0000 (GMT)
  • Re: [BK fbdev updates] Wed, 15 Jan 2003 00:30:45 +0000 (GMT)
  • Re: rivafb still broken in 2.5.59 Wed, 15 Jan 2003 00:29:13 +0000 (GMT)
  • [FB BK updates] Tue, 14 Jan 2003 17:05:07 -0800 (PST)
• Jamie Lokier
  • Re: Bug? Sparc linux defines MAP_LOCKED == MAP_GROWSDOWN Sat, 18 Jan 2003 08:53:31 +0000
  • Re: Is the BitKeeper network protocol documented? Sat, 18 Jan 2003 08:09:59 +0000
  • [OFFTOPIC] Is the repository of a GPL'd program itself under the GPL? Sat, 18 Jan 2003 07:54:55 +0000
  • Re: Is the BitKeeper network protocol documented? Sat, 18 Jan 2003 06:22:14 +0000
  • Re: Is the BitKeeper network protocol documented? Sat, 18 Jan 2003 05:15:28 +0000
  • Re: Is the BitKeeper network protocol documented? Sat, 18 Jan 2003 05:10:12 +0000
  • Is the BitKeeper network protocol documented? Sat, 18 Jan 2003 04:33:09 +0000
  • Minor header bug? MIPS (32-bit) nlink_t sign Sat, 18 Jan 2003 03:34:35 +0000
  • Bug? Sparc linux defines MAP_LOCKED == MAP_GROWSDOWN Sat, 18 Jan 2003 03:29:40 +0000
  • Question about threads and signals Sat, 18 Jan 2003 03:24:50 +0000
  • Re: [PATCH] improved boot time TSC synchronization Fri, 17 Jan 2003 01:00:45 +0000
  • Re: [PATCH] improved boot time TSC synchronization Thu, 16 Jan 2003 21:33:32 +0000
• Jan Hudec
  • Re: Oops on server that just started hanging and crashing Wed, 15 Jan 2003 17:57:10 +0100
• Jan Yenya Kasprzak
  • Re: 2.5.56: Two global symbols "io" Mon, 13 Jan 2003 08:55:18 +0100
• Jan-Benedict Glaw
  • Re: any brand recomendation for a linux laptop ? Sat, 18 Jan 2003 23:59:18 +0100
  • Re: any brand recomendation for a linux laptop ? Thu, 16 Jan 2003 16:37:27 +0100
• Jaroslav Kysela
  • Re: [2.5.58][PnP] Some small points. Sat, 18 Jan 2003 22:23:06 +0100 (CET)
  • Re: ALSA and isapnp cards Fri, 17 Jan 2003 22:34:37 +0100 (CET)
  • Re: [PATCH] PnP update - drivers Tue, 14 Jan 2003 16:45:39 +0100 (CET)
  • [PATCH] more PnP fixes and cleanups Mon, 13 Jan 2003 19:41:01 +0100 (CET)
  • Re: [PATCH] PnP update - drivers Mon, 13 Jan 2003 15:51:04 +0100 (CET)
  • [PATCH] Linux PnP Support 0.94 by Adam Belay Sun, 12 Jan 2003 20:24:53 +0100 (CET)
  • Re: [PATCH 2.5.56] Sound core not compiling without /proc support Sun, 12 Jan 2003 14:59:38 +0100 (CET)
• Jarrett L. Redd
  • /proc/meminfo behaviour... Wed, 15 Jan 2003 16:32:12 -0800
• Jason Papadopoulos
  • [PATCH] page coloring for 2.4.20 kernel, version 2 Wed, 15 Jan 2003 00:45:22 -0500
• Jason Thomas
  • Re: ide-scsi bug hard locks machine Tue, 14 Jan 2003 13:20:03 +1100
  • Re: ide-scsi bug hard locks machine Mon, 13 Jan 2003 16:13:23 +1100
  • ide-scsi bug hard locks machine Mon, 13 Jan 2003 14:07:49 +1100
• Jean Tourrilhes
  • Re: Irda connectivity problems since 2.4.20 Thu, 16 Jan 2003 10:18:27 -0800
  • Re: [TRIVIAL 2.2] CONFIG_NET_RADIO and Wireless Extensions Tue, 14 Jan 2003 09:40:52 -0800
  • Re: 2.4.20-pre11: PCI Wavelan card loses connection Mon, 13 Jan 2003 09:24:35 -0800
• Jean-Daniel Pauget
  • Re: Another holiday, another set of tg3 releases. Sun, 12 Jan 2003 01:14:03 +0100 (CET)
• Jeff Dike
  • uml-patch-2.5.58-1 Fri, 17 Jan 2003 11:28:30 -0500
• Jeff Garzik
  • Re: Code obfuscation in acpi Sat, 18 Jan 2003 17:32:10 -0500
  • Re: UnitedLinux violating GPL? Fri, 17 Jan 2003 15:12:40 -0500
  • Re: Initcall / device model meltdown? Fri, 17 Jan 2003 14:32:56 -0500
  • Re: CONFIG_SOUND_ICH=m does not compile ac97_audio Fri, 17 Jan 2003 13:59:45 -0500
  • cs89x0 in 2.5 (was Re: eepro100 - 802.1q - mtu size) Fri, 17 Jan 2003 12:49:28 -0500
  • Re: eepro100 - 802.1q - mtu size Fri, 17 Jan 2003 11:28:18 -0500
  • Re: Linux 2.5.59 Thu, 16 Jan 2003 23:21:56 -0500
  • Re: Open source hardware Thu, 16 Jan 2003 12:36:34 -0500
  • Re: [BUG FIX] e100 initialization issue on STL2 motherboard Tue, 14 Jan 2003 01:01:30 -0500
  • Re: [PATCH] [TRIVIAL] kstrdup Mon, 13 Jan 2003 23:15:14 -0500
  • Re: [PATCH] [TRIVIAL] kstrdup Mon, 13 Jan 2003 22:38:03 -0500
  • Re: [PATCH] [TRIVIAL] kstrdup Mon, 13 Jan 2003 22:19:21 -0500
  • Re: 2.5.57 missing isapnp_card_protocol Mon, 13 Jan 2003 17:40:29 -0500
  • Re: Linux 2.4.21-pre3-ac4 Mon, 13 Jan 2003 16:24:07 -0500
  • Re: [PATCH] __cacheline_aligned_in_smp? Mon, 13 Jan 2003 02:45:16 -0500
  • Re: [PATCH] Secure user authentication for NFS using RPCSEC_GSS [0/6] Sun, 12 Jan 2003 21:20:39 -0500
  • Re: [PATCH] fixup loop blkdev, add module_get Sun, 12 Jan 2003 21:03:25 -0500
  • Re: [RFC] Consolidate vmlinux.lds.S files Sun, 12 Jan 2003 18:09:27 -0500
• jeff millar
  • Re: [OFFTOPIC] RMS and reactions to him (YAWN) Wed, 15 Jan 2003 20:41:57 -0500
  • "make install" error: No module raid5 found for kernel 2.5.56 12 Jan 2003 13:12:37 -0500
• Jeff Randall
  • Re: Why is Nvidia given GPL'd code to use in closed source drivers? Sun, 12 Jan 2003 12:58:49 -0600
• Jeff Waugh
  • Kernel Traffic reaches #200 Tue, 14 Jan 2003 02:47:18 +1100
• Jeffrey Ross
  • ACPI errors (2.4.21-pre3-ac4) Sun, 12 Jan 2003 16:26:10 -0500
• Jens Axboe
  • Re: VIA C3 and random SIGTRAP or segfault Wed, 15 Jan 2003 17:12:30 +0100
  • Re: I/O error Tue, 14 Jan 2003 20:22:40 +0100
  • Re: any chance of 2.6.0-test*? Mon, 13 Jan 2003 19:48:31 +0100
  • Re: any chance of 2.6.0-test*? Mon, 13 Jan 2003 17:43:05 +0100
  • Re: any chance of 2.6.0-test*? Mon, 13 Jan 2003 17:26:38 +0100
  • Re: any chance of 2.6.0-test*? Mon, 13 Jan 2003 16:49:54 +0100
  • Re: any chance of 2.6.0-test*? Mon, 13 Jan 2003 09:15:49 +0100
  • Re: [BK fbdev updates] Sun, 12 Jan 2003 16:07:44 +0100
  • Re: [BUG 2.5.56] IDE/CDROM Oops at boot time without /proc Sun, 12 Jan 2003 14:37:00 +0100
• Jens Taprogge
  • Re: [PATCH] Re: [BUG] cardbus/hotplugging still broken in 2.5.56 Wed, 15 Jan 2003 20:47:38 +0100
  • Re: [BUG] cardbus/hotplugging still broken in 2.5.56 Wed, 15 Jan 2003 09:11:09 +0100
• jens.taprogge@rwth-aachen.de
  • Re: [PATCH] Re: [BUG] cardbus/hotplugging still broken in 2.5.56 Wed, 15 Jan 2003 21:31:34 +0100
• Jeremy Jackson
  • Re: Devlabel: static device naming via symlinks (improved) 18 Jan 2003 11:47:36 -0500
• Jeroen van Disseldorp
  • Detecting changes in a directory tree Thu, 16 Jan 2003 13:58:36 -0500
• Jesse Pollard
  • Re: Tar'ing /proc ??? Thu, 16 Jan 2003 10:30:45 -0600
  • Re: Changing argv[0] under Linux. Wed, 15 Jan 2003 15:36:31 -0600
  • Re: ISO-9660 Rock Ridge gives different links different inums Wed, 15 Jan 2003 15:28:42 -0600
  • Re: Nvidia and its choice to read the GPL "differently" Mon, 13 Jan 2003 11:37:29 -0600
  • Re: Nvidia and its choice to read the GPL "differently" Mon, 13 Jan 2003 11:09:48 -0600
• Jim Houston
  • Re: [PATCH] improved boot time TSC synchronization Thu, 16 Jan 2003 22:35:21 -0500
  • Re: [PATCH] improved boot time TSC synchronization Thu, 16 Jan 2003 19:34:57 -0500
  • [patch] IDE OnTrack remap for 2.5.58 Thu, 16 Jan 2003 13:14:37 -0500
  • [PATCH] improved boot time TSC synchronization Thu, 16 Jan 2003 11:44:55 -0500
• Jochen Friedrich
  • [BUG 2.5.57] NFSv2 READDIR broken Mon, 13 Jan 2003 21:27:23 +0100 (CET)
• Jochen Hein
  • Re: [BK fbdev updates] Wed, 15 Jan 2003 09:32:39 +0100
  • Re: [2.5.55, APM] running "apm -s" doesn't sleep Tue, 14 Jan 2003 09:29:30 +0100
• Jochen Striepe
  • Re: any chance of 2.6.0-test*? Mon, 13 Jan 2003 04:06:38 +0100
• Joe Korty
  • Re: [PATCH] some large create_module(2) sizes can oops a kernel Sun, 12 Jan 2003 22:59:41 -0500 (EST)
• Joel Becker
  • Re: [PATCH] hangcheck-timer Thu, 16 Jan 2003 16:38:45 -0800
  • [PATCH] hangcheck-timer Thu, 16 Jan 2003 15:17:27 -0800
• John Alvord
  • Re: The GPL, the kernel, and everything else. Thu, 16 Jan 2003 10:22:32 -0800
  • Re: Linux 2.4.21-pre3-ac4 Mon, 13 Jan 2003 11:34:02 -0800
• John Bradford
  • Re: reading from devices in RAW mode Sat, 18 Jan 2003 17:33:37 +0000 (GMT)
  • Re: reading from devices in RAW mode Sat, 18 Jan 2003 16:15:43 +0000 (GMT)
  • Re: reading from devices in RAW mode Sat, 18 Jan 2003 14:30:20 +0000 (GMT)
  • [ANNOUNCE] Kernel Bug Database 2.0 Fri, 17 Jan 2003 23:12:56 +0000 (GMT)
  • Re: Open source hardware Fri, 17 Jan 2003 10:04:41 +0000 (GMT)
  • Re: Open source hardware Thu, 16 Jan 2003 22:25:00 +0000 (GMT)
  • Re: [PATCH 2.5.58] new NUMA scheduler: fix Thu, 16 Jan 2003 19:44:38 +0000 (GMT)
  • Open source hardware Thu, 16 Jan 2003 17:11:20 +0000 (GMT)
  • Re: [RFC] add module reference to struct tty_driver Wed, 15 Jan 2003 11:12:08 +0000 (GMT)
  • Re: [RFC] add module reference to struct tty_driver Wed, 15 Jan 2003 10:30:03 +0000 (GMT)
  • Re: Kernel patch Wed, 15 Jan 2003 10:26:57 +0000 (GMT)
  • Coding style - (Was Re: any chance of 2.6.0-test*?) Sun, 12 Jan 2003 23:11:46 +0000 (GMT)
• John Cherry
  • Re: Linux 2.5.59 17 Jan 2003 08:55:16 -0800
  • [STABILITY] Compile / STP metrics for 2.5.57 14 Jan 2003 13:56:47 -0800
  • [STABILITY] Compile / STP metrics for 2.5.57 13 Jan 2003 16:53:17 -0800
• John Levon
  • Re: any chance of 2.6.0-test*? Mon, 13 Jan 2003 22:42:51 +0000
  • Re: make xconfig broken in bk current Mon, 13 Jan 2003 01:20:33 +0000
  • Re: make xconfig broken in bk current Sun, 12 Jan 2003 21:18:39 +0000
  • Re: make xconfig broken in bk current Sun, 12 Jan 2003 20:31:50 +0000
• John Stoffel
  • Re: Linux 2.4.21pre3-ac2 Mon, 13 Jan 2003 12:22:43 -0500
  • Re: Linux 2.4.21-pre3-ac3 Mon, 13 Jan 2003 09:45:33 -0500
• john stultz
  • Re: Fwd: Re: [PATCH] linux-2.5.54_delay-cleanup_A0 17 Jan 2003 19:33:12 -0800
  • Re: [PATCH][RESEND] linux-2.5.58_timer-tsc-cleanup_A0 17 Jan 2003 19:02:05 -0800
  • Re: [PATCH] linux-2.5.59_timer-tsc-cleanup_A0 17 Jan 2003 11:16:29 -0800
  • [PATCH] linux-2.5.59_timer-tsc-cleanup_A0 16 Jan 2003 18:52:29 -0800
  • Re: Fwd: [PATCH] hangcheck-timer 16 Jan 2003 16:55:20 -0800
  • [PATCH][RESEND] linux-2.5.58_timer-tsc-cleanup_A0 15 Jan 2003 16:15:14 -0800
  • [PATCH][TRIVIAL] linux-2.5.57_x86-tsc-cleanup_A0 13 Jan 2003 19:26:42 -0800
  • [PATCH][RESEND] linux-2.5.57_delay-cleanup_A1.patch 13 Jan 2003 15:35:19 -0800
  • [PATCH][RESEND] linux-2.5.57_timer-none_A0.patch 13 Jan 2003 15:33:14 -0800
• Jon Burgess
  • Re: Detecting changes in a directory tree Fri, 17 Jan 2003 12:58:10 +0000
  • Re: Changing argv[0] under Linux. Thu, 16 Jan 2003 11:31:03 +0000
  • Re: Changing argv[0] under Linux. Thu, 16 Jan 2003 10:12:23 +0000
• Jonah Sherman
  • [PATCH] Trivial: Fix date in i386 microcode changelog Thu, 16 Jan 2003 10:54:40 -0500
• Jonathan Thorpe
  • via82cxxx_audio on VT8235 Mon, 13 Jan 2003 16:23:15 +1100
• Jos Hulzink
  • Why does a thread not sleep ? Thu, 16 Jan 2003 18:15:54 +0100 (CET)
• Jose Rodriguez Ruibal
  • Cannot boot Linux 2.4.19 for IA 64 on an Itanium 2 single processor box Wed, 15 Jan 2003 21:11:52 +0100
• Joseph Fannin
  • Re: Linux v2.5.57 Mon, 13 Jan 2003 14:19:58 -0500
  • Re: Linux v2.5.57 Mon, 13 Jan 2003 13:59:59 -0500
• Joshua Kwan
  • Re: 2.4.20 kernel crashes while scanning partition list Sat, 18 Jan 2003 17:09:07 -0800
  • Re: Linux 2.5.59 Thu, 16 Jan 2003 20:41:57 -0800
  • [2.5.58-bk] link failure in intel.c Wed, 15 Jan 2003 00:50:28 -0800
  • Re: Which FB to use instead of vesafb? Tue, 14 Jan 2003 10:25:56 -0800
  • Re: audio resamples itself Tue, 14 Jan 2003 10:22:58 -0800
• Joshua M. Kwan
  • [2.5] X losing keyboard Wed, 15 Jan 2003 20:28:53 -0800
  • intense disk or tty activity SEGV's X Mon, 13 Jan 2003 22:34:57 -0800
  • Re: usb mouse and 2.5.56bk Mon, 13 Jan 2003 11:26:09 -0800
• Joshua Stewart
  • Re: Sending sk_buffs without being tied to a struct sock Sun, 12 Jan 2003 22:11:51 -0500
• Juan Quintela
  • Re: Does file read-ahead in 2.4 really read ahead? 16 Jan 2003 17:46:21 +0100
• Juergen \
  • Re: Promise SuperTrak SX6000 w/ kernel 2.4.20 16 Jan 2003 12:23:41 +0100
• Juergen Quade
  • [PATCH] small bugfix to tasklet_kill Sun, 12 Jan 2003 10:45:45 +0100
• Jules Kongslie
  • PROBLEM: ACPI failes to use ECDT, and disables itself. 12 Jan 2003 11:42:29 -0800
• Jurriaan
  • Re: 2.5.59 doesn't boot - hangs after 'Uncompressing the kernel' Sat, 18 Jan 2003 11:09:55 +0100
  • 2.5.59 doesn't boot - hangs after 'Uncompressing the kernel' Sat, 18 Jan 2003 09:14:08 +0100
  • Re: [DUMB]: Is kernel oops always a kernel bug ??? Fri, 17 Jan 2003 07:14:58 +0100
  • oops in 2.5.58 Thu, 16 Jan 2003 20:39:59 +0100
• Jurzitza, Dieter
  • Question about boot-message Fri, 17 Jan 2003 13:38:03 +0100
• Justin T. Gibbs
  • Re: Adaptec 79xx > 1GB I/O errors Tue, 14 Jan 2003 17:18:01 -0700
• jw schultz
  • Re: any brand recomendation for a linux laptop ? Thu, 16 Jan 2003 02:41:54 -0800
  • Re: Changing argv[0] under Linux. Wed, 15 Jan 2003 00:25:27 -0800
  • Re: SMBALERT# thermal sensor signal for Intel PII in the kernel ? Tue, 14 Jan 2003 18:11:28 -0800
  • Re: Bugs and Releases Numbers Mon, 13 Jan 2003 14:52:17 -0800
• Kai Germaschewski
  • Re: 2.5.59 vmlinux.lds.S change broke modules Fri, 17 Jan 2003 18:11:01 -0600 (CST)
  • Re: Initcall / device model meltdown? Fri, 17 Jan 2003 13:56:07 -0600 (CST)
  • Re: Linux 2.5.59 Fri, 17 Jan 2003 10:36:54 -0600 (CST)
  • Re: 2.5.59 vmlinux.lds.S change broke modules Fri, 17 Jan 2003 10:24:42 -0600 (CST)
  • Re: unresolved symbols building 2.5.59 Fri, 17 Jan 2003 10:15:34 -0600 (CST)
  • Re: unresolved symbols building 2.5.59 Fri, 17 Jan 2003 10:04:38 -0600 (CST)
  • Re: 2.5.59 vmlinux.lds.S change broke modules Fri, 17 Jan 2003 08:44:22 -0600 (CST)
  • Re: Linux 2.5.59 Thu, 16 Jan 2003 22:24:04 -0600 (CST)
  • RE: Linux 2.5.59 Thu, 16 Jan 2003 22:12:23 -0600 (CST)
  • Re: [RFC] Consolidate vmlinux.lds.S files Wed, 15 Jan 2003 16:42:00 -0600 (CST)
  • Re: [RFC] add module reference to struct tty_driver Wed, 15 Jan 2003 09:26:23 -0600 (CST)
  • Re: [RFC] Consolidate vmlinux.lds.S files Mon, 13 Jan 2003 17:05:37 -0600 (CST)
  • Re: [RFC] Consolidate vmlinux.lds.S files Mon, 13 Jan 2003 14:30:33 -0600 (CST)
  • Re: [RFC] Consolidate vmlinux.lds.S files Mon, 13 Jan 2003 13:13:28 -0600 (CST)
  • Re: [PATCH] Check compiler version, SMP and PREEMPT. Mon, 13 Jan 2003 09:48:12 -0600 (CST)
  • Re: [PATCH] Check compiler version, SMP and PREEMPT. Mon, 13 Jan 2003 09:37:54 -0600 (CST)
• Kai Henningsen
  • Re: any chance of 2.6.0-test*? 18 Jan 2003 12:21:00 +0200
  • Re: any chance of 2.6.0-test*? 18 Jan 2003 12:12:00 +0200
  • Re: any chance of 2.6.0-test*? 14 Jan 2003 21:53:00 +0200
  • Re: any chance of 2.6.0-test*? 14 Jan 2003 22:18:00 +0200
  • Re: any chance of 2.6.0-test*? 14 Jan 2003 22:01:00 +0200
  • Re: why the new config process is a *big* step backwards 14 Jan 2003 22:46:00 +0200
  • Re: [PATCH] Make `obsolete params' work correctly if MODULE_SYMBOL_PRE 13 Jan 2003 20:56:00 +0200
• Kamble, Nitin A
  • [PATCH][2.5] IRQ distribution patch for 2.5.58 Thu, 16 Jan 2003 13:08:55 -0800
• Kees Bakker
  • Re: 2.5.55 - loading bttv gives Unknown symbol videobuf_iolock Mon, 13 Jan 2003 20:52:43 +0100
• Keith Owens
  • Announce: XFS split patches for 2.4.20 - respin Tue, 14 Jan 2003 12:34:35 +1100
  • Re: any chance of 2.6.0-test*? Tue, 14 Jan 2003 09:14:52 +1100
  • Re: [PATCH] Check compiler version, SMP and PREEMPT. Mon, 13 Jan 2003 16:33:45 +1100
  • Re: Kernel oops in 2.4.21-pre3-ac2 Mon, 13 Jan 2003 11:44:33 +1100
• Kent Borg
  • Re: any brand recomendation for a linux laptop ? Thu, 16 Jan 2003 11:32:09 -0500
• Kevin Puetz
  • Re: Is the BitKeeper network protocol documented? Sat, 18 Jan 2003 00:20:15 -0600
  • Re: any chance of 2.6.0-test*? Sun, 12 Jan 2003 14:46:07 -0600
• khromy
  • Re: Nervous with 2.4.21-pre3 and -pre3-ac* Mon, 13 Jan 2003 00:47:00 -0500
• kosh@aesaeion.com
  • usb-uhci host controller halted 2.5.56 Tue, 14 Jan 2003 04:10:19 -0700 (MST)
• Kostadin Karaivanov
  • [PROBLEM] 2.5.57 hangs on boot Tue, 14 Jan 2003 01:07:20 +0200
• Kristian Koehntopp
  • Re: "Mother" == "computer-illiterate" Sun, 12 Jan 2003 12:56:16 +0100
• Kronos
  • Re: [RFC] Migrating net/sched to new module interface Tue, 14 Jan 2003 18:49:11 +0100
• Kurt Garloff
  • Re: [PATCH] sl82c105 driver update Sun, 12 Jan 2003 02:54:56 +0100
• kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru
  • Re: [RFC] Migrating net/sched to new module interface Wed, 15 Jan 2003 04:19:28 +0300 (MSK)
  • Re: [RFC] Migrating net/sched to new module interface Tue, 14 Jan 2003 01:32:56 +0300 (MSK)
• Kyösti Mälkki
  • i2c and sensors for 2.4/2.5 Fri, 17 Jan 2003 19:12:43 +0200 (EET)
• Larry
  • 2.4.20 kernel modules will not load Fri, 17 Jan 2003 23:40:27 -0600
• Larry McVoy
  • Re: Is the BitKeeper network protocol documented? Fri, 17 Jan 2003 21:29:19 -0800
  • Re: [OFFTOPIC] RMS and reactions to him Fri, 17 Jan 2003 16:56:49 -0800
  • Re: Linux 2.5.59 Thu, 16 Jan 2003 20:25:41 -0800
  • Re: Linux 2.5.59 Thu, 16 Jan 2003 20:18:22 -0800
  • Re: Linux 2.5.59 Thu, 16 Jan 2003 20:17:39 -0800
  • disk space on bkbits.net Thu, 16 Jan 2003 11:29:07 -0800
  • Re: any brand recomendation for a linux laptop ? Thu, 16 Jan 2003 07:40:04 -0800
  • Re: any brand recomendation for a linux laptop ? Thu, 16 Jan 2003 06:40:45 -0800
  • Re: 2.5 BK broken? Wed, 15 Jan 2003 16:30:50 -0800
  • BK/s390? Wed, 15 Jan 2003 09:03:38 -0800
  • Re: [OFFTOPIC] RMS and reactions to him Tue, 14 Jan 2003 12:45:54 -0800
  • Re: [OFFTOPIC] RMS and reactions to him Tue, 14 Jan 2003 12:02:02 -0800
  • Re: Nvidia and its choice to read the GPL "differently" Tue, 14 Jan 2003 11:06:00 -0800
  • Re: Linux v2.5.57 Mon, 13 Jan 2003 12:20:34 -0800
• Larry Sendlosky
  • RE: VIA C3 and random SIGTRAP or segfault Wed, 15 Jan 2003 09:15:29 -0500
• Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
  • Re: Performance problems with NFS under 2.4.20 Mon, 13 Jan 2003 17:11:58 +0100
  • Performance problems with NFS under 2.4.20 Mon, 13 Jan 2003 16:35:42 +0100
• Lever, Charles
  • RE: [NFS] Re: broken umount -f Tue, 14 Jan 2003 07:56:12 -0800
• Linus Torvalds
  • Linux 2.5.59 Thu, 16 Jan 2003 18:28:03 -0800 (PST)
  • Re: [PATCH] (0/3) NUMA aware scheduler Thu, 16 Jan 2003 12:28:25 -0800 (PST)
  • Linux v2.5.58 Mon, 13 Jan 2003 22:14:29 -0800 (PST)
  • Re: [PATCH] PnP update - drivers Mon, 13 Jan 2003 14:58:40 -0800 (PST)
  • Re: [PATCH] PnP update - drivers Mon, 13 Jan 2003 14:48:45 -0800 (PST)
  • Re: Linux v2.5.57 Mon, 13 Jan 2003 19:40:30 +0000 (UTC)
  • Linux v2.5.57 Mon, 13 Jan 2003 10:44:25 -0800 (PST)
  • Re: any chance of 2.6.0-test*? Mon, 13 Jan 2003 10:01:27 -0800 (PST)
  • Re: any chance of 2.6.0-test*? Mon, 13 Jan 2003 08:35:46 -0800 (PST)
  • Re: [PATCH] Check compiler version, SMP and PREEMPT. Sun, 12 Jan 2003 21:29:23 -0800 (PST)
  • Re: PTRACE_GET_THREAD_AREA Sun, 12 Jan 2003 20:03:39 -0800 (PST)
  • Re: exception tables in 2.5.55 Sun, 12 Jan 2003 19:24:46 -0800 (PST)
  • Re: any chance of 2.6.0-test*? Sun, 12 Jan 2003 12:33:37 -0800 (PST)
  • Re: any chance of 2.6.0-test*? Sun, 12 Jan 2003 12:22:26 -0800 (PST)
  • Re: [PATCH] PnP update - drivers Sun, 12 Jan 2003 11:41:03 -0800 (PST)
  • Re: any chance of 2.6.0-test*? Sun, 12 Jan 2003 11:38:35 -0800 (PST)
  • Re: [PATCH] add explicit Pentium II support Sun, 12 Jan 2003 11:26:25 -0800 (PST)
  • Re: any chance of 2.6.0-test*? Sun, 12 Jan 2003 11:15:52 -0800 (PST)
  • Re: any chance of 2.6.0-test*? Sun, 12 Jan 2003 09:05:16 -0800 (PST)
• Linux Geek
  • [DUMB]: Is kernel oops always a kernel bug ??? Fri, 17 Jan 2003 11:33:46 +0530
  • Re: Tar'ing /proc ??? Thu, 16 Jan 2003 20:02:26 +0530
  • Re: Tar'ing /proc ??? Thu, 16 Jan 2003 19:50:02 +0530
  • Tar'ing /proc ??? Thu, 16 Jan 2003 19:32:53 +0530
• Louis Zhuang
  • [BUG FIX] e100 initialization issue on STL2 motherboard 14 Jan 2003 13:51:55 +0800
  • [TRIVIAL PATCH] fix and export kset_find_obj 14 Jan 2003 11:42:05 +0800
  • Re: concerns about sysfs_ops 14 Jan 2003 08:43:12 +0800
  • concerns about sysfs_ops 13 Jan 2003 19:17:16 +0800
• Ludovic Drolez
  • Re: BLKBSZSET still not working on 2.4.18 ? Mon, 13 Jan 2003 12:28:36 +0100
• Lukas Hejtmanek
  • Re: 2.5.54 - quota support Sun, 12 Jan 2003 22:20:34 +0100
• Lukas Ruf
  • 2.4.20: kernel preemption, lock-break and stats Tue, 14 Jan 2003 17:10:57 +0100
• Lukasz Trabinski
  • Re: 2.4.21-pre3 - problems with ext3 Tue, 14 Jan 2003 16:48:59 +0100 (CET)
  • 2.4.21-pre3 - problems with ext3 Tue, 14 Jan 2003 14:15:26 +0100 (CET)
• Luuk van der Duim
  • Re: [PATCH] add explicit Pentium II support 12 Jan 2003 22:20:18 +0100
• Maciej Soltysiak
  • Re: Tar'ing /proc ??? Thu, 16 Jan 2003 15:06:47 +0100 (CET)
  • 2.4.x ext3 status question. Thu, 16 Jan 2003 14:52:43 +0100 (CET)
  • Re: timing an application [results] Wed, 15 Jan 2003 13:21:19 +0100 (CET)
  • timing an application Tue, 14 Jan 2003 20:58:16 +0100 (CET)
  • Re: audio resamples itself Tue, 14 Jan 2003 19:58:43 +0100 (CET)
  • audio resamples itself Tue, 14 Jan 2003 17:11:37 +0100 (CET)
  • Re: Docs to a beginner Tue, 14 Jan 2003 16:56:31 +0100 (CET)
  • Re: rmap15b Tue, 14 Jan 2003 16:49:47 +0100 (CET)
• Maciej W. Rozycki
  • Re: Userspace Test Framework for module loader porting Mon, 13 Jan 2003 14:20:45 +0100 (MET)
• Mad Hatter
  • Re: bootsect.S: 2 questions Mon, 13 Jan 2003 17:15:33 -0800 (PST)
  • bootsect.S: 2 questions Mon, 13 Jan 2003 08:28:27 -0800 (PST)
• Madhavi
  • ioremap_nocache() behavior Thu, 16 Jan 2003 09:51:43 +0530 (IST)
  • writel hang problem Mon, 13 Jan 2003 11:11:04 +0530 (IST)
• Maier Gerfried
  • Re: Clock does not keep time Fri, 17 Jan 2003 08:45:15 +0100
  • Clock does not keep time Thu, 16 Jan 2003 12:35:41 +0100
• Mamoru Yamanishi
  • Re: PROBLEM: bad device file for cdrom while using devfs and Fri, 17 Jan 2003 19:26:35 +0900
  • PROBLEM: bad device file for cdrom while using devfs and ide-scsi Fri, 17 Jan 2003 13:04:55 +0900
• Manfred Spraul
  • Re: [INTEL PII BUG] Still SMBALERT# spontaneous shutdown on VAIO Sat, 18 Jan 2003 22:15:16 +0100
  • Re: any chance of 2.6.0-test*? Mon, 13 Jan 2003 21:37:39 +0100
• Marc Zyngier
  • Re: 2.5.59 fails compile 3c509.c 17 Jan 2003 15:29:12 +0100
  • Re: Linux 2.5.59 17 Jan 2003 11:23:28 +0100
• Marcelo Pacheco
  • Re: any chance of 2.6.0-test*? Wed, 15 Jan 2003 13:18:36 -0200
• Marcus Alanen
  • Re: Linux VM Documentation - Draft 1 Sun, 12 Jan 2003 17:11:25 +0200
• Marek Habersack
  • Re: XFS problems (hard lockup and oops on startup) with 2.5.5{6,7} Wed, 15 Jan 2003 22:59:40 +0100
  • XFS problems (hard lockup and oops on startup) with 2.5.5{6,7} Tue, 14 Jan 2003 18:55:28 +0100
• Mark F.
  • 2.5.59 - Compaq 900z - No Go.. Fri, 17 Jan 2003 11:49:10 -0500
• Mark H. Wood
  • Re: The GPL, the kernel, and everything else. Thu, 16 Jan 2003 11:28:42 -0500 (EST)
  • Re: ISO-9660 Rock Ridge gives different links different inums Wed, 15 Jan 2003 16:07:13 -0500 (EST)
• Mark Hounschell
  • Re: Nvidia and its choice to read the GPL "differently" Wed, 15 Jan 2003 15:25:04 -0500
• Mark Mielke
  • Re: Changing argv[0] under Linux. Tue, 14 Jan 2003 23:46:44 -0500
  • Re: Changing argv[0] under Linux. Tue, 14 Jan 2003 16:21:13 -0500
  • Re: [OFFTOPIC] RMS and reactions to him Tue, 14 Jan 2003 16:08:45 -0500
  • Re: Changing argv[0] under Linux. Tue, 14 Jan 2003 15:23:59 -0500
  • Re: Why is Nvidia given GPL'd code to use in closed source drivers? Tue, 14 Jan 2003 14:37:58 -0500
  • Re: Nvidia and its choice to read the GPL "differently" Mon, 13 Jan 2003 12:51:07 -0500
  • Re: Nvidia and its choice to read the GPL "differently" Sun, 12 Jan 2003 07:27:26 -0500
  • Re: inefficient RT vs efficient non-RT Sun, 12 Jan 2003 03:28:22 -0500
  • inefficient RT vs efficient non-RT Sun, 12 Jan 2003 02:58:44 -0500
  • Re: Nvidia and its choice to read the GPL "differently" Sun, 12 Jan 2003 01:16:54 -0500
• Martijn Uffing
  • [BUG/WARNING?] 2.5.57 ALSA sound/core/pcm_lib.c Wed, 15 Jan 2003 01:27:37 +0100 (CET)
• Martin J. Bligh
  • Re: [patch] sched-2.5.59-A2 Sat, 18 Jan 2003 00:12:31 -0800
  • Re: MAX_IO_APICS #ifdef'd wrongly Fri, 17 Jan 2003 16:52:28 -0800
  • Re: [Lse-tech] Re: [patch] sched-2.5.59-A2 Fri, 17 Jan 2003 11:26:43 -0800
  • Re: [patch] sched-2.5.59-A2 Fri, 17 Jan 2003 11:04:14 -0800
  • Re: [patch] sched-2.5.59-A2 Fri, 17 Jan 2003 09:23:32 -0800
  • Re: [patch] sched-2.5.59-A2 Fri, 17 Jan 2003 09:21:49 -0800
  • Re: Linux 2.5.59 Fri, 17 Jan 2003 09:10:48 -0800
  • Re: [patch] sched-2.5.59-A2 Fri, 17 Jan 2003 08:58:43 -0800
  • Re: MAX_IO_APICS #ifdef'd wrongly Fri, 17 Jan 2003 07:53:41 -0800
  • 2.5.58-mjb2 (scalability / NUMA patchset) Thu, 16 Jan 2003 23:11:54 -0800
  • Re: asm-i386/mmzone.h macro paren/eval fixes Thu, 16 Jan 2003 22:50:47 -0800
  • Re: [PATCH 2.5.58] new NUMA scheduler: fix Thu, 16 Jan 2003 15:31:55 -0800
  • Re: [PATCH] (0/3) NUMA aware scheduler Thu, 16 Jan 2003 14:36:02 -0800
  • Re: [PATCH 2.5.58] new NUMA scheduler: fix Thu, 16 Jan 2003 11:43:10 -0800
  • Re: [PATCH] (0/3) NUMA aware scheduler Thu, 16 Jan 2003 11:32:17 -0800
  • Re: [PATCH 2.5.58] new NUMA scheduler: fix Thu, 16 Jan 2003 10:59:03 -0800
  • Re: [PATCH 2.5.58] new NUMA scheduler: fix Thu, 16 Jan 2003 10:48:05 -0800
  • [PATCH] (3/3) NUMA rebalancer Thu, 16 Jan 2003 10:32:07 -0800
  • [PATCH] (2/3) Initial load balancing Thu, 16 Jan 2003 10:29:04 -0800
  • [PATCH] (1/3) Minimal NUMA scheduler Thu, 16 Jan 2003 10:28:22 -0800
  • [PATCH] (0/3) NUMA aware scheduler Thu, 16 Jan 2003 10:27:23 -0800
  • Re: [PATCH] make vm_enough_memory more efficient Thu, 16 Jan 2003 07:22:33 -0800
  • [PATCH] make vm_enough_memory more efficient Wed, 15 Jan 2003 23:47:04 -0800
  • Re: lots of calls to __write/read_lock_failed Wed, 15 Jan 2003 23:13:07 -0800
  • Re: [PATCH 2.5.58] new NUMA scheduler: fix Wed, 15 Jan 2003 22:05:31 -0800
  • Re: 48GB NUMA-Q boots, with major IO-APIC hassles Wed, 15 Jan 2003 14:01:38 -0800
  • [PATCH] (5/5) Enable Summit in makefile, update summit subarch code Wed, 15 Jan 2003 11:23:37 -0800
  • [PATCH] (4/5) Fix APIC header defines for Summit Wed, 15 Jan 2003 11:21:50 -0800
  • [PATCH] (3/5) Make IRQ balancing work with clustered APICs Wed, 15 Jan 2003 11:20:14 -0800
  • [PATCH] (2/5) Add ACPI hook, rename raw_phys_apicid to bios_cpu_apicid Wed, 15 Jan 2003 11:18:44 -0800
  • [PATCH] (1/5) Fix interrupt dest mode / delivery mode confusion Wed, 15 Jan 2003 11:16:28 -0800
  • [PATCH] 0/5 Fix Summit support Wed, 15 Jan 2003 11:14:57 -0800
  • RE: [PATCH] (0/7) Finish moving NUMA-Q into subarch, cleanup Wed, 15 Jan 2003 10:37:30 -0800
  • Re: 48GB NUMA-Q boots, with major IO-APIC hassles Wed, 15 Jan 2003 07:24:40 -0800
  • Re: [PATCH 2.5.58] new NUMA scheduler: fix Tue, 14 Jan 2003 23:47:45 -0800
  • Re: [BUG] SLAB.C:1617-error on boot Tue, 14 Jan 2003 23:38:55 -0800
  • Re: anyone have a 16-bit x86 early_printk? Tue, 14 Jan 2003 08:07:53 -0800
  • 2.5.58-mjb1 (scalability / NUMA patchset) Tue, 14 Jan 2003 00:05:06 -0800
  • Re: [Lse-tech] Re: NUMA scheduler 2nd approach Mon, 13 Jan 2003 20:56:22 -0800
  • RE: APIC version Mon, 13 Jan 2003 20:43:57 -0800
  • RE: APIC version Mon, 13 Jan 2003 15:54:18 -0800
  • RE: APIC version Mon, 13 Jan 2003 15:22:58 -0800
  • RE: APIC version Mon, 13 Jan 2003 11:26:10 -0800
  • RE: [PATCH] (0/7) Finish moving NUMA-Q into subarch, cleanup Mon, 13 Jan 2003 10:30:11 -0800
• Martin Schwidefsky
  • Re: [PATCH][COMPAT] compat_sys_[f]statfs - s390x part Mon, 13 Jan 2003 10:11:20 +0100
• Martin Waitz
  • [PATCH] work around deadlock in add_intf Thu, 16 Jan 2003 22:52:18 +0100
• Matt Young
  • (no subject) Mon, 13 Jan 2003 17:47:49 -0800
• Matthew Dobson
  • Re: [patch] sched-2.5.59-A2 Fri, 17 Jan 2003 15:09:58 -0800
• Matthew Hawkins
  • [PATCH] 2.5.58 sound/isa/sb/sb16.c isapnp compile Wed, 15 Jan 2003 15:34:17 +1100
• Matthew J. Fanto
  • i810_audio problems 17 Jan 2003 21:20:40 -0500
  • Re: any brand recomendation for a linux laptop ? 16 Jan 2003 11:05:48 -0500
• Matthias Andree
  • BK PATCH: BK-kernel-tools/shortlog (to complement recent lk-changelog.pl update). Sat, 18 Jan 2003 13:49:21 +0100
  • lk-changelog.pl 0.66 Sat, 18 Jan 2003 13:44:52 +0100 (CET)
  • Re: Why is Nvidia given GPL'd code to use in non-freedrivers? Mon, 13 Jan 2003 00:44:55 +0100
  • Re: Honest does not pay here ... Mon, 13 Jan 2003 00:36:30 +0100
• Matti Aarnio
  • Re: problem using integer division in kernel modules Wed, 15 Jan 2003 21:11:22 +0200
  • Re: mbox archive of linux-kernel ? Tue, 14 Jan 2003 14:36:49 +0200
  • Re: any chance of 2.6.0-test*? Mon, 13 Jan 2003 11:45:15 +0200
  • Re: any chance of 2.6.0-test*? Mon, 13 Jan 2003 00:28:23 +0200
  • Re: any chance of 2.6.0-test*? Sun, 12 Jan 2003 23:15:30 +0200
• Mattia Dongili
  • Re: 2.5.59 doesn't boot - hangs after 'Uncompressing the kernel' Sat, 18 Jan 2003 12:20:36 +0100
• Mauricio Martinez
  • [OOPS] 2.4.20 with old SONY CDROM Wed, 15 Jan 2003 14:57:02 -0500 (EST)
• Max Krasnyansky
  • [BK] Bluetooth updates for 2.4.21-pre4 Tue, 14 Jan 2003 14:15:56 -0800
  • Re: [RFC] Migrating net/sched to new module interface Mon, 13 Jan 2003 15:23:59 -0800
  • Re: [RFC] add module reference to struct tty_driver Mon, 13 Jan 2003 11:51:28 -0800
• Max Valdez
  • Re: Why kernel 2.5.58 only mounts / (not home etc) 18 Jan 2003 17:53:12 -0600
  • Why kernel 2.5.58 only mounts / (not home etc) 18 Jan 2003 17:21:19 -0600
  • No module aic7xxx found kernel 2.5.58 14 Jan 2003 13:45:04 -0600
  • [Fwd: Re: Linux 2.4.21-pre3-ac4] 13 Jan 2003 14:44:38 -0600
• maxav@msn.com
  • Lose 32 pounds by February Sun, 12 Jan 2003 16:49:16 -0500
• mdew
  • Re: drivers/char/Kconfig:640: can't open file 14 Jan 2003 17:16:50 +1300
  • drivers/char/Kconfig:640: can't open file 14 Jan 2003 16:56:20 +1300
• Mel Gorman
  • Linux VM Documentation - Draft 2 Mon, 13 Jan 2003 05:18:09 +0000 (GMT)
  • Re: Linux VM Documentation - Draft 1 Sun, 12 Jan 2003 18:14:45 +0000 (GMT)
  • Re: Linux VM Documentation - Draft 1 Sun, 12 Jan 2003 18:06:20 +0000 (GMT)
  • Re: Linux VM Documentation - Draft 1 Sun, 12 Jan 2003 15:36:55 +0000 (GMT)
  • Linux VM Documentation - Draft 1 Sun, 12 Jan 2003 02:11:37 +0000 (GMT)
  • (no subject) Sun, 12 Jan 2003 02:09:28 +0000 (GMT)
• Michael D. Shannon
  • Re: Linux 2.5.59 Thu, 16 Jan 2003 21:00:43 -0800
  • Re: OT Naming. was: Re: Why is Nvidia given GPL'd code to use in closedsource drivers? Sun, 12 Jan 2003 10:27:03 -0800
• Michael Dreher
  • Re: hda has changed heads [solved] Thu, 16 Jan 2003 22:49:13 +0100
  • [ACPI] 2.5.58 hangs at boot Thu, 16 Jan 2003 22:15:35 +0100
  • Re: hda has changed heads Thu, 16 Jan 2003 22:08:43 +0100
  • Re: hda has changed heads Thu, 16 Jan 2003 21:51:34 +0100
  • Re: hda has changed heads Sun, 12 Jan 2003 16:10:13 +0100
• Michael Hohnbaum
  • Re: [Lse-tech] Re: [patch] sched-2.5.59-A2 17 Jan 2003 16:13:26 -0800
  • Re: [PATCH 2.5.58] new NUMA scheduler: fix 16 Jan 2003 15:45:40 -0800
  • Re: [PATCH 2.5.58] new NUMA scheduler: fix 15 Jan 2003 16:14:00 -0800
  • Re: [PATCH 2.5.58] new NUMA scheduler: fix 14 Jan 2003 16:05:32 -0800
  • Re: [Lse-tech] Re: [PATCH 2.5.58] new NUMA scheduler: fix 14 Jan 2003 13:56:33 -0800
  • Re: [PATCH 2.5.58] new NUMA scheduler: fix 14 Jan 2003 11:02:34 -0800
  • Re: [Lse-tech] Re: NUMA scheduler 2nd approach 13 Jan 2003 21:50:46 -0800
  • Re: NUMA scheduler 2nd approach 13 Jan 2003 17:23:56 -0800
  • Re: NUMA scheduler 2nd approach 13 Jan 2003 11:03:50 -0800
• Michael Kingsbury
  • Re: any chance of 2.6.0-test*? Sun, 12 Jan 2003 20:08:42 -0500 (EST)
• Michael Madore
  • Adaptec 79xx > 1GB I/O errors Tue, 14 Jan 2003 16:06:07 -0800
• Mihnea Balta
  • Re: Kernel hooks just to get rid of copy_[to/from]_user() and syscall overhead? Tue, 14 Jan 2003 13:47:16 +0200
  • Re: Kernel hooks just to get rid of copy_[to/from]_user() and syscall overhead? Mon, 13 Jan 2003 10:37:52 +0200
• Mikael Pettersson
  • Re: perfctr-2.4.4 released Sat, 18 Jan 2003 15:46:21 +0100 (MET)
  • Re: 2.5.59 vmlinux.lds.S change broke modules Sat, 18 Jan 2003 15:36:40 +0100 (MET)
  • perfctr-2.4.4 released Sat, 18 Jan 2003 15:31:19 +0100 (MET)
  • Re: 2.5.59 vmlinux.lds.S change broke modules Fri, 17 Jan 2003 14:49:02 +0100
  • 2.5.59 vmlinux.lds.S change broke modules Fri, 17 Jan 2003 13:55:21 +0100
  • 2.5.59 broke CONFIG_PACKET=m ? Fri, 17 Jan 2003 11:42:01 +0100
  • CONFIG_APM_DISPLAY_BLANK problem in the 2.5 kernel Thu, 16 Jan 2003 11:34:08 +0100
  • Re: PATCH: [2.4.21-pre3] Fix for Promise PIO Lockup Wed, 15 Jan 2003 15:21:13 +0100
  • Dell Latitude CPi keyboard problems since 2.5.42 Wed, 15 Jan 2003 11:22:05 +0100
  • Re: [BUG] cardbus/hotplugging still broken in 2.5.56 Wed, 15 Jan 2003 10:13:40 +0100
  • Re: new CPUID bit Wed, 15 Jan 2003 09:34:28 +0100
  • Re: [PATCH] emu10k1 forward port (2.4.20 to 2.5.56) Wed, 15 Jan 2003 09:07:57 +0100
  • Re: [BUG] cardbus/hotplugging still broken in 2.5.56 Tue, 14 Jan 2003 13:34:43 +0100
  • Re: 2.5.55/.56 instant reboot problem on 486 Sun, 12 Jan 2003 17:05:59 +0100 (MET)
  • 2.5.55/.56 instant reboot problem on 486 Sun, 12 Jan 2003 03:31:20 +0100 (MET)
• Mikael Starvik
  • RE: [RFC] Consolidate vmlinux.lds.S files Tue, 14 Jan 2003 07:27:55 +0100
• Mike Dresser
  • Re: [PATCH] add explicit Pentium II support Mon, 13 Jan 2003 16:38:55 -0500 (EST)
• Mike Galbraith
  • Re: 2.5.59 vmlinux.lds.S change broke modules Sat, 18 Jan 2003 10:34:41 +0100
  • Re: 2.5.59 vmlinux.lds.S change broke modules Sat, 18 Jan 2003 10:07:55 +0100
  • Re: 2.5.59 vmlinux.lds.S change broke modules Sat, 18 Jan 2003 09:00:51 +0100
  • Re: 2.5.59 vmlinux.lds.S change broke modules Fri, 17 Jan 2003 15:32:55 +0100
• Miklos Szeredi
  • Re: VIA C3 and random SIGTRAP or segfault Wed, 15 Jan 2003 17:26:16 +0100 (MET)
  • Re: VIA C3 and random SIGTRAP or segfault Wed, 15 Jan 2003 16:56:51 +0100 (MET)
  • Re: VIA C3 and random SIGTRAP or segfault Wed, 15 Jan 2003 13:38:58 +0100 (MET)
  • VIA C3 and random SIGTRAP or segfault Wed, 15 Jan 2003 10:29:01 +0100 (MET)
• Milan Roubal
  • Re: IDE feature request & problem Wed, 15 Jan 2003 16:53:04 +0100
• Miles Bader
  • [PATCH] Use `--unique=.gnu.linkonce.this_module' linker flag for modules on v850 Tue, 14 Jan 2003 13:37:57 +0900 (JST)
  • [PATCH] Update v850 nb85e_uart serial driver to set baud min/max Tue, 14 Jan 2003 13:37:57 +0900 (JST)
  • Re: Are linux network drivers really affected by this? 14 Jan 2003 10:19:01 +0900
  • Re: exception tables in 2.5.55 Mon, 13 Jan 2003 00:21:18 -0500
• Mingye Zhang
  • Re: Kernel panic: not continuing do_aic7xxx_isr Fri, 17 Jan 2003 16:35:58 -0800
  • Kernel panic: not continuing do_aic7xxx_isr Fri, 17 Jan 2003 15:06:39 -0800
• Miquel van Smoorenburg
  • Re: argv0 revisited... Wed, 15 Jan 2003 19:46:38 +0000 (UTC)
  • Re: Changing argv[0] under Linux. Tue, 14 Jan 2003 21:55:02 +0000 (UTC)
• Mr. James W. Laferriere
  • Re: choice of raid5 checksumming algorithm wrong ? Sun, 12 Jan 2003 09:44:44 -0500 (EST)
• MSN Hotmail
  • Bonnie Doons Lakeside Leisure Resort Mon, 13 Jan 2003 19:23:32 -0800 (PST)
• Muli Ben-Yehuda
  • Re: 2.5.55: Two global symbols driver_lock Sun, 12 Jan 2003 15:20:39 +0200
• Murray J. Root
  • 2.5.59 - usb-storage and sd-mod won't load Fri, 17 Jan 2003 19:22:14 -0500
  • 2.5.58 - USB-storage Tue, 14 Jan 2003 15:15:33 -0500
• Nakajima, Jun
  • RE: APIC version Mon, 13 Jan 2003 18:26:12 -0800
  • RE: APIC version Mon, 13 Jan 2003 15:35:10 -0800
  • RE: APIC version Mon, 13 Jan 2003 12:12:52 -0800
  • RE: APIC version Mon, 13 Jan 2003 10:59:35 -0800
• Neale Banks
  • Re: [PATCH] Timer bug fix ported to 2.4.20 Fri, 17 Jan 2003 10:00:42 +1100 (EST)
  • [TRIVIAL 2.2] CONFIG_NET_RADIO and Wireless Extensions Tue, 14 Jan 2003 17:34:49 +1100 (EST)
• Nick Piggin
  • Re: [BENCHMARK] 2.5.58-mm1 with contest Fri, 17 Jan 2003 00:28:04 +1100
• Nico Schottelius
  • Re: [BUG] 2.4.21pre2 trident / ali5451 Thu, 16 Jan 2003 09:37:16 +0100
  • Re: [BUG] 2.4.21pre2 trident / ali5451 Wed, 15 Jan 2003 14:32:17 +0100
  • Re: [2.5.56] (partial known) bugs/compile errors Tue, 14 Jan 2003 09:33:57 +0100
  • Re: [2.5.56] (partial known) bugs/compile errors Mon, 13 Jan 2003 21:23:26 +0100
  • Re: [2.5.56] (partial known) bugs/compile errors Mon, 13 Jan 2003 20:47:50 +0100
  • Re: [2.5.56] (partial known) bugs/compile errors Mon, 13 Jan 2003 20:34:01 +0100
  • [2.5.56] (partial known) bugs/compile errors Mon, 13 Jan 2003 10:02:00 +0100
• Nicolas Pitre
  • Re: [OFFTOPIC] RMS and reactions to him Fri, 17 Jan 2003 22:01:34 -0500 (EST)
  • Re: [OFFTOPIC] RMS and reactions to him Wed, 15 Jan 2003 21:51:48 -0500 (EST)
  • Re: any chance of 2.6.0-test*? Sun, 12 Jan 2003 18:16:15 -0500 (EST)
• Nicolas Turro
  • any brand recomendation for a linux laptop ? Thu, 16 Jan 2003 11:00:45 +0100
  • Re: Bug report : i810_audio, compaq evo 410c, 2.4.20 Tue, 14 Jan 2003 10:02:56 +0100
  • Bug report : i810_audio, compaq evo 410c, 2.4.20 Mon, 13 Jan 2003 18:57:56 +0100
• Nikita Danilov
  • Re: [2.4] VFS locking problem during concurrent link/unlink Thu, 16 Jan 2003 19:06:36 +0300
• Nuno Monteiro
  • [BUG/PATCH] OSS/sb_mixer.c is broken on 2.5.59 Fri, 17 Jan 2003 16:17:52 +0000
• Ognen Duzlevski
  • linux on compaq gs80 Mon, 13 Jan 2003 16:06:28 -0600
• Olaf Dietsche
  • Re: timing an application Tue, 14 Jan 2003 23:09:16 +0100
  • Re: [PATCH] [TRIVIAL] kstrdup Tue, 14 Jan 2003 12:48:11 +0100
• Olaf Titz
  • Re: ANN: LKMB (Linux Kernel Module Builder) version 0.1.16 Sat, 18 Jan 2003 23:37:19 +0100
• Oleg Drokin
  • Re: [2.4] VFS locking problem during concurrent link/unlink Thu, 16 Jan 2003 20:20:48 +0300
  • Re: [2.4] VFS locking problem during concurrent link/unlink Thu, 16 Jan 2003 20:03:41 +0300
  • Re: [2.4] VFS locking problem during concurrent link/unlink Thu, 16 Jan 2003 19:07:22 +0300
  • Re: [2.4] VFS locking problem during concurrent link/unlink Thu, 16 Jan 2003 18:43:52 +0300
  • [2.4] VFS locking problem during concurrent link/unlink Thu, 16 Jan 2003 14:00:15 +0300
• Oliver Graf
  • usb-storage problem with >2.4.19 Mon, 13 Jan 2003 09:25:53 +0100
• Oliver Neukum
  • Re: any chance of 2.6.0-test*? Mon, 13 Jan 2003 14:49:14 +0100
  • Re: any chance of 2.6.0-test*? Mon, 13 Jan 2003 00:31:24 +0100
  • Re: any chance of 2.6.0-test*? Mon, 13 Jan 2003 00:23:12 +0100
  • Re: any chance of 2.6.0-test*? Mon, 13 Jan 2003 00:16:20 +0100
  • Re: any chance of 2.6.0-test*? Mon, 13 Jan 2003 00:06:14 +0100
  • Re: Moderated forum for linux-kernel Sun, 12 Jan 2003 23:47:53 +0100
  • Re: any chance of 2.6.0-test*? Sun, 12 Jan 2003 23:43:41 +0100
  • Re: any chance of 2.6.0-test*? Sun, 12 Jan 2003 23:38:20 +0100
  • Re: any chance of 2.6.0-test*? Sun, 12 Jan 2003 23:12:41 +0100
  • Re: any chance of 2.6.0-test*? Sun, 12 Jan 2003 23:06:14 +0100
  • Re: any chance of 2.6.0-test*? Sun, 12 Jan 2003 21:31:10 +0100
• Olivier Galibert
  • Re: [OFFTOPIC] RMS and reactions to him Tue, 14 Jan 2003 15:19:38 -0500
  • Re: Moderated forum for linux-kernel Sun, 12 Jan 2003 17:49:37 -0500
  • Re: any chance of 2.6.0-test*? Sun, 12 Jan 2003 17:29:51 -0500
• Ookhoi
  • Re: 2.4.19, don't "hdparm -I /dev/hde" if hde is on a Asus A7V133 Promise ctrlr, or... Thu, 16 Jan 2003 19:54:44 +0100
  • 2.5.58-bk Oops, EIP is at sysfs_remove_dir, Process swapper Wed, 15 Jan 2003 16:49:30 +0100
• Orion Poplawski
  • Re: kswapd in D uninterruptible sleep on 2.4.21-pre3-ac2 Fri, 17 Jan 2003 11:35:51 -0700
  • kswapd in D uninterruptible sleep on 2.4.21-pre3-ac2 Fri, 17 Jan 2003 09:42:13 -0700
• otter@kjoe.net
  • i830 DRM version Thu, 16 Jan 2003 18:24:48 +0100
• P. Christeas
  • Re: [ACPI] acpi_wakeup fixes: Patch? Tue, 14 Jan 2003 19:56:23 +0200
• Padraig@Linux.ie
  • Re: VIA C3 and random SIGTRAP or segfault Wed, 15 Jan 2003 16:13:58 +0000
  • Re: VIA C3 and random SIGTRAP or segfault Wed, 15 Jan 2003 14:47:36 +0000
• Pallipadi, Venkatesh
  • RE: [PATCH] (2/3) Initial load balancing Fri, 17 Jan 2003 10:49:06 -0800
  • RE: [PATCH] (2/3) Initial load balancing Fri, 17 Jan 2003 09:39:42 -0800
  • RE: [PATCH] (0/7) Finish moving NUMA-Q into subarch, cleanup Wed, 15 Jan 2003 10:29:27 -0800
  • [PATCH][2.5.57] Clustered APIC setup for >8 CPU systems [RESEND] Mon, 13 Jan 2003 20:04:00 -0800
  • [PATCH][2.5] APIC version Mon, 13 Jan 2003 13:15:28 -0800
• Panu Matilainen
  • Re: any brand recomendation for a linux laptop ? Fri, 17 Jan 2003 21:32:01 +0200 (EET)
• Parag Warudkar
  • 2.5.58 doesn't boot on VAIO 705 Thu, 16 Jan 2003 21:07:30 -0000
• Patricia Gaughen
  • [PATCH] acpi compilation fix for 2.5.57 Mon, 13 Jan 2003 18:55:46 -0800
• Patrick Mansfield
  • Re: sysfs Mon, 13 Jan 2003 17:30:51 -0800
  • Re: sysfs Mon, 13 Jan 2003 16:27:41 -0800
  • Re: [PATCH 2.5.56] Scsi not compiling without /proc support Mon, 13 Jan 2003 12:16:57 -0800
• Patrick McHardy
  • [PATCH]: PPP_FILTER outbound only drops with debugging enables Fri, 17 Jan 2003 13:31:27 +0100
• Patrick Mochel
  • Re: Patch: linux-2.5.58/drivers/base/bus.c ignored pre-existing Wed, 15 Jan 2003 10:23:29 -0600 (CST)
  • Re: 2.5.58 Oops when booting from initrd - kobject_del Tue, 14 Jan 2003 15:53:26 -0600 (CST)
  • Re: [PATCH] don't create regular files in devfs (fwd) Tue, 14 Jan 2003 09:59:31 -0600 (CST)
  • Re: [TRIVIAL PATCH] fix and export kset_find_obj Tue, 14 Jan 2003 09:39:08 -0600 (CST)
  • Re: 2.5.56 lib/kobject.c "badness" (ppp bug?) Tue, 14 Jan 2003 09:19:10 -0600 (CST)
  • [patch] fix cpufreq compilation Mon, 13 Jan 2003 16:06:38 -0600 (CST)
  • Re: [PATCH 2.5.57] cpufreq: add sysfs interface Mon, 13 Jan 2003 14:27:45 -0600 (CST)
  • Re: concerns about sysfs_ops Mon, 13 Jan 2003 09:08:31 -0600 (CST)
• Patrik Staehli
  • Re: usb-ohci mouse lockups on National Geode system Tue, 14 Jan 2003 08:12:23 +0100
  • usb-ohci mouse lockups on National Geode system Mon, 13 Jan 2003 17:29:44 +0100
• Paul
  • [2.5.52+] 3c509 / net gone deaf? Wed, 15 Jan 2003 19:10:46 -0500
• Paul Clements
  • Re: raid 5 algorithm docs Thu, 16 Jan 2003 14:47:16 -0500 (EST)
• Paul Evans
  • [PATCH] Kernel 2.4.20 FAT fdmode Sat, 18 Jan 2003 02:56:28 +0000
• Paul Jakma
  • Re: 2.4.19, don't "hdparm -I /dev/hde" if hde is on a Asus A7V133 Fri, 17 Jan 2003 16:47:37 +0000 (GMT)
  • Re: [PATCH] Secure user authentication for NFS using RPCSEC_GSS Mon, 13 Jan 2003 07:49:12 +0000 (GMT)
  • qla2300 driver stability, (was Re: 2.4.20, .text.lock.swap cpu Mon, 13 Jan 2003 05:46:59 +0000 (GMT)
  • Re: Honest does not pay here ... Sun, 12 Jan 2003 13:52:01 +0000 (GMT)
• Paul Mackerras
  • Re: [PATCH]: PPP_FILTER outbound only drops with debugging enables Sat, 18 Jan 2003 09:20:38 +1100
  • Re: IPMI Wed, 15 Jan 2003 14:36:16 +1100
  • Re: IPMI Tue, 14 Jan 2003 20:23:07 +1100
  • ide-cs problem (was Re: any chance of 2.6.0-test*?) Tue, 14 Jan 2003 13:32:43 +1100
  • Re: [patch] Make prof_counter use per-cpu areas patch 2/4 -- ppc arch Tue, 14 Jan 2003 13:21:41 +1100
  • Re: any chance of 2.6.0-test*? Mon, 13 Jan 2003 14:33:30 +1100
• Paul P Komkoff Jr
  • Re: cs89x0 in 2.5 (was Re: eepro100 - 802.1q - mtu size) Fri, 17 Jan 2003 23:14:45 +0300
  • Re: eepro100 - 802.1q - mtu size Fri, 17 Jan 2003 19:08:40 +0300
• Paul Rolland
  • Re: kernel .config support? Sun, 12 Jan 2003 15:20:05 +0100
  • Re: [PATCH 2.5.56] Sound core not compiling without /proc support Sun, 12 Jan 2003 15:15:52 +0100
  • Re: [BUG 2.5.56] IDE/CDROM Oops at boot time without /proc Sun, 12 Jan 2003 14:53:59 +0100
  • [BUG 2.5.56] IDE/CDROM Oops at boot time without /proc Sun, 12 Jan 2003 14:33:38 +0100
  • [PATCH 2.5.56] Sound core not compiling without /proc support Sun, 12 Jan 2003 13:00:40 +0100
  • [PATCH 2.5.56] Scsi not compiling without /proc support Sun, 12 Jan 2003 13:00:42 +0100
  • [PATCH 2.5.56] cpufreq not compiling without /proc Sun, 12 Jan 2003 12:38:37 +0100
  • [PATCH 2.5.56] net/ipv4/route.c doesn't compile without /proc support Sun, 12 Jan 2003 12:18:26 +0100
• paul@laufernet.com
  • Re: [PATCH] 2.5.58 sound/isa/sb/sb16.c isapnp compile Tue, 14 Jan 2003 20:22:26 -0800 (PST)
• Paulo Andre'
  • Re: radeonfb almost there.. but not quite! :) 18 Jan 2003 12:18:47 +0000
  • Re: radeonfb almost there.. but not quite! :) 17 Jan 2003 15:31:47 +0000
  • radeonfb almost there.. but not quite! :) Wed, 15 Jan 2003 18:16:33 +0000
• Pavel Machek
  • Re: Code obfuscation in acpi Sat, 18 Jan 2003 23:39:59 +0100
  • Code obfuscation in acpi Sat, 18 Jan 2003 22:31:34 +0100
  • Fix writing into /proc/acpi/thermal/*/trip_points Sat, 18 Jan 2003 22:53:42 +0100
  • Whoever converted acpi to seq-file Sat, 18 Jan 2003 22:52:33 +0100
  • Re: Fwd: Re: [PATCH] linux-2.5.54_delay-cleanup_A0 Sat, 18 Jan 2003 14:54:08 +0100
  • Re: [PATCH] linux-2.5.54_delay-cleanup_A0 Sun, 12 Jan 2003 15:27:40 +0100
• Perez-Gonzalez, Inaky
  • RE: argv0 revisited... Wed, 15 Jan 2003 10:51:40 -0800
  • RE: argv0 revisited... Wed, 15 Jan 2003 10:22:51 -0800
  • RE: IPMI Tue, 14 Jan 2003 21:08:29 -0800
  • RE: [PATCH] 2.5.56 sound/oss/sb_mixer.c bounds check Tue, 14 Jan 2003 21:05:49 -0800
• Pete Clements
  • Re: 2.5.59 fails compile 3c509.c Fri, 17 Jan 2003 12:56:58 -0500 (EST)
  • 2.5.59 fails compile 3c509.c Fri, 17 Jan 2003 08:49:15 -0500 (EST)
• Pete Zaitcev
  • Re: "PCI BIOS passed nonexistant PCI bus 0" Mon, 13 Jan 2003 22:58:09 -0500
  • Re: usb mouse and 2.5.56bk Mon, 13 Jan 2003 14:06:15 -0500
  • Re: usb-ohci mouse lockups on National Geode system Mon, 13 Jan 2003 14:11:19 -0500
  • Re: Problems with USB Mon, 13 Jan 2003 13:59:09 -0500
  • Re: [patch] Make prof_counter use per-cpu areas patch 4/4 -- sparc arch Mon, 13 Jan 2003 11:49:08 -0500
  • Re: your mail Mon, 13 Jan 2003 11:37:21 -0500
• Peter Chubb
  • Re: Changing argv[0] under Linux. Wed, 15 Jan 2003 09:55:39 +1100
  • Re: ISO-9660 Rock Ridge gives different links different inums Tue, 14 Jan 2003 10:10:03 +1100
• Peter Karlsson
  • 2.4.20 kernel crashes while scanning partition list Sat, 18 Jan 2003 14:02:40 +0100 (CET)
• Peter Ĺstrand
  • Re: broken umount -f Mon, 13 Jan 2003 10:44:33 +0100 (CET)
• peter@cogweb.net
  • Re: 2.4.19 -- ac97_codec failure ALi 5451 Sun, 12 Jan 2003 20:40:38 -0800
• Petr Vandrovec
  • Re: Patch?: linux-2.5.59/sound/soundcore.c referenced non-existant errno variable Sat, 18 Jan 2003 21:27:23 +0100
  • Re: Patch?: linux-2.5.59/sound/soundcore.c referenced non-existant errno variable Sat, 18 Jan 2003 04:13:19 +0100
  • Re: [PATCH] Proposed module init race fix. Wed, 15 Jan 2003 15:21:22 +0100
  • [PATCH] Re: patch for errno-issue (with soundcore) Mon, 13 Jan 2003 20:10:07 +0100
  • Re: patch for errno-issue (with soundcore) Mon, 13 Jan 2003 17:33:27 +0100
  • [PATCH] non-G450/G550 build of matroxfb in 2.4.21-pre3 (was Re: Linux 2.4.21-pre3) Sun, 12 Jan 2003 01:11:46 +0100
• Petr.Titera@whitesoft.cz
  • Re: Problems with USB Mon, 13 Jan 2003 09:13:44 +0100
  • Problems with USB Sun, 12 Jan 2003 21:44:42 +0100
• Philip K.F. Hölzenspies
  • (no subject) Sun, 12 Jan 2003 14:28:35 +0100
• Philippe Troin
  • Re: Changing argv[0] under Linux. 14 Jan 2003 12:25:54 -0800
• Protasevich, Natalie
  • RE: [PATCH] (0/7) Finish moving NUMA-Q into subarch, cleanup Wed, 15 Jan 2003 13:30:37 -0600
  • RE: [PATCH] (0/7) Finish moving NUMA-Q into subarch, cleanup Wed, 15 Jan 2003 12:41:19 -0600
  • Re: 48GB NUMA-Q boots, with major IO-APIC hassles Wed, 15 Jan 2003 11:32:26 -0600
  • RE: [BUG] SLAB.C:1617-error on boot Wed, 15 Jan 2003 10:25:07 -0600
  • [BUG] SLAB.C:1617-error on boot Tue, 14 Jan 2003 22:13:26 -0600
  • Re: anyone have a 16-bit x86 early_printk? Tue, 14 Jan 2003 09:17:40 -0600
  • RE: APIC version Mon, 13 Jan 2003 22:51:30 -0600
  • RE: [PATCH][2.5.57] Clustered APIC setup for >8 CPU systems [RESE Mon, 13 Jan 2003 22:18:59 -0600
  • RE: APIC version Mon, 13 Jan 2003 21:55:59 -0600
  • RE: Question about xAPIC lowest priority delivery Mon, 13 Jan 2003 21:43:36 -0600
  • RE: APIC version Mon, 13 Jan 2003 18:09:43 -0600
  • RE: APIC version Mon, 13 Jan 2003 17:49:16 -0600
  • RE: APIC version Mon, 13 Jan 2003 17:14:56 -0600
  • RE: APIC version Mon, 13 Jan 2003 14:21:54 -0600
  • RE: APIC version Mon, 13 Jan 2003 13:55:00 -0600
  • RE: APIC version Mon, 13 Jan 2003 13:39:43 -0600
  • APIC version Mon, 13 Jan 2003 12:44:06 -0600
  • RE: [PATCH] (0/7) Finish moving NUMA-Q into subarch, cleanup Mon, 13 Jan 2003 12:19:55 -0600
• r k
  • 48 bit lba questions Mon, 13 Jan 2003 15:37:01 -0800 (PST)
• Raja R Harinath
  • Re: Patch?: linux-2.5.59/sound/soundcore.c referenced non-existant Sat, 18 Jan 2003 09:40:36 -0600
  • Re: Patch?: linux-2.5.59/sound/soundcore.c referenced non-existant Fri, 17 Jan 2003 20:49:36 -0600
• Rakesh Sachdeva
  • Sata on Intel D845PEBT2 motherboard Tue, 14 Jan 2003 18:48:20 +0000
• Ralf Baechle
  • Re: [PATCH][COMPAT] compat_sys_sigpending and compat_sys_sigprocmask mips64 Thu, 16 Jan 2003 04:53:04 +0100
• Ralf Hildebrandt
  • Re: Which FB to use instead of vesafb? Wed, 15 Jan 2003 16:30:39 +0100
  • Which FB to use instead of vesafb? Tue, 14 Jan 2003 18:33:48 +0100
• Randy Dunlap
  • Re: Using lilo to boot off any drive ... Sun, 12 Jan 2003 17:17:45 -0800 (PST)
  • Re: any chance of 2.6.0-test*? Sun, 12 Jan 2003 17:06:43 -0800 (PST)
  • Re: any chance of 2.6.0-test*? Sun, 12 Jan 2003 16:54:13 -0800 (PST)
  • Re: any chance of 2.6.0-test*? Sun, 12 Jan 2003 16:48:04 -0800 (PST)
  • Re: any chance of 2.6.0-test*? Sun, 12 Jan 2003 16:38:52 -0800 (PST)
  • Re: restructuring of filesystems config menu Sun, 12 Jan 2003 16:01:30 -0800 (PST)
• Randy.Dunlap
  • RE: Linux 2.5.59 Thu, 16 Jan 2003 20:08:37 -0800 (PST)
  • Re: MB without keyboard controller / USB-only keyboard ? Thu, 16 Jan 2003 08:18:04 -0800 (PST)
  • [PATCH] update LOG BUF SIZE config. Wed, 15 Jan 2003 20:42:27 -0800
  • Re: [RFC] add module reference to struct tty_driver Wed, 15 Jan 2003 08:03:59 -0800 (PST)
  • Re: bootsect.S: 2 questions Mon, 13 Jan 2003 08:59:41 -0800 (PST)
  • Re: USB-Printer status flags question Mon, 13 Jan 2003 08:34:04 -0800 (PST)
  • Re: USB-Printer status flags question Sun, 12 Jan 2003 20:30:27 -0800 (PST)
• Ranjeet Shetye
  • Re: Why is Nvidia given GPL'd code to use in closed source drivers? 14 Jan 2003 12:23:32 +0100
• Ravikiran G Thirumalai
  • Re: [patch] Make prof_counter use per-cpu areas patch 3/4 -- x86_64 arch Thu, 16 Jan 2003 17:47:32 +0530
  • Re: [patch] Make prof_counter use per-cpu areas patch 1/4 -- x86 arch Thu, 16 Jan 2003 17:36:08 +0530
  • Re: [patch] Make prof_counter use per-cpu areas patch 4/4 -- sparc arch Mon, 13 Jan 2003 18:08:25 +0530
  • Re: [patch] Make prof_counter use per-cpu areas patch 3/4 -- x86_64 arch Mon, 13 Jan 2003 18:06:02 +0530
  • Re: [patch] Make prof_counter use per-cpu areas patch 2/4 -- ppc arch Mon, 13 Jan 2003 18:03:23 +0530
• Remco Post
  • Re: Open source hardware Fri, 17 Jan 2003 10:36:30 +0100
• Rene Rebe
  • Re: choice of raid5 checksumming algorithm wrong ? Sun, 12 Jan 2003 17:14:34 +0100 (CET)
• Ricardo Galli
  • [OFFTOPIC] Dave Jones: New Kernel 2.5, The Story So Far Fri, 17 Jan 2003 22:15:52 +0100
• Richard B. Johnson
  • Re: any brand recomendation for a linux laptop ? Thu, 16 Jan 2003 12:18:12 -0500 (EST)
  • Re: Tar'ing /proc ??? Thu, 16 Jan 2003 09:25:10 -0500 (EST)
  • Re: Tar'ing /proc ??? Thu, 16 Jan 2003 09:20:57 -0500 (EST)
  • Re: Tar'ing /proc ??? Thu, 16 Jan 2003 09:04:39 -0500 (EST)
  • Re: NCR 7452/3 POS - Retail CMOS NVRAM Driver Thu, 16 Jan 2003 08:06:06 -0500 (EST)
  • Re: Changing argv[0] under Linux. Wed, 15 Jan 2003 11:43:01 -0500 (EST)
  • Re: Changing argv[0] under Linux. Wed, 15 Jan 2003 09:00:36 -0500 (EST)
  • Re: Changing argv[0] under Linux. Tue, 14 Jan 2003 15:56:34 -0500 (EST)
  • Re: [OFFTOPIC] RMS and reactions to him Tue, 14 Jan 2003 15:36:18 -0500 (EST)
  • Re: Changing argv[0] under Linux. Tue, 14 Jan 2003 15:28:23 -0500 (EST)
  • Re: timing an application Tue, 14 Jan 2003 15:20:29 -0500 (EST)
  • Re: Changing argv[0] under Linux. Tue, 14 Jan 2003 14:56:35 -0500 (EST)
  • Re: Changing argv[0] under Linux. Tue, 14 Jan 2003 14:43:51 -0500 (EST)
  • Re: Changing argv[0] under Linux. Tue, 14 Jan 2003 14:10:23 -0500 (EST)
  • Re: Linux 2.4.21-pre3-ac4 Tue, 14 Jan 2003 09:04:37 -0500 (EST)
  • Re: Linux 2.4.21-pre3-ac4 Mon, 13 Jan 2003 20:20:10 -0500 (EST)
  • Re: Linux 2.4.21-pre3-ac4 Mon, 13 Jan 2003 16:40:37 -0500 (EST)
  • Re: [PATCH] Make `obsolete params' work correctly if MODULE_SYMBOL_PRE Mon, 13 Jan 2003 16:01:32 -0500 (EST)
  • Re: [PATCH] Make `obsolete params' work correctly if MODULE_SYMBOL_PRE Mon, 13 Jan 2003 15:28:45 -0500 (EST)
  • Re: Nvidia and its choice to read the GPL "differently" Mon, 13 Jan 2003 13:48:11 -0500 (EST)
  • Re: Nvidia and its choice to read the GPL "differently" Mon, 13 Jan 2003 12:22:27 -0500 (EST)
  • Re: bootsect.S: 2 questions Mon, 13 Jan 2003 11:50:20 -0500 (EST)
  • Re: any chance of 2.6.0-test*? Mon, 13 Jan 2003 10:23:39 -0500 (EST)
  • Re: Nvidia and its choice to read the GPL "differently" Mon, 13 Jan 2003 09:32:57 -0500 (EST)
  • Re: Nvidia and its choice to read the GPL "differently" Mon, 13 Jan 2003 08:51:06 -0500 (EST)
• Richard B. Tilley \
  • Re: Bugs and Releases Numbers 14 Jan 2003 11:37:11 -0500
  • Re: Bugs and Releases Numbers 13 Jan 2003 10:17:22 -0500
  • Bugs and Releases Numbers 13 Jan 2003 09:53:36 -0500
• Richard Bouska
  • USB: Sony clie does not word with recent 2.5 Wed, 15 Jan 2003 07:35:41 +0100
• Richard Henderson
  • Re: [module-init-tools] fix weak symbol handling Thu, 16 Jan 2003 18:09:13 -0800
  • [BK] alpha update Wed, 15 Jan 2003 11:40:43 -0800
  • Re: [module-init-tools] fix weak symbol handling Tue, 14 Jan 2003 17:14:57 -0800
  • Re: [MODULES] fix weak symbol handling Tue, 14 Jan 2003 17:12:50 -0800
  • Re: [MODULES] fix weak symbol handling Tue, 14 Jan 2003 17:10:31 -0800
  • Re: [MODULES] fix weak symbol handling Tue, 14 Jan 2003 17:07:41 -0800
  • [module-init-tools] fix weak symbol handling Mon, 13 Jan 2003 11:04:57 -0800
  • [MODULES] fix weak symbol handling Mon, 13 Jan 2003 11:00:36 -0800
• Richard Stallman
  • Re: [OFFTOPIC] RMS and reactions to him Sat, 18 Jan 2003 20:36:48 -0500
  • Re: [OFFTOPIC] RMS and reactions to him Fri, 17 Jan 2003 19:47:13 -0500
  • Re: [OFFTOPIC] RMS and reactions to him Fri, 17 Jan 2003 19:47:01 -0500
  • Re: [OFFTOPIC] RMS and reactions to him Wed, 15 Jan 2003 18:28:44 -0500
  • Re: [OFFTOPIC] RMS and reactions to him Wed, 15 Jan 2003 18:28:36 -0500
  • Re: Nvidia and its choice to read the GPL "differently" Tue, 14 Jan 2003 13:55:07 -0500
  • Re: Nvidia and its choice to read the GPL "differently" Tue, 14 Jan 2003 13:54:52 -0500
  • Re: Why is Nvidia given GPL'd code to use in closed source drivers? Tue, 14 Jan 2003 00:47:37 -0500
  • Re: Why is Nvidia given GPL'd code to use in closed source drivers? Tue, 14 Jan 2003 00:47:36 -0500
  • Re: OT Naming. was: Re: Why is Nvidia given GPL'd code to use in closed Sun, 12 Jan 2003 06:56:10 -0500
  • Re: Why is Nvidia given GPL'd code to use in proprietary drivers? Sun, 12 Jan 2003 06:55:54 -0500
  • Re: Nvidia and its choice to read the GPL "differently" Sun, 12 Jan 2003 06:55:14 -0500
  • Re: Why is Nvidia given GPL'd code to use in closed source drivers? Sun, 12 Jan 2003 06:54:59 -0500
• Rick Lindsley
  • Re: [Lse-tech] Re: [PATCH 2.5.58] new NUMA scheduler: fix Thu, 16 Jan 2003 12:29:48 -0800
• Rik van Riel
  • Re: [OFFTOPIC] RMS and reactions to him (YAWN) Thu, 16 Jan 2003 08:42:40 -0200 (BRST)
  • Re: Dynamic memory stack? Thu, 16 Jan 2003 08:28:11 -0200 (BRST)
  • [PATCH][RESEND] disassociate_ctty SMP fix Tue, 14 Jan 2003 08:33:22 -0200 (BRST)
  • Re: any chance of 2.6.0-test*? Tue, 14 Jan 2003 00:13:11 -0200 (BRST)
  • Re: any chance of 2.6.0-test*? Sun, 12 Jan 2003 21:48:55 -0200 (BRST)
  • Re: any chance of 2.6.0-test*? Sun, 12 Jan 2003 19:40:50 -0200 (BRST)
  • Re: any chance of 2.6.0-test*? Sun, 12 Jan 2003 19:29:37 -0200 (BRST)
• Ro0tSiEgE
  • Freeze Functionality Sat, 18 Jan 2003 22:01:54 -0600
• Rob Wilkens
  • [PATCH] Trivial Comment Change (Please Verify) (2.5.59) Fri, 17 Jan 2003 21:49:16 -0500
  • Re: [OffTopic] [apology] any chance of 2.6.0-test*? Mon, 13 Jan 2003 14:22:58 -0500
  • Re: How to avoid the woord 'goto' (was Re: any chance of 2.6.0-test*?) Mon, 13 Jan 2003 09:56:11 -0500
  • Re: gotos in kernel [Was: Re: any chance of 2.6.0-test*?] Mon, 13 Jan 2003 09:53:34 -0500
  • Re: any chance of 2.6.0-test*? Sun, 12 Jan 2003 22:40:07 -0500
  • Re: any chance of 2.6.0-test*? Sun, 12 Jan 2003 22:37:48 -0500
  • Re: any chance of 2.6.0-test*? Sun, 12 Jan 2003 22:09:13 -0500
  • Re: any chance of 2.6.0-test*? Sun, 12 Jan 2003 21:19:28 -0500
  • Re: any chance of 2.6.0-test*? Sun, 12 Jan 2003 20:21:50 -0500
  • Re: any chance of 2.6.0-test*? -> goto example Sun, 12 Jan 2003 19:53:57 -0500
  • RE: any chance of 2.6.0-test*? Sun, 12 Jan 2003 19:38:13 -0500
  • Re: any chance of 2.6.0-test*? Sun, 12 Jan 2003 19:08:57 -0500
  • Re: any chance of 2.6.0-test*? Sun, 12 Jan 2003 18:46:51 -0500
  • Re: any chance of 2.6.0-test*? Sun, 12 Jan 2003 18:16:02 -0500
  • Re: any chance of 2.6.0-test*? Sun, 12 Jan 2003 18:11:41 -0500
  • Re: any chance of 2.6.0-test*? Sun, 12 Jan 2003 17:51:57 -0500
  • Re: any chance of 2.6.0-test*? Sun, 12 Jan 2003 17:35:44 -0500
  • Re: any chance of 2.6.0-test*? Sun, 12 Jan 2003 17:34:58 -0500
  • Re: any chance of 2.6.0-test*? Sun, 12 Jan 2003 17:22:25 -0500
  • Re: any chance of 2.6.0-test*? Sun, 12 Jan 2003 17:21:00 -0500
  • Re: any chance of 2.6.0-test*? Sun, 12 Jan 2003 17:12:42 -0500
  • Re: any chance of 2.6.0-test*? Sun, 12 Jan 2003 17:07:19 -0500
  • Re: any chance of 2.6.0-test*? Sun, 12 Jan 2003 16:44:05 -0500
  • Re: any chance of 2.6.0-test*? Sun, 12 Jan 2003 16:27:30 -0500
  • Re: any chance of 2.6.0-test*? Sun, 12 Jan 2003 16:02:12 -0500
  • RE: any chance of 2.6.0-test*? Sun, 12 Jan 2003 15:58:07 -0500
  • Re: any chance of 2.6.0-test*? Sun, 12 Jan 2003 15:48:24 -0500
  • Re: any chance of 2.6.0-test*? Sun, 12 Jan 2003 15:07:31 -0500
  • Re: any chance of 2.6.0-test*? Sun, 12 Jan 2003 15:03:37 -0500
  • Re: any chance of 2.6.0-test*? Sun, 12 Jan 2003 14:59:57 -0500
  • Re: any chance of 2.6.0-test*? Sun, 12 Jan 2003 14:41:14 -0500
  • Re: any chance of 2.6.0-test*? Sun, 12 Jan 2003 14:37:00 -0500
  • Re: any chance of 2.6.0-test*? Sun, 12 Jan 2003 14:34:54 -0500
  • Re: Linux VM Documentation - Draft 1 Sun, 12 Jan 2003 12:54:53 -0500
  • Re: Intel And Kenrel Programming (was: Nvidia is a great company) Sun, 12 Jan 2003 11:58:55 -0500
  • Re: RT - who cares.. (Off Topic) Sun, 12 Jan 2003 10:39:22 -0500
  • Re: inefficient RT vs efficient non-RT Sun, 12 Jan 2003 10:05:04 -0500
  • Re: Nvidia and its choice to read the GPL "differently" Sun, 12 Jan 2003 09:40:48 -0500
  • Intel And Kenrel Programming (was: Nvidia is a great company) Sun, 12 Jan 2003 09:42:46 -0500
  • Re: The GPL, the kernel, and everything else. Sun, 12 Jan 2003 00:45:53 -0500
• Robert L. Harris
  • Oops on server that just started hanging and crashing Tue, 14 Jan 2003 13:50:33 -0500
  • um, bug in ?????? Tue, 14 Jan 2003 11:08:47 -0500
• Robert Love
  • Re: [PATCH 2.5.58] new NUMA scheduler: fix 16 Jan 2003 13:07:22 -0500
  • Re: any chance of 2.6.0-test*? 12 Jan 2003 18:00:21 -0500
  • Re: any chance of 2.6.0-test*? 12 Jan 2003 17:58:06 -0500
  • Re: any chance of 2.6.0-test*? 12 Jan 2003 15:31:39 -0500
  • Re: any chance of 2.6.0-test*? 12 Jan 2003 15:33:37 -0500
  • Re: [PATCH] add explicit Pentium II support 12 Jan 2003 15:28:47 -0500
  • Re: [PATCH] add explicit Pentium II support 12 Jan 2003 15:26:55 -0500
  • Re: [PATCH] add explicit Pentium II support 12 Jan 2003 15:13:52 -0500
  • [PATCH] add explicit Pentium II support 12 Jan 2003 14:03:30 -0500
  • Re: [FIXED] 2.5 evolution problem 12 Jan 2003 13:47:28 -0500
• Robert Macaulay
  • Re: 2.5.57 IO slowdown with CONFIG_PREEMPT enabled Thu, 16 Jan 2003 10:14:39 -0600 (CST)
  • Re: 2.5.57 IO slowdown with CONFIG_PREEMPT enabled Wed, 15 Jan 2003 17:20:59 -0600 (CST)
  • Re: 2.5.57 IO slowdown with CONFIG_PREEMPT enabled Wed, 15 Jan 2003 16:46:57 -0600 (CST)
  • Re: 2.5.57 IO slowdown with CONFIG_PREEMPT enabled Wed, 15 Jan 2003 16:12:33 -0600 (CST)
  • 2.5.57 IO slowdown with CONFIG_PREEMPT enabled Wed, 15 Jan 2003 11:36:38 -0600 (CST)
• Robert P. J. Day
  • Re: unresolved symbols building 2.5.59 Fri, 17 Jan 2003 11:09:32 -0500 (EST)
  • unresolved symbols building 2.5.59 Fri, 17 Jan 2003 10:57:32 -0500 (EST)
  • questions about config files, I2C and hardware sensors (2.5.59) Fri, 17 Jan 2003 06:53:43 -0500 (EST)
  • display bug in "make xconfig" in 2.5.58 Wed, 15 Jan 2003 06:44:51 -0500 (EST)
  • Re: why the new config process is a *big* step backwards Mon, 13 Jan 2003 10:37:51 -0500 (EST)
  • why the new config process is a *big* step backwards Mon, 13 Jan 2003 08:26:44 -0500 (EST)
  • Re: restructuring of filesystems config menu Sun, 12 Jan 2003 19:42:24 -0500 (EST)
  • restructuring of filesystems config menu Sun, 12 Jan 2003 07:57:33 -0500 (EST)
  • Re: two more oddities with the fs/Kconfig file Sun, 12 Jan 2003 04:59:26 -0500 (EST)
  • Re: two more oddities with the fs/Kconfig file Sun, 12 Jan 2003 04:54:54 -0500 (EST)
  • Re: two more oddities with the fs/Kconfig file Sun, 12 Jan 2003 04:32:34 -0500 (EST)
  • Re: two more oddities with the fs/Kconfig file Sun, 12 Jan 2003 04:27:55 -0500 (EST)
  • Re: more thoughts on kernel config organization Sun, 12 Jan 2003 04:22:10 -0500 (EST)
  • this is what i had in mind for fs/Kconfig Sun, 12 Jan 2003 02:26:43 -0500 (EST)
  • two more oddities with the fs/Kconfig file Sun, 12 Jan 2003 02:07:13 -0500 (EST)
  • some curiosities on the filesystems layout in kernel config Sun, 12 Jan 2003 01:00:40 -0500 (EST)
• Robert Wruck
  • Re: [PATCH] Timer bug fix ported to 2.4.20 Sat, 18 Jan 2003 11:16:49 +0100
  • [PATCH] Timer bug fix ported to 2.4.20 Thu, 16 Jan 2003 19:56:53 +0100
• Rodrigo F. Baroni
  • Docs to a beginner Tue, 14 Jan 2003 12:05:21 -0300 (ART)
• Rodrigo Martins Vieira Fonseca
  • kernel 2.5.57 13 Jan 2003 23:52:57 -0200
• Rodrigob
  • rmap15b 14 Jan 2003 13:36:07 -0200
• Roe Peterson
  • Dell precision M50 and _very_ slow process startup Mon, 13 Jan 2003 10:27:32 -0600 (CST)
• Roger Luethi
  • [PATCH][2.5] Fix via-rhine using skb_padto Tue, 14 Jan 2003 13:45:55 +0100
  • [PATCH][2.5] export skb_pad symbol Tue, 14 Jan 2003 13:21:14 +0100
  • Re: Linux 2.4.21-pre3-ac3 and KT400 Mon, 13 Jan 2003 22:40:45 +0100
  • Re: Linux 2.4.21-pre3-ac3 and KT400 Mon, 13 Jan 2003 22:02:45 +0100
• Roland Dreier
  • Re: [PATCH] fix up RTM_SETLINK handling 15 Jan 2003 17:39:40 -0800
  • Re: [PATCH] fix up RTM_SETLINK handling 15 Jan 2003 17:24:39 -0800
  • Re: [PATCH] fix up RTM_SETLINK handling 15 Jan 2003 16:22:22 -0800
  • [PATCH] fix up RTM_SETLINK handling 14 Jan 2003 23:01:00 -0800
• Roland McGrath
  • Re: PTRACE_GET_THREAD_AREA Mon, 13 Jan 2003 19:15:00 -0800
  • Re: PTRACE_GET_THREAD_AREA Sun, 12 Jan 2003 21:29:49 -0800
  • Re: PTRACE_GET_THREAD_AREA Sun, 12 Jan 2003 19:51:28 -0800
• Rolf Eike Beer
  • Re: PROBLEM: bad device file for cdrom while using devfs and ide-scsi Fri, 17 Jan 2003 08:16:51 +0100
  • [PARISC] kernel 2.5.58 doesn't compile Thu, 16 Jan 2003 18:24:37 +0100
• Romain Lievin
  • [PATCH] gconf (kconfig & GTK+) : final release Thu, 16 Jan 2003 22:37:21 +0100
  • Re: kconfig (gkc) [PATCH] Sun, 12 Jan 2003 12:00:57 +0100
• Roman Zippel
  • Re: Is the BitKeeper network protocol documented? Sat, 18 Jan 2003 15:22:58 +0100
  • Re: questions about config files, I2C and hardware sensors (2.5.59) Sat, 18 Jan 2003 02:40:41 +0100
  • Re: [RFC] Migrating net/sched to new module interface Fri, 17 Jan 2003 22:40:42 +0100
  • Re: [PATCH] Proposed module init race fix. Fri, 17 Jan 2003 16:35:22 +0100
  • Re: [RFC] Migrating net/sched to new module interface Fri, 17 Jan 2003 00:53:12 +0100
  • Re: [RFC] Migrating net/sched to new module interface Thu, 16 Jan 2003 17:05:02 +0100
  • Re: [RFC] Migrating net/sched to new module interface Thu, 16 Jan 2003 19:15:56 +0100
  • Re: [RFC] Migrating net/sched to new module interface Thu, 16 Jan 2003 14:44:23 +0100
  • Re: Nits on 2.5.58 menuconfig Wed, 15 Jan 2003 20:41:24 +0100
  • Re: display bug in "make xconfig" in 2.5.58 Wed, 15 Jan 2003 20:30:53 +0100
  • Re: [RFC] Migrating net/sched to new module interface Wed, 15 Jan 2003 18:04:09 +0100
  • Re: [PATCH] Proposed module init race fix. Wed, 15 Jan 2003 17:34:45 +0100
  • Re: [RFC] add module reference to struct tty_driver Wed, 15 Jan 2003 17:31:35 +0100
  • Re: [RFC] Migrating net/sched to new module interface Wed, 15 Jan 2003 01:21:21 +0100
  • Re: [PATCH] Module state and address in /proc/modules. Tue, 14 Jan 2003 17:36:52 +0100
  • Re: [TRIVIAL] [Tiny PATCH]driver_char_Kconfig bug (fwd) Tue, 14 Jan 2003 17:24:39 +0100
  • Re: [PATCH] fixup loop blkdev, add module_get Mon, 13 Jan 2003 23:20:44 +0100
  • Re: why the new config process is a *big* step backwards Mon, 13 Jan 2003 23:09:19 +0100
  • Re: make xconfig broken in bk current Mon, 13 Jan 2003 22:02:50 +0100
  • Re: [PATCH] Clean up refcounting on filesystems Mon, 13 Jan 2003 01:25:20 +0100
  • Re: make xconfig broken in bk current Mon, 13 Jan 2003 00:56:54 +0100
  • Re: make xconfig broken in bk current Mon, 13 Jan 2003 00:49:39 +0100
  • Re: more thoughts on kernel config organization Sun, 12 Jan 2003 18:12:19 +0100
  • Re: make xconfig broken in bk current Sun, 12 Jan 2003 14:58:15 +0100
• Romeo Andrino Jr.
  • Hi Wed, 15 Jan 2003 00:20:34 +0800
• romieu@fr.zoreil.com
  • Re: any chance of 2.6.0-test*? Sun, 12 Jan 2003 23:42:41 +0100
• Ross Biro
  • [BUG] 2.4.21-pre3 hdparm -X violates IDE locking Wed, 15 Jan 2003 10:49:38 -0800
  • [RFC]: Changes to ide_task_request Wed, 15 Jan 2003 09:53:13 -0800
  • Re: Linux 2.4.21-pre3-ac4 Tue, 14 Jan 2003 09:49:10 -0800
  • Re: PATCH: [2.4.21-pre3] IDE error recovery Tue, 14 Jan 2003 09:36:57 -0800
  • Re: PATCH: [2.4.21-pre3] IDE error recovery Tue, 14 Jan 2003 09:08:15 -0800
  • Re: PATCH: [2.4.21-pre3] IDE error recovery Mon, 13 Jan 2003 19:44:52 -0800
  • PATCH: [2.4.21-pre3] IDE error recovery Mon, 13 Jan 2003 18:39:35 -0800
  • Re: Linux 2.4.21-pre3-ac4 Mon, 13 Jan 2003 17:35:38 -0800
  • Re: Linux 2.4.21-pre3-ac4 Mon, 13 Jan 2003 13:36:32 -0800
  • Re: Linux 2.4.21-pre3-ac4 Mon, 13 Jan 2003 12:36:57 -0800
  • Re: Linux 2.4.21-pre3-ac4 Mon, 13 Jan 2003 11:48:26 -0800
  • Re: Linux 2.4.21-pre3-ac4 Mon, 13 Jan 2003 11:32:20 -0800
  • Re: Linux 2.4.21-pre3-ac4 Mon, 13 Jan 2003 11:19:42 -0800
  • Re: Linux 2.4.21-pre3-ac4 Mon, 13 Jan 2003 10:49:49 -0800
• Rui Sousa
  • Re: [PATCH] emu10k1 forward port (2.4.20 to 2.5.56) Wed, 15 Jan 2003 15:31:44 +0100 (CET)
• Ruslan U. Zakirov
  • Re: [2.5.58][PnP] Some small points. Fri, 17 Jan 2003 20:16:54 +0300 (MSK)
  • Re: ALSA and isapnp cards Fri, 17 Jan 2003 19:56:44 +0300 (MSK)
  • Re: ALSA and isapnp cards Fri, 17 Jan 2003 19:26:19 +0300 (MSK)
  • [2.5.58][PnP] Some small points. Wed, 15 Jan 2003 18:16:11 +0300
  • Re: 2.5.57 missing isapnp_card_protocol Tue, 14 Jan 2003 02:10:41 +0300 (MSK)
  • Re: Linux v2.5.57 Tue, 14 Jan 2003 01:38:38 +0300 (MSK)
• Russell King
  • Re: SCSI/Block boot problems Sat, 18 Jan 2003 18:58:19 +0000
  • SCSI/Block boot problems Sat, 18 Jan 2003 16:57:02 +0000
  • [PATCH] 2.5.59: show_task() oops Sat, 18 Jan 2003 16:56:57 +0000
  • 2.5.59: Input subsystem initialised really late Sat, 18 Jan 2003 16:56:51 +0000
  • Re: Initcall / device model meltdown? Fri, 17 Jan 2003 20:14:32 +0000
  • Initcall / device model meltdown? Fri, 17 Jan 2003 19:23:56 +0000
  • Re: Linux 2.5.59 Fri, 17 Jan 2003 17:10:22 +0000
  • Re: 2.5.59 vmlinux.lds.S change broke modules Fri, 17 Jan 2003 16:50:29 +0000
  • Re: 2.5.59 vmlinux.lds.S change broke modules Fri, 17 Jan 2003 13:56:38 +0000
  • Re: [RFC] add module reference to struct tty_driver Wed, 15 Jan 2003 10:40:16 +0000
  • Re: [RFC] add module reference to struct tty_driver Wed, 15 Jan 2003 10:00:01 +0000
  • TTY subsystem maintainership Tue, 14 Jan 2003 23:13:41 +0000
  • Re: [RFC] add module reference to struct tty_driver Tue, 14 Jan 2003 20:07:19 +0000
  • Re: [BK-2.5] Update the generic DMA API to take GFP_ flags on Tue, 14 Jan 2003 15:51:05 +0000
  • Re: [RFC] add module reference to struct tty_driver Mon, 13 Jan 2003 09:27:34 +0000
  • Re: [PATCH] 2.5.56-bug Mon, 13 Jan 2003 09:18:11 +0000
  • Re: Fixing the tty layer was Re: any chance of 2.6.0-test*? Mon, 13 Jan 2003 09:15:26 +0000
  • Re: Moderated forum for linux-kernel Sun, 12 Jan 2003 22:38:57 +0000
  • Re: any chance of 2.6.0-test*? Sun, 12 Jan 2003 17:37:01 +0000
  • [PATCH] 2.5.56-bug Sun, 12 Jan 2003 12:15:29 +0000
  • Re: two more oddities with the fs/Kconfig file Sun, 12 Jan 2003 10:02:29 +0000
  • Re: partitions and filesystems Sun, 12 Jan 2003 09:22:32 +0000
• Rusty Lynch
  • Re: [Pcihpd-discuss] Re: [BUG][2.5]deadlock on cpci hot insert 17 Jan 2003 18:04:33 -0800
  • Re: [Pcihpd-discuss] Re: [BUG][2.5]deadlock on cpci hot insert 16 Jan 2003 12:42:42 -0800
  • Re: [BUG][2.5]deadlock on cpci hot insert 15 Jan 2003 23:04:48 -0800
  • Re: Unable to boot off kernel built on different machine 14 Jan 2003 01:15:15 -0800
  • Unable to boot off kernel built on different machine Tue, 14 Jan 2003 11:38:36 -0800
• Rusty Russell
  • Re: [PATCH][RESEND] linux-2.5.58_timer-tsc-cleanup_A0 Sat, 18 Jan 2003 12:48:14 +1100
  • Re: [module-init-tools] fix weak symbol handling Fri, 17 Jan 2003 19:56:58 +1100
  • [PATCH] Richard Henderson for President! Fri, 17 Jan 2003 15:49:15 +1100
  • Re: [RFC] Migrating net/sched to new module interface Fri, 17 Jan 2003 13:27:56 +1100
  • Re: [PATCH] Proposed module init race fix. Fri, 17 Jan 2003 12:38:27 +1100
  • Re: [RFC] Migrating net/sched to new module interface Thu, 16 Jan 2003 14:31:27 +1100
  • Re: [PATCH] Proposed module init race fix. Thu, 16 Jan 2003 12:48:57 +1100
  • Re: [RFC] Migrating net/sched to new module interface Thu, 16 Jan 2003 12:12:25 +1100
  • Re: [PATCH] Proposed module init race fix. Wed, 15 Jan 2003 20:06:43 +1100
  • Re: [PATCH] __cacheline_aligned_in_smp? Wed, 15 Jan 2003 19:02:20 +1100
  • [PATCH] Proposed module init race fix. Wed, 15 Jan 2003 19:24:20 +1100
  • Re: [RFC] Migrating net/sched to new module interface Wed, 15 Jan 2003 19:16:24 +1100
  • Re: [PATCH] [TRIVIAL] kstrdup Wed, 15 Jan 2003 17:55:29 +1100
  • Re: [PATCH] [TRIVIAL] kstrdup Wed, 15 Jan 2003 17:45:13 +1100
  • Re: [MODULES] fix weak symbol handling Wed, 15 Jan 2003 15:39:43 +1100
  • Re: IPMI Wed, 15 Jan 2003 14:49:55 +1100
  • Re: [MODULES] fix weak symbol handling Tue, 14 Jan 2003 19:39:44 +1100
  • IPMI Tue, 14 Jan 2003 19:29:48 +1100
  • Re: exception tables in 2.5.55 Tue, 14 Jan 2003 19:28:02 +1100
  • Re: [MODULES] fix weak symbol handling Tue, 14 Jan 2003 14:57:11 +1100
  • Re: [module-init-tools] fix weak symbol handling Tue, 14 Jan 2003 14:16:57 +1100
  • Re: [MODULES] fix weak symbol handling Tue, 14 Jan 2003 14:11:30 +1100
  • Re: Userspace Test Framework for module loader porting Tue, 14 Jan 2003 11:01:15 +1100
  • Re: [PATCH] Check compiler version, SMP and PREEMPT. Tue, 14 Jan 2003 11:21:44 +1100
  • [PATCH] [TRIVIAL] kstrdup Tue, 14 Jan 2003 12:55:40 +1100
  • Re: [PATCH] __cacheline_aligned_in_smp? Tue, 14 Jan 2003 13:22:46 +1100
  • [PATCH] Module state and address in /proc/modules. Tue, 14 Jan 2003 13:24:55 +1100
  • [PATCH] __cacheline_aligned_in_smp? Mon, 13 Jan 2003 18:24:40 +1100
  • Re: [PATCH] Check compiler version, SMP and PREEMPT. Mon, 13 Jan 2003 17:51:15 +1100
  • [PATCH] Cleanup 2/2: Remove extable list Mon, 13 Jan 2003 16:59:53 +1100
  • [PATCH] Cleanup 1/2: Remove exported symbol list Mon, 13 Jan 2003 16:57:26 +1100
  • Re: exception tables in 2.5.55 Mon, 13 Jan 2003 16:26:48 +1100
  • [PATCH] Check compiler version, SMP and PREEMPT. Mon, 13 Jan 2003 16:13:19 +1100
  • Re: [PATCH] fixup loop blkdev, add module_get Mon, 13 Jan 2003 15:08:25 +1100
  • [PATCH] v850 obsolete params fix Mon, 13 Jan 2003 14:39:26 +1100
  • [PATCH] Fix strlen_user usage in module.c Mon, 13 Jan 2003 14:42:57 +1100
  • [PATCH] Fix request_module, kill exec_usermodehelper Mon, 13 Jan 2003 14:27:01 +1100
  • [PATCH] Place __gpl_ksymtab section in all linker scripts Mon, 13 Jan 2003 12:13:51 +1100
  • Re: [PATCH] some large create_module(2) sizes can oops a kernel Mon, 13 Jan 2003 13:34:43 +1100
  • Re: Userspace Test Framework for module loader porting Mon, 13 Jan 2003 11:27:21 +1100
  • Re: [PATCH] fixup loop blkdev, add module_get Mon, 13 Jan 2003 11:55:47 +1100
  • Re: [PATCH] Make `obsolete params' work correctly if MODULE_SYMBOL_PREFIX is non-empty Sun, 12 Jan 2003 00:42:55 +1100
• Rusty Trivial Russell
  • [TRIVIAL] [Tiny PATCH]driver_char_Kconfig bug (fwd) Tue, 14 Jan 2003 13:27:23 +1100
  • [TRIVIAL] cli_sti in drivers_net_hamradio_bpqether.c Tue, 14 Jan 2003 13:34:22 +1100
  • [TRIVIAL] duplicate extern char _stext Tue, 14 Jan 2003 13:35:50 +1100
  • [TRIVIAL] Drain local pages to make swsusp work Tue, 14 Jan 2003 13:42:54 +1100
  • [TRIVIAL] [2.5 patch] MODULE_FORCE_UNLOAD must depend on MODULE_UNLOAD (fwd) Tue, 14 Jan 2003 13:25:21 +1100
• rwhron@earthlink.net
  • big ext3 sequential write improvement in 2.5.51-mm1 gone in 2.5.53-mm1? Wed, 15 Jan 2003 20:50:23 -0500
  • Re: IDE DMA disabled with via82cxxx on kernels >= 2.5.35 Mon, 13 Jan 2003 21:49:49 -0500
• ryan
  • Re: [PATCH] 2.5.56 sound/oss/sb_mixer.c bounds check Tue, 14 Jan 2003 23:37:37 -0500
  • Re: [PATCH] 2.5.56 sound/oss/sb_mixer.c bounds check Tue, 14 Jan 2003 23:21:06 -0500
  • [PATCH] 2.5.56 sound/oss/sb_mixer.c bounds check Tue, 14 Jan 2003 22:13:25 -0500
• Ryan Anderson
  • Re: any chance of 2.6.0-test*? Sun, 12 Jan 2003 22:48:13 -0500
  • Re: any chance of 2.6.0-test*? Sun, 12 Jan 2003 21:00:51 -0500
• SA
  • Thanks Wed, 15 Jan 2003 13:13:38 +0000
  • silly kernel taint question Wed, 15 Jan 2003 13:04:20 +0000
• Salvatore D'Angelo
  • processes or threads Thu, 16 Jan 2003 16:33:27 +0100
• Sam Ravnborg
  • Re: 2.5.59 doesn't boot - hangs after 'Uncompressing the kernel' Sat, 18 Jan 2003 10:37:43 +0100
  • Re: 2.5.59 vmlinux.lds.S change broke modules Sat, 18 Jan 2003 10:23:31 +0100
  • Re: Linux 2.5.59 Fri, 17 Jan 2003 21:07:40 +0100
  • Re: ANN: LKMB (Linux Kernel Module Builder) version 0.1.16 Fri, 17 Jan 2003 19:00:01 +0100
  • Re: 2.5.59 vmlinux.lds.S change broke modules Fri, 17 Jan 2003 17:21:04 +0100
  • Re: 2.5.59 vmlinux.lds.S change broke modules Fri, 17 Jan 2003 17:19:09 +0100
  • Re: Dealing with 2.5.x subarch headers Wed, 15 Jan 2003 17:15:04 +0100
  • Re: [RFC] Consolidate vmlinux.lds.S files Mon, 13 Jan 2003 23:19:43 +0100
  • Re: [RFC] Consolidate vmlinux.lds.S files Mon, 13 Jan 2003 23:11:48 +0100
  • Re: [RFC] Consolidate vmlinux.lds.S files Mon, 13 Jan 2003 19:08:17 +0100
  • Re: [RFC] Consolidate vmlinux.lds.S files Mon, 13 Jan 2003 19:04:50 +0100
  • [RFC] Consolidate vmlinux.lds.S files Sun, 12 Jan 2003 23:07:41 +0100
  • Re: make xconfig broken in bk current Sun, 12 Jan 2003 22:03:49 +0100
  • Re: [PATCH 2.5.56] Sound core not compiling without /proc support Sun, 12 Jan 2003 13:56:45 +0100
  • Re: more thoughts on kernel config organization Sun, 12 Jan 2003 09:04:06 +0100
• Samium Gromoff
  • ALSA and isapnp cards Fri, 17 Jan 2003 17:47:54 +0300
• Samuel Flory
  • Re: Linux 2.4.21-pre3-ac3 and KT400 Mon, 13 Jan 2003 17:43:08 -0800
  • Re: system freezes when using udma on promise pdc20268 Mon, 13 Jan 2003 17:38:23 -0800
• Samuli Suonpaa
  • Re: Intel And Kenrel Programming Sun, 12 Jan 2003 21:30:27 +0200
• sbkz sbkz
  • 2.5.56 changelog entry Sun, 12 Jan 2003 03:57:37 +0800
• Scott McDermott
  • mbox archive of linux-kernel ? Tue, 14 Jan 2003 07:32:56 -0500
  • Re: console framebuffer scrolling speed Mon, 13 Jan 2003 22:18:36 -0500
• Scott Murray
  • Re: [Pcihpd-discuss] Re: [BUG][2.5]deadlock on cpci hot insert Sat, 18 Jan 2003 02:10:31 -0500 (EST)
  • Re: Forcing PCI-PCI bridge to have memory resources Thu, 16 Jan 2003 00:52:00 -0500 (EST)
  • Re: [BUG][2.5]deadlock on cpci hot insert Thu, 16 Jan 2003 00:33:05 -0500 (EST)
  • Re: [patch 2.5] 2-pass PCI probing, generic part Mon, 13 Jan 2003 01:28:51 -0500 (EST)
• Scott Robert Ladd
  • RE: any chance of 2.6.0-test*? Wed, 15 Jan 2003 10:07:23 -0500
  • RE: any chance of 2.6.0-test*? Sun, 12 Jan 2003 19:03:10 -0500
• Sean Neakums
  • Re: any chance of 2.6.0-test*? Sun, 12 Jan 2003 22:53:15 +0000
  • Re: any chance of 2.6.0-test*? Sun, 12 Jan 2003 20:32:01 +0000
• Sebastian Zimmermann
  • Promise SuperTrak SX6000 w/ kernel 2.4.20 16 Jan 2003 11:27:39 +0100
• Sergey S. Kostyliov
  • [PATCH 2.4] multiple cpqarray controlers with devfs Thu, 16 Jan 2003 21:56:38 +0300
• Sergio Visinoni
  • [PATCH] Re: ACPI patches updated (20030109) Wed, 15 Jan 2003 11:03:02 +0100
• Shane Shrybman
  • Re: [FIXED] 2.5 evolution problem 12 Jan 2003 14:26:58 -0500
  • [FIXED] 2.5 evolution problem 12 Jan 2003 13:16:24 -0500
• Shawn Starr
  • Question about linux/limits.h and PIPE_BUF Thu, 16 Jan 2003 11:18:06 -0500
  • Re: [PATCH] PnP update - drivers Mon, 13 Jan 2003 21:30:27 -0500
  • (no subject) Sun, 12 Jan 2003 12:57:27 -0500
• Shlomi Fish
  • Re: ANN: LKMB (Linux Kernel Module Builder) version 0.1.16 Fri, 17 Jan 2003 20:28:26 +0200 (IST)
  • Re: ANN: LKMB (Linux Kernel Module Builder) version 0.1.16 Fri, 17 Jan 2003 19:00:58 +0200 (IST)
  • Re: ANN: LKMB (Linux Kernel Module Builder) version 0.1.16 Fri, 17 Jan 2003 14:37:24 +0200 (IST)
  • CLAN ideaware and planningware Revision 2 Mon, 13 Jan 2003 08:06:20 +0200 (IST)
• shuz@isolate.net
  • kernel: KERNEL: assertion (newsk->state != TCP_SYN_RECV) failed at tcp.c(2229) Mon, 13 Jan 2003 11:33:12 -0500
• Siim Vahtre
  • Re: i810_audio problems Sat, 18 Jan 2003 09:41:49 +0200 (EET)
• Simon Posnjak
  • How to fix: PCI: No IRQ known for interrupt pin A of device 00:11.1. 15 Jan 2003 20:14:42 +0100
  • Re: Disk very slow with VIA KT400 in 2.4.21pre3-ac4 15 Jan 2003 18:06:37 +0100
  • Disk very slow with VIA KT400 in 2.4.18 (stock RedHat 8.0) 14 Jan 2003 23:28:27 +0100
• Soeren Sonnenburg
  • Re: system freezes when using udma on promise pdc20268 14 Jan 2003 09:29:58 +0100
  • Re: Linux 2.4.21-pre3-ac3 and KT400 13 Jan 2003 23:53:12 +0100
  • Bug report : i810_audio, compaq evo 410c, 2.4.20 13 Jan 2003 23:36:53 +0100
  • Re: Linux 2.4.21-pre3-ac3 and KT400 13 Jan 2003 23:10:30 +0100
  • system freezes when using udma on promise pdc20268 13 Jan 2003 22:07:48 +0100
• Sowmya Adiga
  • [BENCHMARK]unixbench result for kernel 2.5.57. Tue, 14 Jan 2003 15:17:50 +0530
  • [BENCHMARK]unixbench result for kernel 2.5.56. Mon, 13 Jan 2003 14:09:26 +0530
  • [BENCHMARK]AIM benchmark result for kernel 2.5.56 Mon, 13 Jan 2003 12:32:59 +0530
• Srikrishnan Sundararajan
  • Kernel BUG(oops) does not occur after upgrading glibc Fri, 17 Jan 2003 14:33:46 +0530
• Stefan Görling
  • Re: mbox archive of linux-kernel ? Wed, 15 Jan 2003 14:42:33 +0100
• Stephen C. Tweedie
  • Re: 2.4.21-pre3 - problems with ext3 14 Jan 2003 15:15:54 +0000
• Stephen D. Smalley
  • [RFC][PATCH] Add LSM sysctl hook to 2.5.59 Fri, 17 Jan 2003 16:54:37 -0500 (EST)
  • Re: [RFC] Changes to the LSM file-related hooks for 2.5.58 Wed, 15 Jan 2003 15:49:45 -0500 (EST)
  • Re: [RFC] Changes to the LSM file-related hooks for 2.5.58 Wed, 15 Jan 2003 10:44:52 -0500 (EST)
  • [RFC][PATCH] Restore LSM hook calls to setpriority and setpgid Tue, 14 Jan 2003 16:44:51 -0500 (EST)
  • [RFC] Changes to the LSM file-related hooks for 2.5.58 Tue, 14 Jan 2003 14:08:16 -0500 (EST)
• Stephen Hemminger
  • Re: lots of calls to __write/read_lock_failed 17 Jan 2003 08:24:19 -0800
  • 2.5.58-dcl1 15 Jan 2003 15:44:05 -0800
• Stephen Rothwell
  • [PATCH][COMPAT] compat_sys_sigpending and compat_sys_sigprocmask Thu, 16 Jan 2003 14:51:36 +1100
  • [PATCH][COMPAT] compat_sys_sigpending and compat_sys_sigprocmask Thu, 16 Jan 2003 14:50:31 +1100
  • [PATCH][COMPAT] compat_sys_sigpending and compat_sys_sigprocmask Thu, 16 Jan 2003 14:49:27 +1100
  • [PATCH][COMPAT] compat_sys_sigpending and compat_sys_sigprocmask Thu, 16 Jan 2003 14:47:41 +1100
  • [PATCH][COMPAT] compat_sys_sigpending and compat_sys_sigprocmask Thu, 16 Jan 2003 14:46:23 +1100
  • [PATCH][COMPAT] compat_sys_sigpending and compat_sys_sigprocmask Thu, 16 Jan 2003 14:45:13 +1100
  • [PATCH][COMPAT] compat_sys_sigpending and compat_sys_sigprocmask Thu, 16 Jan 2003 14:43:58 +1100
  • [PATCH][COMPAT] compat_sys_sigpending and compat_sys_sigprocmask Thu, 16 Jan 2003 14:41:29 +1100
  • [PATCH][COMPAT] compat_{old_}sigset_t parisc part Wed, 15 Jan 2003 17:47:33 +1100
  • [PATCH][COMPAT] compat_{old_}sigset_t mips64 part Wed, 15 Jan 2003 17:46:02 +1100
  • [PATCH][COMPAT] compat_{old_}sigset_t s390x part Wed, 15 Jan 2003 17:44:44 +1100
  • [PATCH][COMPAT] compat_{old_}sigset_t ia64 part Wed, 15 Jan 2003 17:42:24 +1100
  • PATCH][COMPAT] compat_{old_}sigset_t x86_64 part Wed, 15 Jan 2003 17:40:52 +1100
  • [PATCH][COMPAT] compat_{old_}sigset_t sparc64 Wed, 15 Jan 2003 17:39:20 +1100
  • [PATCH][COMPAT] compat_{old_}sigset_t ppc64 Wed, 15 Jan 2003 17:36:27 +1100
  • [PATCH][COMPAT] compat_{old_}sigset_t generic part Wed, 15 Jan 2003 17:34:15 +1100
  • Re: [2.5.55, APM] running "apm -s" doesn't sleep Tue, 14 Jan 2003 16:51:56 +1100
  • Re: [PATCH][COMPAT] compat_sys_[f]statfs - s390x part Mon, 13 Jan 2003 23:38:44 +1100
  • [PATCH][COMPAT] compat_sys_[f]statfs - parisc part Mon, 13 Jan 2003 16:28:47 +1100
  • Re: [PATCH][COMPAT] compat_sys_[f]statfs - mips64 part Mon, 13 Jan 2003 16:27:29 +1100
  • [PATCH][COMPAT] compat_sys_[f]statfs - s390x part Mon, 13 Jan 2003 16:25:35 +1100
  • [PATCH][COMPAT] compat_sys_[f]statfs - ia64 part Mon, 13 Jan 2003 16:23:17 +1100
  • Re: [PATCH][COMPAT] compat_sys_[f]statfs - x86_64 part Mon, 13 Jan 2003 16:21:07 +1100
  • Re: [PATCH][COMPAT] compat_sys_[f]statfs - sparc64 part Mon, 13 Jan 2003 16:19:24 +1100
  • [PATCH][COMPAT] compat_sys_[f]statfs - generic part Mon, 13 Jan 2003 16:09:23 +1100
  • [PATCH][COMPAT] compat_sys_[f]statfs - ppc64 part Mon, 13 Jan 2003 16:12:01 +1100
• Stephen Williams
  • Re: Dell C840, 2.5.58, NVidia - something is on serious crack... 16 Jan 2003 22:17:40 -0600
• Steve Lee
  • RE: [OFFTOPIC] RMS and reactions to him Wed, 15 Jan 2003 23:23:36 -0600
  • RE: PPP problem with >= 2.4.19 Mon, 13 Jan 2003 23:23:41 -0600
• Steve Lion
  • [OT] Whole thing about GNU/Linux and Linux Sat, 18 Jan 2003 15:50:06 -0500
• T C
  • (no subject) Sat, 18 Jan 2003 02:01:30 +0000
• Takao Indoh
  • About tunable features of Linux Wed, 15 Jan 2003 17:30:35 +0900
• Tariq Shureih
  • Error compiling ieee1394/pcilynx.c (2.5.54) Wed, 15 Jan 2003 16:11:10 -0800 (PST)
• Ted Phelps
  • [PATCH] 2.5.59 knfsd: bounds checking for NFSv3 readdirplus Fri, 17 Jan 2003 11:25:48 +0000
  • Re: [PATCH] counting bug in svc_tcp_recvfrom causes panic for TCP NFS Thu, 16 Jan 2003 00:51:47 +0000
  • [PATCH] counting bug in svc_tcp_recvfrom causes panic for TCP NFS Wed, 15 Jan 2003 22:54:32 +0000
  • [PATCH] bounds checking for NFSv3 readdirplus Tue, 14 Jan 2003 20:49:12 +0000
• Terje Eggestad
  • Re: any chance of 2.6.0-test*? 13 Jan 2003 17:41:41 +0100
  • Re: any chance of 2.6.0-test*? 13 Jan 2003 17:25:46 +0100
  • Re: any chance of 2.6.0-test*? 13 Jan 2003 17:02:47 +0100
  • Re: any chance of 2.6.0-test*? 13 Jan 2003 16:43:26 +0100
  • Re: any chance of 2.6.0-test*? 13 Jan 2003 15:34:00 +0100
• Thomas Hood
  • Re: [OFFTOPIC] RMS and reactions to him 18 Jan 2003 17:14:27 +0100
  • Re: Nvidia and its choice to read the GPL "differently" 15 Jan 2003 21:08:37 +0100
  • Re: [PATCH] PnP update - drivers 15 Jan 2003 11:38:16 +0100
  • Change PCMCIA card insert beep pitch? 15 Jan 2003 10:58:46 +0100
• Thomas Schlichter
  • problem using integer division in kernel modules Wed, 15 Jan 2003 19:41:29 +0100
  • Re: patch for errno-issue (with soundcore) Mon, 13 Jan 2003 18:10:53 +0100
  • Re: patch for errno-issue (with soundcore) Mon, 13 Jan 2003 15:57:33 +0100
  • patch for errno-issue (with soundcore) Mon, 13 Jan 2003 14:57:53 +0100
• Thomas Tonino
  • Re: [PATCH] add explicit Pentium II support Sun, 12 Jan 2003 21:27:13 +0100
• Tigran Aivazian
  • Re: [PATCH] Trivial: Fix date in i386 microcode changelog Fri, 17 Jan 2003 09:15:30 +0000 (GMT)
  • Re: [PATCH] don't create regular files in devfs (fwd) Tue, 14 Jan 2003 17:29:58 +0000 (GMT)
  • Re: [PATCH] don't create regular files in devfs (fwd) Tue, 14 Jan 2003 17:31:37 +0000 (GMT)
  • Re: [PATCH] don't create regular files in devfs (fwd) Tue, 14 Jan 2003 16:32:19 +0000 (GMT)
  • Re: [PATCH] don't create regular files in devfs (fwd) Tue, 14 Jan 2003 11:54:52 +0000 (GMT)
  • Re: [PATCH] don't create regular files in devfs (fwd) Tue, 14 Jan 2003 11:48:58 +0000 (GMT)
  • Re: Intel And Kenrel Programming (was: Nvidia is a great company) Tue, 14 Jan 2003 09:39:42 +0000 (GMT)
  • Re: [PATCH] don't create regular files in devfs (fwd) Tue, 14 Jan 2003 09:34:52 +0000 (GMT)
• Tim Connors
  • Re: [NFS] Re: broken umount -f Thu, 16 Jan 2003 20:55:55 +1100
• Tim Walberg
  • Re: any brand recomendation for a linux laptop ? Thu, 16 Jan 2003 07:32:23 -0600
• Timothy D. Witham
  • Re: [OSDL][BENCHMARK] Database results 2.4 versus 2.5 17 Jan 2003 14:11:13 -0800
• Tom Rini
  • [PATCH][RESEND x 5] Don't ask about "Enhanced Real Time Clock Support" on some archs Mon, 13 Jan 2003 16:13:25 -0700
• Tomas Szepe
  • Re: [WAY OFFTOPIC] RMS and reactions to him (best viewed in times new roman) Wed, 15 Jan 2003 17:57:45 +0100
  • Re: why the new config process is a *big* step backwards Mon, 13 Jan 2003 16:32:12 +0100
  • Re: any chance of 2.6.0-test*? Sun, 12 Jan 2003 23:33:18 +0100
  • Re: any chance of 2.6.0-test*? Sun, 12 Jan 2003 21:26:31 +0100
  • Re: any chance of 2.6.0-test*? Sun, 12 Jan 2003 20:53:47 +0100
  • Re: more thoughts on kernel config organization Sun, 12 Jan 2003 11:03:35 +0100
• Tommy Reynolds
  • Re: Docs to a beginner Tue, 14 Jan 2003 09:48:00 -0600
• Tony
  • Re: [PATCH] (revised) fix net/irda warnings for 2.4.21-pre3 Sun, 12 Jan 2003 09:28:06 +0100
  • Re: USB problems on ASUS A7M266-D with kernel 2.4.20 Sun, 12 Jan 2003 04:01:20 +0100
  • Re: [PATCH] (revised) fix net/irda warnings for 2.4.21-pre3 Sun, 12 Jan 2003 03:42:25 +0100
• Tony Dziedzic
  • [PATCH] drivers/char/mem.c, kernel 2.4.20: fix mmap /dev/kmem and vmalloc'd addresses Thu, 16 Jan 2003 13:08:15 -0500
• Torben Mathiasen
  • Re: [PATCH-2.4.20] PCI-X hotplug support for Compaq driver Thu, 16 Jan 2003 12:47:17 +0100
  • [PATCH-2.4.20] PCI-X hotplug support for Compaq driver Wed, 15 Jan 2003 10:55:13 +0100
• Trond Myklebust
  • Re: [NFS] Re: broken umount -f 16 Jan 2003 14:17:50 +0100
  • Re: 2.5.bk no longer boots from NFS root after bk pull this morning 14 Jan 2003 20:02:45 +0100
  • [PATCH] Fix RPC client warning in 2.5.58... Tue, 14 Jan 2003 16:24:54 +0100
  • Re: Performance problems with NFS under 2.4.20 13 Jan 2003 18:23:59 +0100
  • Re: Performance problems with NFS under 2.4.20 13 Jan 2003 16:57:28 +0100
  • Re: [PATCH] Secure user authentication for NFS using RPCSEC_GSS Mon, 13 Jan 2003 13:09:21 +0100
  • Re: [PATCH] Secure user authentication for NFS using RPCSEC_GSS [0/6] Mon, 13 Jan 2003 08:50:20 +0100
  • [PATCH] Secure user authentication for NFS using RPCSEC_GSS [4/6] Mon, 13 Jan 2003 01:14:39 +0100
  • [PATCH] Secure user authentication for NFS using RPCSEC_GSS [5/6] Mon, 13 Jan 2003 01:15:03 +0100
  • [PATCH] Secure user authentication for NFS using RPCSEC_GSS [6/6] Mon, 13 Jan 2003 01:15:47 +0100
  • [PATCH] Secure user authentication for NFS using RPCSEC_GSS [3/6] Mon, 13 Jan 2003 01:14:14 +0100
  • [PATCH] Secure user authentication for NFS using RPCSEC_GSS [2/6] Mon, 13 Jan 2003 01:13:42 +0100
  • [PATCH] Secure user authentication for NFS using RPCSEC_GSS [1/6] Mon, 13 Jan 2003 01:13:18 +0100
  • [PATCH] Secure user authentication for NFS using RPCSEC_GSS [0/6] Mon, 13 Jan 2003 01:12:50 +0100
• Tupshin Harper
  • Re: Is the BitKeeper network protocol documented? Fri, 17 Jan 2003 22:11:34 -0800
  • Re: 2.4.21-pre3-ac4 oops in free_pages_ok Thu, 16 Jan 2003 11:13:16 -0800
  • Re: Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer kernel 2.4.21-pre3-ac4 Thu, 16 Jan 2003 00:53:49 -0800
  • Re: Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer kernel 2.4.21-pre3-ac4 Wed, 15 Jan 2003 14:05:43 -0800
  • Re: Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer kernel 2.4.21-pre3-ac4 Tue, 14 Jan 2003 23:08:27 -0800
  • Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer kernel 2.4.21-pre3-ac4 Tue, 14 Jan 2003 19:55:22 -0800
  • Re: Disk very slow with VIA KT400 in 2.4.18 (stock RedHat 8.0) Tue, 14 Jan 2003 14:40:07 -0800
  • 2.5 ethernet/irq problem Mon, 13 Jan 2003 16:52:27 -0800
• Udo A. Steinberg
  • Re: Linux 2.5.59 Fri, 17 Jan 2003 08:30:27 +0100
  • Re: Linux 2.5.59 Fri, 17 Jan 2003 08:15:16 +0100
• Ulrich Drepper
  • new CPUID bit Tue, 14 Jan 2003 10:02:51 +0000
• Ulrich Windl
  • dosemu causes "invalid operand" in system_call Thu, 16 Jan 2003 08:58:20 +0100
• Vadlapudi Madhu
  • Is linux kernel is available for any AMD processors? 13 Jan 2003 19:26:43 +0530
• Val Henson
  • Re: any chance of 2.6.0-test*? Mon, 13 Jan 2003 15:02:00 -0700
• Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
  • Re: [DUMB]: Is kernel oops always a kernel bug ??? Fri, 17 Jan 2003 01:18:35 -0500
  • Dell C840, 2.5.58, NVidia - something is on serious crack... Thu, 16 Jan 2003 01:32:52 -0500
  • Re: Dell Latitude CPi keyboard problems since 2.5.42 Wed, 15 Jan 2003 14:21:57 -0500
  • Re: 2.5.58 Oops when booting from initrd - kobject_del Wed, 15 Jan 2003 00:52:28 -0500
  • Re: Changing argv[0] under Linux. Tue, 14 Jan 2003 17:04:05 -0500
  • Re: 2.5.58 Oops when booting from initrd - kobject_del Tue, 14 Jan 2003 13:07:54 -0500
  • Linux 2.5.57, i8k driver versions.. Tue, 14 Jan 2003 01:19:27 -0500
  • Weird sound problems on Dell Latitude C840 resolved.. Tue, 14 Jan 2003 01:14:31 -0500
  • Re: [PATCH] [TRIVIAL] kstrdup Tue, 14 Jan 2003 00:15:31 -0500
  • Re: [PATCH] [TRIVIAL] kstrdup Mon, 13 Jan 2003 22:53:32 -0500
  • Re: [PATCH] [TRIVIAL] kstrdup Mon, 13 Jan 2003 22:28:14 -0500
  • Re: any chance of 2.6.0-test*? Mon, 13 Jan 2003 18:32:25 -0500
  • Re: [PATCH] Make `obsolete params' work correctly if MODULE_SYMBOL_PRE Mon, 13 Jan 2003 15:43:28 -0500
  • Re: [2.5.56] (partial known) bugs/compile errors Mon, 13 Jan 2003 13:36:45 -0500
  • 2.5.56, modules, and RedHat Psyche Sun, 12 Jan 2003 16:38:44 -0500
  • Re: [2.5.55, PCI, PCMCIA, XIRCOM] Sun, 12 Jan 2003 18:16:48 -0500
  • [PATCH] 2.5.56 - missing EXPORT_SYMBOL in fs/devfs/base.c Sun, 12 Jan 2003 18:13:12 -0500
  • Re: any chance of 2.6.0-test*? Sun, 12 Jan 2003 15:51:36 -0500
  • Re: any chance of 2.6.0-test*? Sun, 12 Jan 2003 15:18:38 -0500
  • Re: Intel And Kenrel Programming (was: Nvidia is a great company) Sun, 12 Jan 2003 14:46:08 -0500
  • Re: inefficient RT vs efficient non-RT Sun, 12 Jan 2003 03:04:44 -0500
  • Re: some curiosities on the filesystems layout in kernel config Sun, 12 Jan 2003 01:49:29 -0500
• Vamsi Krishna S .
  • [PATCH] [re-xmit] kprobes for 2.5.58 Tue, 14 Jan 2003 17:28:29 +0530
• venom@sns.it
  • Re: The GPL, the kernel, and everything else. Thu, 16 Jan 2003 17:41:02 +0100 (CET)
  • Re: mbox archive of linux-kernel ? Tue, 14 Jan 2003 14:17:49 +0100 (CET)
• Vishwanath Kalbagilmath
  • llc in kernel 2.5 14 Jan 2003 09:21:14 -0000
• Vojtech Pavlik
  • Re: MB without keyboard controller / USB-only keyboard ? Thu, 16 Jan 2003 12:14:06 +0100
  • Re: [PATCH] sl82c105 driver update Sun, 12 Jan 2003 10:07:21 +0100
• Voltan
  • oops on ISN load in 2.5.56 12 Jan 2003 09:59:53 +0000
• Wakko Warner
  • Re: [OFFTOPIC] RMS and reactions to him Tue, 14 Jan 2003 17:27:25 -0500
• Werner Almesberger
  • Re: [RFC] Migrating net/sched to new module interface Thu, 16 Jan 2003 15:58:15 -0300
  • Re: [RFC] Migrating net/sched to new module interface Thu, 16 Jan 2003 01:49:32 -0300
  • Re: [RFC] Migrating net/sched to new module interface Thu, 16 Jan 2003 01:20:39 -0300
  • Re: [PATCH] Proposed module init race fix. Wed, 15 Jan 2003 23:55:01 -0300
  • Re: any chance of 2.6.0-test*? Wed, 15 Jan 2003 16:44:11 -0300
  • Re: [RFC] Migrating net/sched to new module interface Wed, 15 Jan 2003 06:33:49 -0300
  • Re: [RFC] Migrating net/sched to new module interface Wed, 15 Jan 2003 04:31:47 -0300
  • Re: why the new config process is a *big* step backwards Mon, 13 Jan 2003 13:32:00 -0300
  • Re: some curiosities on the filesystems layout in kernel config Mon, 13 Jan 2003 06:30:53 -0300
  • Re: How much we can trust packet timestamping Sun, 12 Jan 2003 20:04:48 -0300
  • Re: Using lilo to boot off any drive ... Sun, 12 Jan 2003 19:57:41 -0300
• Wichert Akkerman
  • Re: IPMI Tue, 14 Jan 2003 15:59:41 +0100
• Willem Riede
  • 2.5.59 spinlock BUG upon loading initial ramdisk Sat, 18 Jan 2003 19:42:47 -0500
• William Lee Irwin III
  • Re: [patch] sched-2.5.59-A2 Sat, 18 Jan 2003 20:22:45 -0800
  • Re: 48GB NUMA-Q boots, with major IO-APIC hassles Sat, 18 Jan 2003 18:55:14 -0800
  • Re: 48GB NUMA-Q boots, with major IO-APIC hassles Sat, 18 Jan 2003 18:27:00 -0800
  • Re: 48GB NUMA-Q boots, with major IO-APIC hassles Sat, 18 Jan 2003 17:50:13 -0800
  • Re: 48GB NUMA-Q boots, with major IO-APIC hassles Sat, 18 Jan 2003 17:43:26 -0800
  • Re: [patch] sched-2.5.59-A2 Sat, 18 Jan 2003 00:16:49 -0800
  • Re: [patch] sched-2.5.59-A2 Fri, 17 Jan 2003 23:08:08 -0800
  • Re: MAX_IO_APICS #ifdef'd wrongly Fri, 17 Jan 2003 15:14:17 -0800
  • Re: 2.5.58-mjb2 (scalability / NUMA patchset) Fri, 17 Jan 2003 01:49:56 -0800
  • Re: Kernel BUG(oops) does not occur after upgrading glibc Fri, 17 Jan 2003 01:26:53 -0800
  • fix nfs_writeback_done() warning Fri, 17 Jan 2003 01:15:03 -0800
  • MAX_IO_APICS #ifdef'd wrongly Fri, 17 Jan 2003 01:00:31 -0800
  • blkdev.h fixes Thu, 16 Jan 2003 23:04:37 -0800
  • Re: i386 pgd_index() doesn't parenthesize its arg Thu, 16 Jan 2003 22:03:27 -0800
  • i386 pgd_index() doesn't parenthesize its arg Thu, 16 Jan 2003 21:51:28 -0800
  • Re: Linux 2.5.59 Thu, 16 Jan 2003 20:44:51 -0800
  • Re: lots of calls to __write/read_lock_failed Wed, 15 Jan 2003 20:46:00 -0800
  • Re: [PATCH] (0/7) Finish moving NUMA-Q into subarch, cleanup Wed, 15 Jan 2003 12:17:19 -0800
  • Re: [PATCH] (0/7) Finish moving NUMA-Q into subarch, cleanup Wed, 15 Jan 2003 11:05:53 -0800
  • Re: 48GB NUMA-Q boots, with major IO-APIC hassles Wed, 15 Jan 2003 07:34:53 -0800
  • Re: 48GB NUMA-Q boots, with major IO-APIC hassles Wed, 15 Jan 2003 05:10:05 -0800
  • Re: 48GB NUMA-Q boots, with major IO-APIC hassles Wed, 15 Jan 2003 03:55:25 -0800
  • 48GB NUMA-Q boots, with major IO-APIC hassles Wed, 15 Jan 2003 02:58:02 -0800
  • Re: anyone have a 16-bit x86 early_printk? Tue, 14 Jan 2003 13:40:07 -0800
  • Re: anyone have a 16-bit x86 early_printk? Tue, 14 Jan 2003 05:43:01 -0800
  • Re: 2.4.21pre2aa2 Tue, 14 Jan 2003 04:23:34 -0800
  • anyone have a 16-bit x86 early_printk? Tue, 14 Jan 2003 03:30:36 -0800
  • Re: 2.5.bk no longer boots from NFS root after bk pull this morning Tue, 14 Jan 2003 03:25:49 -0800
  • Re: 2.5.bk no longer boots from NFS root after bk pull this morning Tue, 14 Jan 2003 03:24:35 -0800
  • Re: 2.5.bk no longer boots from NFS root after bk pull this morning Tue, 14 Jan 2003 02:09:00 -0800
  • Re: 2.5.56-mm1 Mon, 13 Jan 2003 02:41:41 -0800
  • Re: any chance of 2.6.0-test*? Sun, 12 Jan 2003 17:52:29 -0800
  • Re: any chance of 2.6.0-test*? Sun, 12 Jan 2003 12:45:15 -0800
• Willy Tarreau
  • Re: any chance of 2.6.0-test*? -> goto example Mon, 13 Jan 2003 02:31:33 +0100
  • Re: any chance of 2.6.0-test*? -> goto example Sun, 12 Jan 2003 23:48:29 +0100
  • Re: Linux VM Documentation - Draft 1 Sun, 12 Jan 2003 03:49:16 +0100
• Wolfgang Fritz
  • swsuspend: possible with VIA Eden processor? Or alternatives? Sat, 18 Jan 2003 18:14:04 +0100
• Xanthakis Stelios
  • [PATCH] log(n) PID pool Fri, 17 Jan 2003 17:27:35 +0200 (EET)
• Yaacov Akiba Slama
  • Re: 2.5.59-mm1 Fri, 17 Jan 2003 13:18:59 +0200
  • Re: [PATCH] Re: [BUG] cardbus/hotplugging still broken in 2.5.56 Wed, 15 Jan 2003 22:55:32 +0200
  • Re: [PATCH] Re: [BUG] cardbus/hotplugging still broken in 2.5.56 Wed, 15 Jan 2003 22:13:39 +0200
  • [PATCH] Re: [BUG] cardbus/hotplugging still broken in 2.5.56 Wed, 15 Jan 2003 18:26:36 +0200
  • [PATCH] Re : [BUG] cardbus/hotplugging still broken in 2.5.56 Tue, 14 Jan 2003 20:39:22 +0200
• Yang Yang
  • process switch and page directory on INTEL ???? Wed, 15 Jan 2003 10:33:56 -0800
• yodaiken@fsmlabs.com
  • Re: any chance of 2.6.0-test*? Sun, 12 Jan 2003 20:30:45 -0700
  • Re: any chance of 2.6.0-test*? Sun, 12 Jan 2003 13:23:48 -0700
• yuval yeret
  • Re: 2.4.18-14 kernel stuck during ext3 umount with ping still responding Wed, 15 Jan 2003 21:13:43 +0200
• Zed Pobre
  • Re: Nervous with 2.4.21-pre3 and -pre3-ac* Thu, 16 Jan 2003 12:16:02 -0600
• Zwane Mwaikambo
  • Re: 48GB NUMA-Q boots, with major IO-APIC hassles Sat, 18 Jan 2003 21:32:22 -0500 (EST)
  • Re: 48GB NUMA-Q boots, with major IO-APIC hassles Sat, 18 Jan 2003 21:13:36 -0500 (EST)
  • RE: [PATCH] (2/3) Initial load balancing Fri, 17 Jan 2003 13:42:19 -0500 (EST)
  • Re: [PATCH][2.5] fix for_each_cpu compilation on UP Fri, 17 Jan 2003 11:44:34 -0500 (EST)
  • Re: [PATCH][2.5] per-CPU task runqueues Fri, 17 Jan 2003 05:08:03 -0500 (EST)
  • [PATCH][2.5] smp_call_function_on_cpu for PARISC Fri, 17 Jan 2003 04:51:11 -0500 (EST)
  • [PATCH][2.5] per-CPU task runqueues Fri, 17 Jan 2003 04:27:15 -0500 (EST)
  • Re: [PATCH][2.5] smp_call_function_mask Fri, 17 Jan 2003 00:56:32 -0500 (EST)
  • [PATCH][2.5] fix for_each_cpu compilation on UP Fri, 17 Jan 2003 00:01:10 -0500 (EST)
  • Re: [PATCH] hangcheck-timer Thu, 16 Jan 2003 18:43:47 -0500 (EST)
  • Re: CONFIG_APM_DISPLAY_BLANK problem in the 2.5 kernel Thu, 16 Jan 2003 14:54:04 -0500 (EST)
  • Re: [Question] Assinging of IRQ to an ethernet card Tue, 14 Jan 2003 10:24:54 -0500 (EST)
  • [PATCH][2.5] sound/oss/opl3sa2.c compile fix Mon, 13 Jan 2003 22:45:28 -0500 (EST)
  • [PATCH][2.5] sound/oss/ad1848.c compile fix Mon, 13 Jan 2003 22:42:54 -0500 (EST)
  • Re: [PATCH] PnP update - drivers Mon, 13 Jan 2003 20:44:10 -0500 (EST)
  • Re: any chance of 2.6.0-test*? Mon, 13 Jan 2003 18:43:16 -0500 (EST)
  • RE: APIC version Mon, 13 Jan 2003 17:53:20 -0500 (EST)
  • Re: any chance of 2.6.0-test*? Mon, 13 Jan 2003 17:49:12 -0500 (EST)
  • Re: any chance of 2.6.0-test*? Mon, 13 Jan 2003 12:00:10 -0500 (EST)
• Zydox
  • kernel BUG at revoke.c:329! Fri, 17 Jan 2003 20:26:58 +0100