Re: choice of raid5 checksumming algorithm wrong ?

[Rene Rebe]

Hi.

Hm - for me the different throughputs are a nice initial benchmark
... - I like them being printed out.

On: Sun, 12 Jan 2003 09:44:44 -0500 (EST),
    "Mr. James W. Laferriere" <[e-mail]> wrote:
> 
> 	Hello Rene , All ,  How about just printing the algorithm that is
> 	chosen & not the others ?  Just an idea .  JimL
> 
> On Sat, 11 Jan 2003, Rene Rebe wrote:
> > Hi.
> > In the case s.o. wants to pull the patch:
> > http://www.rocklinux.org/sources/package/base/linux24/82-raid5-niceer-output.patch
> > It is only a one-liner. It is not really nice since I print the
> > "writing arround L2 cache" text when XOR_SELECT_TEMPLATE is defined -
> > this might also be the case for an later AlitVec version for PowerPC
> > or so. So we might want a more generic text - or a text in the
> > appropriated .h file whetre XOR_SELECT_TEMPLATE is defined ...
> -- 
>        +------------------------------------------------------------------+
>        | James   W.   Laferriere | System    Techniques | Give me VMS     |
>        | Network        Engineer |     P.O. Box 854     |  Give me Linux  |
>        | [e-mail] | Coudersport PA 16915 |   only  on  AXP |
>        +------------------------------------------------------------------+
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to [e-mail]
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>