RE: APIC version

[Protasevich, Natalie]

The thing is, this array never gets filled with correct values for XAPICs in
case when we go through ACPI, not MP.
I only care about it because that is how I used to distinguish Cascades from
Fosters on ES7000 (which I need to do very early, before I get to APIC mode
setup).

On the other hand, I just noticed that I could go with smp_num_siblings for
this purpose... so if this issue is too shady as of now, i will survive, I
guess...:)

--Natalie

-----Original Message-----
From: Martin J. Bligh [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Monday, January 13, 2003 12:26 PM
To: Nakajima, Jun; Protasevich, Natalie; Pallipadi, Venkatesh
Cc: William Lee Irwin III; Christoph Hellwig; James Cleverdon; Linux
Kernel
Subject: RE: APIC version

> The entries in acpi_version[] are indexed by the APIC id, not
smp_processor_id(). So you can overwrite acpi_version[] for a different
processor.

>> +	apic_version[smp_processor_id()] =

Ugh.

It's indexed by the apic ID, not the cpu id. They're not 1-1.