Re: [module-init-tools] fix weak symbol handling

Richard Henderson (rth@twiddle.net)
Tue, 14 Jan 2003 17:14:57 -0800

On Tue, Jan 14, 2003 at 02:16:57PM +1100, Rusty Russell wrote:
> So the semantics you want are that if A declares a weak symbol S, and
> B exports a (presumably non-weak) symbol S, then A depends on B?

No. The semantics I need is if A references a weak symbol S
and *no one* implements it, then S resolves to NULL.

r~
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/