Re: [PATCH 2.5.58] new NUMA scheduler: fix

[Martin J. Bligh]

> On Thu, 2003-01-16 at 11:47, Erich Focht wrote:
> 
>> Fine. This form is also nearer to the codingstyle rule: "functions
>> should do only one thing" (I'm reading those more carefully now ;-)
> 
> Good ;)
> 
> This is looking good.  Thanks hch for going over it with your fine tooth
> comb.
> 
> Erich and Martin, what more needs to be done prior to inclusion?  Do you
> still want an exec balancer in place?

Yup, that's in patch 2 already. I just pushed it ... will see what
happens.

M.