Re: [PATCH] add explicit Pentium II support

[Linus Torvalds]

On 12 Jan 2003, Alan Cox wrote:
> 
> Looks good. Might also be good to clarify in the help whether the PII/PIII
> option also skips using lock decb for the spinlocks and the other fence
> workarounds for the PPro fence errata. 

The thing I reacted to was that the P4 entry should include the P4-based 
celerons. I have no idea what those are called, though.

Anyway, applied.

		Linus