On Sun, 12 Jan 2003 16:45:24 GMT, Alan Cox said:
> One thing that has been helpful is the microcode update stuff Intel did, we
> hit few bugs that up to date microcode kill off
http://www.urbanmyth.org/microcode/ says that microcode_ctl 1.06 is the
latest, dated all the way back to 11 Jun 2001. Is that in fact the most
recent? In this industry, I alway worry when "most recent" is 18 months
old.
Hopefully it's the most recent because no further errata have been found.;)
-- Valdis Kletnieks Computer Systems Senior Engineer Virginia Tech
--==_Exmh_1749349547P Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001
iD8DBQE+IcX/cC3lWbTT17ARAs/7AKDZSBKk/qis9yBqkuddTeclu2hLwQCgsFGu eVH2nJg17Gf9xTV63zbFE/4= =NWyV -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--==_Exmh_1749349547P-- - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/