Re: [PATCH] add explicit Pentium II support

[Luuk van der Duim]

On Sun, 2003-01-12 at 21:13, Robert Love wrote:
> On Sun, 2003-01-12 at 14:26, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> 
> > The thing I reacted to was that the P4 entry should include the
> > P4-based celerons. I have no idea what those are called, though.
> > 
> > Anyway, applied.
> 
> I was thinking the same thing, but the lame name of the chips held me
> back - the new Celerons are also called "Celerons".
> 
> Regardless, I updated the comments and I call the new Celerons "P4-based
> Celerons" which should be descriptive enough.
> 
> Patch is against current BK.
> 
> 	Robert Love
> 
>  arch/i386/Kconfig |   12 +++++++-----
>  1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> 
> diff -urN linux-2.5.56/arch/i386/Kconfig linux/arch/i386/Kconfig
> --- linux-2.5.56/arch/i386/Kconfig	2003-01-12 15:05:16.000000000 -0500
> +++ linux/arch/i386/Kconfig	2003-01-12 15:10:45.000000000 -0500
> @@ -120,7 +120,7 @@
>  	  - "Pentium-Pro" for the Intel Pentium Pro.
>  	  - "Pentium-II" for the Intel Pentium II or pre-Coppermine Celeron.
>  	  - "Pentium-III" for the Intel Pentium III or Coppermine Celeron.
> -	  - "Pentium-4" for the Intel Pentium 4.
> +	  - "Pentium-4" for the Intel Pentium 4 or P4-based Celeron.

Aren't those called Willamette based Celerons?

-- 
Luuk van der Duim