Linux-kernel mailing list archive 2002-50, by author

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ]

Starting: Thu 01 Jan 1970 - 01:09:01 EET
Ending: Mon 23 Dec 2002 - 13:55:53 EET
Messages: 1538

• (no name)
  • 2.5.52 compile error Wed, 18 Dec 2002 14:12:07 +0100
  • Re: [PATCH RESEND] memory leak in ndisc_router_discovery Mon, 16 Dec 2002 15:35:32 +0900 (JST)
  • Re: [PATCHSET] PC-9800 addtional for 2.5.50-ac1 (21/21) Sun, 15 Dec 2002 22:59:42 +0900 (JST)
  • Re: Linux-2.4.20: bug with radeonfb - solved Sun, 15 Dec 2002 12:55:06 +0100
• 20021221071031.GA25566@codepoet.org
  • 20021221071031.GA25566@codepoet.org 20021221071031.GA25566@codepoet.org
• 200212210943.BAA08993@adam.yggdrasil.com
  • 200212210943.BAA08993@adam.yggdrasil.com 200212210943.BAA08993@adam.yggdrasil.com
• 200212211151.50991.black666@inode.at
  • 200212211151.50991.black666@inode.at 200212211151.50991.black666@inode.at
• =?ISO-8859-2?Q?Martin=20Zoubek?=
  • =?ISO-8859-2?Q?PROBLEM=3A=20=2Fdev=2Finitctl=20not=20working?= Tue, 17 Dec 2002 22:43:45 +0100 (CET)
• Adam J. Richter
  • Re: RFC: bus_type and device_class merge (or partial merge) Sat, 21 Dec 2002 01:00:45 -0800
  • Re: RFC: bus_type and device_class merge (or partial merge) Thu, 19 Dec 2002 14:44:53 -0800
  • RFC: bus_type and device_class merge (or partial merge) Thu, 19 Dec 2002 11:36:10 -0800
  • Re: Freezing.. (was Re: Intel P6 vs P7 system call performance) Wed, 18 Dec 2002 17:08:45 -0800
  • Patch(2.5.52): Add missing PCI ID's for nVidia IDE and PlanB frame grabber Wed, 18 Dec 2002 15:35:35 -0800
  • Re: 2.5.51 ide module problem Wed, 18 Dec 2002 06:18:14 -0800
  • Re: 2.5.51 ide module problem Wed, 18 Dec 2002 06:14:48 -0800
  • Patch(2.5.51): __pnp_add_device dereferenced bad pointer Sun, 15 Dec 2002 02:58:27 -0800
• Adam Radford
  • RE: 3ware driver in 2.4.x and 2.5.x not compatible with 6x00 seri Wed, 18 Dec 2002 10:41:45 -0800
• Adrian Bunk
  • Re: Linux 2.4.21-pre2 Fri, 20 Dec 2002 15:48:08 +0100
  • [2.5 patch] remove kernel 2.0 compatibility code from i91uscsi.c Wed, 18 Dec 2002 01:59:11 +0100
  • [patch] MSNDCLAS_HAVE_BOOT and MSNDPIN_HAVE_BOOT shouldn't ask questions Wed, 18 Dec 2002 01:26:22 +0100
  • Re: Linux-2.4.20: bug with radeonfb - solved Sun, 15 Dec 2002 17:19:37 +0100
  • Re: Networking/Becker et al [was Re: pci-skeleton duplex check] Sun, 15 Dec 2002 13:32:00 +0100
  • Re: Why does the _DoubleTalk card_ not have a major assigned? Sun, 15 Dec 2002 02:01:37 +0100
  • Re: Linux-2.4.20: bug with radeonfb Sun, 15 Dec 2002 01:56:55 +0100
• Alan Cox
  • RE: [PATCH 2.5.52] Use __set_current_state() instead of current-> 20 Dec 2002 03:08:28 +0000
  • Re: Intel P6 vs P7 system call performance 20 Dec 2002 03:05:15 +0000
  • Re: [PATCH/RFC] New module refcounting for net_proto_family 19 Dec 2002 19:28:35 +0000
  • Re: 'D' processes on a healthy system? 19 Dec 2002 19:27:11 +0000
  • Re: 'D' processes on a healthy system? 19 Dec 2002 17:43:52 +0000
  • Re: Linux 2.2.24-rc1 Thu, 19 Dec 2002 07:48:21 -0500 (EST)
  • RE: 15000+ processes -- poor performance ?! 19 Dec 2002 02:31:28 +0000
  • Re: Linux 2.4.21-pre2 19 Dec 2002 01:16:07 +0000
  • Re: 2.4.19, don't "hdparm -I /dev/hde" if hde is on a Asus A7V133 19 Dec 2002 01:11:51 +0000
  • Re: Freezing.. (was Re: Intel P6 vs P7 system call performance) 19 Dec 2002 01:09:17 +0000
  • Re: 2.5.52: PDC20268 failure 19 Dec 2002 01:03:16 +0000
  • Re: Patch(2.5.52): Add missing PCI ID's for nVidia IDE and PlanB 19 Dec 2002 01:02:21 +0000
  • Re: Freezing.. (was Re: Intel P6 vs P7 system call performance) Wed, 18 Dec 2002 19:18:44 -0500 (EST)
  • Re: Freezing.. (was Re: Intel P6 vs P7 system call performance) Wed, 18 Dec 2002 19:08:57 -0500 (EST)
  • Re: 2.5.51 ide module problem 18 Dec 2002 22:43:42 +0000
  • RE: A7M266-D problems with integrate sound device and USB 2.0 PCI 18 Dec 2002 22:42:48 +0000
  • Re: 2.4.19, don't "hdparm -I /dev/hde" if hde is on a Asus A7V133 18 Dec 2002 22:38:42 +0000
  • Re: Freezing.. (was Re: Intel P6 vs P7 system call performance) Wed, 18 Dec 2002 14:42:51 -0500 (EST)
  • Re: Freezing.. (was Re: Intel P6 vs P7 system call performance) Wed, 18 Dec 2002 14:30:48 -0500 (EST)
  • Re: 3ware driver in 2.4.x and 2.5.x not compatible with 6x00 series 18 Dec 2002 20:08:05 +0000
  • Re: Freezing.. (was Re: Intel P6 vs P7 system call performance) Wed, 18 Dec 2002 14:08:02 -0500 (EST)
  • Re: [PATCHSET] PC-9800 addtional for 2.5.50-ac1 (21/21) 18 Dec 2002 16:03:15 +0000
  • Re: Intel P6 vs P7 system call performance 18 Dec 2002 15:50:53 +0000
  • Re: Intel P6 vs P7 system call performance 18 Dec 2002 15:52:26 +0000
  • Re: Intel P6 vs P7 system call performance 17 Dec 2002 20:51:11 +0000
  • Re: Intel P6 vs P7 system call performance 17 Dec 2002 20:49:31 +0000
  • Re: Intel P6 vs P7 system call performance 17 Dec 2002 19:44:33 +0000
  • Re: Intel P6 vs P7 system call performance 17 Dec 2002 19:26:26 +0000
  • Re: Intel P6 vs P7 system call performance 17 Dec 2002 19:23:50 +0000
  • Re: [PATCHSET] PC-9800 addtional for 2.5.50-ac1 (21/21) 17 Dec 2002 17:17:54 +0000
  • Re: Via 8233 flooding of errors [2.4-ac] Tue, 17 Dec 2002 11:34:34 -0500 (EST)
  • Re: Via 8233 flooding of errors [2.4-ac] 17 Dec 2002 16:31:40 +0000
  • Re: Intel P6 vs P7 system call performance 17 Dec 2002 15:12:56 +0000
  • Re: Via 8233 flooding of errors [2.4-ac] 17 Dec 2002 14:41:07 +0000
  • Re: Linux 2.2.24-rc1 17 Dec 2002 02:16:22 +0000
  • Re: Linux 2.2.24-rc1 17 Dec 2002 01:33:53 +0000
  • Re: [PATCH] linux-2.4.21-pre1_cyclone-timer_B3 16 Dec 2002 23:15:55 +0000
  • Re: i810 sound starts and stops for 2.4.XX and i845PE chipset 16 Dec 2002 22:21:42 +0000
  • Linux 2.2.24-rc1 Mon, 16 Dec 2002 15:18:39 -0500 (EST)
  • Re: [PATCHSET] PC-9800 addtional for 2.5.50-ac1 16 Dec 2002 18:24:58 +0000
  • IDE but no disks 16 Dec 2002 16:16:32 +0000
  • Re: Dual Xeon w/ HT: Kernel can't find second CPU 16 Dec 2002 16:13:20 +0000
  • Re: [2.4.20] via82cxxx goes postal and locks system, no full 16 Dec 2002 14:54:13 +0000
  • Re: 2.4.21-pre1 broke the ide-tape driver 16 Dec 2002 14:53:33 +0000
  • Re: Linux 2.4.21-pre1 16 Dec 2002 06:34:06 +0000
  • Re: Intel ICH4 ide not working for 2.4.19 and 2.4.20 16 Dec 2002 06:37:06 +0000
  • Re: [PROBLEM]: "make rpm" fails on RH 8.0 16 Dec 2002 06:06:54 +0000
• Albert D. Cahalan
  • Re: Intel P6 vs P7 system call performance Mon, 16 Dec 2002 02:33:43 -0500 (EST)
• ALESSANDRO.SUARDI
  • Re: Linux v2.5.52 Mon, 16 Dec 2002 01:45:26 -0800 (PST)
• Alex Bennee
  • Re: Alcatel speedtouch USB driver and SMP. 17 Dec 2002 10:30:38 +0000
• Alex Goddard
  • Re: 2.5.52: Many, many unresolved symbols!? Fri, 20 Dec 2002 12:24:26 +0000 (UTC)
  • Re: 2.5.52 and modules (lots of unresolved symbols)? Mon, 16 Dec 2002 13:54:21 +0000 (UTC)
  • Re: 2.5.52 and modules (lots of unresolved symbols)? Mon, 16 Dec 2002 12:11:58 +0000 (UTC)
  • Re: 2.5.52 and modules (lots of unresolved symbols)? Mon, 16 Dec 2002 11:19:00 +0000 (UTC)
• Alex Tomas
  • Re: [Lse-tech] Re: 15000+ processes -- poor performance ?! 19 Dec 2002 13:37:30 +0300
• Alexander Achenbach
  • Re: [PATCH] zero-size E820 memory (kernel start-up failure) Sat, 21 Dec 2002 11:48:41 +0100
  • [PATCH] zero-size E820 memory (kernel start-up failure) Fri, 20 Dec 2002 12:02:57 +0100
• Anders Fugmann
  • Re: mousewheel not working. Wed, 18 Dec 2002 10:31:57 +0100
  • Re: mousewheel not working. Tue, 17 Dec 2002 23:16:30 +0100
• Anders Gustafsson
  • Re: netstat and 2.5.5[12] Tue, 17 Dec 2002 16:02:35 +0100
  • Re: netstat and 2.5.5[12] Mon, 16 Dec 2002 13:45:53 +0100
  • Re: [XFS] add missing file xfs_iomap.c Mon, 16 Dec 2002 03:34:53 +0100
• Andi Kleen
  • [PATCH] Some i386 cleanups - MTRR, bootflag Sat, 21 Dec 2002 02:04:03 +0100
  • Re: Intel P6 vs P7 system call performance 17 Dec 2002 09:56:20 +0100
• Andre Hedrick
  • Re: 2.4.19, don't "hdparm -I /dev/hde" if hde is on a Asus A7V133 Thu, 19 Dec 2002 04:41:23 -0800 (PST)
  • Re: 2.4.19, don't "hdparm -I /dev/hde" if hde is on a Asus A7V133 Thu, 19 Dec 2002 03:45:03 -0800 (PST)
  • Re: 2.4.19, don't "hdparm -I /dev/hde" if hde is on a Asus A7V133 Thu, 19 Dec 2002 02:33:40 -0800 (PST)
  • Re: 2.4.19, don't "hdparm -I /dev/hde" if hde is on a Asus A7V133 Thu, 19 Dec 2002 02:19:47 -0800 (PST)
  • Re: 2.4.19, don't "hdparm -I /dev/hde" if hde is on a Asus A7V133 Wed, 18 Dec 2002 14:01:36 -0800 (PST)
  • Re: 2.4.19, don't "hdparm -I /dev/hde" if hde is on a Asus A7V133 Wed, 18 Dec 2002 13:58:52 -0800 (PST)
  • Re: 2.5.51 ide module problem Wed, 18 Dec 2002 14:06:30 -0800 (PST)
  • Re: 2.4.19, don't "hdparm -I /dev/hde" if hde is on a Asus A7V133 Wed, 18 Dec 2002 13:10:32 -0800 (PST)
  • Re: 2.4.19, don't "hdparm -I /dev/hde" if hde is on a Asus A7V133 Wed, 18 Dec 2002 02:44:51 -0800 (PST)
  • Re: lk maintainers Tue, 17 Dec 2002 23:29:10 -0800 (PST)
  • Serial ATA: SiI3112 numbers, Linux-Raid 1 Tue, 17 Dec 2002 18:17:51 -0800 (PST)
  • Re: No booting with a Silicon Image 3112 SATA-Controller Tue, 17 Dec 2002 17:10:47 -0800 (PST)
  • Re: Intel P6 vs P7 system call performance Tue, 17 Dec 2002 15:18:50 -0800 (PST)
  • Re: Intel P6 vs P7 system call performance Tue, 17 Dec 2002 01:45:52 -0800 (PST)
  • Re: i845PE chipset and 20276 Promise Controller boot failure with Tue, 17 Dec 2002 00:55:30 -0800 (PST)
  • Re: i845PE chipset and 20276 Promise Controller boot failure with Tue, 17 Dec 2002 00:52:44 -0800 (PST)
• Andreas Dilger
  • Re: RedHat Kernel Error Mon, 16 Dec 2002 11:47:29 -0700
• Andreas Schwab
  • Re: [PATCH] Fix CPU bitmask truncation Fri, 20 Dec 2002 21:00:23 +0100
  • Re: [PATCH] Fix CPU bitmask truncation Fri, 20 Dec 2002 13:17:24 +0100
• Andreas Steinmetz
  • Re: [announce] procps 2.0.11 Wed, 18 Dec 2002 02:27:46 +0100
• Andreas Tscharner
  • What has changed in the graphics part between 2.4.18 and 2.4.20 Sun, 15 Dec 2002 19:43:58 +0100
• Andrew Burgess
  • Re: HT Benchmarks (was: /proc/cpuinfo and hyperthreading) Wed, 18 Dec 2002 09:56:56 -0800
• Andrew McGregor
  • Re: rmap and nvidia? Wed, 18 Dec 2002 08:35:22 +1300
  • Re: rmap and nvidia? Tue, 17 Dec 2002 22:58:25 +1300
  • Re: Alcatel speedtouch USB driver and SMP. Tue, 17 Dec 2002 23:02:58 +1300
  • Re: rmap and nvidia? Tue, 17 Dec 2002 07:42:06 +1300
  • Re: RFC: p&p ipsec without authentication Tue, 17 Dec 2002 01:06:58 +1300
  • Re: Alcatel speedtouch USB driver and SMP. Tue, 17 Dec 2002 00:57:32 +1300
  • Re: RFC: p&p ipsec without authentication Mon, 16 Dec 2002 10:59:10 +1300
  • Re: Not able to compile modutils-2.4.21-7.src.rpm Sun, 15 Dec 2002 10:34:42 +1300
  • Re: [RFC] Hardware support notes for the kernel crypto API (2.5+) Sun, 15 Dec 2002 10:28:12 +1300
• Andrew Morton
  • Re: 2.5.52, load and process in D state Sat, 21 Dec 2002 15:20:34 -0800
  • Re: [patch] Make rt_cache_stat use kmalloc_percpu Fri, 20 Dec 2002 23:31:56 -0800
  • Re: [PATCH]Timer list init is done AFTER use Fri, 20 Dec 2002 12:31:52 -0800
  • Re: [PATCH]Timer list init is done AFTER use Fri, 20 Dec 2002 11:34:25 -0800
  • Re: [PATCH]Timer list init is done AFTER use Fri, 20 Dec 2002 02:26:59 -0800
  • Re: [BENCHMARK] scheduler tunables with contest - prio_bonus_ratio Thu, 19 Dec 2002 18:48:11 -0800
  • Re: [BENCHMARK] scheduler tunables with contest - prio_bonus_ratio Thu, 19 Dec 2002 16:27:22 -0800
  • Re: [BENCHMARK] scheduler tunables with contest - prio_bonus_ratio Thu, 19 Dec 2002 16:02:34 -0800
  • Re: [BENCHMARK] scheduler tunables with contest - prio_bonus_ratio Thu, 19 Dec 2002 15:18:49 -0800
  • Re: mremap use-after-free [was Re: 2.5.52-mm2] Thu, 19 Dec 2002 10:18:23 -0800
  • Re: 2.5.52-mm2 Thu, 19 Dec 2002 02:31:32 -0800
  • Re: 2.5.52-mm2 Thu, 19 Dec 2002 01:50:12 -0800
  • Re: 2.5.52-mm2 Thu, 19 Dec 2002 01:41:15 -0800
  • Re: Freezing.. (was Re: Intel P6 vs P7 system call performance) Wed, 18 Dec 2002 22:43:43 -0800
  • 2.5.52-mm2 Wed, 18 Dec 2002 21:53:18 -0800
  • Re: Horrible drive performance under concurrent i/o jobs (dlh problem?) Wed, 18 Dec 2002 15:46:57 -0800
  • Re: Horrible drive performance under concurrent i/o jobs (dlh problem?) Wed, 18 Dec 2002 14:37:08 -0800
  • Re: [BUG] 2.5.47 - Assertion failed in fs/jbd/journal.c:415 Wed, 18 Dec 2002 14:05:14 -0800
  • Re: [BUG] 2.5.47 - Assertion failed in fs/jbd/journal.c:415 Wed, 18 Dec 2002 12:35:19 -0800
  • Re: Intel P6 vs P7 system call performance Wed, 18 Dec 2002 11:12:17 -0800
  • Re: [PATCH] (2.5;v3) move LOG_BUF_SIZE to header/config Wed, 18 Dec 2002 11:06:42 -0800
  • Re: Freezing.. (was Re: Intel P6 vs P7 system call performance) Wed, 18 Dec 2002 09:08:43 -0800
  • Re: 2.5.52-mm1 Wed, 18 Dec 2002 08:37:17 -0800
  • Re: Intel P6 vs P7 system call performance Tue, 17 Dec 2002 20:53:38 -0800
  • Re: [PATCH] (v3) move LOG_BUF_SIZE to header/config Tue, 17 Dec 2002 17:14:36 -0800
  • Re: [PATCH] move LOG_BUF_SIZE to header file Tue, 17 Dec 2002 09:27:03 -0800
  • Re: 2.5.52-mm1 kernel BUG at mm/page_walk.c:430! Tue, 17 Dec 2002 09:10:25 -0800
  • Re: [Benchmark] AIM9 results Mon, 16 Dec 2002 15:37:55 -0800
  • Re: [Benchmark] AIM9 results Mon, 16 Dec 2002 15:25:32 -0800
  • 2.5.52-mm1 Mon, 16 Dec 2002 00:36:29 -0800
  • ext3 updates for 2.4.20 Sun, 15 Dec 2002 12:28:23 -0800
  • [patch] ext3 use-after-free bugfix Sun, 15 Dec 2002 12:26:03 -0800
  • [patch] ext3 deadlock fix Sun, 15 Dec 2002 12:25:25 -0800
  • Re: problem with Andrew's patch ext3 Sun, 15 Dec 2002 10:34:05 -0800
  • Re: problem with Andrew's patch ext3 Sun, 15 Dec 2002 10:21:09 -0800
• Andrew Theurer
  • Re: /proc/cpuinfo and hyperthreading Mon, 16 Dec 2002 09:52:35 -0600
• Andrew Walrond
  • Re: Symlink indirection Sun, 15 Dec 2002 12:17:40 +0000
  • Re: Symlink indirection Sun, 15 Dec 2002 00:41:06 +0000
• Andries Brouwer
  • Re: PROBLEM: kernel 2.4.20 option CONFIG_BLK_STATS breaks /proc/partitons so "mount" can't mount devices by UUID. Thu, 19 Dec 2002 12:51:23 +0100
  • Re: PROBLEM: kernel 2.4.20 option CONFIG_BLK_STATS breaks /proc/partitons so "mount" can't mount devices by UUID. Tue, 17 Dec 2002 01:55:39 +0100
• André Cruz
  • USB troubles in 2.5 kernels 17 Dec 2002 00:59:54 +0000
• Andy Pfiffer
  • Re: [PATCH] kexec for 2.5.52 [OSDL PLM] 16 Dec 2002 16:40:52 -0800
  • Re: [PATCH] kexec for 2.5.52 16 Dec 2002 11:16:35 -0800
• Aniruddha M Marathe
  • [BENCHMARK] TIObench performance of mm2 patch. Latencies come down. Thu, 19 Dec 2002 13:54:33 +0530
  • [BENCHMARK] Lmbench result for 5.52 mm2 patch. Thu, 19 Dec 2002 13:38:24 +0530
  • [BENCHMARK] LM bench results summary for 52-mm1 patch Mon, 16 Dec 2002 15:48:49 +0530
  • [BENCHMARK] 52-mm1 patch-TIO bench- maximum I/O latency on rise. Mon, 16 Dec 2002 15:11:40 +0530
  • [BENCHMARK] no much change in performance of 2.5.52 as tested on LM bench Mon, 16 Dec 2002 12:38:59 +0530
  • [BENCHMARK] not so good performance of 2.5.52 on TIO bench Mon, 16 Dec 2002 12:14:35 +0530
• AnonimoVeneziano
  • Re: vt8235 fix, hopefully last variant Thu, 19 Dec 2002 14:34:58 +0100
  • Re: IDE-CD and VT8235 issue!!! Wed, 18 Dec 2002 23:06:25 +0100
  • Re: IDE-CD and VT8235 issue!!! Mon, 16 Dec 2002 15:13:32 +0100
  • Re: IDE-CD and VT8235 issue!!! Sun, 15 Dec 2002 22:16:06 +0100
  • Re: IDE-CD and VT8235 issue!!! Sun, 15 Dec 2002 14:21:06 +0100
  • Re: IDE-CD and VT8235 issue!!! Sun, 15 Dec 2002 00:55:31 +0100
• Anton Blanchard
  • Re: [PATCH] Fix CPU bitmask truncation Sat, 21 Dec 2002 10:42:26 +1100
  • Re: [PATCH] Fix CPU bitmask truncation Sat, 21 Dec 2002 09:57:14 +1100
  • Re: [ANNOUNCE] Intel PRO/100 software developer manual released Wed, 18 Dec 2002 14:27:32 +1100
• Antonino Daplas
  • Re: [Linux-fbdev-devel] [PATCH] fix endian problem in 21 Dec 2002 11:45:44 +0800
  • Re: [Linux-fbdev-devel] [PATCH] fix endian problem in 15 Dec 2002 06:05:24 +0500
• Aravind Ceyardass
  • Re: Re: pci-skeleton duplex check Mon, 16 Dec 2002 14:55:13 -0400
• Arjan Filius
  • 2.5.50 ipsec -> kernel: pmtu discvovery on SA AH/00003d54/ac110032 Mon, 16 Dec 2002 13:47:26 +0100 (CET)
• Arjan van de Ven
  • Re: Multithreaded coredump patch where? 17 Dec 2002 13:14:55 +0100
  • Re: Data-loss bug stings Linux 17 Dec 2002 13:08:31 +0100
  • Re: Multithreaded coredump patch where? 17 Dec 2002 13:05:16 +0100
  • Re: Multithreaded coredump patch where? 17 Dec 2002 13:08:16 +0100
  • Re: Notification hooks 16 Dec 2002 18:18:55 +0100
  • Re: Notification hooks Mon, 16 Dec 2002 17:28:38 +0000
• Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
  • Re: Kernel GCC Optimizations Sat, 21 Dec 2002 23:26:22 -0200
  • Re: netstat and 2.5.5[12] Wed, 18 Dec 2002 00:21:40 -0200
  • Re: netstat and 2.5.5[12] Tue, 17 Dec 2002 12:59:31 -0200
• arun4linux
  • Re: Re: Data-loss bug stings Linux Sat, 21 Dec 2002 02:37:05 +0530
  • Data-loss bug stings Linux Tue, 17 Dec 2002 13:08:24 +0530
• axel@pearbough.net
  • Build error (2.5.52): undefined reference to `agp_generic_agp_3_0_enable' Sat, 21 Dec 2002 19:39:04 +0100
  • Re: Kernel GCC Optimizations Sat, 21 Dec 2002 19:08:52 +0100
  • 2.5.52: Many, many unresolved symbols!? Fri, 20 Dec 2002 11:46:44 +0100
• bart@etpmod.phys.tue.nl
  • Re: Intel P6 vs P7 system call performance Thu, 19 Dec 2002 16:20:42 +0100 (CET)
  • Re: Intel P6 vs P7 system call performance Thu, 19 Dec 2002 15:57:06 +0100 (CET)
  • Re: Intel P6 vs P7 system call performance Thu, 19 Dec 2002 14:22:36 +0100 (CET)
• Ben Collins
  • Re: Linux 2.4.21-pre2 Fri, 20 Dec 2002 10:50:19 -0500
  • Re: Notification hooks Tue, 17 Dec 2002 08:18:49 -0500
  • Re: Notification hooks Mon, 16 Dec 2002 12:44:26 -0500
  • Re: Linux v2.5.52 Mon, 16 Dec 2002 12:36:21 -0500
  • Re: Notification hooks Mon, 16 Dec 2002 12:27:22 -0500
  • Re: Notification hooks Mon, 16 Dec 2002 12:23:30 -0500
  • Notification hooks Mon, 16 Dec 2002 12:12:18 -0500
  • Re: Linux v2.5.52 Mon, 16 Dec 2002 11:40:32 -0500
  • Re: Linux v2.5.52 Mon, 16 Dec 2002 10:16:39 -0500
• Ben Greear
  • Re: OT: Which Gigabit ethernet card? Fri, 20 Dec 2002 10:29:26 -0800
• Benjamin LaHaise
  • Re: Intel P6 vs P7 system call performance Tue, 17 Dec 2002 16:53:37 -0500
  • Re: Intel P6 vs P7 system call performance Tue, 17 Dec 2002 16:50:33 -0500
  • Re: Intel P6 vs P7 system call performance Tue, 17 Dec 2002 16:39:54 -0500
  • Re: Intel P6 vs P7 system call performance Tue, 17 Dec 2002 16:38:38 -0500
  • Re: Intel P6 vs P7 system call performance Tue, 17 Dec 2002 16:34:58 -0500
  • Re: PS/Top broken - /proc entry bad Mon, 16 Dec 2002 12:43:49 -0500
• Bill Davidsen
  • Re: OT: Which Gigabit ethernet card? Fri, 20 Dec 2002 13:48:22 -0500 (EST)
  • Re: ALSA update Thu, 19 Dec 2002 18:04:09 -0500 (EST)
  • Re: modutils for both redhat kernels and 2.5.x Thu, 19 Dec 2002 17:57:35 -0500 (EST)
  • Are working modules going to be in 2.6? Thu, 19 Dec 2002 15:58:11 -0500 (EST)
  • Re: Dedicated kernel bug database Thu, 19 Dec 2002 15:09:50 -0500 (EST)
  • Re: Kernel for Pentium 4 hyperthreading? Tue, 17 Dec 2002 14:39:24 -0500 (EST)
  • Re: Trouble with kernel 2.4.18-18.7.x Tue, 17 Dec 2002 14:34:38 -0500 (EST)
  • Re: HT Benchmarks (was: /proc/cpuinfo and hyperthreading) Tue, 17 Dec 2002 14:27:04 -0500 (EST)
• billyrose@billyrose.net
  • Re: Intel P6 vs P7 system call performance Thu, 19 Dec 2002 13:46:30 -0500
  • Re: Intel P6 vs P7 system call performance Thu, 19 Dec 2002 11:10:54 -0500
  • Re: Intel P6 vs P7 system call performance Thu, 19 Dec 2002 09:40:34 -0500
  • Re: Intel P6 vs P7 system call performance Wed, 18 Dec 2002 18:51:13 -0500
• Bjorn Helgaas
  • Re: [PATCH] Fix CPU bitmask truncation Fri, 20 Dec 2002 10:00:21 -0700
  • [PATCH] arch/ia64 update Wed, 18 Dec 2002 11:16:06 -0700
  • [PATCH] PCI: disable decoding while sizing BARs Mon, 16 Dec 2002 17:41:53 -0700
  • [PATCH] Remove bogus AGP/DRM assumptions Mon, 16 Dec 2002 13:09:47 -0700
  • [PATCH] joydev: fix HZ->millisecond transformation Mon, 16 Dec 2002 12:27:38 -0700
  • [PATCH] Remove obsolete SMP declarations Mon, 16 Dec 2002 12:23:47 -0700
  • [PATCH] let binfmt_misc optionally preserve argv[1] Mon, 16 Dec 2002 12:17:54 -0700
  • [PATCH] Fix CPU bitmask truncation Mon, 16 Dec 2002 12:13:29 -0700
• Bob Miller
  • Re: Bug? undefined reference to `input_event' Thu, 19 Dec 2002 15:37:48 -0800
  • Re: 2.5.52 compile error Tue, 17 Dec 2002 14:54:28 -0800
  • Re: 2.5.52 compile error Tue, 17 Dec 2002 13:16:18 -0800
• BoehmeSilvio
  • Re: Via KT400 Thu, 19 Dec 2002 16:11:07 +0100
• Bourne
  • Unmounting a busy RO-Filesystem Tue, 17 Dec 2002 06:36:35 +0530
• Brian Gerst
  • Re: Intel P6 vs P7 system call performance Wed, 18 Dec 2002 01:00:25 -0500
  • Re: Intel P6 vs P7 system call performance Wed, 18 Dec 2002 00:25:38 -0500
  • [PATCH] Remove Rules.make from Makefiles (1/3) Sun, 15 Dec 2002 10:16:59 -0500
• Brian Jackson
  • Re: Dedicated kernel bug database Thu, 19 Dec 2002 11:33:29 -0600
  • Re: /proc/cpuinfo and hyperthreading Mon, 16 Dec 2002 07:54:53 -0600
• Brian Murphy
  • [PATCH 2.4] Titan pci serial card recognition fix Sun, 15 Dec 2002 18:39:36 +0100
  • [PATCH 2.5] Titan pci serial card recognition fix Sun, 15 Dec 2002 18:34:26 +0100
  • serial_pci_tbl is incorrect for some Titan devices Sun, 15 Dec 2002 16:23:58 +0100
• Bruce Lowekamp
  • 2.4.21-pre1: cannot load af-packet as module on Athlon Tue, 17 Dec 2002 13:41:24 -0500
• Bryan O'Sullivan
  • RE: 3ware driver in 2.4.x and 2.5.x not compatible with 6x00 seri 18 Dec 2002 17:14:03 -0800
  • Re: 3ware driver in 2.4.x and 2.5.x not compatible with 6x00 18 Dec 2002 17:11:38 -0800
• Burton Windle
  • [2.5.51+] kernel not honoring init= bootparm? Fri, 20 Dec 2002 14:31:14 -0500 (EST)
• caf@guarana.org
  • Re: 2.4.20 st + aic7xxx (Adaptec 19160B) + VIA KT333 repeatable freeze Mon, 16 Dec 2002 14:52:26 +1100
  • Re: 2.4.20 st + aic7xxx (Adaptec 19160B) + VIA KT333 repeatable freeze Sun, 15 Dec 2002 23:49:55 +1100
• carbonated beverage
  • [PATCH] tiny ens1370.c warning fix, bk 2.5.52 Fri, 20 Dec 2002 14:52:51 -0800
  • Boot probs on 2.5.52-bk, BusLogic driver. Fri, 20 Dec 2002 14:34:47 -0800
  • [PATCH] [TINY] Documentation/Changes for modules Fri, 20 Dec 2002 11:49:00 -0800
  • depmod errors in 2.5.52-bk Thu, 19 Dec 2002 14:23:36 -0800
• Carl Spalletta
  • subterfugue 0.2.1a for kernel testing - update Sun, 15 Dec 2002 18:20:14 -0800 (PST)
• Carlos Fernandez Sanz
  • Re: NAT helper module for MSN Mon, 16 Dec 2002 23:36:03 +0100
  • NAT helper module for MSN Mon, 16 Dec 2002 23:07:45 +0100
• Charl P. Botha
  • Re: [Dri-devel] PROBLEM: 2.4.{19,20} fails to resume if radeon.o is loaded Sun, 15 Dec 2002 20:37:47 +0100
• Chris Mason
  • Re: ext3 updates for 2.4.20 16 Dec 2002 16:28:12 -0500
  • Re: [BK][PATCH] ReiserFS CPU and memory bandwidth efficient large 16 Dec 2002 13:24:28 -0500
• Chris Wright
  • Re: [ANNOUNCE] 2.5.52-lsm1 Thu, 19 Dec 2002 11:25:58 -0800
  • [ANNOUNCE] 2.5.52-lsm1 Thu, 19 Dec 2002 02:51:23 -0800
  • Re: QM_MODULES: Function not implemented Wed, 18 Dec 2002 12:19:04 -0800
  • Re: converting cap_set_pg() to for_each_task_pid() Wed, 18 Dec 2002 10:04:45 -0800
• Christian Gennerat
  • Re: [PATCH 2.4] : donauboe IrDA driver (resend) Fri, 20 Dec 2002 19:05:08 +0100
• Christian Leber
  • Re: Intel P6 vs P7 system call performance Sat, 21 Dec 2002 17:07:06 +0100
• Christian Seidemann
  • Re: vt8235 fix, hopefully last variant Sat, 21 Dec 2002 01:25:33 +0100
• Christoph Hellwig
  • [PATCH] mmuless ports can't support /proc/<pid>/maps Sat, 21 Dec 2002 22:49:26 +0100
  • Re: [PATCH] aic7xxx bouncing over 4G Sat, 21 Dec 2002 08:55:10 +0000
  • Re: [PATCH 2.5.52] NUMA scheduler (1/2) Fri, 20 Dec 2002 15:17:21 +0000
  • Re: Linux 2.4.21-pre2 Fri, 20 Dec 2002 14:57:09 +0000
  • Re: PTRACE_GET_THREAD_AREA Fri, 20 Dec 2002 10:24:31 +0000
  • Re: [PATCH][2.4] generic cluster APIC support for systems with more than 8 CPUs Fri, 20 Dec 2002 08:00:50 +0000
  • Re: Linux 2.4.21-pre2 Wed, 18 Dec 2002 23:31:46 +0000
  • Re: [PATCH][2.4] generic cluster APIC support for systems with more than 8 CPUs Wed, 18 Dec 2002 23:26:40 +0000
  • Re: [PATCH] move LOG_BUF_SIZE to header file Tue, 17 Dec 2002 09:41:51 +0000
  • Re: Notification hooks Mon, 16 Dec 2002 17:34:30 +0000
  • Re: Linux v2.5.52 Mon, 16 Dec 2002 16:36:31 +0000
  • Re: Linux v2.5.52 Mon, 16 Dec 2002 10:26:40 +0000
• Chuck Lever
  • [PATCH] cleanup: simplify req_offset function in NFS client Wed, 18 Dec 2002 18:22:17 -0500 (EST)
  • [PATCH] give NFS client a "set_page_dirty" address space op. Wed, 18 Dec 2002 18:20:37 -0500 (EST)
  • [PATCH] use kmap_atomic instaed of kmap in NFS client Wed, 18 Dec 2002 18:19:43 -0500 (EST)
• Cliff White
  • Re: [Benchmark] AIM9 results Wed, 18 Dec 2002 10:47:43 -0800
• Colin Paul Adams
  • Re: Alcatel speedtouch USB driver and SMP. 16 Dec 2002 09:02:35 +0000
  • Re: Alcatel speedtouch USB driver and SMP. 15 Dec 2002 08:58:14 +0000
  • Alcatel speedtouch USB driver and SMP. 15 Dec 2002 07:10:33 +0000
• Colin Slater
  • Re: BUG: 2.5.52-bk4 Fri, 20 Dec 2002 09:28:18 -0500 (EST)
  • Re: BUG: 2.5.52-bk4 Thu, 19 Dec 2002 18:19:21 -0500 (EST)
• Con Kolivas
  • [BENCHMARK] scheduler tunables with contest - interactive_delta Sat, 21 Dec 2002 15:39:32 +1100
  • [BENCHMARK] 2.5.52-mm2 with contest Fri, 20 Dec 2002 20:22:25 +1100
  • Re: [BENCHMARK] scheduler tunables with contest - prio_bonus_ratio Fri, 20 Dec 2002 11:22:59 +1100
  • Re: [BENCHMARK] scheduler tunables with contest - prio_bonus_ratio Fri, 20 Dec 2002 11:04:24 +1100
  • [BENCHMARK] scheduler tunables with contest - starvation_limit Fri, 20 Dec 2002 10:48:50 +1100
  • Re: [BENCHMARK] scheduler tunables with contest - prio_bonus_ratio Fri, 20 Dec 2002 10:42:43 +1100
  • [BENCHMARK] scheduler tunables with contest - prio_bonus_ratio Fri, 20 Dec 2002 08:50:27 +1100
  • [BENCHMARK] scheduler tunables with contest - max_sleep_average Thu, 19 Dec 2002 20:14:17 +1100
  • [BENCHMARK] scheduler tunables with contest - child_penalty Thu, 19 Dec 2002 15:45:06 +1100
  • [BENCHMARK] scheduler tunables with contest - max_timeslice Thu, 19 Dec 2002 12:31:48 +1100
  • [BENCHMARK] 2.5.52-mm1 with contest Thu, 19 Dec 2002 08:25:49 +1100
  • Re: Horrible drive performance under concurrent i/o jobs (dlh problem?) Thu, 19 Dec 2002 08:10:47 +1100
  • 2.4.20-ck2 Thu, 19 Dec 2002 00:58:25 +1100
  • [BENCHMARK] 2.5.52 with contest Tue, 17 Dec 2002 23:23:46 +1100
• Cort Dougan
  • Re: 2 (minor) Alpha probs in 2.5.51 Mon, 16 Dec 2002 13:02:39 -0700
• Courtney Grimland
  • Re: Via KT400 Wed, 18 Dec 2002 23:26:53 -0600
• D.A.M. Revok
  • Right, I tried flashing the BIOS, as suggested, and /still/ can't enable SMART Fri, 20 Dec 2002 13:38:45 -0500
  • Re: 2.4.19, don't "hdparm -I /dev/hde" if hde is on a Asus A7V133 Promise ctrlr, or... Wed, 18 Dec 2002 17:18:26 -0500
  • Re: 2.4.19, don't "hdparm -I /dev/hde" if hde is on a Asus A7V133 Promise ctrlr, or... Wed, 18 Dec 2002 17:03:18 -0500
  • Re: 2.4.19, don't "hdparm -I /dev/hde" if hde is on a Asus A7V133 Promise ctrlr, or... Wed, 18 Dec 2002 16:35:58 -0500
  • Re: 2.4.19, don't "hdparm -I /dev/hde" if hde is on a Asus A7V133 Promise ctrlr, or... Wed, 18 Dec 2002 05:38:03 -0500
  • Re: 2.4.19, don't "hdparm -I /dev/hde" if hde is on a Asus A7V133 Promise ctrlr, or... Sun, 15 Dec 2002 17:25:57 -0500
  • 2.4.19, don't "hdparm -I /dev/hde" if hde is on a Asus A7V133 Promise ctrlr, or... Sun, 15 Dec 2002 15:49:37 -0500
• dada1
  • Re: Intel P6 vs P7 system call performance Wed, 18 Dec 2002 15:51:04 +0100
  • Re: Intel P6 vs P7 system call performance Tue, 17 Dec 2002 12:17:42 +0100
• Dan Christensen
  • suspend to ram problems on Dell I4150 with Radeon 7500 Sun, 15 Dec 2002 01:15:03 -0500
• Dan Kegel
  • Re: Dedicated kernel bug database Thu, 19 Dec 2002 18:26:27 -0800
  • Re: Dedicated kernel bug database Thu, 19 Dec 2002 14:26:32 -0800
  • Re: Dedicated kernel bug database Thu, 19 Dec 2002 14:05:19 -0800
  • re: Dedicated kernel bug database Thu, 19 Dec 2002 09:46:44 -0800
• Dan Merillat
  • raid5 multi-drive-failure and recovery? Thu, 19 Dec 2002 19:49:05 -0500
• Daniel Jacobowitz
  • Re: PTRACE_GET_THREAD_AREA Fri, 20 Dec 2002 11:08:17 -0500
  • Re: PTRACE_GET_THREAD_AREA Fri, 20 Dec 2002 10:48:29 -0500
  • Re: PTRACE_GET_THREAD_AREA Fri, 20 Dec 2002 10:44:13 -0500
  • Re: Intel P6 vs P7 system call performance Thu, 19 Dec 2002 21:37:36 -0500
  • Re: Intel P6 vs P7 system call performance Thu, 19 Dec 2002 19:53:33 -0500
  • Re: Intel P6 vs P7 system call performance Tue, 17 Dec 2002 15:35:05 -0500
• Dave Hansen
  • [PATCH] (2/4) stack updates for x86 Sun, 15 Dec 2002 21:59:15 -0800
  • [PATCH] (3/4) stack updates for x86 Sun, 15 Dec 2002 21:59:17 -0800
  • [PATCH] (1/4) stack updates for x86 Sun, 15 Dec 2002 21:59:13 -0800
  • [PATCH] (4/4) stack updates for x86 Sun, 15 Dec 2002 21:59:19 -0800
• Dave Jones
  • Re: Build error (2.5.52): undefined reference to `agp_generic_agp_3_0_enable' Sat, 21 Dec 2002 18:46:32 +0000
  • Re: [drm:drm_init] *ERROR* Cannot initialize the agpgart module. Sat, 21 Dec 2002 14:22:26 +0000
  • Re: Next round of AGPGART fixes. Fri, 20 Dec 2002 18:44:01 +0000
  • Re: [PATCH] zero-size E820 memory (kernel start-up failure) Fri, 20 Dec 2002 12:54:00 +0000
  • Next round of AGPGART fixes. Fri, 20 Dec 2002 12:41:37 +0000
  • Re: Dedicated kernel bug database Fri, 20 Dec 2002 10:40:04 +0000
  • Re: Dedicated kernel bug database Fri, 20 Dec 2002 10:35:27 +0000
  • Re: Dedicated kernel bug database Fri, 20 Dec 2002 10:32:12 +0000
  • Re: Dedicated kernel bug database Fri, 20 Dec 2002 10:30:27 +0000
  • Re: 2.4.20: Broken AGP initialization for i845G chipset [patch] Fri, 20 Dec 2002 10:27:15 +0000
  • Re: 2.5.52: agp, drm, i810 problem Fri, 20 Dec 2002 10:25:41 +0000
  • Re: [drm:drm_init] *ERROR* Cannot initialize the agpgart module. Fri, 20 Dec 2002 10:33:07 +0100
  • Re: Dedicated kernel bug database Thu, 19 Dec 2002 20:18:11 +0000
  • Re: Dedicated kernel bug database Thu, 19 Dec 2002 18:49:58 +0000
  • Re: Intel P6 vs P7 system call performance Thu, 19 Dec 2002 16:56:00 +0000
  • Re: Intel P6 vs P7 system call performance Thu, 19 Dec 2002 13:38:48 +0000
  • Re: Freezing.. (was Re: Intel P6 vs P7 system call performance) Thu, 19 Dec 2002 10:50:10 +0000
  • Re: Via KT400 Thu, 19 Dec 2002 10:43:21 +0000
  • Re: Via KT400 Thu, 19 Dec 2002 10:41:58 +0000
  • Re: Freezing.. (was Re: Intel P6 vs P7 system call performance) Thu, 19 Dec 2002 10:27:14 +0000
  • Re: 3ware driver in 2.4.x and 2.5.x not compatible with 6x00 series cards Wed, 18 Dec 2002 18:26:18 +0000
  • Re: Freezing.. (was Re: Intel P6 vs P7 system call performance) Wed, 18 Dec 2002 16:58:38 +0000
  • Re: Intel P6 vs P7 system call performance Wed, 18 Dec 2002 16:41:19 +0000
  • Re: [drm:drm_init] *ERROR* Cannot initialize the agpgart module. Wed, 18 Dec 2002 16:29:58 +0000
  • Re: [patch 2.5] PCI: kill pdev_enable_device() Wed, 18 Dec 2002 00:42:26 +0000
  • Re: Intel P6 vs P7 system call performance Tue, 17 Dec 2002 19:47:08 +0000
  • Re: Intel P6 vs P7 system call performance Tue, 17 Dec 2002 12:40:09 +0000
  • Re: My cpu fuzzy problem was due to XMMS Tue, 17 Dec 2002 12:38:06 +0000
  • Re: [drm:drm_init] *ERROR* Cannot initialize the agpgart module. Tue, 17 Dec 2002 13:33:07 +0100
  • Re: Linux 2.2.24-rc1 Tue, 17 Dec 2002 01:06:12 +0000
  • Re: Intel P6 vs P7 system call performance Tue, 17 Dec 2002 01:03:21 +0000
  • Re: L2 Cache problem Mon, 16 Dec 2002 19:21:58 +0000
  • Re: Where is this printk? Mon, 16 Dec 2002 18:53:32 +0000
  • Re: Notification hooks Mon, 16 Dec 2002 18:25:14 +0000
  • Re: Notification hooks Mon, 16 Dec 2002 17:19:25 +0000
  • Re: /proc/cpuinfo and hyperthreading Mon, 16 Dec 2002 14:08:10 +0000
  • Re: [Oops 2.5.51] PnPBIOS: cat /proc/bus/pnp/escd Mon, 16 Dec 2002 13:58:13 +0000
  • Re: Kernel for Pentium 4 hyperthreading? Sun, 15 Dec 2002 19:17:48 +0000
  • Re: Kernel for Pentium 4 hyperthreading? Sun, 15 Dec 2002 15:58:19 +0000
  • Re: Kernel for Pentium 4 hyperthreading? Sun, 15 Dec 2002 15:57:28 +0000
  • Re: Kernel for Pentium 4 hyperthreading? Sun, 15 Dec 2002 13:44:08 +0000
  • Re: MCE 7 / Athlon / 2.4.20 Sun, 15 Dec 2002 00:11:07 +0000
• David A. Chappel
  • PROBLEM: Oops during high ide io loads. Thu, 19 Dec 2002 16:05:00 -0700
• David Brownell
  • Re: USB 2.0 is too slow? Fri, 20 Dec 2002 08:42:08 -0800
• David Gómez
  • Re: problems creating a driver Sun, 15 Dec 2002 16:49:44 +0100
• David Lang
  • RE: Horrible drive performance under concurrent i/o jobs (dlh Fri, 20 Dec 2002 14:25:28 -0800 (PST)
  • Re: 15000+ processes -- poor performance ?! Wed, 18 Dec 2002 17:44:46 -0800 (PST)
  • Re: 15000+ processes -- poor performance ?! Wed, 18 Dec 2002 17:20:02 -0800 (PST)
  • Re: 15000+ processes -- poor performance ?! Wed, 18 Dec 2002 17:12:41 -0800 (PST)
• David Meybohm
  • Re: pnp/IDE question- help fixing up a patch Fri, 20 Dec 2002 16:16:11 -0500
• David Mosberger
  • Re: PATCH 2.5.x disable BAR when sizing Fri, 20 Dec 2002 10:26:30 -0800
  • Re: PATCH 2.5.x disable BAR when sizing Fri, 20 Dec 2002 01:42:33 -0800
  • Re: PATCH 2.5.x disable BAR when sizing Thu, 19 Dec 2002 18:27:17 -0800
  • Re: [RFT][PATCH] generic device DMA implementation Tue, 17 Dec 2002 19:13:45 -0800
• David S. Miller
  • Re: [PATCH] aic7xxx bouncing over 4G Sat, 21 Dec 2002 13:41:33 -0800 (PST)
  • Re: [patch] Make rt_cache_stat use kmalloc_percpu Fri, 20 Dec 2002 23:29:09 -0800 (PST)
  • Re: [PATCH RESEND] memory leak in ndisc_router_discovery Fri, 20 Dec 2002 23:08:36 -0800 (PST)
  • Re: [patch] Make rt_cache_stat use kmalloc_percpu Fri, 20 Dec 2002 23:05:28 -0800 (PST)
  • Re: [PATCH/RFC] New module refcounting for net_proto_family Fri, 20 Dec 2002 22:54:11 -0800 (PST)
  • Re: [PATCH] aic7xxx bouncing over 4G 20 Dec 2002 20:10:51 -0800
• David Sanán Baena
  • problems creating a driver Sun, 15 Dec 2002 14:05:47 +0100
• David Schwartz
  • Re: Intel P6 vs P7 system call performance Mon, 16 Dec 2002 20:10:42 -0800
• David Woodhouse
  • Re: Notification hooks Tue, 17 Dec 2002 09:05:07 +0000
• Dax Kelson
  • Re: OT: Which Gigabit ethernet card? Fri, 20 Dec 2002 14:08:58 -0700 (MST)
• dean gaudet
  • Re: Intel P6 vs P7 system call performance Mon, 16 Dec 2002 22:43:30 -0800 (PST)
• Denis Vlasenko
  • Re: 2.4.19, don't "hdparm -I /dev/hde" if hde is on a Asus A7V133 Promise ctrlr, or... Thu, 19 Dec 2002 13:14:01 -0200
  • Re: [Lse-tech] Re: 15000+ processes -- poor performance ?! Thu, 19 Dec 2002 13:15:35 -0200
  • Re: [Lse-tech] Re: 15000+ processes -- poor performance ?! Thu, 19 Dec 2002 13:05:03 -0200
  • Re: 15000+ processes -- poor performance ?! Thu, 19 Dec 2002 12:59:28 -0200
  • Re: 2.4.19, don't "hdparm -I /dev/hde" if hde is on a Asus A7V133 Promise ctrlr, or... Thu, 19 Dec 2002 12:40:22 -0200
  • Re: lk maintainers Wed, 18 Dec 2002 11:24:26 -0200
  • Re: lk maintainers Wed, 18 Dec 2002 08:49:59 -0200
  • Re: My cpu fuzzy problem was due to XMMS Tue, 17 Dec 2002 11:54:39 -0200
  • Re: i845PE chipset and 20276 Promise Controller boot failure with 2.4.20-ac2 Tue, 17 Dec 2002 09:35:29 -0200
  • Re: Dual P3 550 Katmai Bug Tue, 17 Dec 2002 09:29:15 -0200
  • lk maintainers Tue, 17 Dec 2002 09:17:55 -0200
  • Re: HT Benchmarks (was: /proc/cpuinfo and hyperthreading) Tue, 17 Dec 2002 09:03:38 -0200
  • Re: 2.5.51 load avg += 1 Mon, 16 Dec 2002 16:06:38 -0200
  • Re: Unmounting a busy RO-Filesystem Mon, 16 Dec 2002 16:03:01 -0200
• dino klein
  • PROBLEM: devfs related oops Thu, 19 Dec 2002 15:09:49 +0000
• Dipankar Sarma
  • [PATCH] RCU statistics 2.5.52 Mon, 16 Dec 2002 13:08:28 +0530
  • [PATCH] RCU statistics 2.5.51 Sun, 15 Dec 2002 22:23:13 +0530
• Dominik Brodowski
  • [PATCH 2.5] cpufreq: minor cleanups Sat, 21 Dec 2002 21:25:09 +0100
  • [PATCH 2.5] cpufreq: elanfreq compile fix Sat, 21 Dec 2002 19:20:44 +0100
  • [PATCH 2.5] cpufreq: x86 per-CPU loops_per_jiffy notifier Sat, 21 Dec 2002 18:47:13 +0100
  • [PATCH 2.5] cpufreq: update system-wide loops_per_jiffy only on UP Sat, 21 Dec 2002 18:41:09 +0100
  • [PATCH 2.5] cpufreq: x86 tsc cpufreq notifier Sat, 21 Dec 2002 18:45:14 +0100
  • [PATCH 2.5] cpufreq: change setpolicy to event Sun, 15 Dec 2002 13:49:34 +0100
• Doug Ledford
  • Re: [PATCH] aic7xxx bouncing over 4G Sat, 21 Dec 2002 12:45:54 -0500
• Douglas Gilbert
  • Re: DMA from SCSI controller to PCI frame buffer memory. Sun, 15 Dec 2002 13:06:54 +1100
• Dr. David Alan Gilbert
  • Re: 2 (minor) Alpha probs in 2.5.51 Mon, 16 Dec 2002 12:49:37 +0000
  • 2 (minor) Alpha probs in 2.5.51 Mon, 16 Dec 2002 00:33:27 +0000
• Ducrot Bruno
  • Re: [PATCH] S4bios for 2.5.52. Wed, 18 Dec 2002 09:59:02 +0100
  • [PATCH] S4bios for 2.5.52. Tue, 17 Dec 2002 21:39:03 +0100
  • [PATCH] acpi_wakeup fixes Tue, 17 Dec 2002 21:21:42 +0100
  • Re: Q: i845MP/P4-M laptop support? (specific problems listed) Tue, 17 Dec 2002 19:06:07 +0100
  • Re: rmap and nvidia? Mon, 16 Dec 2002 14:32:23 +0100
• Dumitru Ciobarcianu
  • Re: [PATCH 2.4] : donauboe IrDA driver (resend) 21 Dec 2002 11:16:31 +0200
  • Re: [PATCH 2.4] : donauboe IrDA driver (resend) 20 Dec 2002 12:55:40 +0200
  • Re: [PATCH 2.4] : donauboe IrDA driver (resend) 19 Dec 2002 17:05:16 +0200
• Ed Tomlinson
  • Re: [drm:drm_init] *ERROR* Cannot initialize the agpgart module. Sat, 21 Dec 2002 23:41:29 -0500
  • [PATCH] compile error mtrr/if.c Sat, 21 Dec 2002 18:53:26 -0500
  • Re: [drm:drm_init] *ERROR* Cannot initialize the agpgart module. Fri, 20 Dec 2002 18:29:18 -0500
  • Re: [drm:drm_init] *ERROR* Cannot initialize the agpgart module. Tue, 17 Dec 2002 07:50:12 -0500
  • [drm:drm_init] *ERROR* Cannot initialize the agpgart module. Mon, 16 Dec 2002 20:49:16 -0500
  • Re: [PATCH] kexec for 2.5.51.... Sun, 15 Dec 2002 16:41:49 -0500
• edward.kuns@rockwellfirstpoint.com
  • Re: i845PE chipset and 20276 Promise Controller boot failure with 2.4.20-ac2 Tue, 17 Dec 2002 11:25:05 -0600
  • Re: i810 sound starts and stops for 2.4.XX and i845PE chipset Tue, 17 Dec 2002 11:16:26 -0600
  • i845PE chipset and 20276 Promise Controller boot failure with 2.4.20-ac2 Mon, 16 Dec 2002 17:09:49 -0600
  • i810 sound starts and stops for 2.4.XX and i845PE chipset Mon, 16 Dec 2002 15:03:16 -0600
• Eli Carter
  • Re: Dedicated kernel bug database Fri, 20 Dec 2002 09:43:21 -0600
  • Re: Dedicated kernel bug database Thu, 19 Dec 2002 15:57:30 -0600
  • Re: Dedicated kernel bug database Thu, 19 Dec 2002 15:14:27 -0600
  • Re: Dedicated kernel bug database Thu, 19 Dec 2002 14:38:46 -0600
  • Re: Dedicated kernel bug database Thu, 19 Dec 2002 14:24:33 -0600
  • Re: Dedicated kernel bug database Thu, 19 Dec 2002 13:49:56 -0600
  • Re: Dedicated kernel bug database Thu, 19 Dec 2002 12:08:55 -0600
  • Re: Dedicated kernel bug database Thu, 19 Dec 2002 11:48:16 -0600
  • Re: Freezing.. (was Re: Intel P6 vs P7 system call performance) Thu, 19 Dec 2002 10:39:14 -0600
  • Re: Freezing.. (was Re: Intel P6 vs P7 system call performance) Wed, 18 Dec 2002 11:06:42 -0600
  • Re: FYI Mon, 16 Dec 2002 15:38:03 -0600
  • Re: FYI Mon, 16 Dec 2002 15:31:34 -0600
• Eric Altendorf
  • Re: [2.5.50, ACPI] link error Sun, 15 Dec 2002 19:40:24 -0800
• eric lin
  • Re: 2.5.52 compile error Wed, 18 Dec 2002 00:46:43 -0700
  • Re: 2.5.52 compile error Wed, 18 Dec 2002 00:26:20 -0700
  • Re: 2.5.52 compile error Wed, 18 Dec 2002 00:00:23 -0700
  • Re: 2.5.52 compile error Tue, 17 Dec 2002 23:39:33 -0700
  • make install , or make modules error in 2.5.52 Tue, 17 Dec 2002 14:18:30 -0700
• Eric W. Biederman
  • Re: PATCH 2.5.x disable BAR when sizing 21 Dec 2002 15:06:50 -0700
  • Re: [PATCH] kexec for 2.5.52 16 Dec 2002 12:29:12 -0700
  • [PATCH] kexec for 2.5.52 16 Dec 2002 09:40:34 -0700
  • Re: [PATCH] kexec for 2.5.51.... 15 Dec 2002 17:41:35 -0700
  • Re: [PATCH] kexec for 2.5.51.... 15 Dec 2002 14:03:17 -0700
• Eric Weigle
  • Re: OT: Which Gigabit ethernet card? Fri, 20 Dec 2002 14:13:42 -0700
• Erich Focht
  • Re: [PATCH 2.5.52] NUMA scheduler (1/2) Fri, 20 Dec 2002 18:44:32 +0100
  • [PATCH 2.5.52] NUMA scheduler: cputimes stats Fri, 20 Dec 2002 15:49:09 +0100
  • [PATCH 2.5.52] NUMA scheduler (2/2) Wed, 18 Dec 2002 17:23:02 +0100
  • [PATCH 2.5.52] NUMA scheduler (1/2) Wed, 18 Dec 2002 17:21:39 +0100
• Erik Andersen
  • Re: [PATCH] aic7xxx bouncing over 4G Sat, 21 Dec 2002 00:10:31 -0700
• Eyal Lebedinsky
  • Re: Linux 2.4.21-pre2 - unresolved Thu, 19 Dec 2002 10:49:38 +1100
  • Re: Linux 2.4.21-pre2 Thu, 19 Dec 2002 10:33:35 +1100
  • Re: rmap and nvidia? Tue, 17 Dec 2002 10:17:16 +1100
  • Re: rmap and nvidia? Sun, 15 Dec 2002 12:40:48 +1100
  • Re: rmap and nvidia? Sun, 15 Dec 2002 12:23:26 +1100
• Feldman, Scott
  • RE: [ANNOUNCE] Intel PRO/100 software developer manual released Wed, 18 Dec 2002 14:41:07 -0800
  • RE: [ANNOUNCE] Intel PRO/100 software developer manual released Wed, 18 Dec 2002 09:07:59 -0800
  • RE: [ANNOUNCE] Intel PRO/100 software developer manual released Tue, 17 Dec 2002 19:46:27 -0800
  • [ANNOUNCE] Intel PRO/100 software developer manual released Tue, 17 Dec 2002 14:03:50 -0800
• Felipe W Damasio
  • Re: Machine Check Exception Mon, 16 Dec 2002 19:55:58 +0000
• Felix Seeger
  • Re: Next round of AGPGART fixes. Fri, 20 Dec 2002 17:41:05 +0100
  • Re: Next round of AGPGART fixes. Fri, 20 Dec 2002 15:42:48 +0100
  • 2.5.52: agp, drm, i810 problem Fri, 20 Dec 2002 00:34:12 +0100
• Felix von Leitner
  • Machine Check Exception Sun, 15 Dec 2002 21:22:27 +0100
• fleming@austin.ibm.com
  • Driver for Margi video card? Tue, 17 Dec 2002 17:16:43 -0600 (CST)
• Folkert van Heusden
  • DECpc XL 590 -> bios won't set up IRQ's and Linux neither Fri, 20 Dec 2002 18:49:32 +0100
  • problem with 2.4.20 and OPTi Inc. 82C861 (rev 10) USB card Thu, 19 Dec 2002 22:56:04 +0100
• folkert@vanheusden.com
  • Re: Kernel GCC Optimizations Sat, 21 Dec 2002 23:13:22 +0100 (CET)
  • Re: Kernel GCC Optimizations Sat, 21 Dec 2002 23:10:56 +0100 (CET)
• Frank van de Pol
  • Re: 2.5.52: PDC20268 failure - ACPI to blame !!! Thu, 19 Dec 2002 17:24:00 +0100
  • 2.5.52: PDC20268 failure Thu, 19 Dec 2002 00:28:53 +0100
• Georg Nikodym
  • Re: [PATCH] 2.4.20-rmap15b Tue, 17 Dec 2002 16:54:56 -0500
• george anzinger
  • Re: [PATCH] joydev: fix HZ->millisecond transformation Sat, 21 Dec 2002 08:46:12 -0800
  • [PATCH 2/3] High-res-timers part 2 (x86 platform code) take 21.1 Fri, 20 Dec 2002 21:50:22 -0800
  • Re: [PATCH 2/3] High-res-timers part 2 (x86 platform code) take 21 Fri, 20 Dec 2002 21:53:20 -0800
  • Re: [PATCH]Timer list init is done AFTER use Fri, 20 Dec 2002 12:01:46 -0800
  • Re: [PATCH ] POSIX clocks & timers take 17.1 (NOT HIGH RES) Fri, 20 Dec 2002 11:47:48 -0800
  • Re: [PATCH] joydev: fix HZ->millisecond transformation Fri, 20 Dec 2002 10:16:27 -0800
  • Re: [PATCH] joydev: fix HZ->millisecond transformation Fri, 20 Dec 2002 09:24:58 -0800
  • Re: [PATCH]Timer list init is done AFTER use Fri, 20 Dec 2002 09:18:02 -0800
  • Re: [PATCH] joydev: fix HZ->millisecond transformation Fri, 20 Dec 2002 02:41:50 -0800
  • Re: [PATCH ] POSIX clocks & timers take 17 (NOT HIGH RES) Fri, 20 Dec 2002 01:52:06 -0800
  • [PATCH 2/3] High-res-timers part 2 (x86 platform code) take 21 Fri, 20 Dec 2002 01:52:53 -0800
  • [PATCH 3/3] High-res-timers part 3 (posix to hrposix) take 21 Fri, 20 Dec 2002 01:52:42 -0800
  • [PATCH 1/3] High-res-timers part 1 (core) take 21 Fri, 20 Dec 2002 01:52:31 -0800
  • [PATCH]Timer list init is done AFTER use Fri, 20 Dec 2002 00:43:11 -0800
  • Re: [PATCH] An O1, nonrecursive ID allocator for Posix timers Thu, 19 Dec 2002 10:38:47 -0800
  • Re: [PATCH] An O1, nonrecursive ID allocator for Posix timers Wed, 18 Dec 2002 13:50:02 -0800
• Gergely Nagy
  • [PATCH][TRIVIAL] drivers/video/tdfxfb.c compile failure (Linux 2.5.52) Thu, 19 Dec 2002 19:06:36 +0100
• Gianni Tedesco
  • [PATCH]: trivial sys_mincore cleanup 20 Dec 2002 11:17:54 +0000
  • NMI: IOCK error (debug interrupt?) - nope 19 Dec 2002 10:23:40 +0000
  • Re: 2.4.20 copy_from/to_user 17 Dec 2002 12:52:57 +0000
• gordontrumanai256@ananzi.co.za
  • Wichtige Frage Sat, 21 Dec 2002 03:31:48 +0300
• GrandMasterLee
  • Re: Intel P6 vs P7 system call performance 17 Dec 2002 00:19:02 -0600
• Grant Grundler
  • Re: PATCH 2.5.x disable BAR when sizing Fri, 20 Dec 2002 13:29:21 -0800
  • Re: PATCH 2.5.x disable BAR when sizing Fri, 20 Dec 2002 13:22:13 -0800
  • Re: PATCH 2.5.x disable BAR when sizing Fri, 20 Dec 2002 11:50:31 -0800
  • PATCH 2.5.x disable BAR when sizing Thu, 19 Dec 2002 13:37:12 -0800 (PST)
• Greg KH
  • Re: A little explanation needed Sat, 21 Dec 2002 21:35:01 -0800
  • [PATCH] remove __MOD_* from dm Fri, 20 Dec 2002 15:38:56 -0800
  • [PATCH] allow dm-ioctl.ko to be used Fri, 20 Dec 2002 14:41:49 -0800
  • Re: Please use the 'usbfs' filetype instead Fri, 20 Dec 2002 11:33:54 -0800
  • Re: [lvm-devel] [PATCH] add kobject to struct mapped_device Fri, 20 Dec 2002 09:49:52 -0800
  • Re: [lvm-devel] [PATCH] add kobject to struct mapped_device Fri, 20 Dec 2002 00:31:50 -0800
  • Re: ALSA update Thu, 19 Dec 2002 16:27:33 -0800
  • Re: RFC: bus_type and device_class merge (or partial merge) Thu, 19 Dec 2002 15:37:01 -0800
  • Re: pcibios functions left in m68knommu port Thu, 19 Dec 2002 09:42:36 -0800
  • Re: [BUGlet] security/Kconfig Wed, 18 Dec 2002 17:04:01 -0800
  • [RFC] more security hooks for System V IPC Wed, 18 Dec 2002 15:47:08 -0800
  • Re: [PATCH] LSM changes for 2.5.52 Wed, 18 Dec 2002 15:29:01 -0800
  • Re: [PATCH] LSM changes for 2.5.52 Wed, 18 Dec 2002 15:28:10 -0800
  • [PATCH] LSM changes for 2.5.52 Wed, 18 Dec 2002 15:27:15 -0800
  • [BK PATCH] LSM changes for 2.5.52 Wed, 18 Dec 2002 15:21:25 -0800
  • [BK PATCH] LSM changes for 2.5.52 Wed, 18 Dec 2002 15:19:17 -0800
  • Re: converting cap_set_pg() to for_each_task_pid() Wed, 18 Dec 2002 15:08:46 -0800
  • Re: ALSA update Wed, 18 Dec 2002 11:27:40 -0800
  • Re: [lvm-devel] [PATCH] add kobject to struct mapped_device Wed, 18 Dec 2002 10:53:01 -0800
  • [PATCH] add kobject to struct mapped_device Wed, 18 Dec 2002 10:43:07 -0800
  • Re: ALSA update Wed, 18 Dec 2002 10:21:35 -0800
  • [BK PATCH] USB changes for 2.5.52 Wed, 18 Dec 2002 00:35:15 -0800
  • Re: [ANNOUNCE] Intel PRO/100 software developer manual released Tue, 17 Dec 2002 22:34:05 -0800
  • Re: converting cap_set_pg() to for_each_task_pid() Tue, 17 Dec 2002 22:05:51 -0800
  • pcibios functions left in m68knommu port Tue, 17 Dec 2002 09:21:08 -0800
  • Re: USB troubles in 2.5 kernels Mon, 16 Dec 2002 17:12:54 -0800
  • [BK PATCH] USB changes for 2.4.21-pre1 Mon, 16 Dec 2002 16:46:50 -0800
  • Re: [PATCH] PCI Hotplug changes for 2.4.21-pre1 Mon, 16 Dec 2002 15:51:11 -0800
  • [PATCH] PCI Hotplug changes for 2.4.21-pre1 Mon, 16 Dec 2002 15:49:53 -0800
  • [BK PATCH] PCI Hotplug changes for 2.4.21-pre1 Mon, 16 Dec 2002 15:48:17 -0800
  • Re: Notification hooks Mon, 16 Dec 2002 09:22:17 -0800
  • Re: Alcatel speedtouch USB driver and SMP. Sun, 15 Dec 2002 21:13:00 -0800
• Greg Stark
  • Re: Problem with read blocking for a long time on /dev/scd1 21 Dec 2002 01:14:38 -0500
  • Re: Problem with read blocking for a long time on /dev/scd1 20 Dec 2002 20:28:58 -0500
• Greg Ungerer
  • Re: pcibios functions left in m68knommu port Fri, 20 Dec 2002 16:02:11 +1000
  • Re: pcibios functions left in m68knommu port Wed, 18 Dec 2002 10:48:42 +1000
  • [PATCH]: linux-2.5.52-uc0 (MMU-less fix ups) Tue, 17 Dec 2002 15:20:38 +1000
• Gregoire Favre
  • How to compil dvb CVS with 2.5.52? Thu, 19 Dec 2002 23:27:30 +0100
  • Re: 2.5.52 and modules (lots of unresolved symbols)? Mon, 16 Dec 2002 18:17:03 +0100
  • 2.5.52 and modules (lots of unresolved symbols)? Mon, 16 Dec 2002 10:45:14 +0100
• Gregory Stark
  • Problem with read blocking for a long time on /dev/scd1 20 Dec 2002 19:51:38 -0500
  • Problem with read blocking for a long time on /dev/scd1 20 Dec 2002 19:49:28 -0500
  • read blocking for really long time on /dev/scd? 20 Dec 2002 00:30:48 -0500
• Grover, Andrew
  • RE: 2.5.52: PDC20268 failure - ACPI to blame !!! Thu, 19 Dec 2002 13:47:07 -0800
  • RE: [PATCH] S4bios for 2.5.52. Tue, 17 Dec 2002 14:24:23 -0800
  • RE: [PATCH] S4bios for 2.5.52. Tue, 17 Dec 2002 13:39:02 -0800
  • RE: [ACPI] Metolious hardware-sensors-using-ACPI specs Mon, 16 Dec 2002 15:02:31 -0800
  • RE: [ACPI] Metolious hardware-sensors-using-ACPI specs Mon, 16 Dec 2002 10:21:22 -0800
• Guillaume Boissiere
  • [STATUS 2.5] December 18, 2002 Tue, 17 Dec 2002 23:56:29 -0500
• H. Peter Anvin
  • Re: Intel P6 vs P7 system call performance Fri, 20 Dec 2002 15:50:37 -0800
  • Re: Intel P6 vs P7 system call performance Thu, 19 Dec 2002 14:36:43 -0800
  • Re: Intel P6 vs P7 system call performance Thu, 19 Dec 2002 14:26:38 -0800
  • Re: Intel P6 vs P7 system call performance Thu, 19 Dec 2002 14:30:24 -0800
  • Re: Intel P6 vs P7 system call performance Thu, 19 Dec 2002 14:23:26 -0800
  • Re: Intel P6 vs P7 system call performance Thu, 19 Dec 2002 14:18:41 -0800
  • Re: Intel P6 vs P7 system call performance Thu, 19 Dec 2002 14:17:11 -0800
  • Re: Intel P6 vs P7 system call performance Thu, 19 Dec 2002 14:16:02 -0800
  • Re: Intel P6 vs P7 system call performance Thu, 19 Dec 2002 11:29:50 -0800
  • Re: Intel P6 vs P7 system call performance Wed, 18 Dec 2002 14:39:26 -0800
  • Re: Intel P6 vs P7 system call performance Wed, 18 Dec 2002 12:26:20 -0800
  • Re: Intel P6 vs P7 system call performance Wed, 18 Dec 2002 12:14:14 -0800
  • Re: Intel P6 vs P7 system call performance Tue, 17 Dec 2002 21:38:50 -0800
  • Re: Intel P6 vs P7 system call performance Tue, 17 Dec 2002 20:39:13 -0800
  • Re: Intel P6 vs P7 system call performance Tue, 17 Dec 2002 20:36:38 -0800
  • Re: Intel P6 vs P7 system call performance Tue, 17 Dec 2002 19:36:19 -0800
  • Re: Intel P6 vs P7 system call performance Tue, 17 Dec 2002 13:41:55 -0800
  • Re: Intel P6 vs P7 system call performance Tue, 17 Dec 2002 13:41:07 -0800
  • Re: Intel P6 vs P7 system call performance Tue, 17 Dec 2002 13:36:53 -0800
  • Re: HT Benchmarks (was: /proc/cpuinfo and hyperthreading) 17 Dec 2002 12:44:22 -0800
  • Re: 2.5.49: Severe PIIX4/ATA filesystem corruption 17 Dec 2002 12:41:39 -0800
  • Re: Intel P6 vs P7 system call performance Tue, 17 Dec 2002 12:16:56 -0800
  • Re: Intel P6 vs P7 system call performance Tue, 17 Dec 2002 12:12:16 -0800
  • Re: Intel P6 vs P7 system call performance Tue, 17 Dec 2002 12:10:38 -0800
  • Re: Intel P6 vs P7 system call performance Tue, 17 Dec 2002 11:54:01 -0800
  • Re: Intel P6 vs P7 system call performance Tue, 17 Dec 2002 11:43:57 -0800
  • Re: Intel P6 vs P7 system call performance Tue, 17 Dec 2002 11:32:29 -0800
  • Re: Intel P6 vs P7 system call performance Tue, 17 Dec 2002 11:21:53 -0800
  • Re: Intel P6 vs P7 system call performance Tue, 17 Dec 2002 11:19:14 -0800
  • Re: Intel P6 vs P7 system call performance Tue, 17 Dec 2002 11:12:46 -0800
  • Re: Intel P6 vs P7 system call performance Tue, 17 Dec 2002 11:11:19 -0800
  • Re: HT Benchmarks (was: /proc/cpuinfo and hyperthreading) 16 Dec 2002 15:50:04 -0800
  • Re: How to do -nostdinc? 16 Dec 2002 15:16:18 -0800
  • Re: Intel P6 vs P7 system call performance Mon, 16 Dec 2002 11:55:42 -0800
• Hanna Linder
  • Re: Dedicated kernel bug database Fri, 20 Dec 2002 15:52:40 -0800
  • Re: Dedicated kernel bug database Fri, 20 Dec 2002 11:37:03 -0800
  • Re: Dedicated kernel bug database Thu, 19 Dec 2002 18:10:56 -0800
  • Re: Dedicated kernel bug database Thu, 19 Dec 2002 18:01:34 -0800
  • Re: Dedicated kernel bug database Thu, 19 Dec 2002 17:01:41 -0800
  • Re: Dedicated kernel bug database Thu, 19 Dec 2002 16:19:03 -0800
  • Re: Dedicated kernel bug database Thu, 19 Dec 2002 14:45:42 -0800
  • Re: [PATCH] updated scheduler tunables Mon, 16 Dec 2002 18:44:52 -0800
• Hannes Reinecke
  • [PATCH] 2.5.52: compilation fixes for alpha Thu, 19 Dec 2002 23:01:39 +0100
• Hans Reiser
  • Re: [Benchmark] AIM9 results Tue, 17 Dec 2002 03:00:13 +0300
  • Re: [Benchmark] AIM9 results Tue, 17 Dec 2002 02:09:47 +0300
  • Re: [BK][PATCH] ReiserFS CPU and memory bandwidth efficient large Sun, 15 Dec 2002 01:21:06 +0300
  • [BK] [PATCH] ReiserFS assorted trivia Sun, 15 Dec 2002 00:18:01 +0300
• Heater, Daniel
  • RE: Dedicated kernel bug database Thu, 19 Dec 2002 16:04:13 -0500
• Helge Hafting
  • Re: 2.5.52-mm1 kernel BUG at mm/page_walk.c:430! Tue, 17 Dec 2002 09:19:23 +0100
  • Re: Intel P6 vs P7 system call performance Tue, 17 Dec 2002 09:02:28 +0100
• Henning P. Schmiedehausen
  • Re: [PATCH] fix for RPM build target under newer versions Tue, 17 Dec 2002 10:44:54 +0000 (UTC)
  • Re: RFC: p&p ipsec without authentication Mon, 16 Dec 2002 09:20:27 +0000 (UTC)
  • Re: Networking/Becker et al [was Re: pci-skeleton duplex check] Sun, 15 Dec 2002 13:06:41 +0000 (UTC)
  • Re: Networking/Becker et al [was Re: pci-skeleton duplex check] Sun, 15 Dec 2002 09:54:05 +0000 (UTC)
• Henrik Størner
  • 2.4.20-ac2: sound problems when using realplayer Sat, 21 Dec 2002 22:36:51 +0100
• Herbert Xu
  • [PATCH] sc520cdp depends on mtdconcat Sun, 15 Dec 2002 14:39:42 +1100
• Holger Waechtler
  • Re: [linux-dvb] How to compil dvb CVS with 2.5.52? Fri, 20 Dec 2002 11:39:42 +0100
• Hollis Blanchard
  • Re: [PATCH] BIN_TO_BCD consolidation 16 Dec 2002 13:53:52 -0600
  • [PATCH] BIN_TO_BCD consolidation 16 Dec 2002 12:42:45 -0600
• Holzrichter, Bruce
  • RE: NAT helper module for MSN Mon, 16 Dec 2002 17:24:16 -0500
• Horst von Brand
  • Re: Intel P6 vs P7 system call performance Wed, 18 Dec 2002 15:41:39 -0300
  • Re: Intel P6 vs P7 system call performance Wed, 18 Dec 2002 11:10:50 -0300
  • Re: Intel P6 vs P7 system call performance Wed, 18 Dec 2002 10:40:24 -0300
• Hugh Dickins
  • mremap use-after-free [was Re: 2.5.52-mm2] Thu, 19 Dec 2002 17:02:59 +0000 (GMT)
  • [PATCH] smpboot magical numbers Wed, 18 Dec 2002 19:48:07 +0000 (GMT)
  • Re: Intel P6 vs P7 system call performance Tue, 17 Dec 2002 16:54:34 +0000 (GMT)
  • Re: Intel P6 vs P7 system call performance Tue, 17 Dec 2002 16:12:00 +0000 (GMT)
• Ian Soboroff
  • Re: Trident/ALi 5451 problem, 2.4.20-ac2 Thu, 19 Dec 2002 08:19:25 -0500
  • Trident/ALi 5451 problem, 2.4.20-ac2 Wed, 18 Dec 2002 08:38:31 -0500
• Igmar Palsenberg
  • Invalidate: busy buffer + MD RAID 1 Wed, 18 Dec 2002 19:45:00 +0100 (CET)
• Ilya Teterin
  • arp poisoning immunity Mon, 16 Dec 2002 04:11:26 +0500
• Inaky Perez-Gonzalez
  • [PATCH 2.5.52] Use __set_current_state() instead of current->state = (take 3) Thu, 19 Dec 2002 11:57:33 -0800
  • [PATCH 2.5.52] Use __set_current_state() instead of current->state = (take 2) Wed, 18 Dec 2002 17:49:27 -0800
  • [PATCH 2.5.52] Use __set_current_state() instead of current->state = (take 1) Wed, 18 Dec 2002 15:56:58 -0800
  • [PATCH 2.5.52] Optimize include/asm-ARCH/page.h:get_order() (take 1.0) Tue, 17 Dec 2002 13:25:34 -0800
  • [PATCH] Priority-based real-time futexes v1.1 for 2.5.52 Mon, 16 Dec 2002 20:19:25 -0800
  • [PATCH] Priority-based real-time futexes v1.0 for 2.5.52 Mon, 16 Dec 2002 20:18:29 -0800
• Ingo Molnar
  • Re: Intel P6 vs P7 system call performance Sat, 21 Dec 2002 12:24:50 +0100 (CET)
  • [patch] threaded coredumps, tcore-fixes-2.5.51-A0 Sun, 15 Dec 2002 11:19:06 +0100 (CET)
• Ivan Kokshaysky
  • Re: PATCH 2.5.x disable BAR when sizing Fri, 20 Dec 2002 21:50:29 +0300
  • Re: PATCH 2.5.x disable BAR when sizing Fri, 20 Dec 2002 15:53:11 +0300
  • Re: [patch 2.5] PCI: kill pdev_enable_device() Wed, 18 Dec 2002 13:11:24 +0300
  • [patch 2.5] PCI: setup-bus.c cleanup Tue, 17 Dec 2002 20:28:27 +0300
  • [patch 2.5] PCI: kill pdev_enable_device() Tue, 17 Dec 2002 20:19:38 +0300
  • Re: [PATCH] PCI: disable decoding while sizing BARs Tue, 17 Dec 2002 17:29:25 +0300
  • Re: 2.4.20 smp on alpha won't boot Mon, 16 Dec 2002 02:35:02 +0300
• J Sloan
  • Partial Success with 2.5.52bk6 Sat, 21 Dec 2002 11:48:56 -0800
• J.A. Magallon
  • Re: 2.4.20-aa and LARGE Squid process -> SIGSEGV Sat, 21 Dec 2002 01:13:34 +0100
  • Re: 2.4.20-aa and LARGE Squid process -> SIGSEGV Fri, 20 Dec 2002 23:37:54 +0100
  • Re: HT Benchmarks (was: /proc/cpuinfo and hyperthreading) Thu, 19 Dec 2002 23:04:55 +0100
  • Re: HT Benchmarks (was: /proc/cpuinfo and hyperthreading) Tue, 17 Dec 2002 00:27:55 +0100
  • Re: How to do -nostdinc? Mon, 16 Dec 2002 23:44:42 +0100
  • Re: HT Benchmarks (was: /proc/cpuinfo and hyperthreading) Mon, 16 Dec 2002 23:38:48 +0100
  • Re: Intel P6 vs P7 system call performance Sun, 15 Dec 2002 03:03:18 +0100
• Jakub Jelinek
  • Re: PTRACE_GET_THREAD_AREA Fri, 20 Dec 2002 10:55:16 -0500
• James Bottomley
  • [PATCH] fix bug in scripts/kallsyms.c Sat, 21 Dec 2002 12:05:05 -0600
  • [PATCH 2.4] Enable checking of reap of in-use slab Fri, 20 Dec 2002 10:45:19 -0600
  • [RFT][PATCH] generic device DMA implementation Tue, 17 Dec 2002 21:01:57 -0600
• James Cleverdon
  • Re: [PATCH][2.4] generic cluster APIC support for systems with more than 8 CPUs Thu, 19 Dec 2002 18:04:55 -0800
  • Re: [PATCH][2.4] generic cluster APIC support for systems with more than 8 CPUs Wed, 18 Dec 2002 20:14:19 -0800
  • Re: [PATCH][2.4] generic cluster APIC support for systems with more than 8 CPUs Wed, 18 Dec 2002 17:32:43 -0800
• James H. Cloos Jr.
  • dell i8100 touchstick, 2.5 input -- further info 18 Dec 2002 16:58:15 -0500
  • Re: [PATCH] move LOG_BUF_SIZE to header file 17 Dec 2002 01:39:33 -0500
  • Re: Linux v2.5.52 16 Dec 2002 07:05:24 -0500
  • Re: Q: i845MP/P4-M laptop support? (specific problems listed) 16 Dec 2002 06:16:30 -0500
• James Morris
  • Re: [ANNOUNCE] Intel PRO/100 software developer manual released Wed, 18 Dec 2002 19:34:06 +1100 (EST)
  • Re: [RFC] Hardware support notes for the kernel crypto API (2.5+) Sun, 15 Dec 2002 12:15:52 +1100 (EST)
  • [RFC] Hardware support notes for the kernel crypto API (2.5+) Sun, 15 Dec 2002 00:51:25 +1100 (EST)
• James Simmons
  • Re: 2.5.52 vesafb -- no display Fri, 20 Dec 2002 22:17:50 +0000 (GMT)
  • Re: [FBDEV]: Framebuffer driver for Intel 810/815 chipsets Fri, 20 Dec 2002 21:22:08 +0000 (GMT)
  • Re: vesafb no longer works on 2.5.50/51 Fri, 20 Dec 2002 20:03:00 +0000 (GMT)
  • Re: [Linux-fbdev-devel] [PATCH] fix endian problem in color_imageblit Fri, 20 Dec 2002 19:54:52 +0000 (GMT)
  • Re: [2.5.50] Keyboard dying Fri, 20 Dec 2002 19:29:29 +0000 (GMT)
  • Re: 2.5.52 vesafb -- no display Fri, 20 Dec 2002 18:39:59 +0000 (GMT)
  • Re: [PATCH] update chipsfb.c to new API Fri, 20 Dec 2002 18:39:10 +0000 (GMT)
  • Re: [Linux-fbdev-devel] [PATCH][TRIVIAL] drivers/video/tdfxfb.c Fri, 20 Dec 2002 18:16:37 +0000 (GMT)
  • Re: Bug? undefined reference to `input_event' Fri, 20 Dec 2002 18:11:32 +0000 (GMT)
  • Re: [Linux-fbdev-devel] Type confusion in fbcon Fri, 20 Dec 2002 18:10:17 +0000 (GMT)
  • Re: mousewheel not working. Tue, 17 Dec 2002 15:04:00 -0800 (PST)
  • Re: 2.5.52 compile error Tue, 17 Dec 2002 14:49:49 -0800 (PST)
• Jamie Lokier
  • Re: Intel P6 vs P7 system call performance Sat, 21 Dec 2002 17:18:08 +0000
  • Re: Intel P6 vs P7 system call performance Fri, 20 Dec 2002 23:38:25 +0000
  • Re: Intel P6 vs P7 system call performance Fri, 20 Dec 2002 12:06:56 +0000
  • Re: Intel P6 vs P7 system call performance Thu, 19 Dec 2002 22:10:43 +0000
  • Re: Intel P6 vs P7 system call performance Thu, 19 Dec 2002 14:22:12 +0000
  • Re: Intel P6 vs P7 system call performance Wed, 18 Dec 2002 22:28:35 +0000
• Jan-Benedict Glaw
  • Re: Machine Check Exception Sun, 15 Dec 2002 21:39:20 +0100
• Janet Morgan
  • [PATCH] aic7xxx bouncing over 4G Fri, 20 Dec 2002 16:12:48 -0800 (PST)
  • Re: [PATCH] sys_epoll for 2.4 Mon, 16 Dec 2002 18:02:17 -0800 (PST)
• Jaroslav Kysela
  • Re: ALSA update Thu, 19 Dec 2002 13:18:10 +0100 (CET)
  • Re: ALSA update Wed, 18 Dec 2002 20:17:55 +0100 (CET)
  • [PATCH] ALSA & HP100 update Wed, 18 Dec 2002 11:46:21 +0100 (CET)
• Jason Lixfeld
  • Modules loading when hardcoded 19 Dec 2002 19:33:39 -0500
• Jason Radford
  • Re: 2.4.19, don't "hdparm -I /dev/hde" if hde is on a Asus A7V133 Promise ctrlr, or... Sat, 21 Dec 2002 17:22:47 -0600
• Jean Tourrilhes
  • Re: [PATCH/RFC] New module refcounting for net_proto_family Thu, 19 Dec 2002 15:08:56 -0800
  • Re: [PATCH 2.4] : donauboe IrDA driver (resend) Thu, 19 Dec 2002 10:56:30 -0800
  • [PATCH 2.4] : donauboe IrDA driver (resend) Wed, 18 Dec 2002 18:46:32 -0800
  • [PATCH 2.4] : IrLMP basic socket scheduler (to make 2.4.21-pre2 compile) Wed, 18 Dec 2002 18:40:45 -0800
  • Re : Linux 2.4.21-pre2 - unresolved Wed, 18 Dec 2002 17:21:28 -0800
  • Re: [PATCH] : More module parameter compatibility for 2.5.52 Tue, 17 Dec 2002 18:29:59 -0800
  • [PATCH 2.5.52] : IrDA drivers quick module fixes Tue, 17 Dec 2002 14:36:27 -0800
  • Re: [PATCH] : More module parameter compatibility for 2.5.52 Tue, 17 Dec 2002 09:33:46 -0800
  • Re: [PATCH] : More module parameter compatibility for 2.5.52 Mon, 16 Dec 2002 19:02:43 -0800
  • [PATCH] : More module parameter compatibility for 2.5.52 Mon, 16 Dec 2002 17:26:46 -0800
• Jean-Luc Cooke
  • Re: [CryptoAPI-devel] Re: [RFC] Hardware support notes for the kernel crypto API (2.5+) Tue, 17 Dec 2002 11:54:31 -0500
• Jeff Chua
  • Re: 2.5.51 ide module problem Thu, 19 Dec 2002 03:50:00 +0800 (SGT)
  • can't boot 2.5.52 Tue, 17 Dec 2002 03:56:04 +0800 (SGT)
• Jeff Dike
  • Re: Valgrind meets UML Sat, 21 Dec 2002 13:57:44 -0500
  • Re: Valgrind meets UML Sat, 21 Dec 2002 11:05:25 -0500
  • Re: Valgrind meets UML Fri, 20 Dec 2002 21:49:27 -0500
  • Re: Valgrind meets UML Fri, 20 Dec 2002 17:58:18 -0500
  • Valgrind meets UML Thu, 19 Dec 2002 21:41:43 -0500
  • Re: [uml-devel] Re: uml-patch-2.5.52-1 Wed, 18 Dec 2002 22:18:40 -0500
  • uml-patch-2.5.52-1 Tue, 17 Dec 2002 19:54:00 -0500
  • [PATCH] Miscellaneous UML bug fixes Tue, 17 Dec 2002 18:23:56 -0500
  • [PATCH] UML network updates Tue, 17 Dec 2002 18:24:03 -0500
  • [PATCH] Update UML to 2.5.52 Tue, 17 Dec 2002 18:23:58 -0500
  • [PATCH] UML device configuration reporting Tue, 17 Dec 2002 18:24:05 -0500
  • [PATCH] Allow UML kernel to run in a separate host address space Tue, 17 Dec 2002 18:24:01 -0500
  • [PATCH] UML documentation updates Tue, 17 Dec 2002 18:23:59 -0500
  • Re: Intel P6 vs P7 system call performance Tue, 17 Dec 2002 13:39:22 -0500
• Jeff Garzik
  • Re: difference between 8139D and 8139d(l)? Thu, 19 Dec 2002 13:46:47 -0500
  • Re: 15000+ processes -- poor performance ?! Wed, 18 Dec 2002 19:59:40 -0500
  • Re: Freezing.. (was Re: Intel P6 vs P7 system call performance) Wed, 18 Dec 2002 19:58:41 -0500
  • Re: Freezing.. (was Re: Intel P6 vs P7 system call performance) Wed, 18 Dec 2002 13:03:29 -0500
  • Re: [PATCH] sys_poll SuS compliance fix Wed, 18 Dec 2002 12:06:11 -0500
  • Re: 2.5.52-wli-1 Tue, 17 Dec 2002 23:50:12 -0500
  • Re: [patch 2.5] PCI: kill pdev_enable_device() Tue, 17 Dec 2002 19:52:50 -0500
  • Re: [ANNOUNCE] Intel PRO/100 software developer manual released Tue, 17 Dec 2002 17:59:59 -0500
  • Re: [patch 2.5] PCI: kill pdev_enable_device() Tue, 17 Dec 2002 17:31:57 -0500
• Jens Axboe
  • Re: [PATCH] remove error message on illegal ioctl Mon, 16 Dec 2002 12:56:58 +0100
  • Re: [PATCH] remove error message on illegal ioctl Mon, 16 Dec 2002 10:16:15 +0100
• Jeremy Fitzhardinge
  • Re: Valgrind meets UML 21 Dec 2002 11:07:48 -0800
  • Re: Valgrind meets UML 20 Dec 2002 23:32:21 -0800
  • Re: [PATCH] Fix CPU bitmask truncation 20 Dec 2002 10:23:17 -0800
  • Re: modules oops in 2.5.52 18 Dec 2002 22:59:24 -0800
  • Re: modules oops in 2.5.52 18 Dec 2002 20:19:09 -0800
  • modules oops in 2.5.52 18 Dec 2002 17:14:05 -0800
  • Re: Intel P6 vs P7 system call performance 17 Dec 2002 21:34:17 -0800
• Jes Sorensen
  • Re: [RFC][PATCH] net drivers and cache alignment 15 Dec 2002 13:31:15 -0500
• Jim Houston
  • [PATCH] The alternate Posix timers patch8 Mon, 16 Dec 2002 14:31:58 -0500
• jiri.wichern@hccnet.nl
  • PROBLEM: kernel 2.4.20 option CONFIG_BLK_STATS breaks /proc/partitons so "mount" can't mount devices by UUID. Tue, 17 Dec 2002 00:24:50 +0100
• Jirka Kosina
  • SMIC and IPMI (was: [ACPI] Metolious hardware-sensors-using-ACPI Tue, 17 Dec 2002 09:44:09 +0100 (CET)
• Jochen Friedrich
  • Re: [PATCH] 2.5.52: compilation fixes for alpha Fri, 20 Dec 2002 23:54:43 +0100 (CET)
  • Re: [PATCH] 2.5.52: compilation fixes for alpha Fri, 20 Dec 2002 08:44:15 +0100 (CET)
• Jochen Hein
  • Re: [2.5.52, ALSA] Unable to handle kernel paging request at Fri, 20 Dec 2002 20:30:25 +0100
  • [2.5.52, ALSA] Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual Tue, 17 Dec 2002 20:13:16 +0100
  • [2.5.52, afs, modules] error loading kafs.ko Tue, 17 Dec 2002 18:28:39 +0100
• Joe Korty
  • Re: [PATCH] joydev: fix HZ->millisecond transformation Fri, 20 Dec 2002 09:52:28 -0500 (EST)
  • Re: [PATCH] An O1, nonrecursive ID allocator for Posix timers Thu, 19 Dec 2002 09:08:18 -0500 (EST)
• Joe Thornber
  • Re: [lvm-devel] [PATCH] add kobject to struct mapped_device Fri, 20 Dec 2002 09:44:47 +0000
  • Re: [lvm-devel] [PATCH] add kobject to struct mapped_device Thu, 19 Dec 2002 10:55:30 +0000
  • 7/19 Mon, 16 Dec 2002 10:10:25 +0000
  • 8/19 Mon, 16 Dec 2002 10:11:13 +0000
  • 13/19 Mon, 16 Dec 2002 10:14:59 +0000
  • 14/19 Mon, 16 Dec 2002 10:15:39 +0000
  • 17/19 Mon, 16 Dec 2002 10:17:48 +0000
  • 19/19 Mon, 16 Dec 2002 10:19:12 +0000
  • 18/19 Mon, 16 Dec 2002 10:18:30 +0000
  • 16/19 Mon, 16 Dec 2002 10:16:52 +0000
  • 15/19 Mon, 16 Dec 2002 10:16:20 +0000
  • 12/19 Mon, 16 Dec 2002 10:14:15 +0000
  • 11/19 Mon, 16 Dec 2002 10:13:14 +0000
  • 10/19 Mon, 16 Dec 2002 10:12:36 +0000
  • 9/19 Mon, 16 Dec 2002 10:11:55 +0000
  • 6/19 Mon, 16 Dec 2002 10:09:47 +0000
  • 4/19 Mon, 16 Dec 2002 10:08:21 +0000
  • 5/19 Mon, 16 Dec 2002 10:09:01 +0000
  • 3/19 Mon, 16 Dec 2002 10:07:47 +0000
  • 2/19 Mon, 16 Dec 2002 10:06:57 +0000
  • 1/19 Mon, 16 Dec 2002 10:06:08 +0000
  • Re: [PATCH] dm.c - device-mapper I/O path fixes Mon, 16 Dec 2002 10:04:58 +0000
• joe user
  • Re: netstat and 2.5.5[12] Wed, 18 Dec 2002 02:27:46 +0100
  • netstat and 2.5.5[12] Mon, 16 Dec 2002 13:06:32 +0100
• Joel Jaeggli
  • Re: OT: Which Gigabit ethernet card? Fri, 20 Dec 2002 13:06:13 -0800 (PST)
• John Alvord
  • Re: Freezing.. (was Re: Intel P6 vs P7 system call performance) Wed, 18 Dec 2002 10:25:39 -0800
• John Bradford
  • Re: First Bug Found : RE: How to help new comers trying the v2.5x series kernels. Sat, 21 Dec 2002 22:18:35 +0000 (GMT)
  • Re: First Bug Found : RE: How to help new comers trying the v2.5x series kernels. Sat, 21 Dec 2002 21:23:14 +0000 (GMT)
  • Re: Fw: PROBLEM: Keyboard not found, but it exists! Sat, 21 Dec 2002 19:51:27 +0000 (GMT)
  • Re: How to help new comers trying the v2.5x series kernels. Sat, 21 Dec 2002 19:15:36 +0000 (GMT)
  • Re: How to help new comers trying the v2.5x series kernels. Sat, 21 Dec 2002 18:16:03 +0000 (GMT)
  • Re: Kernel GCC Optimizations Sat, 21 Dec 2002 18:11:39 +0000 (GMT)
  • Re: Right, I tried flashing the BIOS, as suggested, and /still/ can't enable SMART Fri, 20 Dec 2002 19:09:58 +0000 (GMT)
  • Re: Dedicated kernel bug database Thu, 19 Dec 2002 23:09:10 +0000 (GMT)
  • Re: Dedicated kernel bug database Thu, 19 Dec 2002 21:55:31 +0000 (GMT)
  • Re: Dedicated kernel bug database Thu, 19 Dec 2002 20:59:15 +0000 (GMT)
  • Re: Dedicated kernel bug database Thu, 19 Dec 2002 20:45:04 +0000 (GMT)
  • Re: Dedicated kernel bug database Thu, 19 Dec 2002 20:42:54 +0000 (GMT)
  • Re: Dedicated kernel bug database Thu, 19 Dec 2002 20:32:28 +0000 (GMT)
  • Re: Dedicated kernel bug database Thu, 19 Dec 2002 20:12:16 +0000 (GMT)
  • Re: Dedicated kernel bug database Thu, 19 Dec 2002 20:08:42 +0000 (GMT)
  • Re: Dedicated kernel bug database Thu, 19 Dec 2002 19:52:29 +0000 (GMT)
  • Re: Dedicated kernel bug database Thu, 19 Dec 2002 18:00:03 +0000 (GMT)
  • Dedicated kernel bug database Thu, 19 Dec 2002 13:35:27 +0000 (GMT)
  • Re: Freezing.. (was Re: Intel P6 vs P7 system call performance) Thu, 19 Dec 2002 00:59:20 +0000 (GMT)
  • Re: Freezing.. (was Re: Intel P6 vs P7 system call performance) Thu, 19 Dec 2002 00:53:19 +0000 (GMT)
  • Re: Freezing.. (was Re: Intel P6 vs P7 system call performance) Wed, 18 Dec 2002 22:37:26 +0000 (GMT)
  • Re: Freezing.. (was Re: Intel P6 vs P7 system call performance) Wed, 18 Dec 2002 20:39:11 +0000 (GMT)
  • Re: [Oops 2.5.51] PnPBIOS: cat /proc/bus/pnp/escd Sun, 15 Dec 2002 23:39:38 +0000 (GMT)
  • Re: 2.4.19, don't "hdparm -I /dev/hde" if hde is on a Asus A7V133 Promise ctrlr, or... Sun, 15 Dec 2002 23:37:35 +0000 (GMT)
  • Re: 2.4.19, don't "hdparm -I /dev/hde" if hde is on a Asus A7V133 Promise ctrlr, or... Sun, 15 Dec 2002 21:39:18 +0000 (GMT)
  • Union mounts Sun, 15 Dec 2002 14:03:29 +0000 (GMT)
  • Re: Symlink indirection Sun, 15 Dec 2002 12:58:14 +0000 (GMT)
• John Levon
  • Re: [PATCH] (4/5) improved notifier callback mechanism - read copy update Thu, 19 Dec 2002 18:08:20 +0000
  • [PATCH] oprofile update for 2.5.52 Tue, 17 Dec 2002 17:50:40 +0000
• John Reiser
  • Re: vt8235 fix, hopefully last variant Sat, 21 Dec 2002 09:57:42 -0800
  • Re: Valgrind meets UML Sat, 21 Dec 2002 08:15:27 -0800
  • Re: Valgrind meets UML Fri, 20 Dec 2002 15:32:30 -0800
  • Re: Valgrind meets UML Fri, 20 Dec 2002 07:26:39 -0800
  • Re: vt8235 fix, hopefully last variant Thu, 19 Dec 2002 09:41:48 -0800
  • Re: Intel P6 vs P7 system call performance Tue, 17 Dec 2002 08:14:33 -0800
  • Re: Intel P6 vs P7 system call performance Tue, 17 Dec 2002 08:01:02 -0800
• john slee
  • bk-current __secpath_destroy link error Wed, 18 Dec 2002 17:51:54 +1100
• john stultz
  • [PATCH][RESEND] linux-2.5.52_subarch-cleanup_A3 16 Dec 2002 14:50:47 -0800
  • [RFC] linux-2.4.21-pre1_lost-tick_A0 16 Dec 2002 14:09:29 -0800
  • [PATCH] linux-2.4.21-pre1_cyclone-timer_B3 16 Dec 2002 14:03:26 -0800
• John Weber
  • 2.5.x Cirrus Logic Framebuffer Support Fri, 20 Dec 2002 18:38:00 -0500
• Jon Tollefson
  • Re: Dedicated kernel bug database 20 Dec 2002 21:30:47 -0600
  • Re: Dedicated kernel bug database 20 Dec 2002 21:27:24 -0600
  • Re: Dedicated kernel bug database 20 Dec 2002 11:32:45 -0600
  • Re: Dedicated kernel bug database 20 Dec 2002 09:09:31 -0600
• Jonah Sherman
  • Re: Intel P6 vs P7 system call performance Mon, 16 Dec 2002 11:07:06 -0500
• Joseph
  • USB 2.0 is too slow? Thu, 19 Dec 2002 15:57:39 +0800
• Joseph D. Wagner
  • RE: Horrible drive performance under concurrent i/o jobs (dlh problem?) Sat, 21 Dec 2002 00:00:16 -0600
  • RE: Horrible drive performance under concurrent i/o jobs (dlh problem?) Fri, 20 Dec 2002 14:40:30 -0600
  • RE: Problem Compiling Linux Kernel 2.4.20 Tue, 17 Dec 2002 14:27:32 -0600
  • RE: big load Tue, 17 Dec 2002 00:50:32 -0600
  • Problem using "make config/xconfig" with 2.4.20 on Redhat 7.3 Mon, 16 Dec 2002 22:38:38 -0600
• Joseph Fannin
  • Re: Notification hooks Thu, 19 Dec 2002 01:34:45 -0500
• Jurgen Kramer
  • Re: OT: Which Gigabit ethernet card? 21 Dec 2002 13:44:47 +0100
  • OT: Which Gigabit ethernet card? 20 Dec 2002 14:45:36 +0100
• Justin Clift
  • Re: [CryptoAPI-devel] Re: [RFC] Hardware support notes for the kernel Sun, 15 Dec 2002 15:34:23 +1100
• Justin Pryzby
  • Re: Bug? undefined reference to `input_event' Thu, 19 Dec 2002 18:47:05 -0500
  • Re: Dedicated kernel bug database Thu, 19 Dec 2002 15:33:04 -0500
• Justin T. Gibbs
  • Re: [PATCH] aic7xxx bouncing over 4G Sat, 21 Dec 2002 08:23:04 -0700
  • Re: [PATCH] aic7xxx bouncing over 4G Sat, 21 Dec 2002 08:19:13 -0700
  • Re: [PATCH] aic7xxx bouncing over 4G Fri, 20 Dec 2002 18:59:46 -0700
  • Re: [PATCH] aic7xxx bouncing over 4G Fri, 20 Dec 2002 17:59:10 -0700
  • Re: [PATCH] aic7xxx bouncing over 4G Fri, 20 Dec 2002 17:23:42 -0700
  • Re: 2.4.20 st + aic7xxx (Adaptec 19160B) + VIA KT333 repeatable Sun, 15 Dec 2002 13:01:45 -0700
• Jörg Prante
  • [PATCH] [2.4.21-pre2] scx200 build fix Fri, 20 Dec 2002 01:58:24 +0100
  • [2.4.21-pre1] scx200.c in arch/i386/kernel Wed, 18 Dec 2002 00:51:07 +0100
• Kai Germaschewski
  • Re: [BUG] module-init-tools 0.9.3, rmmod modules with '-' Wed, 18 Dec 2002 11:47:26 -0600 (CST)
  • RE: [PATCH] S4bios for 2.5.52. Tue, 17 Dec 2002 16:14:41 -0600 (CST)
• Kai Henningsen
  • Re: Intel P6 vs P7 system call performance 18 Dec 2002 09:41:00 +0200
  • Re: Intel P6 vs P7 system call performance 18 Dec 2002 09:20:00 +0200
• Kamble, Nitin A
  • [PATCH] IRQ distribution in the 2.5.52 kernel Fri, 20 Dec 2002 01:08:18 -0800
• Keith Owens
  • Announce: XFS split patches for 2.4.20 - respin Wed, 18 Dec 2002 13:16:00 +1100
  • Re: How to do -nostdinc? Tue, 17 Dec 2002 08:26:33 +1100
  • Re: 2.4.20 st + aic7xxx (Adaptec 19160B) + VIA KT333 repeatable freeze Mon, 16 Dec 2002 15:47:32 +1100
  • How to do -nostdinc? Sun, 15 Dec 2002 23:06:41 +1100
  • Re: 2.4.20 st + aic7xxx (Adaptec 19160B) + VIA KT333 repeatable freeze Sun, 15 Dec 2002 22:42:40 +1100
  • Re: compilation failure Sun, 15 Dec 2002 22:24:50 +1100
• Kevin Easton
  • Re: 2.4.20 st + aic7xxx (Adaptec 19160B) + VIA KT333 repeatable freeze Mon, 16 Dec 2002 16:21:00 +1100
  • Re: 2.4.20 st + aic7xxx (Adaptec 19160B) + VIA KT333 repeatable freeze Mon, 16 Dec 2002 16:04:30 +1100
• kevin@sylandro.com
  • Re: 2.4.20 st + aic7xxx (Adaptec 19160B) + VIA KT333 repeatable freeze Mon, 16 Dec 2002 08:52:03 +1100
• khromy
  • Re: Announce: XFS split patches for 2.4.20 - respin Tue, 17 Dec 2002 22:04:50 -0500
• Kostadin Karaivanov
  • 2.5.52 hangs on boot Wed, 18 Dec 2002 16:01:13 +0200
• Kurt Garloff
  • Re: Problems with OnStream USB30 Tape drive on the USB ports on a FIC VA-503+ - VIA MVP3 Chipset Wed, 18 Dec 2002 23:07:34 +0100
• Kurt Roeckx
  • Re: adjtimex/ppskit Sun, 15 Dec 2002 11:57:06 +0100
• Larry McVoy
  • Re: Freezing.. (was Re: Intel P6 vs P7 system call performance) Wed, 18 Dec 2002 16:37:54 -0800
  • Re: Freezing.. (was Re: Intel P6 vs P7 system call performance) Wed, 18 Dec 2002 14:08:45 -0800
  • Re: Freezing.. (was Re: Intel P6 vs P7 system call performance) Wed, 18 Dec 2002 11:45:12 -0800
  • Re: Freezing.. (was Re: Intel P6 vs P7 system call performance) Wed, 18 Dec 2002 11:33:24 -0800
  • Re: Freezing.. (was Re: Intel P6 vs P7 system call performance) Wed, 18 Dec 2002 11:23:51 -0800
  • Re: Freezing.. (was Re: Intel P6 vs P7 system call performance) Wed, 18 Dec 2002 08:56:57 -0800
  • Re: Linux v2.5.52 Mon, 16 Dec 2002 12:39:32 -0800
  • Re: Notification hooks Mon, 16 Dec 2002 09:25:34 -0800
  • Re: Notification hooks Mon, 16 Dec 2002 09:24:15 -0800
  • Re: Notification hooks Mon, 16 Dec 2002 09:21:29 -0800
• Linus Torvalds
  • Re: Intel P6 vs P7 system call performance Sat, 21 Dec 2002 19:11:59 -0800 (PST)
  • Re: PATCH 2.5.x disable BAR when sizing Sat, 21 Dec 2002 14:44:23 -0800 (PST)
  • Re: Intel P6 vs P7 system call performance Sat, 21 Dec 2002 11:39:46 -0800 (PST)
  • Re: Next round of AGPGART fixes. Fri, 20 Dec 2002 23:07:58 -0800 (PST)
  • Re: [PATCH] [v850] Reduce redundancy in v850 linker scripts Fri, 20 Dec 2002 22:18:57 -0800 (PST)
  • Re: Intel P6 vs P7 system call performance Fri, 20 Dec 2002 16:09:50 -0800 (PST)
  • Re: PATCH 2.5.x disable BAR when sizing Fri, 20 Dec 2002 12:14:43 -0800 (PST)
  • Re: PTRACE_GET_THREAD_AREA Fri, 20 Dec 2002 17:42:36 +0000 (UTC)
  • Re: PTRACE_GET_THREAD_AREA Fri, 20 Dec 2002 17:36:37 +0000 (UTC)
  • Re: PATCH 2.5.x disable BAR when sizing Fri, 20 Dec 2002 09:05:53 -0800 (PST)
  • Re: Intel P6 vs P7 system call performance Fri, 20 Dec 2002 08:47:05 -0800 (PST)
  • Re: PATCH 2.5.x disable BAR when sizing Fri, 20 Dec 2002 06:05:29 +0000 (UTC)
  • Re: PATCH 2.5.x disable BAR when sizing Fri, 20 Dec 2002 05:57:23 +0000 (UTC)
  • Re: Intel P6 vs P7 system call performance Thu, 19 Dec 2002 17:47:55 -0800 (PST)
  • Re: Intel P6 vs P7 system call performance Thu, 19 Dec 2002 15:30:23 -0800 (PST)
  • Re: Intel P6 vs P7 system call performance Thu, 19 Dec 2002 14:49:50 -0800 (PST)
  • Re: Intel P6 vs P7 system call performance Thu, 19 Dec 2002 14:22:12 -0800 (PST)
  • Re: Intel P6 vs P7 system call performance Thu, 19 Dec 2002 11:37:06 -0800 (PST)
  • Re: Freezing.. (was Re: Intel P6 vs P7 system call performance) Wed, 18 Dec 2002 17:17:03 -0800 (PST)
  • Re: Intel P6 vs P7 system call performance Wed, 18 Dec 2002 14:57:11 -0800 (PST)
  • Re: Intel P6 vs P7 system call performance Wed, 18 Dec 2002 14:37:35 -0800 (PST)
  • Re: Freezing.. (was Re: Intel P6 vs P7 system call performance) Wed, 18 Dec 2002 09:41:15 -0800 (PST)
  • Freezing.. (was Re: Intel P6 vs P7 system call performance) Wed, 18 Dec 2002 08:49:37 -0800 (PST)
  • Re: Intel P6 vs P7 system call performance Tue, 17 Dec 2002 22:38:09 -0800 (PST)
  • Re: Intel P6 vs P7 system call performance Tue, 17 Dec 2002 22:06:41 -0800 (PST)
  • Re: Intel P6 vs P7 system call performance Tue, 17 Dec 2002 20:52:19 -0800 (PST)
  • Re: Intel P6 vs P7 system call performance Tue, 17 Dec 2002 20:49:17 -0800 (PST)
  • Re: Intel P6 vs P7 system call performance Tue, 17 Dec 2002 20:15:47 -0800 (PST)
  • Re: Intel P6 vs P7 system call performance Tue, 17 Dec 2002 20:15:05 -0800 (PST)
  • Re: Intel P6 vs P7 system call performance Tue, 17 Dec 2002 20:05:35 -0800 (PST)
  • Re: Intel P6 vs P7 system call performance Tue, 17 Dec 2002 16:20:36 -0800 (PST)
  • Re: Intel P6 vs P7 system call performance Tue, 17 Dec 2002 12:01:06 -0800 (PST)
  • Re: Intel P6 vs P7 system call performance Tue, 17 Dec 2002 11:58:25 -0800 (PST)
  • Re: Intel P6 vs P7 system call performance Tue, 17 Dec 2002 11:44:34 -0800 (PST)
  • Re: Intel P6 vs P7 system call performance Tue, 17 Dec 2002 11:37:04 -0800 (PST)
  • Re: Intel P6 vs P7 system call performance Tue, 17 Dec 2002 11:28:09 -0800 (PST)
  • Re: Intel P6 vs P7 system call performance Tue, 17 Dec 2002 11:10:20 -0800 (PST)
  • Re: Intel P6 vs P7 system call performance Tue, 17 Dec 2002 11:05:56 -0800 (PST)
  • Re: Intel P6 vs P7 system call performance Tue, 17 Dec 2002 11:04:51 -0800 (PST)
  • Re: Intel P6 vs P7 system call performance Tue, 17 Dec 2002 10:49:31 -0800 (PST)
  • Re: Intel P6 vs P7 system call performance Tue, 17 Dec 2002 10:24:44 -0800 (PST)
  • Re: Intel P6 vs P7 system call performance Tue, 17 Dec 2002 10:01:58 -0800 (PST)
  • Re: Intel P6 vs P7 system call performance Tue, 17 Dec 2002 09:55:28 -0800 (PST)
  • Re: Intel P6 vs P7 system call performance Tue, 17 Dec 2002 09:47:39 -0800 (PST)
  • Re: Intel P6 vs P7 system call performance Tue, 17 Dec 2002 09:07:21 -0800 (PST)
  • Re: Intel P6 vs P7 system call performance Tue, 17 Dec 2002 09:06:06 -0800 (PST)
  • Re: Intel P6 vs P7 system call performance Tue, 17 Dec 2002 08:57:44 -0800 (PST)
  • Re: Intel P6 vs P7 system call performance Tue, 17 Dec 2002 08:50:17 -0800 (PST)
  • Re: Intel P6 vs P7 system call performance Mon, 16 Dec 2002 22:18:27 -0800 (PST)
  • Re: Intel P6 vs P7 system call performance Mon, 16 Dec 2002 22:09:33 -0800 (PST)
  • Re: Intel P6 vs P7 system call performance Mon, 16 Dec 2002 21:55:13 -0800 (PST)
  • Re: Intel P6 vs P7 system call performance Mon, 16 Dec 2002 18:36:20 -0800 (PST)
  • Re: Intel P6 vs P7 system call performance Mon, 16 Dec 2002 16:47:00 -0800 (PST)
  • Re: Linux v2.5.52 Mon, 16 Dec 2002 12:54:00 -0800 (PST)
  • Re: Linux v2.5.52 Mon, 16 Dec 2002 09:26:58 -0800 (PST)
  • Re: 1/19 Mon, 16 Dec 2002 09:07:05 -0800 (PST)
  • Re: [PATCH] remove error message on illegal ioctl Mon, 16 Dec 2002 01:39:24 -0800 (PST)
  • Re: [XFS] add missing file xfs_iomap.c Sun, 15 Dec 2002 20:39:31 -0800 (PST)
  • Linux v2.5.52 Sun, 15 Dec 2002 19:34:09 -0800 (PST)
  • Re: [PATCH] dm.c - device-mapper I/O path fixes Sun, 15 Dec 2002 16:50:16 -0800 (PST)
• Linux Kernel Developer
  • Problems with OnStream USB30 Tape drive on the USB ports on a FIC VA-503+ - VIA MVP3 Chipset Sun, 15 Dec 2002 08:32:19 -0500
• Lists
  • [OOPS] Kernel 2.4.20 ... Sat, 21 Dec 2002 19:59:52 +0200 (EET)
• Lukas Hejtmanek
  • Re: BUG: 2.5.52-bk4 Fri, 20 Dec 2002 19:09:31 +0100
  • module loading on demand is not working? 2.5.52-bk4 Fri, 20 Dec 2002 01:16:26 +0100
  • Re: BUG: 2.5.52-bk4 Fri, 20 Dec 2002 01:06:38 +0100
  • Re: BUG: 2.5.52-bk4 Fri, 20 Dec 2002 00:49:13 +0100
  • BUG: 2.5.52-bk4 Thu, 19 Dec 2002 22:47:21 +0100
• Lukasz Trabinski
  • EXT3-fs panic on 2.4.20 Sun, 15 Dec 2002 16:51:05 +0100 (CET)
• Maciej W. Rozycki
  • Re: PATCH 2.5.x disable BAR when sizing Sat, 21 Dec 2002 19:34:10 +0100 (MET)
• Manfred Spraul
  • Re: Intel P6 vs P7 system call performance Tue, 17 Dec 2002 17:32:35 +0100
  • boot_cpu_data problem Sun, 15 Dec 2002 00:29:01 +0100
• Manish Lachwani
  • Re: another seagate for the black-list? Tue, 17 Dec 2002 07:52:55 -0800 (PST)
• Marc-Christian Petersen
  • Re: [BENCHMARK] scheduler tunables with contest - prio_bonus_ratio Fri, 20 Dec 2002 12:17:07 +0100
  • Re: [PATCH] updated scheduler tunables Tue, 17 Dec 2002 10:33:11 +0100
  • Re: Where is this printk? Mon, 16 Dec 2002 19:57:54 +0100
  • Re: L2 Cache problem Mon, 16 Dec 2002 19:47:31 +0100
  • Where is this printk? Mon, 16 Dec 2002 19:43:24 +0100
  • Re: 2.4.21-pre1 broke the ide-tape driver Sun, 15 Dec 2002 02:23:34 +0100
• Marcelo Tosatti
  • Re: 2.4.21-pre1 broke the ide-tape driver Thu, 19 Dec 2002 18:08:15 -0200 (BRST)
  • Re: IDE-CD and VT8235 issue!!! Wed, 18 Dec 2002 17:27:30 -0200 (BRST)
  • Linux 2.4.21-pre2 Wed, 18 Dec 2002 17:22:50 -0200 (BRST)
  • Re: PROBLEM: kernel 2.4.20 option CONFIG_BLK_STATS breaks /proc/partitons Wed, 18 Dec 2002 13:31:44 -0200 (BRST)
  • Re: [PATCH] PCI: disable decoding while sizing BARs Wed, 18 Dec 2002 10:30:54 -0200 (BRST)
  • Re: [PATCH] 2.4.21pre1 cpqfc Tue, 17 Dec 2002 14:58:08 -0200 (BRST)
  • Re: My fixes to ide-tape in 2.4.20-ac2 Tue, 17 Dec 2002 14:28:34 -0200 (BRST)
  • Re: My fixes to ide-tape in 2.4.20-ac2 Mon, 16 Dec 2002 22:49:35 -0200 (BRST)
• Marcin Kasperski
  • heavy kupdated still observed in 2.4.18 18 Dec 2002 15:37:22 +0100
• Marco d'Itri
  • Re: Are working modules going to be in 2.6? Sat, 21 Dec 2002 17:44:22 +0100
• marco mascherpa aka mush
  • Re: A7M266-D problems with integrate sound device and USB 2.0 PCI card Wed, 18 Dec 2002 21:43:55 +0100
  • A7M266-D problems with integrate sound device and USB 2.0 PCI card Wed, 18 Dec 2002 20:57:33 +0100
• Marek Michalkiewicz
  • Re: parport_serial link order bug, NetMos support Thu, 19 Dec 2002 23:13:50 +0100 (CET)
  • parport_serial link order bug, NetMos support Thu, 19 Dec 2002 11:03:12 +0100 (CET)
• Margit Schubert-While
  • Re: 2.4.20 AGP for I845 wrong ? Fri, 20 Dec 2002 16:09:28 +0100
  • 2.5.52 take 1 Wed, 18 Dec 2002 17:42:16 +0100
  • 2.4.20 copy_from/to_user Tue, 17 Dec 2002 11:42:41 +0100
• Marius Gedminas
  • Re: How to do -nostdinc? Sun, 15 Dec 2002 15:47:28 +0200
• Mark H. Wood
  • Re: Re: pci-skeleton duplex check Tue, 17 Dec 2002 09:35:33 -0500 (EST)
• Mark Mielke
  • Re: Intel P6 vs P7 system call performance Wed, 18 Dec 2002 14:12:07 -0500
  • Re: Intel P6 vs P7 system call performance Mon, 16 Dec 2002 12:54:32 -0500
• Markus Wagner
  • No booting with a Silicon Image 3112 SATA-Controller Tue, 17 Dec 2002 23:07:44 -0500
• martin f krafft
  • Re: 'D' processes on a healthy system? Thu, 19 Dec 2002 19:51:53 +0100
  • Re: 'D' processes on a healthy system? Thu, 19 Dec 2002 19:23:59 +0100
  • 'D' processes on a healthy system? Thu, 19 Dec 2002 13:40:43 +0100
• Martin J. Bligh
  • RE: [PATCH][2.4] generic cluster APIC support for systems with Fri, 20 Dec 2002 20:43:42 -0800
  • Re: Dedicated kernel bug database Fri, 20 Dec 2002 18:52:08 -0800
  • Re: Dedicated kernel bug database + documentaion Fri, 20 Dec 2002 14:01:29 -0800
  • Re: Dedicated kernel bug database Fri, 20 Dec 2002 08:08:53 -0800
  • Re: Dedicated kernel bug database Thu, 19 Dec 2002 19:40:22 -0800
  • Re: Dedicated kernel bug database Thu, 19 Dec 2002 19:35:31 -0800
  • Re: Dedicated kernel bug database Thu, 19 Dec 2002 19:26:36 -0800
  • Re: Dedicated kernel bug database Thu, 19 Dec 2002 19:21:04 -0800
  • Re: Dedicated kernel bug database Thu, 19 Dec 2002 18:22:18 -0800
  • Re: Dedicated kernel bug database Thu, 19 Dec 2002 18:20:25 -0800
  • Re: Dedicated kernel bug database Thu, 19 Dec 2002 17:39:56 -0800
  • Re: [Lse-tech] Re: 15000+ processes -- poor performance ?! Thu, 19 Dec 2002 07:24:34 -0800
  • Re: 2.5.52-mm2 Thu, 19 Dec 2002 07:22:15 -0800
  • Re: Freezing.. (was Re: Intel P6 vs P7 system call performance) Wed, 18 Dec 2002 23:05:27 -0800
  • RE: [PATCH][2.4] generic cluster APIC support for systems with Wed, 18 Dec 2002 19:10:07 -0800
  • Re: Freezing.. (was Re: Intel P6 vs P7 system call performance) Wed, 18 Dec 2002 17:43:40 -0800
  • Re: [Lse-tech] 15000+ processes -- poor performance ?! Wed, 18 Dec 2002 16:47:35 -0800
  • Re: [PATCH][2.4] generic cluster APIC support for systems with more than 8 CPUs Wed, 18 Dec 2002 16:24:55 -0800
  • Re: [PATCH][2.4] generic cluster APIC support for systems with more than 8 CPUs Wed, 18 Dec 2002 15:59:13 -0800
  • Re: lk maintainers Wed, 18 Dec 2002 07:13:26 -0800
  • Re: 2.5.52-mjb1 (scalability / NUMA patchset) Tue, 17 Dec 2002 11:31:06 -0800
  • Re: Intel P6 vs P7 system call performance Tue, 17 Dec 2002 11:26:50 -0800
  • 2.5.52-mjb1 (scalability / NUMA patchset) Tue, 17 Dec 2002 00:10:29 -0800
• Martin Waitz
  • device interface api Wed, 18 Dec 2002 01:40:39 +0100
• Matt Bernstein
  • Re: [drm:drm_init] *ERROR* Cannot initialize the agpgart module. Fri, 20 Dec 2002 01:30:01 +0000 (GMT)
• Matt Reppert
  • Re: 2 (minor) Alpha probs in 2.5.51 Sun, 15 Dec 2002 19:07:04 -0600
  • Re: 2.5.51 on Alpha oopses on mount Sun, 15 Dec 2002 15:01:51 -0600
• Matt Young
  • 2.5.50 working great so far Sun, 15 Dec 2002 16:43:36 -0800
  • Replacing the SUSU ifcfg-{up/down} Sun, 15 Dec 2002 13:13:37 -0800
• Matt_Domsch@Dell.com
  • RE: How to get the size of the block device ???? (Important) Tue, 17 Dec 2002 12:49:09 -0600
• Matthew Bell
  • Re: [PATCH] Obvious(ish): 3c515 should work if ISAPNP is a module. Sun, 15 Dec 2002 09:05:52 +0800
  • [PATCH] Obvious(ish): 3c515 should work if ISAPNP is a module. Sun, 15 Dec 2002 04:12:20 +0800
  • [PATCH] Obvious: parport_serial depends on PCI. Sun, 15 Dec 2002 03:36:38 +0800
• Matthew D. Pitts
  • Via KT400 Wed, 18 Dec 2002 18:33:20 -0500
• Matthew J Fanto
  • Linksys WPC11 PCMCIA Wireless Mon, 16 Dec 2002 19:08:31 -0500
• Matthias Andree
  • Re: /proc/mounts and data=journal Fri, 20 Dec 2002 00:16:47 +0100
• Matti Aarnio
  • ADMIN: A note to all subscribers ... Thu, 19 Dec 2002 18:11:54 +0200
  • Re: Intel P6 vs P7 system call performance Tue, 17 Dec 2002 22:07:49 +0200
  • Re: Intel P6 vs P7 system call performance Tue, 17 Dec 2002 21:59:17 +0200
  • Re: Intel P6 vs P7 system call performance Tue, 17 Dec 2002 19:19:08 +0200
• Max Krasnyansky
  • Re: [PATCH/RFC] New module refcounting for net_proto_family Thu, 19 Dec 2002 15:23:31 -0800
  • Re: [PATCH/RFC] New module refcounting for net_proto_family Thu, 19 Dec 2002 14:17:26 -0800
  • Re: [PATCH/RFC] New module refcounting for net_proto_family 19 Dec 2002 08:05:28 -0800
  • [PATCH/RFC] New module refcounting for net_proto_family 18 Dec 2002 07:25:55 -0800
  • Re: Alcatel speedtouch USB driver and SMP. Tue, 17 Dec 2002 11:59:48 -0800
• Max Lapshin
  • PCMCIA 3CCFE575 Card bugs Sun, 15 Dec 2002 13:58:07 +0300
• mdew
  • Bug? undefined reference to `input_event' 20 Dec 2002 11:22:09 +1300
• Meelis Roos
  • piix4 ide error still present in 2.4.21-pre1 Thu, 19 Dec 2002 13:35:26 +0200 (EET)
  • PPC: compile failure in 2.4.21-pre1 ide Thu, 19 Dec 2002 09:04:36 +0200 (EET)
• Melchior FRANZ
  • Re: 2.5.52 and modules (lots of unresolved symbols)? Mon, 16 Dec 2002 20:22:50 +0100
  • Re: 2.5.52 and modules (lots of unresolved symbols)? Mon, 16 Dec 2002 19:13:56 +0100
• merlin hughes
  • kernels 2.4.19--2.4.20-ac2 hang at boot Sun, 15 Dec 2002 11:34:19 -0500
• mgross
  • Re: Multithreaded coredump patch where? Wed, 18 Dec 2002 08:19:33 -0800
  • Re: Multithreaded coredump patch where? Wed, 18 Dec 2002 08:13:25 -0800
  • Re: Multithreaded coredump patch where? Mon, 16 Dec 2002 13:21:20 -0800
• Michael Aldrich
  • RedHat Kernel Error Mon, 16 Dec 2002 13:44:15 -0500
• Michael Elizabeth Chastain
  • Re: First Bug Found : RE: How to help new comers trying the v2.5x series kernels. Sat, 21 Dec 2002 23:07:03 -0600
• Michael Kerrisk
  • Shutdown(), TCP sockets, and select() discrepancy Tue, 17 Dec 2002 18:01:20 +0100 (MET)
• Michael Knigge
  • RE: 3ware driver in 2.4.x and 2.5.x not compatible with 6x00 seri es cards Fri, 20 Dec 2002 09:05:55 GMT
• Michael Milligan
  • Re: 2.4.20: Broken AGP initialization for i845G chipset [patch] Fri, 20 Dec 2002 10:31:25 -0700
  • 2.4.20: Broken AGP initialization for i845G chipset [patch] Thu, 19 Dec 2002 16:38:00 -0700
• Michal Jaegermann
  • Re: [2.4.20] via82cxxx goes postal and locks system, no full duplex(?) Sun, 15 Dec 2002 16:47:53 -0700
• Michel Lanners
  • Re: Patch(2.5.52): Add missing PCI ID's for nVidia IDE and PlanB frame grabber Thu, 19 Dec 2002 21:17:03 +0100 (CET)
• Miguel Freitas
  • Linux kernel multimedia experiments 19 Dec 2002 16:35:50 -0200
• Mikael Pettersson
  • Re: 2.4.21-pre1 broke the ide-tape driver Fri, 20 Dec 2002 19:04:01 +0100 (MET)
  • 2.5.52: ejecting 3c575 Cardbus nic oopses pci_remove_device Wed, 18 Dec 2002 23:23:44 +0100 (MET)
  • Re: Intel P6 vs P7 system call performance Tue, 17 Dec 2002 18:37:21 +0100
  • Re: 2.4.21-pre1 broke the ide-tape driver Tue, 17 Dec 2002 00:27:06 +0100 (MET)
  • Re: 2.4.21-pre1 broke the ide-tape driver Mon, 16 Dec 2002 23:18:58 +0100 (MET)
  • Re: 2.4.21-pre1 broke the ide-tape driver Mon, 16 Dec 2002 00:38:16 +0100 (MET)
  • Re: 2.4.21-pre1 broke the ide-tape driver Sun, 15 Dec 2002 16:37:07 +0100 (MET)
  • 2.4.21-pre1 broke the ide-tape driver Sun, 15 Dec 2002 02:19:20 +0100 (MET)
• Mikael Starvik
  • RE: Linux 2.4.21-pre2 Thu, 19 Dec 2002 07:49:32 +0100
  • RE: Compiling iproute2(w/HTB patch) for 2.5.51 Mon, 16 Dec 2002 07:26:55 +0100
• Mike Dresser
  • Re: 2.4.19, don't "hdparm -I /dev/hde" if hde is on a Asus A7V133 Wed, 18 Dec 2002 21:02:31 -0500 (EST)
  • Re: Freezing.. (was Re: Intel P6 vs P7 system call performance) Wed, 18 Dec 2002 13:09:27 -0500 (EST)
  • Re: L2 Cache problem Mon, 16 Dec 2002 13:56:09 -0500 (EST)
• Milan Roubal
  • Re: big load Tue, 17 Dec 2002 19:24:49 +0100
  • big load Mon, 16 Dec 2002 02:54:37 +0100
• Miles Bader
  • Re: [PATCH] [v850] Reduce redundancy in v850 linker scripts Sat, 21 Dec 2002 02:59:47 -0500
  • [PATCH] [v850] Reduce redundancy in v850 linker scripts Fri, 20 Dec 2002 14:28:03 +0900 (JST)
  • [PATCH] [v850] Pass extra signal handler args correctly on the v850 Thu, 19 Dec 2002 11:43:27 +0900 (JST)
  • [PATCH] [v850] Add v850 support for `sys_restart_syscall' Thu, 19 Dec 2002 11:33:59 +0900 (JST)
  • [PATCH] [v850] Add some v850 elf constants Thu, 19 Dec 2002 11:34:00 +0900 (JST)
  • [PATCH] Make some symbol exports conditional on CONFIG_MMU Thu, 19 Dec 2002 11:33:59 +0900 (JST)
  • [PATCH] [v850] Update v850 includes for slimmed-down sched.h Thu, 19 Dec 2002 11:33:59 +0900 (JST)
• Måns Rullgård
  • Re: cmpci: microphone/line in not working 20 Dec 2002 11:56:28 +0100
  • Re: /proc/cpuinfo and hyperthreading 16 Dec 2002 16:11:23 +0100
• Nakajima, Jun
  • RE: [PATCH][2.4] generic cluster APIC support for systems with more than 8 CPUs Fri, 20 Dec 2002 19:27:00 -0800
  • RE: Freezing.. (was Re: Intel P6 vs P7 system call performance) Wed, 18 Dec 2002 14:00:43 -0800
  • RE: Intel P6 vs P7 system call performance Tue, 17 Dec 2002 17:30:59 -0800
  • RE: [PATCH][2.5][RFC] Using xAPIC apic address space on !Summit Mon, 16 Dec 2002 18:30:31 -0800
• Nathan Neulinger
  • 3ware driver in 2.4.x and 2.5.x not compatible with 6x00 series cards Wed, 18 Dec 2002 12:10:54 -0600
• Nathaniel Russell
  • Re: Via 8233 flooding of errors [2.4-ac] Tue, 17 Dec 2002 11:27:01 -0500 (EST)
  • Re: Via 8233 flooding of errors [2.4-ac] Tue, 17 Dec 2002 10:49:27 -0500 (EST)
  • Via 8233 flooding of errors [2.4-ac] Tue, 17 Dec 2002 06:41:49 -0500 (EST)
• Neil Brown
  • Re: raid5 multi-drive-failure and recovery? Fri, 20 Dec 2002 11:59:17 +1100
  • Re: detecting layout in RAID Wed, 18 Dec 2002 09:55:45 +1100
• Neulinger, Nathan
  • RE: 3ware driver in 2.4.x and 2.5.x not compatible with 6x00 seriescards Wed, 18 Dec 2002 13:30:36 -0600
  • RE: 3ware driver in 2.4.x and 2.5.x not compatible with 6x00 series cards Wed, 18 Dec 2002 12:45:51 -0600
  • RE: 3ware driver in 2.4.x and 2.5.x not compatible with 6x00 series cards Wed, 18 Dec 2002 12:29:05 -0600
• Nicholas Berry
  • Re: How to get the size of the block device ???? (Important) Tue, 17 Dec 2002 09:39:04 -0500
• Nicolas Mailhot
  • Re: Dedicated kernel bug database 20 Dec 2002 12:18:50 +0100
• Nicolas Turro
  • 2.4.20 pcnet32 problem Wed, 18 Dec 2002 17:08:00 +0100
• Nigel Cunningham
  • RE: [ACPI] Re: [PATCH] S4bios for 2.5.52. Thu, 19 Dec 2002 08:37:30 +1300
• Nikita Danilov
  • Re: [Benchmark] AIM9 results Wed, 18 Dec 2002 22:10:03 +0300
• Nils O.
  • [BUG] oops in dcache.c , 2.4.20 19 Dec 2002 23:34:30 +0100
• Nuno Silva
  • Re: Horrible drive performance under concurrent i/o jobs (dlh problem?) Fri, 20 Dec 2002 01:47:37 +0000
• O.Sezer
  • Re: rmap and nvidia? Tue, 17 Dec 2002 22:14:51 +0200
  • Re: Linux 2.4.20-ac2 Tue, 17 Dec 2002 12:32:23 +0200
  • Re: rmap and nvidia? Tue, 17 Dec 2002 00:22:34 +0200
• Octave
  • Re: problem with Andrew's patch ext3 Sun, 15 Dec 2002 20:59:05 +0100
  • Re: problem with Andrew's patch ext3 Sun, 15 Dec 2002 19:26:45 +0100
  • problem with Andrew's patch ext3 Sun, 15 Dec 2002 15:40:50 +0100
• Olaf Dietsche
  • [PATCH] 2.5.52: Filesystem capabilities 0.13 Mon, 16 Dec 2002 17:51:38 +0100
  • [PATCH] 2.5.52: access permission filesystem 0.13 Mon, 16 Dec 2002 17:51:08 +0100
• Oleg Drokin
  • Re: [BK][PATCH] ReiserFS CPU and memory bandwidth efficient large writes Tue, 17 Dec 2002 13:53:13 +0300
  • Re: JDIRTY JWAIT errors in 2.4.19 Mon, 16 Dec 2002 09:46:16 +0300
• Oliver Xymoron
  • Re: [PATCH 2.5.52] Use __set_current_state() instead of current-> state = (take 1) Fri, 20 Dec 2002 13:36:20 -0600
  • Re: Freezing.. (was Re: Intel P6 vs P7 system call performance) Wed, 18 Dec 2002 13:50:09 -0600
• Orion Poplawski
  • Re:hanging system Wed, 18 Dec 2002 12:33:09 -0700
  • Re: NFS - IRIX client issues Tue, 17 Dec 2002 17:28:09 -0700
• Osamu Tomita
  • Re: [PATCHSET] PC-9800 addtional for 2.5.50-ac1 (21/21) Wed, 18 Dec 2002 01:25:28 +0900
  • Re: [PATCHSET] PC-9800 addtional for 2.5.50-ac1 (21/21) Mon, 16 Dec 2002 23:36:46 +0900
  • RE: [BUG] module-init-tools 0.9.3, rmmod modules with '-' Tue, 17 Dec 2002 15:55:39 +0900
  • [PATCHSET] PC-9800 addtional for 2.5.50-ac1 (21/21) Sun, 15 Dec 2002 22:20:15 +0900
  • [PATCHSET] PC-9800 addtional for 2.5.50-ac1 (20/21) Sun, 15 Dec 2002 22:15:40 +0900
  • [PATCHSET] PC-9800 addtional for 2.5.50-ac1 (19/21) Sun, 15 Dec 2002 22:11:22 +0900
  • [PATCHSET] PC-9800 addtional for 2.5.50-ac1 (18/21) Sun, 15 Dec 2002 22:04:53 +0900
  • [PATCHSET] PC-9800 addtional for 2.5.50-ac1 (17/21) Sun, 15 Dec 2002 22:01:00 +0900
  • [PATCHSET] PC-9800 addtional for 2.5.50-ac1 (16/21) Sun, 15 Dec 2002 21:56:55 +0900
  • [PATCHSET] PC-9800 addtional for 2.5.50-ac1 (15/21) Sun, 15 Dec 2002 21:47:17 +0900
  • [PATCHSET] PC-9800 addtional for 2.5.50-ac1 (14/21) Sun, 15 Dec 2002 21:43:19 +0900
  • [PATCHSET] PC-9800 addtional for 2.5.50-ac1 (13/21) Sun, 15 Dec 2002 21:39:28 +0900
  • [PATCHSET] PC-9800 addtional for 2.5.50-ac1 (12/21) Sun, 15 Dec 2002 21:26:54 +0900
  • [PATCHSET] PC-9800 addtional for 2.5.50-ac1 (11/21) Sun, 15 Dec 2002 21:20:57 +0900
  • [PATCHSET] PC-9800 addtional for 2.5.50-ac1 (10/21) Sun, 15 Dec 2002 21:15:44 +0900
  • [PATCHSET] PC-9800 addtional for 2.5.50-ac1 (9/21) Sun, 15 Dec 2002 21:05:19 +0900
  • [PATCHSET] PC-9800 addtional for 2.5.50-ac1 (8/21) Sun, 15 Dec 2002 20:58:01 +0900
  • [PATCHSET] PC-9800 addtional for 2.5.50-ac1 (7/21) Sun, 15 Dec 2002 20:40:57 +0900
  • [PATCHSET] PC-9800 addtional for 2.5.50-ac1 (6/21) Sun, 15 Dec 2002 20:28:37 +0900
  • [PATCHSET] PC-9800 addtional for 2.5.50-ac1 (5/21) Sun, 15 Dec 2002 20:15:33 +0900
  • [PATCHSET] PC-9800 addtional for 2.5.50-ac1 (4/21) Sun, 15 Dec 2002 20:06:02 +0900
  • [PATCHSET] PC-9800 addtional for 2.5.50-ac1 (3/21) Sun, 15 Dec 2002 19:56:44 +0900
  • [PATCHSET] PC-9800 addtional for 2.5.50-ac1 (2/21) Sun, 15 Dec 2002 19:51:38 +0900
  • Re: [PATCHSET] PC-9800 addtional for 2.5.50-ac1 (2/21) Sun, 15 Dec 2002 19:39:12 +0900
  • [PATCHSET] PC-9800 addtional for 2.5.50-ac1 (1/21) Sun, 15 Dec 2002 19:34:26 +0900
  • [PATCHSET] PC-9800 addtional for 2.5.50-ac1 Sun, 15 Dec 2002 18:52:41 +0900
• Pallipadi, Venkatesh
  • [PATCH][2.4] generic support for systems with more than 8 CPUs (2/2) Sat, 21 Dec 2002 22:59:10 -0800
  • [PATCH][2.4] generic support for systems with more than 8 CPUs (1/2) Sat, 21 Dec 2002 22:59:06 -0800
  • [PATCHSET][2.4] generic support for systems with more than 8 CPUs (0/2) Sat, 21 Dec 2002 22:58:54 -0800
  • RE: [PATCH][2.4] generic cluster APIC support for systems with m ore than 8 CPUs Sat, 21 Dec 2002 22:19:20 -0800
  • RE: [PATCH][2.4] generic cluster APIC support for systems with m ore than 8 CPUs Sat, 21 Dec 2002 20:00:54 -0800
  • RE: [PATCH][2.4] generic cluster APIC support for systems with more than 8 CPUs Wed, 18 Dec 2002 18:45:07 -0800
  • RE: [PATCH][2.4] generic cluster APIC support for systems with more than 8 CPUs Wed, 18 Dec 2002 18:35:22 -0800
  • RE: [PATCH][2.4] generic cluster APIC support for systems with more than 8 CPUs Wed, 18 Dec 2002 17:05:01 -0800
  • [PATCH][2.4] generic cluster APIC support for systems with more than 8 CPUs Wed, 18 Dec 2002 14:36:20 -0800
• Paolo Ciarrocchi
  • [Benchmark] AIM9 results Tue, 17 Dec 2002 06:52:57 +0800
• Pascal Schmidt
  • Re: [patch] ext3 fixes Mon, 16 Dec 2002 13:57:32 +0100
• Patrick Mochel
  • Re: ide-scsi + kobject Badness in 2.5.52 Fri, 20 Dec 2002 11:46:21 -0600 (CST)
  • Re: RFC: bus_type and device_class merge (or partial merge) Thu, 19 Dec 2002 22:29:39 -0600 (CST)
  • Re: drivers/base/fs/fs.h - needed? Thu, 19 Dec 2002 15:49:05 -0600 (CST)
  • Re: RFC: bus_type and device_class merge (or partial merge) Thu, 19 Dec 2002 14:37:07 -0600 (CST)
  • Re: device interface api Thu, 19 Dec 2002 13:31:43 -0600 (CST)
• Patrick Petermair
  • Re: vt8235 fix, hopefully last variant Fri, 20 Dec 2002 21:12:58 +0100
  • Re: IDE-CD and VT8235 issue!!! Mon, 16 Dec 2002 14:45:34 +0100
• Patrick R. McManus
  • Re: Dual Xeon w/ HT: Kernel can't find second CPU Mon, 16 Dec 2002 09:42:43 -0500
• Paul
  • Re: [Oops 2.5.51] PnPBIOS: cat /proc/bus/pnp/escd Mon, 16 Dec 2002 17:46:08 -0500
  • Re: [Oops 2.5.51] PnPBIOS: cat /proc/bus/pnp/escd Sun, 15 Dec 2002 18:36:54 -0500
  • [Oops 2.5.51] PnPBIOS: cat /proc/bus/pnp/escd Sun, 15 Dec 2002 18:03:44 -0500
• Paul Fulghum
  • [PATCH] 2.5.52 n_hdlc.c 19 Dec 2002 14:42:30 -0600
  • [PATCH] 2.4.20 n_hdlc.c 19 Dec 2002 14:41:18 -0600
  • [PATCH] 2.2.23 n_hdlc.c 19 Dec 2002 14:39:57 -0600
• Paul Mackerras
  • [PATCH] update chipsfb.c to new API Thu, 19 Dec 2002 09:59:45 +1100
• Paul P Komkoff Jr
  • Re: [drm:drm_init] *ERROR* Cannot initialize the agpgart module. Tue, 17 Dec 2002 11:06:26 +0300
  • [PATCH] rmap15b for 2.4.20-ac2 Mon, 16 Dec 2002 18:56:00 +0300
• Paul Richards
  • [PATCH] 2.4.20 rivafb updates Sat, 21 Dec 2002 20:31:37 -0500
  • Re: [PATCH] 2.4.19 rivafb updates Sat, 21 Dec 2002 20:08:32 -0500
• Pavel Machek
  • Re: [ACPI] [PATCH] acpi_wakeup fixes Sat, 21 Dec 2002 13:01:02 +0100
  • Re: 2.5.52 vesafb -- no display Fri, 20 Dec 2002 23:05:34 +0100
  • Re: Intel P6 vs P7 system call performance Thu, 19 Dec 2002 01:14:41 +0100
  • Re: Intel P6 vs P7 system call performance Thu, 19 Dec 2002 00:51:24 +0100
  • Cold allocation so that swsusp works Thu, 19 Dec 2002 21:04:08 +0100
  • Re: Intel P6 vs P7 system call performance Thu, 19 Dec 2002 00:53:27 +0100
  • Re: Intel P6 vs P7 system call performance Thu, 19 Dec 2002 23:34:51 +0100
  • Re: Intel P6 vs P7 system call performance Thu, 19 Dec 2002 23:21:36 +0100
  • Re: Intel P6 vs P7 system call performance Thu, 19 Dec 2002 23:26:14 +0100
  • Re: Intel P6 vs P7 system call performance Thu, 19 Dec 2002 00:45:12 +0100
  • Re: Intel P6 vs P7 system call performance Thu, 19 Dec 2002 00:59:49 +0100
  • Re: Intel P6 vs P7 system call performance Thu, 19 Dec 2002 00:55:46 +0100
  • One-liner to make S4 work Wed, 18 Dec 2002 23:24:42 +0100
  • 2.5.52 vesafb -- no display Wed, 18 Dec 2002 23:01:19 +0100
  • 2.5.52 a/arch/i386/mm/init.c Wed, 18 Dec 2002 22:50:15 +0100
  • Re: [ACPI] Metolious hardware-sensors-using-ACPI specs Tue, 17 Dec 2002 00:15:51 +0100
  • Re: [ACPI] Metolious hardware-sensors-using-ACPI specs Mon, 16 Dec 2002 23:40:57 +0100
  • Metolious hardware-sensors-using-ACPI specs Mon, 16 Dec 2002 13:17:22 +0100
  • Re: Intel P6 vs P7 system call performance Mon, 16 Dec 2002 12:17:59 +0100
  • Re: [2.5.50, ACPI] link error Mon, 16 Dec 2002 12:16:29 +0100
  • Re: Intel P6 vs P7 system call performance Sun, 15 Dec 2002 23:43:48 +0100
  • Re: Intel P6 vs P7 system call performance Sun, 15 Dec 2002 22:59:51 +0100
  • Re: Intel P6 vs P7 system call performance Sun, 15 Dec 2002 23:01:32 +0100
• Pawel Kot
  • Re: Linux 2.2.24-rc1 Tue, 17 Dec 2002 01:15:40 +0100 (CET)
• Perez-Gonzalez, Inaky
  • RE: [PATCH 2.5.52] Use __set_current_state() instead of current-> Thu, 19 Dec 2002 11:04:06 -0800
  • RE: [PATCH 2.5.52] Use __set_current_state() instead of current-> Wed, 18 Dec 2002 17:53:50 -0800
  • RE: [PATCH 2.5.52] Use __set_current_state() instead of current-> Wed, 18 Dec 2002 18:40:05 -0800
  • RE: 15000+ processes -- poor performance ?! Wed, 18 Dec 2002 17:04:16 -0800
  • RE: [PATCH 2.5.52] Use __set_current_state() instead of current-> Wed, 18 Dec 2002 16:46:00 -0800
• Pete Zaitcev
  • Patch for e100 on my z505je Fri, 20 Dec 2002 03:32:58 -0500
  • Re: Dedicated kernel bug database Thu, 19 Dec 2002 19:24:19 -0500
  • Re: Dedicated kernel bug database Thu, 19 Dec 2002 18:59:30 -0500
  • Re: My fixes to ide-tape in 2.4.20-ac2 Tue, 17 Dec 2002 14:22:35 -0500
• peter
  • [PATCH] fix for RPM build target under newer versions Tue, 17 Dec 2002 05:40:01 -0500
• Philip Dodd
  • Re: rmap and nvidia? Sun, 15 Dec 2002 02:28:38 +0100
• Philipp Matthias Hahn
  • [BUGlet] security/Kconfig Tue, 17 Dec 2002 16:15:07 +0100
• Pierre Lombard
  • Re: [patch] ext3 deadlock fix Wed, 18 Dec 2002 01:16:52 +0100
• Pierre-Marc Fournier
  • cmpci: microphone/line in not working 18 Dec 2002 19:31:29 -0500
• Pine.LNX.4.43.0212181026370.25931-100000@cibs9.sns.it
  • Pine.LNX.4.43.0212181026370.25931-100000@cibs9.sns.it Pine.LNX.4.43.0212181026370.25931-100000@cibs9.sns.it
• Pine.LNX.4.44.0212201808070.6471-100000@phoenix.infradead.org
  • Pine.LNX.4.44.0212201808070.6471-100000@phoenix.infradead.org Pine.LNX.4.44.0212201808070.6471-100000@phoenix.infradead.org
• plachninka
  • Saving logs when system is started Thu, 19 Dec 2002 08:37:43 +0100
  • mkinitrd: binary operator expacted Tue, 17 Dec 2002 09:52:01 +0100
• Preston A. Elder
  • PROBLEM: Keyboard not found, but it exists! Wed, 18 Dec 2002 08:05:06 -0500
• Protasevich, Natalie
  • RE: [PATCH][2.4] generic cluster APIC support for systems with m Fri, 20 Dec 2002 16:57:28 -0600
• PSI-Systems
  • Re: [ACPI] Metolious hardware-sensors-using-ACPI specs Mon, 16 Dec 2002 19:33:24 +0100
• Ralf Hildebrandt
  • Re: 2.4.20-aa and LARGE Squid process -> SIGSEGV Sat, 21 Dec 2002 10:06:42 +0100
  • Re: 2.4.20-aa and LARGE Squid process -> SIGSEGV Sat, 21 Dec 2002 08:52:05 +0100
  • Re: 2.4.20-aa and LARGE Squid process -> SIGSEGV Fri, 20 Dec 2002 23:57:33 +0100
  • 2.4.20-aa and LARGE Squid process -> SIGSEGV Fri, 20 Dec 2002 12:48:37 +0100
  • 2.4.21-pre2 assertion errer in af_inet.c/tcp.c Fri, 20 Dec 2002 07:14:36 +0100
  • Re: IDE but no disks Tue, 17 Dec 2002 08:59:14 +0100
  • Re: Linux 2.4.21-pre1 Tue, 17 Dec 2002 09:02:51 +0100
  • Re: Linux 2.4.21-pre1 Sun, 15 Dec 2002 10:56:30 +0100
• Randy.Dunlap
  • Re: [PATCH 2/3] High-res-timers part 2 (x86 platform code) take 21 Fri, 20 Dec 2002 16:43:26 -0800 (PST)
  • Re: Dedicated kernel bug database + documentaion Fri, 20 Dec 2002 13:59:15 -0800 (PST)
  • pr_debug() and #define DEBUG usage Thu, 19 Dec 2002 22:38:19 -0800 (PST)
  • Re: Dedicated kernel bug database Thu, 19 Dec 2002 18:58:56 -0800 (PST)
  • Re: [drm:drm_init] *ERROR* Cannot initialize the agpgart module. Thu, 19 Dec 2002 17:43:14 -0800 (PST)
  • Re: Bug? undefined reference to `input_event' Thu, 19 Dec 2002 16:01:32 -0800 (PST)
  • Re: Dedicated kernel bug database Thu, 19 Dec 2002 13:55:20 -0800 (PST)
  • Re: Dedicated kernel bug database Thu, 19 Dec 2002 13:32:57 -0800 (PST)
  • Re: Dedicated kernel bug database Thu, 19 Dec 2002 12:32:13 -0800 (PST)
  • Re: Notification hooks Thu, 19 Dec 2002 10:02:28 -0800 (PST)
  • [PATCH] (2.5;v3) move LOG_BUF_SIZE to header/config Wed, 18 Dec 2002 10:31:20 -0800 (PST)
  • Re: [PATCH] (v3) move LOG_BUF_SIZE to header/config Tue, 17 Dec 2002 20:03:22 -0800 (PST)
  • Re: 2.5.52 compile error Tue, 17 Dec 2002 15:28:58 -0800 (PST)
  • Re: 2.5.52 compile error Tue, 17 Dec 2002 15:03:42 -0800 (PST)
  • [PATCH] (v3) move LOG_BUF_SIZE to header/config Tue, 17 Dec 2002 14:33:55 -0800 (PST)
  • Re: [PATCH] move LOG_BUF_SIZE to header file Tue, 17 Dec 2002 09:22:28 -0800 (PST)
  • Re: [PATCH] move LOG_BUF_SIZE to header file Tue, 17 Dec 2002 09:14:15 -0800 (PST)
  • [PATCH] move LOG_BUF_SIZE to header file Mon, 16 Dec 2002 22:11:42 -0800 (PST)
  • Re: Where is this printk? Mon, 16 Dec 2002 10:49:58 -0800 (PST)
  • [PATCH] 2.5.52 fix intermezzo build (trivial) Sun, 15 Dec 2002 20:05:32 -0800
• Ravikiran G Thirumalai
  • [patch] Make rt_cache_stat use kmalloc_percpu Mon, 16 Dec 2002 19:22:12 +0530
• Reuben Farrelly
  • Re: 2.4.20-aa and LARGE Squid process -> SIGSEGV Sat, 21 Dec 2002 20:17:42 +1100
  • Re: 2.4.20-aa and LARGE Squid process -> SIGSEGV Sat, 21 Dec 2002 19:28:12 +1100
• Richard A Nelson
  • 2.5.52 PNP failure Tue, 17 Dec 2002 17:34:53 -0500 (EST)
• Richard B. Johnson
  • Re: [OOPS] Kernel 2.4.20 ... Sat, 21 Dec 2002 20:48:17 -0500 (EST)
  • Re: PATCH 2.5.x disable BAR when sizing Fri, 20 Dec 2002 15:37:49 -0500 (EST)
  • Re: Intel P6 vs P7 system call performance Thu, 19 Dec 2002 10:11:11 -0500 (EST)
  • Re: Intel P6 vs P7 system call performance Wed, 18 Dec 2002 15:25:10 -0500 (EST)
  • Re: Intel P6 vs P7 system call performance Wed, 18 Dec 2002 08:17:17 -0500 (EST)
  • Re: Intel P6 vs P7 system call performance Tue, 17 Dec 2002 14:52:08 -0500 (EST)
  • Re: Intel P6 vs P7 system call performance Tue, 17 Dec 2002 12:19:31 -0500 (EST)
  • Re: Intel P6 vs P7 system call performance Tue, 17 Dec 2002 12:13:04 -0500 (EST)
  • Re: Intel P6 vs P7 system call performance Tue, 17 Dec 2002 11:33:10 -0500 (EST)
  • Re: How to get the size of the block device ???? (Important) Tue, 17 Dec 2002 09:36:26 -0500 (EST)
  • Re: 2.4.20 copy_from/to_user Tue, 17 Dec 2002 08:20:31 -0500 (EST)
  • FYI Mon, 16 Dec 2002 16:15:49 -0500 (EST)
  • Re: /proc/cpuinfo and hyperthreading Mon, 16 Dec 2002 09:10:30 -0500 (EST)
• Richard B. Tilley
  • Re: 2.5.52 compile error 17 Dec 2002 16:34:33 -0500
  • Re: 2.5.52 compile error 17 Dec 2002 16:27:40 -0500
• Richard Henderson
  • Re: 2 (minor) Alpha probs in 2.5.51 Mon, 16 Dec 2002 09:35:28 -0800
  • Re: 2 (minor) Alpha probs in 2.5.51 Sun, 15 Dec 2002 17:38:27 -0800
  • Re: 2.5.51 on Alpha oopses on mount Sun, 15 Dec 2002 10:57:22 -0800
• Richard Kettlewell
  • 2.4.20: ideN=... option stopped working Sat, 21 Dec 2002 18:50:55 +0000
• Richard Russon
  • [PATCH] 2.4.20 fs/partitions/Config.in 20 Dec 2002 05:01:56 +0000
• Rik van Riel
  • RE: 15000+ processes -- poor performance ?! Wed, 18 Dec 2002 23:58:15 -0200 (BRST)
  • Re: [PATCH] 2.4.20-rmap15b Tue, 17 Dec 2002 19:50:04 -0200 (BRST)
  • RFC: p&p ipsec without authentication Sun, 15 Dec 2002 18:34:06 -0200 (BRST)
• Ro0tSiEgE
  • Kernel GCC Optimizations Sat, 21 Dec 2002 11:35:10 -0600
• Rob Landley
  • Re: Difference between dummy and loopback interfaces Mon, 16 Dec 2002 07:02:26 +0000
• Robert Love
  • Re: Kernel GCC Optimizations 21 Dec 2002 20:26:41 -0500
  • Re: [BENCHMARK] scheduler tunables with contest - prio_bonus_ratio 20 Dec 2002 12:54:14 -0500
  • Re: [BENCHMARK] scheduler tunables with contest - prio_bonus_ratio 19 Dec 2002 21:42:16 -0500
  • Re: [BENCHMARK] scheduler tunables with contest - prio_bonus_ratio 19 Dec 2002 19:29:14 -0500
  • Re: [BENCHMARK] scheduler tunables with contest - prio_bonus_ratio 19 Dec 2002 19:16:16 -0500
  • Re: [BENCHMARK] scheduler tunables with contest - prio_bonus_ratio 19 Dec 2002 19:15:06 -0500
  • Re: [BENCHMARK] scheduler tunables with contest - prio_bonus_ratio 19 Dec 2002 18:53:16 -0500
  • Re: [BENCHMARK] scheduler tunables with contest - prio_bonus_ratio 19 Dec 2002 18:41:34 -0500
  • Re: [BENCHMARK] scheduler tunables with contest - prio_bonus_ratio 19 Dec 2002 17:46:22 -0500
  • RE: [PATCH 2.5.52] Use __set_current_state() instead of current-> 18 Dec 2002 22:19:47 -0500
  • RE: [PATCH 2.5.52] Use __set_current_state() instead of current-> 18 Dec 2002 21:04:04 -0500
  • Re: 15000+ processes -- poor performance ?! 18 Dec 2002 20:42:58 -0500
  • Re: [BENCHMARK] scheduler tunables with contest - max_timeslice 18 Dec 2002 20:40:06 -0500
  • RE: 15000+ processes -- poor performance ?! 18 Dec 2002 20:13:07 -0500
  • RE: [PATCH 2.5.52] Use __set_current_state() instead of current-> 18 Dec 2002 20:03:13 -0500
  • Re: [PATCH 2.5.52] Use __set_current_state() instead of 18 Dec 2002 19:11:38 -0500
  • Re: [announce] procps 2.0.11 17 Dec 2002 21:36:15 -0500
  • [PATCH] updated scheduler tunables 16 Dec 2002 21:15:22 -0500
  • Re: /proc/cpuinfo and hyperthreading 15 Dec 2002 23:02:39 -0500
• Robert Macaulay
  • Re: [BUG] 2.5.47 - Assertion failed in fs/jbd/journal.c:415 Wed, 18 Dec 2002 14:55:13 -0600 (CST)
  • [BUG] 2.5.47 - Assertion failed in fs/jbd/journal.c:415 Wed, 18 Dec 2002 13:02:35 -0600 (CST)
• Roberto Fichera
  • Re: Multithreaded coredump patch where? Tue, 17 Dec 2002 13:51:49 +0100
  • Re: Multithreaded coredump patch where? Tue, 17 Dec 2002 12:05:55 +0100
  • Multithreaded coredump patch where? Mon, 16 Dec 2002 18:28:42 +0100
• Roger Larsson
  • Re: Horrible drive performance under concurrent i/o jobs (dlh problem?) Fri, 20 Dec 2002 15:27:16 +0100
• Roger Luethi
  • VIA Rhine 1.15exp1, patch for testing/discussion Sat, 21 Dec 2002 22:44:48 +0100
• Rogier Wolff
  • Re: Intel P6 vs P7 system call performance Wed, 18 Dec 2002 14:00:59 +0100
  • Re: 2.5.51 load avg += 1 Sun, 15 Dec 2002 13:25:54 +0100
• Roland McGrath
  • Re: PTRACE_GET_THREAD_AREA Fri, 20 Dec 2002 13:27:49 -0800
  • PTRACE_GET_THREAD_AREA Fri, 20 Dec 2002 00:32:41 -0800
• Roman Belenov
  • _mmx_memcpy and module symbol versioning in 2.4.x Wed, 18 Dec 2002 17:44:09 +0300
• Roman Zippel
  • [PATCH] How not to break everything at once II Sat, 21 Dec 2002 22:58:35 +0100 (CET)
• romieu@fr.zoreil.com
  • Re: Are working modules going to be in 2.6? Thu, 19 Dec 2002 23:04:11 +0100
  • Re: Alcatel speedtouch USB driver and SMP. Tue, 17 Dec 2002 23:20:11 +0100
• Ross Biro
  • Re: 2.4.19, don't "hdparm -I /dev/hde" if hde is on a Asus A7V133 Thu, 19 Dec 2002 10:12:38 -0800
  • Re: 2.4.19, don't "hdparm -I /dev/hde" if hde is on a Asus A7V133 Wed, 18 Dec 2002 13:19:44 -0800
  • Re: 2.4.19, don't "hdparm -I /dev/hde" if hde is on a Asus A7V133 Wed, 18 Dec 2002 10:19:52 -0800
  • Re: 2.4.19, don't "hdparm -I /dev/hde" if hde is on a Asus A7V133 Wed, 18 Dec 2002 10:17:36 -0800
  • Re: Intel P6 vs P7 system call performance Tue, 17 Dec 2002 11:09:03 -0800
• Ross Vandegrift
  • Re: 2.4.19, don't "hdparm -I /dev/hde" if hde is on a Asus A7V133 Promise ctrlr, or... Thu, 19 Dec 2002 01:47:12 -0500
• Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk
  • Re: i4l dtmf errors Mon, 16 Dec 2002 12:07:15 +0100
  • Re: 2.5.51 load avg += 1 Sun, 15 Dec 2002 12:02:09 +0100
• rtilley
  • 2.5.52 compile error Tue, 17 Dec 2002 15:57:01 -0500
• Ruslan U. Zakirov
  • fbset in startup script and atyfb problems. Fri, 20 Dec 2002 22:37:28 +0300
  • Re: 2.5.52 PNP failure Wed, 18 Dec 2002 23:49:45 +0300 (MSK)
  • Re: ALSA update Wed, 18 Dec 2002 22:51:27 +0300 (MSK)
  • Re[2]: [Oops 2.5.51] PnPBIOS: cat /proc/bus/pnp/escd Mon, 16 Dec 2002 17:57:50 +0300
  • [2.5.5(01)]oops when catting info from /proc/bus/pnp/escd Sun, 15 Dec 2002 21:53:42 +0300
• Russell King
  • Re: [Linux-fbdev-devel] [PATCH] fix endian problem in color_imageblit Sat, 21 Dec 2002 09:27:44 +0000
  • Re: [Linux-fbdev-devel] Type confusion in fbcon Fri, 20 Dec 2002 21:30:56 +0000
  • Re: Dedicated kernel bug database Fri, 20 Dec 2002 10:41:00 +0000
  • Type confusion in fbcon Thu, 19 Dec 2002 23:14:15 +0000
  • Re: Freezing.. (was Re: Intel P6 vs P7 system call performance) Thu, 19 Dec 2002 09:13:36 +0000
  • Re: Freezing.. (was Re: Intel P6 vs P7 system call performance) Thu, 19 Dec 2002 00:37:40 +0000
  • Re: serial_pci_tbl is incorrect for some Titan devices Sun, 15 Dec 2002 15:59:21 +0000
  • Re: How to do -nostdinc? Sun, 15 Dec 2002 15:11:15 +0000
  • Re: early_serial_setup is broken in the 2.5 series Sun, 15 Dec 2002 15:07:52 +0000
• Rusty Russell
  • Re: module-init-tools 0.9.5 Fri, 20 Dec 2002 11:37:27 +1100
  • Re: modules oops in 2.5.52 Thu, 19 Dec 2002 16:55:38 +1100
  • Re: modules oops in 2.5.52 Thu, 19 Dec 2002 13:11:21 +1100
  • Re: [BUG] module-init-tools 0.9.3, rmmod modules with '-' Thu, 19 Dec 2002 11:39:24 +1100
  • [PATCH] Update MAINTAINERS for modules Wed, 18 Dec 2002 19:58:13 +1100
  • [PATCH] /proc/modules format change Wed, 18 Dec 2002 20:04:50 +1100
  • Re: [PATCH] : More module parameter compatibility for 2.5.52 Wed, 18 Dec 2002 13:24:57 +1100
  • Re: [BUG] module-init-tools 0.9.3, rmmod modules with '-' Wed, 18 Dec 2002 11:23:35 +1100
  • Re: [PATCH] : More module parameter compatibility for 2.5.52 Tue, 17 Dec 2002 15:20:10 +1100
  • Re: [BUG] module-init-tools 0.9.3, rmmod modules with '-' Tue, 17 Dec 2002 11:17:05 +1100
  • Re: [2.5.51] Failure to mount ext3 root when ext2 compiled in Tue, 17 Dec 2002 08:42:35 +1100
  • Re: [BUG] module-init-tools 0.9.3, rmmod modules with '-' Tue, 17 Dec 2002 08:36:10 +1100
• Sam Ravnborg
  • Re: First Bug Found : RE: How to help new comers trying the v2.5x series kernels. Sat, 21 Dec 2002 22:52:50 +0100
  • Re: How to help new comers trying the v2.5x series kernels. Sat, 21 Dec 2002 20:05:03 +0100
  • drivers/base/fs/fs.h - needed? Tue, 17 Dec 2002 21:04:05 +0100
  • Re: Where is this printk? Mon, 16 Dec 2002 19:59:26 +0100
  • Re: [PATCHSET] PC-9800 addtional for 2.5.50-ac1 Mon, 16 Dec 2002 19:31:31 +0100
  • Re: How to do -nostdinc? Mon, 16 Dec 2002 19:29:19 +0100
  • Re: [PATCH] Remove Rules.make from Makefiles (1/3) Sun, 15 Dec 2002 12:14:55 +0100
• Samium Gromoff
  • difference between 8139D and 8139d(l)? Thu, 19 Dec 2002 15:04:10 +0300
  • Re: [2.5.50] Keyboard dying Sun, 15 Dec 2002 13:07:44 +0300
• Sampson Fung
  • [PROBLEM]:All of your loopback devices are in use. Sun, 15 Dec 2002 00:25:56 +0800
• Samuel Flory
  • Re: [PATCH] aic7xxx bouncing over 4G Fri, 20 Dec 2002 16:51:25 -0800
• Sanjay Kumar
  • How to get the size of the block device ???? (Important) Tue, 17 Dec 2002 14:22:47 +0000 (GMT)
• Scorpion
  • USB/Storage - transport.c - Olympus D150Zoom 21 Dec 2002 01:31:23 -0200
• Scott Nash
  • char device kernel module won't write Wed, 18 Dec 2002 23:08:58 -0600
• Scott Robert Ladd
  • RE: HT Benchmarks (was: /proc/cpuinfo and hyperthreading) Mon, 16 Dec 2002 18:21:08 -0500
  • HT Benchmarks (was: /proc/cpuinfo and hyperthreading) Mon, 16 Dec 2002 10:44:34 -0500
  • RE: /proc/cpuinfo and hyperthreading Mon, 16 Dec 2002 09:56:27 -0500
  • RE: /proc/cpuinfo and hyperthreading Mon, 16 Dec 2002 09:36:08 -0500
  • re: /proc/cpuinfo and hyperthreading Mon, 16 Dec 2002 08:38:05 -0500
  • RE: /proc/cpuinfo and hyperthreading Sun, 15 Dec 2002 23:13:17 -0500
  • /proc/cpuinfo and hyperthreading Sun, 15 Dec 2002 22:58:12 -0500
  • RE: Kernel for Pentium 4 hyperthreading? Sun, 15 Dec 2002 12:40:59 -0500
  • RE: Kernel for Pentium 4 hyperthreading? Sun, 15 Dec 2002 10:07:43 -0500
• scott thomason
  • Re: Kernel GCC Optimizations Sat, 21 Dec 2002 19:20:28 -0600
  • Re: Intel P6 vs P7 system call performance Sun, 15 Dec 2002 02:43:25 -0600
• Sean Neakums
  • Re: Intel P6 vs P7 system call performance Wed, 18 Dec 2002 13:47:24 +0000
  • Re: How to get the size of the block device ???? (Important) Tue, 17 Dec 2002 14:40:47 +0000
• Shawn Starr
  • [PROBLEM][2.5][AMD76X_PM]: Possible porting problem - Can't register AMD Northbridge? Sun, 15 Dec 2002 13:50:54 -0500
• Shuji YAMAMURA
  • Re: Intel P6 vs P7 system call performance Thu, 19 Dec 2002 23:03:29 +0900
• Shureih, Tariq
  • RE: QM_MODULES: Function not implemented Wed, 18 Dec 2002 12:25:28 -0800
  • QM_MODULES: Function not implemented Wed, 18 Dec 2002 12:09:10 -0800
• Simon Oosthoek
  • Q: i845MP/P4-M laptop support? (specific problems listed) Mon, 16 Dec 2002 11:06:10 +0100
• Smolinski
  • [PATCH] 2.2.23 wild pointer in struct sock Thu, 19 Dec 2002 14:09:52 +0100 (CET)
• Soeren Sonnenburg
  • harddisk freeze on 2.4.20 Fri, 20 Dec 2002 12:08:57 +0100 (MET)
• Sowmya Adiga
  • [BENCHMARK]unixbench result for kernel 2.5.52mm2 patch Fri, 20 Dec 2002 09:29:39 +0530
  • [BENCHMARK]AIM benchmark result for kernel 2.5.52 with mm2 patch Fri, 20 Dec 2002 09:28:23 +0530
  • RE: [BENCHMARK]Unixbench result for kernel 2.5.52 with mm1 patch Tue, 17 Dec 2002 09:48:16 +0530
  • [BENCHMARK]AIM benchmark result for kernel 2.5.52with mm1 patch. Tue, 17 Dec 2002 09:15:38 +0530
  • [BENCHMARK]Unixbench result for kernel 2.5.52 Mon, 16 Dec 2002 16:31:12 +0530
  • [BENCHMARK]Unixbench result for kernel 2.5.52. Mon, 16 Dec 2002 15:06:12 +0530
  • [BENCHMARK]AIM benchmark result for kernel 2.5.52 Mon, 16 Dec 2002 14:35:47 +0530
  • [BENCHMARK RESULT]Unixbench result for kernel 2.5.51 with mm2 patch . Mon, 16 Dec 2002 09:58:49 +0530
  • [BENCHMARK RESULT]Unixbench result for kernel 2.5.51 with mm1 patch Mon, 16 Dec 2002 09:37:08 +0530
  • [BENCHMARK] unixbench result for kernel 2.5.49 and 2.5.50 Mon, 16 Dec 2002 09:13:49 +0530
  • [BENCHMARK] AIM benchmark result for kernel 2.5.51 with mm2 patch. Mon, 16 Dec 2002 09:07:45 +0530
• Steffen Persvold
  • Re: How to do -nostdinc? Mon, 16 Dec 2002 01:17:30 +0100 (CET)
  • Re: Re: pci-skeleton duplex check Sun, 15 Dec 2002 01:37:27 +0100 (CET)
• Steffen Rumler
  • cramfs over ramdisk broken ? Fri, 20 Dec 2002 09:19:38 +0100
• Stelian Pop
  • [PATCH 2.4.21-pre2 RESEND] CREDITS update Thu, 19 Dec 2002 14:59:59 +0100
  • [PATCH 2.4.21-pre2 RESEND] sonypi driver update Thu, 19 Dec 2002 14:58:34 +0100
• Stephan van Hienen
  • Re: modprobe: Can't locate module personality-8 Mon, 16 Dec 2002 13:01:02 +0100 (CET)
• Stephen Hemminger
  • linux-2.5.52-dcl1 20 Dec 2002 15:14:12 -0800
  • [PATCH] (5/5) improved notifier callback mechanism -- remove old 19 Dec 2002 15:09:33 -0800
  • [PATCH] (4/5) notifier callback mechanism - read copy update V2 19 Dec 2002 15:07:27 -0800
  • [PATCH] (3/5) improved notifier callback mechanism - use lists 18 Dec 2002 14:35:36 -0800
  • [PATCH] (3/5) improved notifier callback mechanism - use lists 18 Dec 2002 14:14:09 -0800
  • [PATCH] (2/5) improved notifier callback mechanism - 18 Dec 2002 14:14:07 -0800
  • [PATCH] (5/5) improved notifier callback mechanism -- remove old 18 Dec 2002 14:14:16 -0800
  • [PATCH] (4/5) improved notifier callback mechanism - read copy 18 Dec 2002 14:14:12 -0800
  • [PATCH] (1/5) improved notifier callback mechanism - C99 18 Dec 2002 14:14:04 -0800
• Stephen Lord
  • Re: Compile warnings due to missing __inline__ in fs/xfs/xfs_log.h 17 Dec 2002 11:55:18 -0600
• Stephen Rothwell
  • Re: Intel P6 vs P7 system call performance Fri, 20 Dec 2002 15:03:24 +1100
  • Re: Intel P6 vs P7 system call performance Wed, 18 Dec 2002 15:40:23 +1100
  • [PATCH] better compat_jiffies_to_clock_t Tue, 17 Dec 2002 15:25:54 +1100
• Stephen Satchell
  • Re: Saving logs when system is started Thu, 19 Dec 2002 20:28:13 -0800
  • Re: Freezing.. (was Re: Intel P6 vs P7 system call performance) Thu, 19 Dec 2002 05:17:30 -0800
  • Re: 2.4.19, don't "hdparm -I /dev/hde" if hde is on a Asus Thu, 19 Dec 2002 05:26:07 -0800
• Stephen Wille Padnos
  • Re: Dedicated kernel bug database Thu, 19 Dec 2002 17:23:03 -0500
  • Re: Dedicated kernel bug database Thu, 19 Dec 2002 16:11:30 -0500
• Steve Best
  • [ANNOUNCE] Journaled File System (JFS) release 1.1.1 Tue, 17 Dec 2002 13:18:49 -0600
• Steve Isaacs
  • Re: [CryptoAPI-devel] [RFC] Hardware support notes for the kernel crypto API (2.5+) Mon, 16 Dec 2002 16:56:06 -0800
  • Re: [CryptoAPI-devel] [RFC] Hardware support notes for the kernel crypto API (2.5+) Mon, 16 Dec 2002 16:15:15 -0800
• Steve Lee
  • RE: A7M266-D problems with integrate sound device and USB 2.0 PCI card Wed, 18 Dec 2002 14:40:31 -0600
• Steven Cole
  • Re: 2.5.52 compile error 17 Dec 2002 14:29:11 -0700
• Steven Dake
  • Re: Unmounting a busy RO-Filesystem Mon, 16 Dec 2002 11:17:48 -0700
• Stian Jordet
  • NFS crash with 2.4.19 16 Dec 2002 14:29:26 +0100
• Takashi Iwai
  • Re: ALSA update Thu, 19 Dec 2002 13:17:28 +0100
  • Re: ALSA update Thu, 19 Dec 2002 13:07:20 +0100
• Tarkan Erimer
  • [PROBLEM]: "make rpm" fails on RH 8.0 Sun, 15 Dec 2002 14:17:34 +0200
• Teodor Iacob
  • Re: Invalidate: busy buffer + MD RAID 1 Thu, 19 Dec 2002 17:35:16 +0200
• Terje Eggestad
  • Re: Intel P6 vs P7 system call performance 18 Dec 2002 13:55:43 +0100
• Thomas Heinz
  • module_list not exported Thu, 19 Dec 2002 21:23:12 +0100
• Thomas Schlichter
  • Re: Compile warnings due to missing __inline__ in fs/xfs/xfs_log.h Wed, 18 Dec 2002 01:05:40 +0100
  • Compile warnings due to missing __inline__ in fs/xfs/xfs_log.h Tue, 17 Dec 2002 17:01:31 +0100
• Till Immanuel Patzschke
  • Re: 15000+ processes -- poor performance ?! Wed, 18 Dec 2002 16:53:45 -0800
  • 15000+ processes -- poor performance ?! Wed, 18 Dec 2002 16:46:15 -0800
• Timothy D. Witham
  • Re: Freezing.. (was Re: Intel P6 vs P7 system call performance) 18 Dec 2002 22:08:30 -0800
  • Re: Freezing.. (was Re: Intel P6 vs P7 system call performance) 18 Dec 2002 21:45:30 -0800
  • Re: Freezing.. (was Re: Intel P6 vs P7 system call performance) 18 Dec 2002 21:34:42 -0800
• Timothy Hockin
  • [BK PATCH 1/1] nix NGROUPS limit - re-send again Mon, 16 Dec 2002 16:27:42 -0800 (PST)
  • [BK SUMMARY] nix NGROUPS limit - re-send again Mon, 16 Dec 2002 16:27:41 -0800 (PST)
• Tomas Szepe
  • Re: module-init-tools 0.9.5 Fri, 20 Dec 2002 04:51:14 +0100
  • [PATCH] 2.4.20 ide for 2.4.21-pre2 Fri, 20 Dec 2002 04:43:16 +0100
  • module-init-tools 0.9.5 Thu, 19 Dec 2002 16:29:42 +0100
  • Re: 2.4.19, don't "hdparm -I /dev/hde" if hde is on a Asus A7V133 Promise ctrlr, or... Thu, 19 Dec 2002 13:03:07 +0100
  • Re: 2.4.19, don't "hdparm -I /dev/hde" if hde is on a Asus A7V133 Promise ctrlr, or... Thu, 19 Dec 2002 12:14:50 +0100
  • Re: 6/19 Mon, 16 Dec 2002 11:38:12 +0100
  • Re: 6/19 Mon, 16 Dec 2002 11:35:58 +0100
• Torben Frey
  • Re: Horrible drive performance under concurrent i/o jobs (dlh problem?) Thu, 19 Dec 2002 15:29:43 +0100
  • Re: Horrible drive performance under concurrent i/o jobs (dlh problem?) Thu, 19 Dec 2002 00:30:57 +0100
  • Re: Horrible drive performance under concurrent i/o jobs (dlh problem?) Wed, 18 Dec 2002 23:40:42 +0100
  • Re: Horrible drive performance under concurrent i/o jobs (dlh problem?) Wed, 18 Dec 2002 23:16:20 +0100
  • Horrible drive performance under concurrent i/o jobs (dlh problem?) Wed, 18 Dec 2002 20:06:32 +0100
• Trond Myklebust
  • Re: problems with NFSv3 kernel 2.5.52 server, 2.4.20 client. (server x86 linux, clientsparclinux) 18 Dec 2002 12:04:46 +0100
• Tupshin Harper
  • Re: Via KT400 Wed, 18 Dec 2002 16:12:55 -0800
  • Re: JDIRTY JWAIT errors in 2.4.19 Sun, 15 Dec 2002 22:37:41 -0800
• Ulrich Drepper
  • Re: Intel P6 vs P7 system call performance Fri, 20 Dec 2002 02:08:48 -0800
  • Re: Intel P6 vs P7 system call performance Tue, 17 Dec 2002 17:54:38 -0800
  • Re: Intel P6 vs P7 system call performance Tue, 17 Dec 2002 16:38:13 -0800
  • Re: Intel P6 vs P7 system call performance Tue, 17 Dec 2002 12:17:44 -0800
  • Re: Intel P6 vs P7 system call performance Tue, 17 Dec 2002 12:06:29 -0800
  • Re: Intel P6 vs P7 system call performance Tue, 17 Dec 2002 11:53:32 -0800
  • Re: Intel P6 vs P7 system call performance Tue, 17 Dec 2002 11:19:26 -0800
  • Re: Intel P6 vs P7 system call performance Tue, 17 Dec 2002 10:57:29 -0800
  • Re: Intel P6 vs P7 system call performance Tue, 17 Dec 2002 10:48:28 -0800
  • Re: Intel P6 vs P7 system call performance Tue, 17 Dec 2002 10:33:08 -0800
  • Re: Intel P6 vs P7 system call performance Tue, 17 Dec 2002 10:30:35 -0800
  • Re: Intel P6 vs P7 system call performance Tue, 17 Dec 2002 09:55:13 -0800
  • Re: Intel P6 vs P7 system call performance Tue, 17 Dec 2002 09:33:50 -0800
  • Re: Intel P6 vs P7 system call performance Tue, 17 Dec 2002 02:53:50 -0800
• Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
  • Re: 2.5.5[01]]: Xircom Cardbus broken (PCI resource collisions) Mon, 16 Dec 2002 09:54:04 -0500
• Vamsi Krishna S .
  • Re: [PATCH] (4/5) improved notifier callback mechanism - read copy update Thu, 19 Dec 2002 18:19:29 +0530
  • Re: [BUG] module-init-tools 0.9.3, rmmod modules with '-' Thu, 19 Dec 2002 12:41:00 +0530
  • Re: [BUG] module-init-tools 0.9.3, rmmod modules with '-' Tue, 17 Dec 2002 11:48:46 +0530
  • [PATCH] kprobes for 2.5.52 Mon, 16 Dec 2002 16:46:57 +0530
  • [BUG] module-init-tools 0.9.3, rmmod modules with '-' Mon, 16 Dec 2002 16:36:34 +0530
• Van Maren, Kevin
  • RE: [PATCH][2.4] generic cluster APIC support for systems with m Fri, 20 Dec 2002 09:46:19 -0600
• venom@sns.it
  • problems with NFSv3 kernel 2.5.52 server, 2.4.20 client. (server Wed, 18 Dec 2002 10:46:50 +0100 (CET)
• Vergoz Michael
  • Re: Kernel for Pentium 4 hyperthreading? Sun, 15 Dec 2002 16:47:39 +0100
  • Re: problem with Andrew's patch ext3 Sun, 15 Dec 2002 16:15:56 +0100
• Vojtech Pavlik
  • Re: Fw: PROBLEM: Keyboard not found, but it exists! Sat, 21 Dec 2002 20:19:18 +0100
  • Re: vt8235 fix, hopefully last variant Sat, 21 Dec 2002 19:27:47 +0100
  • Re: vt8235 fix, hopefully last variant Sat, 21 Dec 2002 13:00:24 +0100
  • Re: vt8235 fix, hopefully last variant Sat, 21 Dec 2002 10:21:00 +0100
  • Re: [PATCH] joydev: fix HZ->millisecond transformation Sat, 21 Dec 2002 10:18:51 +0100
  • Re: [PATCH] joydev: fix HZ->millisecond transformation Fri, 20 Dec 2002 18:35:44 +0100
  • vt8235 fix, hopefully last variant Thu, 19 Dec 2002 11:26:40 +0100
  • Re: mousewheel not working. Wed, 18 Dec 2002 10:07:33 +0100
  • Re: IDE-CD and VT8235 issue!!! Wed, 18 Dec 2002 10:03:38 +0100
  • Re: IDE-CD and VT8235 issue!!! Mon, 16 Dec 2002 11:39:24 +0100
  • Re: IDE-CD and VT8235 issue!!! Mon, 16 Dec 2002 11:34:58 +0100
  • Re: IDE-CD and VT8235 issue!!! Sun, 15 Dec 2002 21:50:57 +0100
• Walt H
  • Adaptec 79xx support in 2.4.x Thu, 19 Dec 2002 20:21:42 -0800
• Walton, Shane
  • [patch] "fully HT-aware scheduler" support, 2.5.31-BK-curr Tue, 17 Dec 2002 12:27:22 -0500
• White, Charles
  • RE: [PATCH] 2.4.21pre1 cpqfc Tue, 17 Dec 2002 14:19:27 -0600
  • [PATCH] 2.4.21pre1 cpqfc Tue, 17 Dec 2002 13:50:53 -0600
• William Lee Irwin III
  • Re: [PATCH][2.4] generic cluster APIC support for systems with m ore than 8 CPUs Sat, 21 Dec 2002 22:39:26 -0800
  • Re: linux-2.5.40 64GB highmem BUG() Sat, 21 Dec 2002 01:48:56 -0800
  • Re: [PATCH] aic7xxx bouncing over 4G Fri, 20 Dec 2002 17:35:00 -0800
  • Re: [PATCH] aic7xxx bouncing over 4G Fri, 20 Dec 2002 16:29:40 -0800
  • Re: [PATCH] Fix CPU bitmask truncation Fri, 20 Dec 2002 15:36:53 -0800
  • Re: [PATCH][2.4] generic cluster APIC support for systems with m ore than 8 CPUs Fri, 20 Dec 2002 15:33:39 -0800
  • Re: [PATCH][2.4] generic cluster APIC support for systems with m ore than 8 CPUs Fri, 20 Dec 2002 09:16:58 -0800
  • Re: [PATCH] Fix CPU bitmask truncation Fri, 20 Dec 2002 09:12:43 -0800
  • Re: [PATCH][2.4] generic cluster APIC support for systems with more than 8 CPUs Fri, 20 Dec 2002 03:29:28 -0800
  • Re: [PATCH][2.4] generic cluster APIC support for systems with more than 8 CPUs Fri, 20 Dec 2002 03:24:01 -0800
  • Re: [PATCH] Fix CPU bitmask truncation Fri, 20 Dec 2002 03:15:23 -0800
  • Re: [PATCH] IRQ distribution in the 2.5.52 kernel Fri, 20 Dec 2002 03:15:18 -0800
  • Re: [PATCH] Fix CPU bitmask truncation Fri, 20 Dec 2002 02:30:28 -0800
  • Re: linux-2.5.40 64GB highmem BUG() Thu, 19 Dec 2002 15:36:23 -0800
  • Re: [ANNOUNCE] 2.5.52-lsm1 Thu, 19 Dec 2002 03:42:46 -0800
  • Re: [ANNOUNCE] 2.5.52-lsm1 Thu, 19 Dec 2002 03:14:33 -0800
  • Re: [Lse-tech] Re: 15000+ processes -- poor performance ?! Thu, 19 Dec 2002 02:55:11 -0800
  • Re: 2.5.52-mm2 Thu, 19 Dec 2002 02:51:25 -0800
  • Re: [Lse-tech] Re: 15000+ processes -- poor performance ?! Thu, 19 Dec 2002 02:27:20 -0800
  • Re: 2.5.52-mm2 Thu, 19 Dec 2002 02:12:19 -0800
  • Re: 2.5.52-mm2 Thu, 19 Dec 2002 01:28:53 -0800
  • Re: 2.5.52-mm2 Thu, 19 Dec 2002 00:54:26 -0800
  • Re: 15000+ processes -- poor performance ?! Wed, 18 Dec 2002 18:01:47 -0800
  • Re: [Lse-tech] Re: 15000+ processes -- poor performance ?! Wed, 18 Dec 2002 18:05:52 -0800
  • Re: 15000+ processes -- poor performance ?! Wed, 18 Dec 2002 17:36:45 -0800
  • Re: 15000+ processes -- poor performance ?! Wed, 18 Dec 2002 17:25:49 -0800
  • Re: [Lse-tech] Re: 15000+ processes -- poor performance ?! Wed, 18 Dec 2002 17:24:53 -0800
  • Re: 15000+ processes -- poor performance ?! Wed, 18 Dec 2002 17:15:41 -0800
  • Re: 15000+ processes -- poor performance ?! Wed, 18 Dec 2002 17:11:44 -0800
  • Re: [PATCH][2.4] generic cluster APIC support for systems with more than 8 CPUs Wed, 18 Dec 2002 15:41:26 -0800
  • vm86 IRQ bugfix Tue, 17 Dec 2002 22:39:40 -0800
  • Re: converting cap_set_pg() to for_each_task_pid() Tue, 17 Dec 2002 22:17:44 -0800
  • converting cap_set_pg() to for_each_task_pid() Tue, 17 Dec 2002 21:57:42 -0800
  • Re: uml-patch-2.5.52-1 Tue, 17 Dec 2002 21:53:39 -0800
  • Re: 2.5.52-wli-1 Tue, 17 Dec 2002 20:53:15 -0800
  • 2.5.52-wli-1 Tue, 17 Dec 2002 20:44:43 -0800
  • Re: 2.5.52-mjb1 (scalability / NUMA patchset) Tue, 17 Dec 2002 09:49:58 -0800
  • Re: 2.5.52-mm1 DCU_MISS_OUTSTANDING + IFU_FETCH_MISS Tue, 17 Dec 2002 09:49:45 -0800
  • Re: 2.5.52-mjb1 (scalability / NUMA patchset) Tue, 17 Dec 2002 07:57:30 -0800
  • 2.5.52-mm1 DCU_MISS_OUTSTANDING + IFU_FETCH_MISS Mon, 16 Dec 2002 22:49:48 -0800
  • Re: rmap and nvidia? Mon, 16 Dec 2002 07:42:18 -0800
  • Re: Intel P6 vs P7 system call performance Sun, 15 Dec 2002 14:37:03 -0800
• Wolfgang Fritz
  • [PATCH] (Was: i4l dtmf errors) Mon, 16 Dec 2002 18:44:58 +0100
• Xavier LaRue
  • My cpu fuzzy problem was due to XMMS Tue, 17 Dec 2002 01:16:00 -0500
  • Dual P3 550 Katmai Bug Mon, 16 Dec 2002 18:27:24 -0500
  • Re: L2 Cache problem Mon, 16 Dec 2002 14:31:22 -0500
  • L2 Cache problem Mon, 16 Dec 2002 13:30:16 -0500
• Zack Weinberg
  • Re: Kernel GCC Optimizations Sat, 21 Dec 2002 23:57:12 -0800
• Zwane Mwaikambo
  • Re: parport_serial link order bug, NetMos support Thu, 19 Dec 2002 19:40:31 -0500 (EST)
  • [patch][2.5][cft] OSS cs4232.c fix compilation Thu, 19 Dec 2002 19:08:23 -0500 (EST)
  • Re: parport_serial link order bug, NetMos support Thu, 19 Dec 2002 10:52:06 -0500 (EST)
  • Re: lk maintainers Tue, 17 Dec 2002 18:55:54 -0500 (EST)
  • Re: [BUG] module-init-tools 0.9.3, rmmod modules with '-' Mon, 16 Dec 2002 18:39:58 -0500 (EST)
  • [patch][2.5] idepnp pnp conversion Mon, 16 Dec 2002 04:01:03 -0500 (EST)
  • [patch][2.5] ISAPNP helper macros Mon, 16 Dec 2002 03:25:31 -0500 (EST)
  • [patch][2.5] OSS opl3sa2 pnp conversion Mon, 16 Dec 2002 03:23:15 -0500 (EST)
  • [patch][2.5] ad1848 pnp conversion + fixes Mon, 16 Dec 2002 03:18:14 -0500 (EST)
  • [patch][2.5] fix NULL Scsi_Host_Template.name entry + C99 initializers Mon, 16 Dec 2002 03:09:03 -0500 (EST)
  • RE: /proc/cpuinfo and hyperthreading Mon, 16 Dec 2002 01:35:48 -0500 (EST)
  • RE: /proc/cpuinfo and hyperthreading Mon, 16 Dec 2002 01:28:35 -0500 (EST)
• ©[
  @ÄØÿ¿8þÿ¿Andrew Morton
  • Lists: Publicity - Libraries - Bookstores - Film Producers - Art Galleries - Custom (more) Tue, 17 Dec 2002 17:18:37 -0800