Re: [Lse-tech] Re: 15000+ processes -- poor performance ?!

William Lee Irwin III (wli@holomorphy.com)
Thu, 19 Dec 2002 02:55:11 -0800

William Lee Irwin (WLI) writes:
WLI> As userspace solutions go your suggestions is just as good. The
WLI> kernel still needs to get its act together and with some
WLI> urgency.

On Thu, Dec 19, 2002 at 01:37:30PM +0300, Alex Tomas wrote:
> what about retreiving info from /proc/kmem or something like? just to
> avoid binary -> text(proc) -> binary

That would also be an excellent userspace solution to this local DoS.

Bill
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/