RE: 15000+ processes -- poor performance ?!

Rik van Riel (riel@conectiva.com.br)
Wed, 18 Dec 2002 23:58:15 -0200 (BRST)


On Thu, 19 Dec 2002, Alan Cox wrote:

> He's running the -aa kernel, which has all the right bits for this too.
> In fact in some ways for very large memory boxes its probably the better
> variant

If you're willing to merge a patch to take -ac up to rmap15b
I'll integrate some large memory stuff into my tree for 15c
and 2.4-ac should be able to handle large boxes too within a
month or so.

(keeping the speed of merging slow, deliberately)

regards,

Rik

-- 
Bravely reimplemented by the knights who say "NIH".
http://www.surriel.com/		http://guru.conectiva.com/
Current spamtrap:  <a href=mailto:"october@surriel.com">october@surriel.com</a>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/