Re: [Lse-tech] Re: 15000+ processes -- poor performance ?!

[William Lee Irwin III]

On Wed, Dec 18, 2002 at 05:44:46PM -0800, David Lang wrote:
> In my case I will still be running thousands of processes, so I have to
> just teach everyone not to use top instead.
> David Lang

Well, a better solution would be a userspace free of /proc/ dependency.

Or actually fixing the kernel. proc_pid_readdir() wants an efficiently
indexable linear list, e.g. TAOCP's 6.2.3 "Linear List Representation".
At that point its expense is proportional to the buffer size and
"seeking" about the list as it is wont to do is O(lg(processes)).

Bill