Re: [BENCHMARK] scheduler tunables with contest - prio_bonus_ratio
Con Kolivas (conman@kolivas.net)
Fri, 20 Dec 2002 11:22:59 +1100
>On Thu, 2002-12-19 at 19:02, Andrew Morton wrote:
>> What Con said. When the scheduler makes an inappropriate decision,
>> shortening the timeslice minimises its impact.
>
>OK, I tried it. It does suck.
>
>I wonder why, though, because with the estimator off the scheduler
>should not be making "bad" decisions.
Is it just because the base timeslices are longer than the old scheduler?
Con
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/