Re: Intel P6 vs P7 system call performance

[Mikael Pettersson]

Richard B. Johnson writes:
 > Actually I should be:
 > 
 > 	pushl	$next_address	# Where to go when the call returns
 > 	pushl	$0xfffff000	# Put this on the stack
 > 	ret			# 'Return' to it (jump)
 > next_address:			# Were we end up after

You just killed that process' performance by causing the
return-stack branch prediction buffer to go out of sync.

It might have worked ok on a 486, but P6+ don't like it one bit.

This is also why I'm slightly unhappy about the
s/int $0x80/call <address of sysenter>/ approach, since it leads
to yet another recursion level and risk overflowing the RSB.