Re: Intel P6 vs P7 system call performance

[Jamie Lokier]

H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> Terje Eggestad wrote:
> > fd = open("/dev/vsyscall", );
> > _vsyscall = mmap(NULL, getpagesize(),  PROT_READ|PROT_EXEC, MAP_SHARED,
> > fd, 0);
> 
> Very ugly -- then the application has to do indirect calls.

No it doesn't.

The application, or library, would map the vsyscall page to an address
in its own data section.  This means that position-independent code
can do vsyscalls without any relocations, and hence without dirtying
its own caller pages.

In some ways this is better than the 0xfffe0000 address: _that_
requires position-independent code to do indirect calls to the
absolute address, or to dirty its caller pages.

That said, you always need the page at 0xfffe0000 mapped anyway, so
that sysexit can jump to a fixed address (which is fastest).

-- Jamie