On Tue, 17 Dec 2002 19:50:04 -0200 (BRST)
Rik van Riel <riel@conectiva.com.br> wrote:
> On Mon, 16 Dec 2002, Georg Nikodym wrote:
>
> > Incidentally, a colleague claimed to have seem this behaviour on a
> > non-rmap 2.4.20.
>
> > 1. Known behaviour?
> > 2. Is there any data that I should be collecting that people are
> > interested in?
> > 3. Or should I just go back to 2.4.19-rmap14b (which did not trouble
> > me
> > in this way)?
>
> The suspect is the disk elevator, which isn't scheduling requests
> in a way to cause lower read latency, but is optimised more for
> throughput. This results in some pauses.
>
> I'll need to look into it.
I discovered after sending the above:
Dec 16 15:08:04 keller kernel: ieee1394: sbp2: sbp2util_allocate_request_packet
- no packets available!
Dec 16 15:08:04 keller kernel: ieee1394: sbp2: sbp2util_allocate_write_request_p
acket failed
Dec 16 15:08:34 keller kernel: ieee1394: sbp2: aborting sbp2 command
These messages correspond with the pauses... However, the ieee1394 code
has not changed in some time (as in many months).
-g
--=.eiWXN4nLe8Qzt7
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE9/50woJNnikTddkMRAlb8AJ9aTWRrNL1EyynTGVa96slt63JsXQCgtqwi
RfrdQGz/CT1yxb0pXEIw4f4=
=bm+8
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=.eiWXN4nLe8Qzt7--
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/