[BENCHMARK] scheduler tunables with contest - starvation_limit

Con Kolivas (conman@kolivas.net)
Fri, 20 Dec 2002 10:48:50 +1100


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

osdl, contest, tunable - starvation limit on 2.5.52-mm1

noload:
Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
sta_lim1000 [3] 39.7 179 0 0 1.10
sta_lim2000 [3] 39.7 181 0 0 1.10

cacherun:
Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
sta_lim1000 [3] 36.7 194 0 0 1.01
sta_lim2000 [3] 37.0 194 0 0 1.02

process_load:
Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
sta_lim1000 [3] 48.2 146 10 47 1.33
sta_lim2000 [3] 45.6 157 7 37 1.26

ctar_load:
Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
sta_lim1000 [3] 57.9 158 1 10 1.60
sta_lim2000 [3] 54.3 153 1 10 1.50

xtar_load:
Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
sta_lim1000 [3] 72.9 125 1 8 2.01
sta_lim2000 [3] 67.6 130 1 9 1.87

io_load:
Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
sta_lim1000 [3] 89.6 98 12 19 2.47
sta_lim2000 [3] 79.9 104 11 19 2.21

io_other:
Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
sta_lim1000 [3] 68.1 124 8 19 1.88
sta_lim2000 [3] 68.5 116 9 20 1.89

read_load:
Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
sta_lim1000 [3] 49.9 151 5 6 1.38
sta_lim2000 [3] 50.9 150 5 6 1.41

list_load:
Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
sta_lim1000 [3] 43.8 167 0 9 1.21
sta_lim2000 [3] 43.5 168 0 9 1.20

mem_load:
Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
sta_lim1000 [3] 106.8 77 36 2 2.95
sta_lim2000 [3] 112.4 73 36 2 3.10

Slight balance changes here. Most io things take slightly longer with lower
starvation limit and mem_load takes less time.

Con
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.0 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE+AlriF6dfvkL3i1gRAugYAJ93cYDhjqXjM4TIZsLF+zvUtMoJ5QCfS5EC
nIPWPR1JF0awLBCvL1uBzJ4=
=eU+1
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/