Linux-kernel mailing list archive 2001-02, by author

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ]

Starting: Thu 01 Jan 1970 - 10:10:01 EET
Ending: Sat 20 Jan 2001 - 23:37:12 EET
Messages: 1185

• (no name)
  • Efficient 3060 Driver Thu, 18 Jan 2001 09:34:47 -0500
• =?ISO-8859-1?Q?G=E9rard_Roudier?=
  • Re: Scanning problems - machine lockups Fri, 19 Jan 2001 20:37:57 +0100 (CET)
• =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Joel_Franco_Guzm=E1n?=
  • Re: PROBLEM: 128M memory OK, but with 192M sound card es1391 trouble Thu, 18 Jan 2001 13:34:40 -0200 (BRST)
  • Re: PROBLEM: 128M memory OK, but with 192M sound card es1391 trouble Thu, 18 Jan 2001 13:30:09 -0200 (BRST)
  • PROBLEM: 128M memory OK, but with 192M sound card es1391 trouble Wed, 17 Jan 2001 21:11:36 -0200 (BRST)
• =?us-ascii?Q?Andr=E9?= Dahlqvist
  • Does reiserfs really meet the "Linux-2.4.x patch submission policy"? Tue, 16 Jan 2001 20:55:58 +0100
• Aaron Lehmann
  • Re: Does reiserfs really meet the "Linux-2.4.x patch submission policy"? Tue, 16 Jan 2001 17:05:39 -0800
• Aaron Sethman
  • Re: pre5 VM feedback.. Mon, 15 Jan 2001 22:43:50 -0500 (EST)
• Aaron Tiensivu
  • [2.4.1-p8 More MPPP oops] Sat, 20 Jan 2001 04:48:09 -0500
  • [2.4.1-pre8] MPP related OPPS Fri, 19 Jan 2001 00:58:23 -0500
• Abramo Bagnara
  • Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)]] Sat, 20 Jan 2001 19:14:08 +0100
• Adam J. Richter
  • [PATCH] linux-2.4.1-pre9/drivers/usb/serial/mct_u232.c usb_device_id table broken by new format Sat, 20 Jan 2001 03:04:30 -0800
• Adam Lackorzynski
  • Re: [PATCH] PCI-Devices and ServerWorks chipset Wed, 17 Jan 2001 11:14:49 +0100
  • [PATCH] PCI-Devices and ServerWorks chipset Tue, 16 Jan 2001 18:12:07 +0100
• Adam Scislowicz
  • Failure to mount INITRD on a 1GB or 2GB machine w/ 4GB bigmem enabled. Tue, 16 Jan 2001 12:14:47 -0800
• Alan Chandler
  • Re: [preview] Latest AMD & VIA IDE drivers with UDMA100 support Sat, 20 Jan 2001 18:45:10 +0000
  • [preview] Latest AMD & VIA IDE drivers with UDMA100 support Sat, 20 Jan 2001 17:14:04 +0000
• Alan Cox
  • Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? Fri, 19 Jan 2001 01:57:32 -0500 (EST)
  • Patches Thu, 18 Jan 2001 01:34:02 -0500
  • Re: ide-floppy [Fwd: Updated ATAPI FORMAT_UNIT patch.] Sat, 13 Jan 2001 23:59:32 +0000 (GMT)
  • Linux 2.4.0-ac9 Sat, 13 Jan 2001 23:24:22 +0000 (GMT)
  • Re: [PATCH] sparc64 compile fix Sat, 13 Jan 2001 23:15:16 +0000 (GMT)
• Alan Shutko
  • Re: linmodem???? 15 Jan 2001 08:54:37 -0500
• Albert Cranford
  • 2.4.1-pre9 fails to compile drm r128 as module Sat, 20 Jan 2001 01:49:27 +0000
  • Re: ide.2.4.1-p3.01112001.patch Mon, 15 Jan 2001 00:06:50 +0000
• Albert D. Cahalan
  • Re: Coding Style Fri, 19 Jan 2001 19:46:42 -0500 (EST)
  • Re: [PLEASE-TESTME] Zerocopy networking patch, 2.4.0-1 Thu, 18 Jan 2001 16:12:48 -0500 (EST)
  • Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? Mon, 15 Jan 2001 15:33:51 -0500 (EST)
  • Re: 2.4.0-x features ? Mon, 15 Jan 2001 14:59:13 -0500 (EST)
  • Re: The latest instance in the A20 farce Mon, 15 Jan 2001 14:30:29 -0500 (EST)
• Alberto Bertogli
  • Re: Linux MegaRAID Driver Version 1.14b Release Thu, 18 Jan 2001 21:41:43 -0300
  • Re: Weird vmstat reports in 2.2.18 Sun, 14 Jan 2001 12:23:15 -0300
• Alessandro Suardi
  • IO-APIC and ne2000 PCI [Manfred's test] Sun, 14 Jan 2001 02:29:39 +0100
• Alex Deucher
  • Re: APM, ACPI, WOL, Oh My! Tue, 16 Jan 2001 13:54:31 -0500
  • APM, ACPI, WOL, Oh My! Tue, 16 Jan 2001 13:11:15 -0500
• alex@foogod.com
  • Re: can't build small enough zImage for floppy Sun, 14 Jan 2001 21:34:27 -0800
• Allen Bolderoff
  • "Received disconnect: Command terminated on signal 13." when logging Tue, 16 Jan 2001 17:49:38 +1030
• Anders Peter Fugmann
  • Re: 2.4.0+aic7xxx doesn't boot, 2.2.17 OK Tue, 16 Jan 2001 17:42:27 +0100
• andersg@0x63.nu
  • lvm-oops in 2.4.1pre8 Sat, 20 Jan 2001 18:41:06 +0100
• Andi Kleen
  • Re: How come top and /proc/meminfo on 2.4.0 says 0K shared? Fri, 19 Jan 2001 17:46:08 +0100
  • Re: [Lse-tech] sched_test_yield benchmark Fri, 19 Jan 2001 15:52:31 +0100
  • Re: multi-queue scheduler update Fri, 19 Jan 2001 02:48:21 +0100
  • Re: 2.4.1pre8 slowdown on dbench tests Fri, 19 Jan 2001 02:46:10 +0100
  • Re: multi-queue scheduler update Fri, 19 Jan 2001 02:08:52 +0100
  • Re: [Lse-tech] Re: multi-queue scheduler update Fri, 19 Jan 2001 01:51:01 +0100
  • Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)]] Thu, 18 Jan 2001 20:45:13 +0100
  • Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)]] Thu, 18 Jan 2001 15:57:11 +0100
  • Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)]] Thu, 18 Jan 2001 10:34:14 +0100
  • Re: 2.4.0 + iproute2 Wed, 17 Jan 2001 22:21:14 +0100
  • Re: IP defrag (was RE: ipchains blocking port 65535) Wed, 17 Jan 2001 19:01:26 +0100
  • Re: IP defrag (was RE: ipchains blocking port 65535) Wed, 17 Jan 2001 18:35:47 +0100
  • Re: Linux not adhering to BIOS Drive boot order? Tue, 16 Jan 2001 22:01:25 +0100
  • Re: O_ANY [was: Re: 'native files', 'object fingerprints' [was: sendpath()]] Tue, 16 Jan 2001 13:34:05 +0100
  • Re: 'native files', 'object fingerprints' [was: sendpath()] Tue, 16 Jan 2001 12:37:43 +0100
  • Re: 'native files', 'object fingerprints' [was: sendpath()] Tue, 16 Jan 2001 12:13:23 +0100
  • Re: 2.4.0 + iproute2 Sun, 14 Jan 2001 16:23:31 +0100
  • Re: 2.4.0 + iproute2 Sun, 14 Jan 2001 13:31:40 +0100
  • Re: 2.4.0 + iproute2 Sun, 14 Jan 2001 12:46:59 +0100
  • Re: 2.4.0 + iproute2 Sun, 14 Jan 2001 12:33:10 +0100
  • Re: 2.4.0 + iproute2 Sun, 14 Jan 2001 11:52:15 +0100
• Andre Hedrick
  • Re: [preview] Latest AMD & VIA IDE drivers with UDMA100 support Thu, 20 Jan 2011 09:51:03 -0800 (PST)
  • Minors remaining in Major 10 ?? Sat, 20 Jan 2001 00:45:33 -0800 (PST)
  • Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? Fri, 19 Jan 2001 02:55:57 -0800 (PST)
  • RE: [PATCH] PCI-Devices and ServerWorks chipset (fwd) Thu, 18 Jan 2001 16:30:04 -0800 (PST)
  • Re: [PATCH] PCI-Devices and ServerWorks chipset Thu, 18 Jan 2001 09:40:33 -0800 (PST)
  • Re: [PATCH] PCI-Devices and ServerWorks chipset Thu, 18 Jan 2001 02:01:45 -0800 (PST)
  • Re: File System Corruption with 2.2.18 Thu, 18 Jan 2001 00:45:13 -0800 (PST)
  • Re: File System Corruption with 2.2.18 Wed, 17 Jan 2001 16:32:44 -0800 (PST)
  • Re: File System Corruption with 2.2.18 Wed, 17 Jan 2001 14:44:06 -0800 (PST)
  • Re: File System Corruption with 2.2.18 Wed, 17 Jan 2001 10:40:13 -0800 (PST)
  • Re: int. assignment on SMP + ServerWorks chipset Wed, 17 Jan 2001 10:11:15 -0800 (PST)
  • Re: File System Corruption with 2.2.18 Wed, 17 Jan 2001 10:06:38 -0800 (PST)
  • Re: ServerWorks IDE in 2.4.0-ac4 Wed, 17 Jan 2001 03:48:18 -0800 (PST)
  • Re: IDE not fully found (2.4.0) Mon, 15 Jan 2001 20:07:31 -0800 (PST)
• Andrea Arcangeli
  • Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)]] Sat, 20 Jan 2001 22:20:21 +0100
  • Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)]] Sat, 20 Jan 2001 22:05:21 +0100
  • Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)]] Sat, 20 Jan 2001 21:56:15 +0100
  • Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)]] Sat, 20 Jan 2001 20:30:23 +0100
  • Re: lvm-oops in 2.4.1pre8 Sat, 20 Jan 2001 19:25:53 +0100
  • Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)]] Fri, 19 Jan 2001 22:13:27 +0100
  • Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)]] Fri, 19 Jan 2001 21:54:00 +0100
  • Re: multi-queue scheduler update Fri, 19 Jan 2001 02:35:02 +0100
  • Re: [Lse-tech] Re: multi-queue scheduler update Fri, 19 Jan 2001 02:30:41 +0100
  • Re: multi-queue scheduler update Fri, 19 Jan 2001 01:26:16 +0100
  • Re: 2.4.1pre8 slowdown on dbench tests Fri, 19 Jan 2001 01:16:29 +0100
  • Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)]] Thu, 18 Jan 2001 23:16:51 +0100
  • Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)]] Thu, 18 Jan 2001 22:54:32 +0100
  • Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)]] Thu, 18 Jan 2001 22:14:11 +0100
  • Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)]] Thu, 18 Jan 2001 22:04:28 +0100
  • Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)]] Thu, 18 Jan 2001 21:44:32 +0100
  • Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)]] Thu, 18 Jan 2001 21:24:41 +0100
  • Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)]] Thu, 18 Jan 2001 20:38:02 +0100
  • Re: Locking problem in 2.2.18/19-pre7? (fs/inode.c and fs/dcache.c) Wed, 17 Jan 2001 00:05:10 +0100
  • Re: Locking problem in 2.2.18/19-pre7? (fs/inode.c and fs/dcache.c) Tue, 16 Jan 2001 20:33:34 +0100
  • Re: [lvm-devel] Re: lvm 0.9.1-beta1 still segfaults vgexport Mon, 15 Jan 2001 05:16:24 +0100
  • Re: lvm 0.9.1-beta1 still segfaults vgexport Sun, 14 Jan 2001 17:32:34 +0100
• Andreas Dilger
  • Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? Thu, 18 Jan 2001 03:01:01 -0700 (MST)
  • Re: Linux not adhering to BIOS Drive boot order? Wed, 17 Jan 2001 17:39:56 -0700 (MST)
  • Re: Linux not adhering to BIOS Drive boot order? Wed, 17 Jan 2001 16:23:55 -0700 (MST)
  • Re: Linux not adhering to BIOS Drive boot order? Wed, 17 Jan 2001 13:43:49 -0700 (MST)
  • Re: Linux not adhering to BIOS Drive boot order? Wed, 17 Jan 2001 03:19:28 -0700 (MST)
  • Re: Linux not adhering to BIOS Drive boot order? Wed, 17 Jan 2001 03:12:22 -0700 (MST)
  • Re: 2.0.37 crashes immediately Wed, 17 Jan 2001 02:24:39 -0700 (MST)
  • Re: super_operations in -pre7 Tue, 16 Jan 2001 15:59:37 -0700 (MST)
  • Re: Linux not adhering to BIOS Drive boot order? Tue, 16 Jan 2001 14:18:26 -0700 (MST)
  • Re: Name of SCSI Device Tue, 16 Jan 2001 14:13:24 -0700 (MST)
  • Re: Linux not adhering to BIOS Drive boot order? Tue, 16 Jan 2001 14:11:21 -0700 (MST)
  • Re: FS corruption on 2.4.0-ac8 Mon, 15 Jan 2001 17:29:46 -0700 (MST)
• Andreas Franck
  • Re: IDE-Floppy and devfs Fri, 19 Jan 2001 23:56:46 +0100
• Andreas Schwab
  • Re: Documenting stat(2) 19 Jan 2001 11:18:56 +0100
• Andres Salomon
  • [PATCH] maestro3 oops + fix (for ac9!) Tue, 16 Jan 2001 11:29:25 -0500
• Andrew
  • kernel 2.4, iproute2 and routing rules that refuse to match Thu, 18 Jan 2001 13:51:28 -0800
• Andrew Morton
  • Re: console spin_lock Thu, 18 Jan 2001 23:42:59 +1100
  • Re: console spin_lock Thu, 18 Jan 2001 00:49:37 +1100
  • Re: low-latency scheduling patch for 2.4.0 Mon, 15 Jan 2001 21:59:59 +1100
  • Re: low-latency scheduling patch for 2.4.0 Sun, 14 Jan 2001 22:35:51 +1100
• Andrew Scott
  • Re: [PLEASE-TESTME] Zerocopy networking patch, 2.4.0-1 Fri, 19 Jan 2001 10:55:29 -0500
• Andrey Savochkin
  • Re: eepro cmd_wait Thu, 18 Jan 2001 21:03:09 +0800
• Andries.Brouwer@cwi.nl
  • Re: Linux not adhering to BIOS Drive boot order? Thu, 18 Jan 2001 17:36:04 +0100 (MET)
  • Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? Tue, 16 Jan 2001 14:50:49 +0100 (MET)
  • Re: [PATCH] plan9 partition support Sun, 14 Jan 2001 02:26:40 +0100 (MET)
• Andrzej Krzysztofowicz
  • Re: ide.2.4.1-p3.01112001.patch Sun, 14 Jan 2001 00:40:58 +0100 (CET)
• Anton Altaparmakov
  • Re: Coding Style Sat, 20 Jan 2001 15:32:51 +0000
  • [PATCH] 2.4.0-ac9: NTFS cleanup & assorted bugfixes Wed, 17 Jan 2001 18:11:06 +0000
• Anton Blanchard
  • Re: Caches, page coloring, virtual indexed caches, and more Wed, 17 Jan 2001 15:36:47 +1100
  • Re: Caches, page coloring, virtual indexed caches, and more Mon, 15 Jan 2001 23:53:40 +1100
  • Re: Caches, page coloring, virtual indexed caches, and more Mon, 15 Jan 2001 23:51:13 +1100
  • Re: sparc10 with 512M of RAM hangs on boot Sun, 14 Jan 2001 12:34:21 +1100
  • [PATCH] pcnet32 one liner Sun, 14 Jan 2001 10:49:11 +1100
• Antony Suter
  • [off topic] Re: .br blacklisted ? Fri, 19 Jan 2001 03:13:25 +1100
• apark@cdf.toronto.edu
  • /proc/PID/stat format Tue, 16 Jan 2001 08:26:46 -0500 (EST)
• aprasad@in.ibm.com
  • Re: Problems in 2.4 kernel Wed, 17 Jan 2001 14:43:09 +0530
• archan
  • cddrive problem in Toshiba Laptop with 2.4.0-test11 kernel Thu, 18 Jan 2001 18:54:24 +0530
  • cddrive problem in Toshiba Laptop with 2.4.0-test11 kernel Thu, 18 Jan 2001 12:35:35 +0530
• Arjan van de Ven
  • Re: Linux not adhering to BIOS Drive boot order? Tue, 16 Jan 2001 17:27:48 +0100 (CET)
• Armin Schindler
  • lock_kernel() ? Tue, 16 Jan 2001 16:54:12 +0100 (MET)
  • SMP Problem with RTL8139 Sun, 14 Jan 2001 12:07:36 +0100 (MET)
• Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
  • Re: -ac10 compile error Fri, 19 Jan 2001 23:14:53 -0200
• Arthur Pedyczak
  • Oops in 2.4.0 (fs corruption?) Mon, 15 Jan 2001 18:20:34 -0500
• Barry K. Nathan
  • Re: lance.c @ 100Mbit Tue, 16 Jan 2001 14:53:57 -0800 (PST)
• Ben De Rydt
  • /proc/*/mem permissions (2.2.19pre6) Sun, 14 Jan 2001 17:59:39 +0100
• Ben Greear
  • [PATCH] 802.1Q VLAN for Linux Fri, 19 Jan 2001 21:33:40 -0700
  • Question on 2.2.18 and setting a device to PROMISC. Sun, 14 Jan 2001 17:06:00 -0700
• Ben Mansell
  • Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? Wed, 17 Jan 2001 15:02:02 +0000 (GMT)
• Bernd Eckenfels
  • Re: PROBLEM: select() on TCP socket sleeps for 1 tick even if data available Sat, 20 Jan 2001 11:53:25 +0100
• bert hubert
  • Re: [Lse-tech] Re: multi-queue scheduler update Fri, 19 Jan 2001 20:52:26 +0100
  • Re: eepro100 error messages Wed, 17 Jan 2001 09:35:59 +0100
  • Re: a linux qos mailing list Tue, 16 Jan 2001 10:24:13 +0100
• Bill Crawford
  • Re: Problem with networking in 2.4.0 Thu, 18 Jan 2001 21:32:24 +0000
  • Linux 2.4.0-ac9 Mon, 15 Jan 2001 01:12:23 +0000
• Bill Hartner
  • sched_test_yield benchmark Fri, 19 Jan 2001 09:30:55 -0500
• Bill Nottingham
  • Re: Is there a Crystal 4299 sound driver? Fri, 19 Jan 2001 12:53:10 -0500
  • Re: Is there a Crystal 4299 sound driver? Fri, 19 Jan 2001 00:24:10 -0500
• Bjorn Wesen
  • Re: PROBLEM: select() on TCP socket sleeps for 1 tick even if data available Sat, 20 Jan 2001 12:39:20 +0100 (MET)
• Bob Frey
  • Re: Scanning problems - machine lockups Fri, 19 Jan 2001 09:41:30 +0800
• Bobo Rajec
  • 2.4.0 bug: file /proc/dri 4 times in ls listing Tue, 16 Jan 2001 09:08:38 +0100
• Boszormenyi Zoltan
  • Re: Linux not adhering to BIOS Drive boot order? Wed, 17 Jan 2001 11:28:27 +0100 (CET)
  • 2.4.0-vmpatch-15.1 still no go Wed, 17 Jan 2001 09:36:07 +0100 (CET)
• Brad Felmey
  • Re: [off topic] Re: .br blacklisted ? Thu, 18 Jan 2001 22:24:54 -0600
  • Re: [off topic] Re: .br blacklisted ? Thu, 18 Jan 2001 20:54:03 -0600
• Brent B. Powers
  • asus a7v 2.40 kernel crash Sun, 14 Jan 2001 04:04:44 -0500 (EST)
• Brian Gerst
  • Re: [QUESTION]: Applying patches ontop of patches (2.4.1pre7 to Wed, 17 Jan 2001 15:34:03 -0500
  • Re: SCSI partitions Tue, 16 Jan 2001 14:33:40 -0500
  • Re: Linux not adhering to BIOS Drive boot order? Tue, 16 Jan 2001 12:04:57 -0500
  • Re: Linux not adhering to BIOS Drive boot order? Tue, 16 Jan 2001 11:31:29 -0500
• Brian Pomerantz
  • Re: kmalloc() of 4MB causes "kernel BUG at slab.c:1542!" Wed, 17 Jan 2001 12:17:19 -0800
• Bruce Collins
  • PROBLEM: aic7xxx hangs 2.4.0 with SMP Sun, 14 Jan 2001 12:59:56 -0500
• Bryan Henderson
  • RE: Linux not adhering to BIOS Drive boot order? Tue, 16 Jan 2001 09:30:55 -0800
• bsuparna@in.ibm.com
  • Re: [Kiobuf-io-devel] Re: [PLEASE-TESTME] Zerocopy networking Fri, 19 Jan 2001 08:05:41 +0530
  • [ANNOUNCE] Dynamic Probes 1.3 released Thu, 18 Jan 2001 12:19:25 +0530
  • Common Abstraction of Notification & Completion Handling Wed, 17 Jan 2001 21:04:43 +0530
• Burton Windle
  • VM: Undead swap messages at shutdown Sat, 13 Jan 2001 14:23:41 -0500 (EST)
• Carles Pina i Estany
  • RE: PCMCIA Cards on 2.4.0 Sat, 20 Jan 2001 19:05:49 +0000 (GMT)
  • Name of SCSI Device Tue, 16 Jan 2001 21:17:53 +0000 (GMT)
• Chad Miller
  • Re: G400 behavior different, 2.2.18->2.4.0 Tue, 16 Jan 2001 17:16:23 -0500
  • G400 behavior different, 2.2.18->2.4.0 (was: matroxfb on 2.4.0 / PCI: Failed to allocate...) Tue, 16 Jan 2001 15:55:46 -0500
  • Re: matroxfb on 2.4.0 / PCI: Failed to allocate... Tue, 16 Jan 2001 13:22:51 -0500
  • matroxfb on 2.4.0 / PCI: Failed to allocate... Mon, 15 Jan 2001 19:22:08 -0500
• Chandler, Alan
  • RE:[preview] VIA IDE driver v3.11 with vt82c686b UDMA100 support Wed, 17 Jan 2001 14:38:00 -0000
• Chris Jones
  • Re: problem mounting root under 2.4.0 16 Jan 2001 14:20:22 -0500
  • problem mounting root under 2.4.0 16 Jan 2001 08:40:41 -0500
• Chris Mason
  • Re: set_page_dirty/page_launder deadlock Wed, 17 Jan 2001 14:57:26 -0500
  • Re: kernel BUG with 2.4.1-pre7 reiserfs Tue, 16 Jan 2001 14:18:43 -0500
  • Re: More information on reiserfs bug Tue, 16 Jan 2001 14:12:23 -0500
  • Re: patch:reiserfs 3.6.25 + LVM(Fix oops reiserfs filesystem) Mon, 15 Jan 2001 14:57:42 -0500
• Chris Meadors
  • Re: Delay in authentication.gy Mon, 15 Jan 2001 15:37:37 -0500 (EST)
• Chris Rankin
  • [PATCH] : Sound module locking - uart401 Sat, 20 Jan 2001 20:00:27 +1100 (EST)
• Chris Wedgwood
  • Re: PROBLEM: select() on TCP socket sleeps for 1 tick even if data available Sat, 20 Jan 2001 20:07:27 +1300
  • Re: PROBLEM: select() on TCP socket sleeps for 1 tick even if data available Sat, 20 Jan 2001 12:31:39 +1300
• Christian Gennerat
  • Re: PCMCIA problem loading ide-floppy from ide_cs Thu, 18 Jan 2001 09:59:50 +0100
  • Re: 2.4.0 config breaks /dev/fd0* major/minor ? Fixed Wed, 17 Jan 2001 11:34:31 +0100
  • Re: 2.4.0 config breaks /dev/fd0* major/minor ? Wed, 17 Jan 2001 11:10:23 +0100
  • Re: 2.4.0 config breaks /dev/fd0* major/minor ? Wed, 17 Jan 2001 11:05:13 +0100
• Christoph Hellwig
  • Re: [RFC] generic IO write clustering Sat, 20 Jan 2001 20:05:15 +0100
  • Re: [RFC] generic IO write clustering Sat, 20 Jan 2001 18:45:06 +0100
  • Re: [RFC] generic IO write clustering Sat, 20 Jan 2001 16:57:58 +0100
  • Re: [Kiobuf-io-devel] Re: [PLEASE-TESTME] Zerocopy networking patch, 2.4.0-1 Fri, 19 Jan 2001 17:25:03 +0100
  • Re: [PLEASE-TESTME] Zerocopy networking patch, 2.4.0-1 Thu, 18 Jan 2001 18:50:23 +0100
  • Re: [PLEASE-TESTME] Zerocopy networking patch, 2.4.0-1 Thu, 18 Jan 2001 01:53:33 +0100
• Christoph Lameter
  • khttpd: patch for range support + accumulated patches Sat, 13 Jan 2001 19:10:36 -0800 (PST)
• Christoph Rohland
  • Re: set_page_dirty/page_launder deadlock 19 Jan 2001 18:44:44 +0100
  • Re: VM subsystem bug in 2.4.0 ? 18 Jan 2001 09:23:41 +0100
  • [patch2] swapfs fixes against ac9 16 Jan 2001 19:31:05 +0100
  • [patch] swapfs fixes against and comments on ac9 16 Jan 2001 18:56:27 +0100
  • [Patch2] shmem fixes for 2.4.1-pre7 16 Jan 2001 15:20:44 +0100
  • [Patch] shmem fixes for 2.4.1-pre7 16 Jan 2001 13:16:18 +0100
  • Re: Bug in swapfs (2.4.0-ac9) 16 Jan 2001 09:50:09 +0100
  • Re: [Patch] memparse should return long long 15 Jan 2001 18:25:06 +0100
  • Re: linmodem???? 15 Jan 2001 16:27:31 +0100
  • [Patch] memparse should return long long 15 Jan 2001 09:22:19 +0100
  • Re: SetPageDirty in shmem_nopage 14 Jan 2001 22:44:04 +0100
  • Re: shmem or swapfs? was: [Patch] make shm filesystem part configurable 14 Jan 2001 22:29:08 +0100
  • SetPageDirty in shmem_nopage 14 Jan 2001 19:25:09 +0100
  • Re: shmem or swapfs? was: [Patch] make shm filesystem part configurable 14 Jan 2001 10:56:08 +0100
  • Re: Linux 2.4.0-ac9 14 Jan 2001 10:56:11 +0100
• Christopher Friesen
  • Re: Linux not adhering to BIOS Drive boot order? Tue, 16 Jan 2001 14:54:23 -0500
• Claudio Martins
  • Adaptec SCSI RAID ASR-2100S Thu, 18 Jan 2001 05:09:53 +0000 (WET)
• Cort Dougan
  • Re: lance.c @ 100Mbit Tue, 16 Jan 2001 15:41:36 -0700
• Craig Ruff
  • Re: Linux not adhering to BIOS Drive boot order? Wed, 17 Jan 2001 10:07:09 -0700
• D.W.Howells
  • What happened to merge_segments()? Tue, 16 Jan 2001 23:05:13 +0000
• Dag Bakke
  • Inconsistent cache size reporting.? Fri, 19 Jan 2001 09:26:27 +0100
• Dan Aloni
  • [PATCH 2.4] fs/super.c - paratition boundary checking before mount Wed, 17 Jan 2001 15:35:46 +0200 (IST)
• Dan Egli
  • ide-scsi not working in 2.4.0. Possible scsi subsystem problems? Mon, 15 Jan 2001 14:30:26 -0700
• Dan Hollis
  • Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? Sun, 14 Jan 2001 17:14:11 -0800 (PST)
• Dan Kegel
  • Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)]] Wed, 17 Jan 2001 13:51:31 -0800
• Dan Maas
  • Re: PROBLEM: select() on TCP socket sleeps for 1 tick even if data available Sat, 20 Jan 2001 04:41:32 -0500
• Dan Merillat
  • (no subject) Mon, 15 Jan 2001 01:56:13 -0500
• Daniel Kobras
  • Re: Problems with bigblock support of fat Tue, 16 Jan 2001 00:28:59 +0100 (CET)
• Daniel Mehrmnann
  • Re: pppoe in 2.4.0 Fri, 19 Jan 2001 07:34:05 +0100
• Daniel Quinlan
  • cramfs filesystem patch for 2.4.0 Mon, 15 Jan 2001 03:33:31 -0800
• Danny ter Haar
  • Re: PRoblem with pcnet32 under 2.4.0 , was :Drivers under 2.4 Mon, 15 Jan 2001 17:29:07 +0100
• Dave Cinege
  • md= broken. Found problem. Can't fix it. : ( Sat, 20 Jan 2001 16:34:07 -0500
• david
  • need help raid and 2.4.0 Thu, 18 Jan 2001 06:27:42 +1300
  • test only do not read Thu, 18 Jan 2001 06:16:13 +1300
• David Balazic
  • Re: Linux not adhering to BIOS Drive boot order? Thu, 18 Jan 2001 17:55:49 +0100
  • Re: Linux not adhering to BIOS Drive boot order? Thu, 18 Jan 2001 12:01:29 +0100
  • Re: Linux not adhering to BIOS Drive boot order? Thu, 18 Jan 2001 11:14:59 +0100
  • RE: Linux not adhering to BIOS Drive boot order? Wed, 17 Jan 2001 12:04:41 +0100
  • Re: Linux not adhering to BIOS Drive boot order? Wed, 17 Jan 2001 11:56:53 +0100
  • Re: Linux not adhering to BIOS Drive boot order? Wed, 17 Jan 2001 11:48:37 +0100
  • Re: Linux not adhering to BIOS Drive boot order? Wed, 17 Jan 2001 11:21:06 +0100
  • Re: Linux not adhering to BIOS Drive boot order? Tue, 16 Jan 2001 18:04:02 +0100
  • devices.txt missing some info about OSS devices Tue, 16 Jan 2001 14:10:32 +0100
  • Re: MTRR type AMD Duron/intel ? Mon, 15 Jan 2001 20:46:12 +0100
  • MTRR type AMD Duron/intel ? Mon, 15 Jan 2001 20:35:06 +0100
  • Re: Disk geometry changed after running linux Mon, 15 Jan 2001 19:54:47 +0100
  • Disk geometry changed after running linux Mon, 15 Jan 2001 19:18:30 +0100
• David Brownell
  • Re: [linux-usb-devel] Re: Inefficient PCI DMA usage (was: Sat, 20 Jan 2001 11:43:51 -0800
• David D.W. Downey
  • VIA chipset discussion Wed, 17 Jan 2001 14:02:17 -0800 (PST)
  • Re: Article: Using test suites to test the new kernel Sun, 14 Jan 2001 23:50:33 -0800 (PST)
  • Re: ide.2.4.1-p3.01112001.patch Sun, 14 Jan 2001 01:03:13 -0800 (PST)
  • Re: ide.2.4.1-p3.01112001.patch Sun, 14 Jan 2001 00:31:54 -0800 (PST)
• David Ford
  • Re: Coding Style Sat, 20 Jan 2001 00:09:09 +0000
  • Re: [off topic] Re: .br blacklisted ? Fri, 19 Jan 2001 04:35:37 +0000
  • Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)]] Fri, 19 Jan 2001 03:56:30 +0000
  • Re: [off topic] Re: .br blacklisted ? Fri, 19 Jan 2001 03:53:32 +0000
  • Re: Problem with networking in 2.4.0 Thu, 18 Jan 2001 21:46:40 +0000
  • Re: [OT]: Linux v.2.4.0 and Netscape 4.76? Wed, 17 Jan 2001 15:17:48 -0800
  • 2.4.0-ac6, 'rm' stalls in wait_on_buffer Tue, 16 Jan 2001 01:06:50 -0800
  • Re: BUG in 2.4.0: dd if=/dev/random of=out.txt bs=10000 count=100 Sat, 13 Jan 2001 14:45:49 -0800
  • Re: shmem or swapfs? was: [Patch] make shm filesystem part configurable Sat, 13 Jan 2001 14:39:45 -0800
• David L. Parsley
  • Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? Tue, 16 Jan 2001 10:05:06 -0500
• David Lang
  • Re: [Lse-tech] Re: multi-queue scheduler update Fri, 19 Jan 2001 08:06:37 -0800 (PST)
  • Re: SCSI partitions Tue, 16 Jan 2001 14:39:04 -0800 (PST)
• David Luyer
  • Patch: Pass parameters to xirc2ps_cs via kernel command line Wed, 17 Jan 2001 22:28:21 +1100
• David Riley
  • Re: [PATCH] via82cxxx_audio Fri, 19 Jan 2001 03:05:38 -0500
• David S. Miller
  • Re: set_page_dirty/page_launder deadlock Sun, 14 Jan 2001 05:27:45 -0800 (PST)
  • Re: 2.4.0-pre3+zerocopy: weird messages Sun, 14 Jan 2001 05:21:33 -0800 (PST)
  • Re: 2.4.0 + iproute2 Sun, 14 Jan 2001 05:17:01 -0800 (PST)
  • Re: 2.4.0 + iproute2 Sun, 14 Jan 2001 05:15:53 -0800 (PST)
  • Re: 2.4.0 + iproute2 Sun, 14 Jan 2001 04:05:26 -0800 (PST)
  • Re: 2.4.0 + iproute2 Sun, 14 Jan 2001 03:36:55 -0800 (PST)
  • Re: 2.4.0-pre3+zerocopy: weird messages Sun, 14 Jan 2001 03:32:40 -0800 (PST)
  • Re: 2.4.0-pre3+zerocopy: weird messages Sun, 14 Jan 2001 02:58:54 -0800 (PST)
  • Re: 2.4.0 + iproute2 Sun, 14 Jan 2001 02:55:28 -0800 (PST)
  • Re: 2.4.0-pre3+zerocopy: weird messages Sun, 14 Jan 2001 02:33:26 -0800 (PST)
  • Re: [PATCH] sparc64 compile fix Sun, 14 Jan 2001 01:19:33 -0800 (PST)
  • Re: 2.4.0 + iproute2 Sun, 14 Jan 2001 01:17:54 -0800 (PST)
  • Re: 2.4.0 + iproute2 Sun, 14 Jan 2001 00:55:11 -0800 (PST)
  • Re: Spinlocking patch for in xprt.c Sat, 13 Jan 2001 15:10:01 -0800 (PST)
  • Re: [PATCH] sparc64 compile fix Sat, 13 Jan 2001 14:55:42 -0800 (PST)
• David Santinoli
  • Re: Partition renumbering under 2.4.0 Fri, 19 Jan 2001 12:38:47 +0100
  • Partition renumbering under 2.4.0 Wed, 17 Jan 2001 12:54:17 +0100
• David Schwartz
  • RE: PROBLEM: select() on TCP socket sleeps for 1 tick even if data available Fri, 19 Jan 2001 19:27:19 -0800
  • RE: PROBLEM: select() on TCP socket sleeps for 1 tick even if data available Fri, 19 Jan 2001 15:20:29 -0800
• David Weinehall
  • Re: Linux not adhering to BIOS Drive boot order? Thu, 18 Jan 2001 23:55:17 +0100
  • Re: 2.0.37 crashes immediately Wed, 17 Jan 2001 13:33:36 +0100
  • Re: 2.0.37 crashes immediately Wed, 17 Jan 2001 10:15:56 +0100
• David Woodhouse
  • Re: Problem with networking in 2.4.0 Wed, 17 Jan 2001 13:40:56 +0000
  • Re: Linux not adhering to BIOS Drive boot order? Wed, 17 Jan 2001 10:02:07 +0000
  • Re: Linux not adhering to BIOS Drive boot order? Wed, 17 Jan 2001 09:38:47 +0000
  • Re: Linux not adhering to BIOS Drive boot order? Tue, 16 Jan 2001 17:58:11 +0000
  • Re: Linux not adhering to BIOS Drive boot order? Tue, 16 Jan 2001 16:06:46 +0000
  • Re: Where did vm_operations_struct->unmap in 2.4.0 go? Mon, 15 Jan 2001 09:09:02 +0000
  • Re: Where did vm_operations_struct->unmap in 2.4.0 go? Sun, 14 Jan 2001 21:57:20 +0000 (GMT)
  • Re: Where did vm_operations_struct->unmap in 2.4.0 go? Sun, 14 Jan 2001 21:15:41 +0000 (GMT)
  • Re: Where did vm_operations_struct->unmap in 2.4.0 go? Sun, 14 Jan 2001 20:02:06 +0000 (GMT)
  • Re: Where did vm_operations_struct->unmap in 2.4.0 go? Sun, 14 Jan 2001 17:46:37 +0000 (GMT)
  • Re: ide.2.4.1-p3.01112001.patch Sun, 14 Jan 2001 17:22:06 +0000 (GMT)
  • Re: Where did vm_operations_struct->unmap in 2.4.0 go? Sun, 14 Jan 2001 10:45:02 +0000 (GMT)
  • Re: Where did vm_operations_struct->unmap in 2.4.0 go? Sun, 14 Jan 2001 09:43:21 +0000 (GMT)
• David Wragg
  • Re: MTRR type AMD Duron/intel ? 15 Jan 2001 23:45:03 +0000
• Davide Libenzi
  • Re: [Lse-tech] Re: multi-queue scheduler update Fri, 19 Jan 2001 15:24:41 -0800
  • Re: sched_test_yield benchmark Fri, 19 Jan 2001 08:35:55 -0800
  • Re: [Lse-tech] Re: multi-queue scheduler update Thu, 18 Jan 2001 17:39:45 -0800
  • Re: multi-queue scheduler update Thu, 18 Jan 2001 17:38:30 -0800
• dean gaudet
  • Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)]] Thu, 18 Jan 2001 19:35:27 -0800 (PST)
  • Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)]] Thu, 18 Jan 2001 19:25:36 -0800 (PST)
  • Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)]] Thu, 18 Jan 2001 19:16:05 -0800 (PST)
  • Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)]] Thu, 18 Jan 2001 19:03:02 -0800 (PST)
  • Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)]] Thu, 18 Jan 2001 18:46:49 -0800 (PST)
  • Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)]] Wed, 17 Jan 2001 12:38:23 -0800 (PST)
  • Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? Wed, 17 Jan 2001 11:27:40 -0800 (PST)
  • Re: 'native files', 'object fingerprints' [was: sendpath()] Tue, 16 Jan 2001 20:39:04 -0800 (PST)
  • Re: [patch] sendpath() support, 2.4.0-test3/-ac9 Tue, 16 Jan 2001 16:03:42 -0800 (PST)
  • Re: [patch] sendpath() support, 2.4.0-test3/-ac9 Mon, 15 Jan 2001 20:51:26 -0800 (PST)
  • Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? Mon, 15 Jan 2001 10:58:46 -0800 (PST)
  • Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? Mon, 15 Jan 2001 08:05:32 -0800 (PST)
• dep
  • ide that *does* work well with 2.4.0? Mon, 15 Jan 2001 12:48:00 -0500
• Derek Wildstar
  • Re: (2.4.0->2.4.1-pre8) config problem with PCMCIA causing link Thu, 18 Jan 2001 15:36:57 -0500 (EST)
• dmeyer@dmeyer.net
  • Re: Documenting stat(2) Thu, 18 Jan 2001 10:54:31 -0500
  • Documenting stat(2) Thu, 18 Jan 2001 02:05:28 -0500
• Dominik Kubla
  • APIC errors Wed, 17 Jan 2001 09:14:32 +0100
  • Re: Linux not adhering to BIOS Drive boot order? Tue, 16 Jan 2001 17:40:09 +0100
  • Re: Slot Number Question Tue, 16 Jan 2001 00:47:54 +0100
• Douglas Gilbert
  • Re: Linux not adhering to BIOS Drive boot order? Wed, 17 Jan 2001 13:41:18 -0500
  • Re: Linux not adhering to BIOS Drive boot order? Tue, 16 Jan 2001 11:45:05 -0500
• Dr. Kelsey Hudson
  • Re: Linux not adhering to BIOS Drive boot order? Wed, 17 Jan 2001 13:26:05 -0800 (PST)
  • Re: APIC errors Wed, 17 Jan 2001 12:54:27 -0800 (PST)
  • Re: 2.0.37 crashes immediately Tue, 16 Jan 2001 16:08:42 -0800 (PST)
  • Re: Linux not adhering to BIOS Drive boot order? Tue, 16 Jan 2001 16:05:26 -0800 (PST)
  • Re: Linux not adhering to BIOS Drive boot order? Tue, 16 Jan 2001 15:51:06 -0800 (PST)
  • RE: Linux not adhering to BIOS Drive boot order? Tue, 16 Jan 2001 12:30:34 -0800 (PST)
  • RE: Linux not adhering to BIOS Drive boot order? Tue, 16 Jan 2001 12:01:12 -0800 (PST)
  • Re: APIC ERRor on CPU0: 00(02) ... Sun, 14 Jan 2001 18:56:30 -0800 (PST)
• Duncan Laurie
  • RE: int. assignment on SMP + ServerWorks chipset Tue, 16 Jan 2001 18:39:46 -0700
• Dunlap, Randy
  • RE: [Patch] memparse should return long long Mon, 15 Jan 2001 08:50:04 -0800
• ebi4
  • 2.4.1-pre8 video/ohci1394 compile problem Thu, 18 Jan 2001 19:52:40 -0600 (CST)
• ed@alcpress.com
  • SCSI partitions Tue, 16 Jan 2001 11:10:41 -0800
• Eddie Williams
  • Re: Linux not adhering to BIOS Drive boot order? Tue, 16 Jan 2001 12:24:49 -0500
  • Re: Linux not adhering to BIOS Drive boot order? Tue, 16 Jan 2001 11:53:47 -0500
• Edward
  • Don't mix reiserfs and RAID5 in linux-2.4.1-pre8, severe corruption Fri, 19 Jan 2001 21:27:02 +0000
• egger@suse.de
  • Re: Hang when booting 2.4.0/2.4.1-pre8 on Compaq 1850R with SMART 3200 Fri, 19 Jan 2001 03:39:21 +0100 (CET)
• Eli Carter
  • Re: [PATCH] pcnet32.c ARM support & AM79C973 improvements Thu, 18 Jan 2001 12:37:35 -0600
  • [PATCH] pcnet32.c ARM support & AM79C973 improvements Thu, 18 Jan 2001 10:46:13 -0600
  • Re: lance.c @ 100Mbit Tue, 16 Jan 2001 17:37:17 -0600
  • lance.c @ 100Mbit Tue, 16 Jan 2001 16:27:43 -0600
• Eric Lammerts
  • Re: Off-Topic: how do I trace a PID over double-forks? Sat, 20 Jan 2001 11:55:24 +0100 (CET)
• Eric S. Raymond
  • Documenting stat(2) Thu, 18 Jan 2001 00:28:12 -0500
• Eric Taylor
  • tcp no-ack bug can-rpt, w/script incl (this bugs 4 u) Mon, 15 Jan 2001 15:36:26 -0800
• Eric W. Biederman
  • Re: Q: Linux rebooting directly into linux. 18 Jan 2001 09:18:25 -0700
  • Re: Caches, page coloring, virtual indexed caches, and more 17 Jan 2001 01:35:56 -0700
  • Re: Caches, page coloring, virtual indexed caches, and more 16 Jan 2001 02:34:39 -0700
  • Re: Caches, page coloring, virtual indexed caches, and more 15 Jan 2001 10:16:57 -0700
  • Caches, page coloring, virtual indexed caches, and more 15 Jan 2001 01:41:06 -0700
  • Re: Subtle MM bug 14 Jan 2001 23:59:23 -0700
• Erik Mouw
  • Re: /proc/PID/stat format Wed, 17 Jan 2001 11:43:49 +0100
• Eugenio Jimenez
  • ACPI slows down the system (2.4.0) Thu, 18 Jan 2001 16:00:26 +0000 (WET)
• Felix von Leitner
  • Off-Topic: how do I trace a PID over double-forks? Fri, 19 Jan 2001 01:36:49 +0100
  • Re: Documenting stat(2) Thu, 18 Jan 2001 13:56:35 +0100
  • Re: O_ANY [was: Re: 'native files', 'object fingerprints' [was: sendpath()]] Tue, 16 Jan 2001 15:40:13 +0100
  • Re: 'native files', 'object fingerprints' [was: sendpath()] Tue, 16 Jan 2001 15:27:56 +0100
  • Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? Tue, 16 Jan 2001 15:20:23 +0100
  • Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? Tue, 16 Jan 2001 13:47:37 +0100
  • Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? Tue, 16 Jan 2001 11:40:18 +0100
• Florent Cueto
  • Re: Linux not adhering to BIOS Drive boot order? Tue, 16 Jan 2001 17:23:28 +0100
• Florian Weimer
  • Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? 15 Jan 2001 14:02:22 +0100
• fool@elven.org
  • linux-2.4.0: couple typos in 'make menuconfig', also kbd freeze Mon, 15 Jan 2001 03:17:44 -0600
• Frank Davis
  • 2.4.0-ac10 patching issue Fri, 19 Jan 2001 21:18:59 -0500 (EST)
• Frank de Lange
  • Re: QUESTION: Network hangs with BP6 and 2.4.x kernels, hardware related? Sun, 14 Jan 2001 01:23:32 +0100
• Friedrich Lindenberg
  • (no subject) Sun, 14 Jan 2001 11:46:08 -0500 (EST)
• Gary Lawrence Murphy
  • Re: linmodem???? 15 Jan 2001 12:37:22 -0500
• george anzinger
  • Re: Latency: allowing resheduling while holding spin_locks Mon, 15 Jan 2001 19:09:14 -0800
  • Re: [linux-audio-dev] low-latency scheduling patch for 2.4.0 Sun, 14 Jan 2001 21:27:37 -0800
  • Re: Latency: allowing resheduling while holding spin_locks Sat, 13 Jan 2001 16:06:27 -0800
• Gerhard Mack
  • Re: multi-queue scheduler update Thu, 18 Jan 2001 16:43:15 -0800 (PST)
  • Re: The latest instance in the A20 farce Thu, 18 Jan 2001 04:21:15 -0800 (PST)
  • Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? Sun, 14 Jan 2001 13:54:38 -0800 (PST)
• Giacomo Catenazzi
  • Re: Problems in 2.4 kernel Wed, 17 Jan 2001 10:55:40 +0100
• gmo@broadcom.com
  • RE: PCMCIA Cards on 2.4.0 Fri, 19 Jan 2001 13:59:28 -0800
• Gregg Lloyd
  • Kernel is compiled but LILO wont boot it... Sat, 20 Jan 2001 00:32:14 -0500
• Gregor Jasny
  • Bug in swapfs (2.4.0-ac9) Mon, 15 Jan 2001 23:19:26 +0100
• Gregory Maxwell
  • Re: Kernel 2.4.x and 2.4.1-preX - Higher latency then 2.2.x kernels? Sat, 20 Jan 2001 14:59:24 -0500
  • Re: low-latency scheduling patch for 2.4.0 Sun, 14 Jan 2001 09:38:36 -0500
• gsdrahei@xenon.cs.adelaide.edu.au
  • Modifying TCP implementation in Linux Kernel? Fri, 19 Jan 2001 12:13:49 +1030 (CST)
• Guest section DW
  • Re: Disk geometry changed after running linux Mon, 15 Jan 2001 20:42:54 +0100
  • Re: Disk geometry changed after running linux Mon, 15 Jan 2001 19:51:31 +0100
• Guus Sliepen
  • Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)]] Sat, 20 Jan 2001 22:31:11 +0100
• H. Peter Anvin
  • Re: Linux not adhering to BIOS Drive boot order? 18 Jan 2001 17:17:47 -0800
  • Re: [PATCH] i386/setup.c cpuinfo notsc 15 Jan 2001 19:47:58 -0800
  • Re: MTRR type AMD Duron/intel ? 15 Jan 2001 13:44:00 -0800
  • Re: [PATCH] i386/setup.c cpuinfo notsc Mon, 15 Jan 2001 13:41:11 -0800
  • Re: [PATCH] i386/setup.c cpuinfo notsc Mon, 15 Jan 2001 12:48:49 -0800
  • Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? 15 Jan 2001 12:17:59 -0800
  • Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? 15 Jan 2001 12:15:08 -0800
  • Re: The latest instance in the A20 farce Mon, 15 Jan 2001 12:00:36 -0800
  • Re: The latest instance in the A20 farce Mon, 15 Jan 2001 09:44:54 -0800
• Hans Grobler
  • Re: kmalloc() of 4MB causes "kernel BUG at slab.c:1542!" Thu, 18 Jan 2001 07:11:05 +0200 (SAST)
• Hans Reiser
  • Re: [reiserfs-list] Don't mix reiserfs and RAID5 in linux-2.4.1-pre8, Sat, 20 Jan 2001 15:39:36 +0300
• Harald Welte
  • Re: 2.4.0 + iproute2 Sun, 14 Jan 2001 09:36:23 +0100
• Heikki Lindholm
  • Total loss with 2.4.0 (release) Mon, 15 Jan 2001 15:40:53 +0200 (EET)
• Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
  • Re: ide.2.4.1-p3.01112001.patch Mon, 15 Jan 2001 21:47:11 -0200
• Herrmann, Achim
  • modules, insmod and multiple object files Tue, 16 Jan 2001 12:56:33 +0100
• hgp-linux@madaket.netwizards.net
  • Strange mm problem?? Wed, 17 Jan 2001 11:46:36 -0800
• Holger Kiehl
  • Re: Serious file system corruption with RAID5+SMP and kernels above2.4.0 Sat, 20 Jan 2001 19:42:04 +0100 (CET)
  • Re: More filesystem corruption under 2.4.1-pre8 and SW Raid5 Fri, 19 Jan 2001 13:49:28 +0100 (CET)
  • Re: More filesystem corruption under 2.4.1-pre8 and SW Raid5 Fri, 19 Jan 2001 12:36:33 +0100 (CET)
  • More filesystem corruption under 2.4.1-pre8 and SW Raid5 Fri, 19 Jan 2001 08:47:23 +0100 (CET)
  • PROBLEM: More filesystem corruption with 2.4.1-pre3 and SW raid5 Mon, 15 Jan 2001 13:28:05 +0100 (CET)
  • PROBLEM: Filesystem corruption with 2.4.1-pre3 and raid5 Sun, 14 Jan 2001 23:07:04 +0100 (CET)
• Honza Pazdziora
  • Re: Linux not adhering to BIOS Drive boot order? Tue, 16 Jan 2001 17:09:10 GMT
• Howard Johnson
  • Re: VIA chipset discussion Thu, 18 Jan 2001 23:42:25 +0000
• Hubertus Franke
  • Re: [Lse-tech] Re: multi-queue scheduler update Fri, 19 Jan 2001 13:03:05 -0500
  • Re: [Lse-tech] Re: multi-queue scheduler update Fri, 19 Jan 2001 11:47:52 -0500
  • Re: [Lse-tech] Re: multi-queue scheduler update Fri, 19 Jan 2001 11:30:04 -0500
  • Re: [Lse-tech] Re: multi-queue scheduler update Fri, 19 Jan 2001 10:47:06 -0500
• Hugh Dickins
  • [PATCH] udf writepage UnlockPage Thu, 18 Jan 2001 16:39:18 +0000 (GMT)
  • [PATCH] i386/setup.c cpuinfo notsc Mon, 15 Jan 2001 20:33:17 +0000 (GMT)
• Ian Macdonald
  • Re: pppoe in 2.4.0 Fri, 19 Jan 2001 07:10:30 +0100
  • Hang when booting 2.4.0/2.4.1-pre8 on Compaq 1850R with SMART 3200 Fri, 19 Jan 2001 02:48:35 +0100
• Ian S. Nelson
  • How come top and /proc/meminfo on 2.4.0 says 0K shared? Fri, 19 Jan 2001 09:39:13 -0700
• idalton@ferret.phonewave.net
  • Re: Linux not adhering to BIOS Drive boot order? Thu, 18 Jan 2001 09:59:06 -0800
• Igmar Palsenberg
  • Re: Documenting stat(2) Sat, 20 Jan 2001 20:39:52 +0100 (CET)
  • Re: Documenting stat(2) Thu, 18 Jan 2001 21:52:02 +0100 (CET)
  • Re: 2.4.0 + iproute2 Wed, 17 Jan 2001 23:57:28 +0100 (CET)
  • Re: detecting bounced mails Wed, 17 Jan 2001 23:50:43 +0100 (CET)
  • 2.4.0ac9 Tue, 16 Jan 2001 09:51:56 +0100 (CET)
  • Re: 2.4.0 + iproute2 Mon, 15 Jan 2001 01:51:23 +0100 (CET)
  • Re: 2.4.0 + iproute2 Sun, 14 Jan 2001 13:15:02 +0100 (CET)
  • Re: 2.4.0 + iproute2 Sun, 14 Jan 2001 13:13:16 +0100 (CET)
  • Re: 2.4.0 + iproute2 Sun, 14 Jan 2001 13:08:16 +0100 (CET)
  • Re: 2.4.0 + iproute2 Sun, 14 Jan 2001 10:14:08 +0100 (CET)
  • Re: 2.4.0 + iproute2 Sun, 14 Jan 2001 09:52:16 +0100 (CET)
• Ignacio Monge
  • Linux-2.4.0ac0 compile error 15 Jan 2001 00:52:55 CET
• Igor Mozetic
  • 2.4.0 crash [bdflush?] Fri, 19 Jan 2001 17:06:15 +0100
  • Re: 2.4.0+aic7xxx doesn't boot, 2.2.17 OK Wed, 17 Jan 2001 10:00:44 +0100
  • 2.4.0+aic7xxx doesn't boot, 2.2.17 OK Tue, 16 Jan 2001 12:47:52 +0100
• Ingo Molnar
  • Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)]] Thu, 18 Jan 2001 23:20:47 +0100 (CET)
  • Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)]] Thu, 18 Jan 2001 23:18:48 +0100 (CET)
  • Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)]] Thu, 18 Jan 2001 22:57:20 +0100 (CET)
  • Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)]] Thu, 18 Jan 2001 15:50:42 -0500 (EST)
  • Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)]] Thu, 18 Jan 2001 21:44:57 +0100 (CET)
  • Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)]] Thu, 18 Jan 2001 21:33:37 +0100 (CET)
  • Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)]] Thu, 18 Jan 2001 20:43:47 +0100 (CET)
  • Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)]] Thu, 18 Jan 2001 18:32:20 +0100 (CET)
  • Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)]] Thu, 18 Jan 2001 18:04:56 +0100 (CET)
  • Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)]] Thu, 18 Jan 2001 14:29:44 +0100 (CET)
  • Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)]] Thu, 18 Jan 2001 14:18:09 +0100 (CET)
  • Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)]] Thu, 18 Jan 2001 14:06:46 +0100 (CET)
  • Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)]] Thu, 18 Jan 2001 13:56:55 +0100 (CET)
  • Re: Hi memory support in 2.4 not working correctly. Wed, 17 Jan 2001 20:09:48 +0100 (CET)
  • Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? Tue, 16 Jan 2001 13:42:37 +0100 (CET)
  • Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? Tue, 16 Jan 2001 13:37:11 +0100 (CET)
  • Re: O_ANY [was: Re: 'native files', 'object fingerprints' [was: Tue, 16 Jan 2001 13:33:44 +0100 (CET)
  • Re: O_ANY [was: Re: 'native files', 'object fingerprints' [was: Tue, 16 Jan 2001 13:09:38 +0100 (CET)
  • O_ANY [was: Re: 'native files', 'object fingerprints' [was: Tue, 16 Jan 2001 13:04:22 +0100 (CET)
  • Re: [patch] sendpath() support, 2.4.0-test3/-ac9 Tue, 16 Jan 2001 10:19:39 +0100 (CET)
  • Re: 4G SGI quad Xeon - memory-related slowdowns Mon, 15 Jan 2001 23:33:24 +0100 (CET)
  • [patch] sendpath() support, 2.4.0-test3/-ac9 Mon, 15 Jan 2001 21:47:03 +0100 (CET)
  • Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? Mon, 15 Jan 2001 20:41:01 +0100 (CET)
  • [patch] fixes for RAID1/RAID5 hot-add/hot-remove, 2.4.0-ac9 Mon, 15 Jan 2001 12:51:23 +0100 (CET)
  • Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? Sun, 14 Jan 2001 22:49:23 +0100 (CET)
  • Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? Sun, 14 Jan 2001 21:38:23 +0100 (CET)
  • Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? Sun, 14 Jan 2001 20:09:54 +0100 (CET)
  • Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? Sun, 14 Jan 2001 19:50:12 +0100 (CET)
  • Re: Ingo's RAID patch for 2.2.18 final? Sun, 14 Jan 2001 13:35:12 +0100 (CET)
• isaac albeniz
  • ppp errors Sun, 14 Jan 2001 18:33:12 -0500 (EST)
• Ishikawa
  • Re: Linux not adhering to BIOS Drive boot order? Wed, 17 Jan 2001 18:45:20 +0900
• J . A . Magallon
  • TLB IPI error Fri, 19 Jan 2001 16:17:38 +0100
  • Re: PROBLEM: 128M memory OK, but with 192M sound card es1391 trouble Thu, 18 Jan 2001 00:25:51 +0100
  • Re: Linux not adhering to BIOS Drive boot order? Wed, 17 Jan 2001 16:45:21 +0100
  • Re: Call for testers: ne2k-pci and io apic Sun, 14 Jan 2001 03:14:06 +0100
  • Re: Call for testers: ne2k-pci and io apic (was: Re: QUESTION: Network hangs with BP6...) Sun, 14 Jan 2001 01:23:44 +0100
  • Re: Call for testers: ne2k-pci and io apic Sun, 14 Jan 2001 01:18:46 +0100
• J Sloan
  • Re: Problem with networking in 2.4.0 Wed, 17 Jan 2001 11:12:11 -0800
  • [OT]: Linux v.2.4.0 and Netscape 4.76? Wed, 17 Jan 2001 11:06:01 -0800
  • Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? Sun, 14 Jan 2001 14:45:57 -0800
• J.Brown
  • Continuing OOP's... Fri, 19 Jan 2001 17:47:14 +0800 (WST)
  • UPDATE: Re: 2.4.0 kernel oops from apt-get (dcache.h) Mon, 15 Jan 2001 20:41:21 +0800 (WST)
  • 2.4.0 kernel oops from apt-get (dcache.h) Mon, 15 Jan 2001 18:42:40 +0800 (WST)
• J.D. Hollis
  • class handles Fri, 19 Jan 2001 11:49:44 -0500
  • a linux qos mailing list Mon, 15 Jan 2001 19:24:42 -0500
• J.W. Hoogervorst
  • IRQ routing problem - SMP related? Thu, 18 Jan 2001 14:25:22 +0100
• Jack Hammer
  • Slot Number Question Mon, 15 Jan 2001 14:03:25 -0500
• Jakob Borg
  • Re: kernel BUG with 2.4.1-pre7 reiserfs Tue, 16 Jan 2001 20:20:41 +0100
  • Re: kernel BUG with 2.4.1-pre7 reiserfs Tue, 16 Jan 2001 19:58:37 +0100
  • More information on reiserfs bug Tue, 16 Jan 2001 19:38:58 +0100
  • kernel BUG with 2.4.1-pre7 reiserfs Tue, 16 Jan 2001 19:20:42 +0100
• Jakub Jelinek
  • Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? Tue, 16 Jan 2001 10:05:06 -0500
• jamal
  • Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? Tue, 16 Jan 2001 08:47:22 -0500 (EST)
  • Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? Sun, 14 Jan 2001 14:18:29 -0500 (EST)
  • Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? Sun, 14 Jan 2001 14:02:40 -0500 (EST)
  • Is sendfile all that sexy? Sun, 14 Jan 2001 13:29:22 -0500 (EST)
• James Bottomley
  • Re: Linux not adhering to BIOS Drive boot order? Wed, 17 Jan 2001 11:16:58 -0500
  • Re: Partition renumbering under 2.4.0 Wed, 17 Jan 2001 10:56:14 -0500
• James Brents
  • Oops in 2.2.17 Sat, 20 Jan 2001 13:56:34 -0600
• James H. Cloos Jr.
  • Re: shmem or swapfs? was: [Patch] make shm filesystem part configurable 14 Jan 2001 07:56:28 -0600
• James Mastros
  • Re: Loopback almost-freeze? Mon, 15 Jan 2001 01:17:07 -0500
  • Loopback almost-freeze? Mon, 15 Jan 2001 00:34:08 -0500
• James Simmons
  • Re: console spin_lock Thu, 18 Jan 2001 17:23:11 -0800 (PST)
  • Re: console spin_lock Wed, 17 Jan 2001 15:40:26 -0800 (PST)
  • console spin_lock Tue, 16 Jan 2001 16:05:38 -0800 (PST)
• James Stevenson
  • [PF_PACKET] and failed checksums Thu, 18 Jan 2001 14:34:08 +0000 (GMT)
• Jamie Lokier
  • Re: 'native files', 'object fingerprints' [was: sendpath()] Tue, 16 Jan 2001 14:57:05 +0100
  • Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? Tue, 16 Jan 2001 14:48:49 +0100
  • Re: Caches, page coloring, virtual indexed caches, and more Mon, 15 Jan 2001 19:22:01 +0100
  • Re: ide.2.4.1-p3.01112001.patch Mon, 15 Jan 2001 02:13:41 +0100
  • Re: USB Mass Storage in 2.4.0 Sun, 14 Jan 2001 20:46:57 +0100
  • Re: ide.2.4.1-p3.01112001.patch Sun, 14 Jan 2001 20:38:23 +0100
• Jan Kara
  • Re: quota and 2.4.0-ac9 Thu, 18 Jan 2001 17:18:27 +0100
• Janos Farkas
  • Re: Inconsistent cache size reporting.? Sat, 20 Jan 2001 17:26:10 +0100
• Jason Saunders
  • Warnings on compiling 2.4.1-pre8 Fri, 19 Jan 2001 11:15:27 +0000
• Jean-Marc Saffroy
  • Re: [BUG] Panic in smp_call_function_interrupt Thu, 18 Jan 2001 22:31:16 +0100 (CET)
  • [BUG] Panic in smp_call_function_interrupt Tue, 16 Jan 2001 21:09:57 +0100 (CET)
• Jeff Chua
  • Re: linmodem???? Tue, 16 Jan 2001 00:07:57 +0800 (SGT)
  • linmodem???? Mon, 15 Jan 2001 22:20:57 +0800
• Jeff Garzik
  • Re: Linux 2.4.0-ac10 build errors Fri, 19 Jan 2001 21:27:44 -0500
  • Re: 2.4.0-ac10 patching issue Fri, 19 Jan 2001 21:25:38 -0500
  • Re: Linux not adhering to BIOS Drive boot order? Wed, 17 Jan 2001 04:55:21 -0500
  • Re: 2.4.0 config breaks /dev/fd0* major/minor ? Wed, 17 Jan 2001 04:37:19 -0500
  • Re: pre5 VM feedback.. Mon, 15 Jan 2001 22:03:04 -0500
  • pre5 VM feedback.. Mon, 15 Jan 2001 20:53:50 -0500
  • Re: [PATCH] make drivers/scsi/atari_scsi.c check request_irq (240p3) Sun, 14 Jan 2001 16:29:11 -0500
• Jeff Hartmann
  • Re: Patch for aic7xxx 2.4.0 test12 hang Fri, 19 Jan 2001 14:00:28 -0700
• Jeff Raubitschek
  • Bonnie on NBD w/ memory pressure deadlocks (problem in wait_for_tcp_memory?) Mon, 15 Jan 2001 16:20:23 -0500 (EST)
• Jeffrey Rose
  • Re: 2.4.0 config breaks /dev/fd0* major/minor ? *not* Fixed Wed, 17 Jan 2001 12:04:54 +0100
  • Re: Problems in 2.4 kernel Wed, 17 Jan 2001 11:29:24 +0100
  • Re: 2.4.0 config breaks /dev/fd0* major/minor ? Wed, 17 Jan 2001 11:11:08 +0100
  • Re: Problems in 2.4 kernel Wed, 17 Jan 2001 10:38:59 +0100
  • 2.4.0 config breaks /dev/fd0* major/minor ? Wed, 17 Jan 2001 10:35:05 +0100
• Jens Axboe
  • Re: lvm-oops in 2.4.1pre8 Sat, 20 Jan 2001 19:50:27 +0100
  • Re: 2.4.1pre8 slowdown on dbench tests Fri, 19 Jan 2001 03:13:03 +0100
  • Re: 2.4.1pre8 slowdown on dbench tests Fri, 19 Jan 2001 03:10:04 +0100
  • Re: 2.4.1pre8 slowdown on dbench tests Fri, 19 Jan 2001 02:43:51 +0100
  • Re: 2.4.1pre8 slowdown on dbench tests Fri, 19 Jan 2001 02:40:23 +0100
  • Re: 2.4.1-pre3 kernel oops from kmem_cache_create(...) Tue, 16 Jan 2001 03:07:13 +0100
  • Re: vmware 2.0.3, kernel 2.4.0 and a cdrom Mon, 15 Jan 2001 22:15:53 +0100
  • Re: Linux 2.4.0-ac9 Mon, 15 Jan 2001 02:47:57 +0100
• Jens Taprogge
  • Re: PCMCIA Cards on 2.4.0 Sat, 20 Jan 2001 14:33:29 +0100
• Jeremy M. Dolan
  • test, ignore Thu, 18 Jan 2001 17:01:23 -0600
• Jerry Frana
  • Re: Problem with networking in 2.4.0 Wed, 17 Jan 2001 07:36:05 -0600 (CST)
• Jes Sorensen
  • Re: Compiling 2.4.1-preX series 17 Jan 2001 03:17:06 +0100
• Jie Zhou
  • Question about formatting UDF format DVD Mon, 15 Jan 2001 12:48:15 -0500
• Jim M.
  • delete object file Tue, 16 Jan 2001 01:54:25 -0000
• JJ Jordan
  • Question relating to the nopage handler and memory in general Mon, 15 Jan 2001 01:06:02 -0600
• Johannes Erdfelt
  • Re: Inefficient PCI DMA usage (was: [experimental patch] UHCI updates) Sat, 20 Jan 2001 13:08:49 -0500
  • Re: Inefficient PCI DMA usage (was: [experimental patch] UHCI updates) Sat, 20 Jan 2001 12:34:42 -0500
  • Inefficient PCI DMA usage (was: [experimental patch] UHCI updates) Sat, 20 Jan 2001 00:38:12 -0500
• John Cavan
  • Re: Coding Style Fri, 19 Jan 2001 20:26:01 -0500
  • Re: tcp no-ack bug can-rpt, w/script incl (this bugs 4 u) Mon, 15 Jan 2001 19:08:58 -0500
  • Networking strangeness 2.4.0-ac9 and earlier Mon, 15 Jan 2001 08:41:29 -0500
• John Clemens
  • Re: multi-queue scheduler update Thu, 18 Jan 2001 20:14:38 -0500 (EST)
• John Fremlin
  • Re: 2.4.0-x features ? 16 Jan 2001 13:14:18 +0000
• John Jasen
  • Re: Serious file system corruption with RAID5+SMP and kernels Sat, 20 Jan 2001 13:50:40 -0500
  • md problems (2.4.0/2.4.1-pre7 on alpha) Wed, 17 Jan 2001 10:36:25 -0500
• John Newbigin
  • binary garbage in dmesg/boot messages (2.4.0) Mon, 15 Jan 2001 11:31:43 +1000
• John O'Donnell
  • Re: Ibcs2 or abi for kernel 2.4 Fri, 19 Jan 2001 18:34:32 -0500
  • Re: VIA chipset discussion Fri, 19 Jan 2001 11:42:01 -0500
  • Re: [off topic] Re: .br blacklisted ? Thu, 18 Jan 2001 18:19:31 -0500
  • Re: .br blacklisted ? Wed, 17 Jan 2001 14:29:27 -0500
  • Re: .br blacklisted ? Wed, 17 Jan 2001 03:11:52 -0500
• John Summerfield
  • Re: Linux not adhering to BIOS Drive boot order? Wed, 17 Jan 2001 03:48:37 +0800
  • Re: Linux not adhering to BIOS Drive boot order? Wed, 17 Jan 2001 03:52:06 +0800
• Jon Eisenstein
  • PROBLEM: Kernel crash with cron/mail? Thu, 18 Jan 2001 21:58:40 -0500 (EST)
• Jonathan Earle
  • Ethernet Bonding Performance under kernel 2.4.0 Tue, 16 Jan 2001 14:48:31 -0500
• Jonathan Thackray
  • Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? Mon, 15 Jan 2001 18:34:02 +0000
  • Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? Mon, 15 Jan 2001 15:24:55 +0000
• Jonathan Walther
  • Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)]] Wed, 17 Jan 2001 14:44:37 -0800 (PST)
• Jordan
  • [Off-Topic] Support For 1 Ghz on Tyan Trinity 400 Fri, 19 Jan 2001 09:11:47 -0600
• Jorge Boncompte
  • RE: ERR in /proc/interrupts Thu, 18 Jan 2001 23:58:31 +0100
  • RE: ERR in /proc/interrupts Thu, 18 Jan 2001 23:31:38 +0100
  • ERR in /proc/interrupts Thu, 18 Jan 2001 22:54:24 +0100
• Jorge Nerin
  • Re: APIC errors Thu, 18 Jan 2001 20:17:52 +0100
  • Re: QUESTION: Network hangs with BP6 and 2.4.x kernels, hardwarerelated? Mon, 15 Jan 2001 03:00:15 +0100
• Josh Myer
  • Re: PROBLEM: 128M memory OK, but with 192M sound card es1391 trouble Wed, 17 Jan 2001 04:36:19 -0600
• Juergen E Fischer
  • Re: SCSI scanner problem with all kernels since 2.3.42 Mon, 15 Jan 2001 22:24:35 +0100
• Juhani Rautiainen
  • VIA VT82C686 serial port over 115200 Thu, 18 Jan 2001 01:13:09 +0200 (EET)
• Julien Gaulmin
  • Re: 2.4.0+aic7xxx doesn't boot, 2.2.17 neither Tue, 16 Jan 2001 13:41:48 +0100
• junio@siamese.dhis.twinsun.com
  • Re: 2.4.1-pre7 raid5syncd oops 16 Jan 2001 23:06:32 -0800
  • 2.4.1-pre7 raid5syncd oops 16 Jan 2001 11:28:28 -0800
  • Re: Ingo's RAID patch for 2.2.18 final? 13 Jan 2001 23:54:29 -0800
• Jure Pecar
  • FS corruption on 2.4.0-ac8 Mon, 15 Jan 2001 23:47:49 +0100
• Jussi Hamalainen
  • RE: ipchains blocking port 65535 Wed, 17 Jan 2001 19:12:14 +0200 (EET)
  • ipchains blocking port 65535 Wed, 17 Jan 2001 15:40:10 +0200 (EET)
• Kai Germaschewski
  • Re: (2.4.0->2.4.1-pre8) config problem with PCMCIA causing link Thu, 18 Jan 2001 12:29:36 +0100 (CET)
  • Re: bug (isdn-subsystem?) in 2.4.0 Mon, 15 Jan 2001 23:13:35 +0100 (CET)
• Kai Henningsen
  • Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? 20 Jan 2001 17:36:00 +0200
  • Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)]] 20 Jan 2001 16:56:00 +0200
  • Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? 18 Jan 2001 20:46:00 +0200
  • Re: Where did vm_operations_struct->unmap in 2.4.0 go? 14 Jan 2001 12:16:00 +0200
• Karsten Hopp
  • Re: Linux 2.4.0-ac9 Sun, 14 Jan 2001 04:05:50 +0100
• kees
  • Re: old binary works not with 2.2.18 (fwd) Sun, 14 Jan 2001 20:05:44 +0100 (CET)
• Keith Owens
  • Re: Oops with 4GB memory setting in 2.4.0 stable Tue, 16 Jan 2001 13:03:02 +1100
  • Re: Where did vm_operations_struct->unmap in 2.4.0 go? Mon, 15 Jan 2001 10:00:22 +1100
  • Re: Where did vm_operations_struct->unmap in 2.4.0 go? Sun, 14 Jan 2001 21:05:51 +1100
  • Re: HP Pavilion 8290 HANGS on boot 2.4/2.4-test9 Sun, 14 Jan 2001 11:31:48 +1100
  • Re: Where did vm_operations_struct->unmap in 2.4.0 go? Sun, 14 Jan 2001 11:21:20 +1100
• Konstantin Cherenkoff
  • Oops in rtl8139, and more ... Sun, 14 Jan 2001 21:02:18 +0000 (PST)
• Kostas Nikoloudakis
  • eepro100 error messages Tue, 16 Jan 2001 19:02:52 -0800
• Kristofer T. Karas
  • Re: 2.4.1-pre8, webbrowsers and proxies... Wed, 17 Jan 2001 12:29:12 -0500
• kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru
  • Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)]] Sat, 20 Jan 2001 23:22:14 +0300 (MSK)
  • Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)]] Sat, 20 Jan 2001 22:39:36 +0300 (MSK)
  • Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)]] Sat, 20 Jan 2001 22:05:45 +0300 (MSK)
  • Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? Sat, 20 Jan 2001 21:53:42 +0300 (MSK)
  • Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)]] Sat, 20 Jan 2001 21:03:43 +0300 (MSK)
  • Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)]] Sat, 20 Jan 2001 20:28:04 +0300 (MSK)
  • Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? Fri, 19 Jan 2001 23:18:00 +0300 (MSK)
  • Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)]] Fri, 19 Jan 2001 23:03:19 +0300 (MSK)
  • Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)]] Fri, 19 Jan 2001 21:18:04 +0300 (MSK)
  • Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)]] Fri, 19 Jan 2001 20:52:53 +0300 (MSK)
  • Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)]] Thu, 18 Jan 2001 23:30:22 +0300 (MSK)
  • Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)]] Thu, 18 Jan 2001 23:37:10 +0300 (MSK)
  • Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)]] Thu, 18 Jan 2001 23:11:12 +0300 (MSK)
  • Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)]] Thu, 18 Jan 2001 22:59:11 +0300 (MSK)
  • Re: Kernel oops in tcp_ipv4.c Sun, 14 Jan 2001 22:46:48 +0300 (MSK)
  • Re: ENOMEM on socket writes Sun, 14 Jan 2001 22:15:05 +0300 (MSK)
• LAMBERT Bernard
  • lp with kernel 2.2.18 Sun, 14 Jan 2001 09:03:57 +0100
• Laramie Leavitt
  • RE: Is sendfile all that sexy? Thu, 18 Jan 2001 14:00:19 -0000
• Larry McVoy
  • Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? Thu, 18 Jan 2001 08:36:55 -0800
• Leslie Donaldson
  • Re: Patch for aic7xxx 2.4.0 test12 hang Fri, 19 Jan 2001 20:48:25 -0600
  • Re: Patch for aic7xxx 2.4.0 test12 hang Fri, 19 Jan 2001 12:05:45 -0600
  • Patch for aic7xxx 2.4.0 test12 hang Fri, 19 Jan 2001 11:40:16 -0600
• Linus Torvalds
  • Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? Sat, 20 Jan 2001 13:01:54 -0800 (PST)
  • Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)]] Sat, 20 Jan 2001 11:39:30 -0800 (PST)
  • Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? Sat, 20 Jan 2001 11:26:52 -0800 (PST)
  • Re: 2.4.1-pre9 fails to compile drm r128 as module Sat, 20 Jan 2001 08:38:17 -0800 (PST)
  • Re: Coding Style Fri, 19 Jan 2001 22:29:35 -0800 (PST)
  • Re: Coding Style 19 Jan 2001 21:34:42 -0800
  • Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? 19 Jan 2001 13:45:09 -0800
  • Re: [PLEASE-TESTME] Zerocopy networking patch, 2.4.0-1 18 Jan 2001 22:55:59 -0800
  • Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? 18 Jan 2001 17:53:40 -0800
  • Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? Thu, 18 Jan 2001 17:14:01 -0800 (PST)
  • Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)]] Thu, 18 Jan 2001 11:52:33 -0800 (PST)
  • Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)]] Thu, 18 Jan 2001 11:45:45 -0800 (PST)
  • Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? Thu, 18 Jan 2001 11:42:03 -0800 (PST)
  • Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)]] Thu, 18 Jan 2001 10:50:02 -0800 (PST)
  • Re: [PLEASE-TESTME] Zerocopy networking patch, 2.4.0-1 Thu, 18 Jan 2001 10:04:33 -0800 (PST)
  • Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)]] Thu, 18 Jan 2001 08:51:19 -0800 (PST)
  • Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)]] Thu, 18 Jan 2001 08:49:38 -0800 (PST)
  • Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? Thu, 18 Jan 2001 08:24:12 -0800 (PST)
  • Re: Documenting stat(2) 17 Jan 2001 22:46:11 -0800
  • Re: What happened to your kernel changelogs? Wed, 17 Jan 2001 17:45:34 -0800 (PST)
  • Re: Subtle MM bug 17 Jan 2001 17:23:05 -0800
  • Re: [PLEASE-TESTME] Zerocopy networking patch, 2.4.0-1 Wed, 17 Jan 2001 17:13:31 -0800 (PST)
  • Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)]] Wed, 17 Jan 2001 14:53:14 -0800 (PST)
  • Re: int. assignment on SMP + ServerWorks chipset Wed, 17 Jan 2001 13:33:42 -0800 (PST)
  • Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)]] Wed, 17 Jan 2001 13:22:10 -0800 (PST)
  • Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? 17 Jan 2001 11:32:35 -0800
  • Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)]] Wed, 17 Jan 2001 11:27:52 -0800 (PST)
  • Re: Does reiserfs really meet the "Linux-2.4.x patch submission Tue, 16 Jan 2001 17:14:29 -0800 (PST)
  • Re: Does reiserfs really meet the "Linux-2.4.x patch submission policy"? 16 Jan 2001 12:25:33 -0800
  • Re: kernel BUG with 2.4.1-pre7 reiserfs 16 Jan 2001 10:36:43 -0800
  • Re: 'native files', 'object fingerprints' [was: sendpath()] Tue, 16 Jan 2001 09:47:46 -0800 (PST)
  • Re: [patch] sendpath() support, 2.4.0-test3/-ac9 Mon, 15 Jan 2001 20:59:02 -0800 (PST)
  • RE: int. assignment on SMP + ServerWorks chipset Mon, 15 Jan 2001 20:49:56 -0800 (PST)
  • Re: pre5 VM feedback.. 15 Jan 2001 19:20:51 -0800
  • Re: pre5 VM feedback.. 15 Jan 2001 18:48:32 -0800
  • Re: 4G SGI quad Xeon - memory-related slowdowns 15 Jan 2001 13:32:40 -0800
  • Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? 15 Jan 2001 13:00:41 -0800
  • Re: MTRR type AMD Duron/intel ? Mon, 15 Jan 2001 11:52:12 -0800 (PST)
  • Re: [SOLVED + PATCH] Re: Anybody got 2.4.0 running on a 386 ? Mon, 15 Jan 2001 11:11:59 -0800 (PST)
  • Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? 15 Jan 2001 10:46:41 -0800
  • Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? Sun, 14 Jan 2001 14:40:02 -0800 (PST)
  • Re: Where did vm_operations_struct->unmap in 2.4.0 go? Sun, 14 Jan 2001 13:47:29 -0800 (PST)
  • Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? Sun, 14 Jan 2001 13:44:00 -0800 (PST)
  • Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? 14 Jan 2001 12:22:31 -0800
  • Re: Where did vm_operations_struct->unmap in 2.4.0 go? Sun, 14 Jan 2001 12:15:29 -0800 (PST)
  • Re: SetPageDirty in shmem_nopage Sun, 14 Jan 2001 11:20:45 -0800 (PST)
  • Re: Where did vm_operations_struct->unmap in 2.4.0 go? Sun, 14 Jan 2001 11:12:47 -0800 (PST)
  • Re: set_page_dirty/page_launder deadlock Sun, 14 Jan 2001 10:56:10 -0800 (PST)
  • Re: Where did vm_operations_struct->unmap in 2.4.0 go? 13 Jan 2001 20:04:05 -0800
• Linux Admin
  • boot.img & initrd.img Sat, 20 Jan 2001 09:46:06 +0530
• Lukasz Trabinski
  • Re: eepro100 error messages Wed, 17 Jan 2001 19:29:51 +0100
• M T
  • quota and 2.4.0-ac9 Tue, 16 Jan 2001 07:15:50 -0000
• Maciej W. Rozycki
  • Re: patch: enabling RDPMC: bit 8 in CR4 (PCE) Thu, 18 Jan 2001 17:14:41 +0100 (MET)
  • Re: [PATCH] PCI-Devices and ServerWorks chipset Thu, 18 Jan 2001 12:08:03 +0100 (MET)
  • Re: [PATCH] PCI-Devices and ServerWorks chipset Thu, 18 Jan 2001 09:37:53 +0100 (MET)
  • Re: APIC errors Wed, 17 Jan 2001 12:22:25 +0100 (MET)
  • Re: [PATCH] PCI-Devices and ServerWorks chipset Wed, 17 Jan 2001 12:25:39 +0100 (MET)
  • Re: QUESTION: Network hangs with BP6 and 2.4.x kernels, hardware related? Tue, 16 Jan 2001 20:23:59 +0100 (MET)
  • Re: [PATCH] i386/setup.c cpuinfo notsc Mon, 15 Jan 2001 22:51:04 +0100 (MET)
  • Re: [PATCH] i386/setup.c cpuinfo notsc Mon, 15 Jan 2001 22:38:28 +0100 (MET)
  • Re: [PATCH] i386/setup.c cpuinfo notsc Mon, 15 Jan 2001 22:34:48 +0100 (MET)
  • Re: The latest instance in the A20 farce Mon, 15 Jan 2001 18:24:12 +0100 (MET)
• Malahal Rao Naineni
  • Re: Linux not adhering to BIOS Drive boot order? Tue, 16 Jan 2001 09:38:19 -0800 (PST)
• Manfred Spraul
  • Re: More filesystem corruption under 2.4.1-pre8 and SW Raid5 Fri, 19 Jan 2001 12:59:56 +0100
  • More filesystem corruption under 2.4.1-pre8 and SW Raid5 Fri, 19 Jan 2001 12:18:05 +0100
  • 2.4.0-ac9: bug in drivers/message/fusion/mptctl.c Wed, 17 Jan 2001 17:50:16 +0100
  • Re: Oops in rtl8139, and more Mon, 15 Jan 2001 18:25:14 +0100
  • Re: Question regarding driver developement Sun, 14 Jan 2001 20:43:02 +0100
• Marcelo Tosatti
  • Re: [RFC] generic IO write clustering Sat, 20 Jan 2001 15:55:33 -0200 (BRST)
  • Re: [RFC] generic IO write clustering Sat, 20 Jan 2001 14:00:24 -0200 (BRST)
  • Re: [RFC] generic IO write clustering Sat, 20 Jan 2001 13:24:40 -0200 (BRST)
  • Re: [RFC] generic IO write clustering Fri, 19 Jan 2001 23:52:36 -0200 (BRST)
  • [RFC] generic IO write clustering Fri, 19 Jan 2001 22:34:44 -0200 (BRST)
  • Re: pre5 VM feedback.. Fri, 19 Jan 2001 03:57:03 -0200 (BRST)
  • Re: pre5 VM feedback.. Fri, 19 Jan 2001 03:51:01 -0200 (BRST)
  • Re: 2.4.1pre8 slowdown on dbench tests Thu, 18 Jan 2001 21:51:03 -0200 (BRST)
  • Re: 2.4.1pre8 slowdown on dbench tests Thu, 18 Jan 2001 19:49:00 -0200 (BRST)
  • Re: mmap()/VM problem in 2.4.0 Thu, 18 Jan 2001 15:25:54 -0200 (BRST)
  • 2.4.1pre8 slowdown on dbench tests Thu, 18 Jan 2001 15:17:13 -0200 (BRST)
  • RE: Oops with 4GB memory setting in 2.4.0 stable Mon, 15 Jan 2001 20:37:45 -0200 (BRST)
  • RE: Oops with 4GB memory setting in 2.4.0 stable Mon, 15 Jan 2001 20:09:14 -0200 (BRST)
  • Re: Oops with 4GB memory setting in 2.4.0 stable Mon, 15 Jan 2001 19:47:29 -0200 (BRST)
  • Re: FS corruption on 2.4.0-ac8 Mon, 15 Jan 2001 19:11:56 -0200 (BRST)
  • Re: 2.4.0-ac9 works, but slower and swappier Mon, 15 Jan 2001 03:20:19 -0200 (BRST)
  • Re: mmap()/VM problem in 2.4.0 Mon, 15 Jan 2001 02:40:31 -0200 (BRST)
  • set_page_dirty/page_launder deadlock Sun, 14 Jan 2001 01:21:22 -0200 (BRST)
• Margulies, Adam
  • oracle 8.1.7 on 2.4.0? Mon, 15 Jan 2001 16:01:08 -0500
• Marian Jancar
  • Strange QoS problem Wed, 17 Jan 2001 21:02:42 +0100
  • CBQ clases Wed, 17 Jan 2001 12:32:14 +0100
• Mark Hahn
  • Re: multi-queue scheduler update Thu, 18 Jan 2001 20:00:16 -0500 (EST)
• Mark Hemment
  • Re: 4G SGI quad Xeon - memory-related slowdowns Tue, 16 Jan 2001 20:14:20 +0000 (GMT)
• Mark Orr
  • Re: 2.4.0-ac9 works, but slower and swappier Mon, 15 Jan 2001 07:02:11 -0600 (CST)
  • 2.4.0-ac9 works, but slower and swappier Sun, 14 Jan 2001 18:39:53 -0600 (CST)
• Markus Berndt
  • oops report (2.4.1-pre7) Wed, 17 Jan 2001 20:07:17 -0700
• Markus Schlup
  • ServerWorks IDE in 2.4.0-ac4 Wed, 17 Jan 2001 09:05:18 +0100
• Martin Braun
  • linux-2.4.1-pre3 CONFIG_HIGHMEM4G compile error Mon, 15 Jan 2001 12:46:01 +0100
• Martin Hicks
  • pppoe in 2.4.0 18 Jan 2001 21:45:26 -0500
• Martin Maciaszek
  • 2.4.0 and grub (0.5.96.1) Tue, 16 Jan 2001 12:54:49 +0100
  • vmware 2.0.3, kernel 2.4.0 and a cdrom Sun, 14 Jan 2001 20:49:48 +0100
• Martin MaD Douda
  • Re: PROBLEM: select() on TCP socket sleeps for 1 tick even if data Sat, 20 Jan 2001 13:26:08 +0100 (CET)
• Martin Mares
  • Re: [PATCH] PCI-Devices and ServerWorks chipset Wed, 17 Jan 2001 09:52:21 +0100
• Martin Tessun
  • Re: vmware 2.0.3, kernel 2.4.0 and a cdrom Sun, 14 Jan 2001 21:29:56 +0100
• Matt Kemner
  • Re: Overriding BIOS settings with kernel 2.4.0 Thu, 18 Jan 2001 11:23:32 +0800 (WST)
• Matt_Domsch@Dell.com
  • RE: 2.4.0 oops bdflush Sat, 13 Jan 2001 20:31:11 -0600
• Matthew D. Pitts
  • Re: Linux not adhering to BIOS Drive boot order? Tue, 16 Jan 2001 14:18:25 -0500
• Matthew Fredrickson
  • Re: VIA chipset discussion Fri, 19 Jan 2001 15:54:35 -0600
  • Re: VIA chipset discussion Thu, 18 Jan 2001 12:13:56 -0600
  • PROBLEM: PS/2 Mouse && Asus A7V Mobo && X 4.0.x (and 3.3.x) Sun, 14 Jan 2001 21:59:53 -0600
• Matthew G. Marsh
  • Re: kernel 2.4, iproute2 and routing rules that refuse to match Sat, 20 Jan 2001 10:24:15 -0600 (CST)
• Matthew Wilcox
  • super_operations in -pre7 Tue, 16 Jan 2001 22:13:57 +0000
• Matthias Andree
  • Re: Linux not adhering to BIOS Drive boot order? Tue, 16 Jan 2001 17:40:56 +0100
  • Re: *Very* weird behavior from 2.2.14 Mon, 15 Jan 2001 11:18:22 +0100
  • Re: ide.2.4.1-p3.01112001.patch Mon, 15 Jan 2001 11:15:16 +0100
• Matthias Schniedermeyer
  • Re: Mainboard with Serverworks HE Chipset Sat, 20 Jan 2001 12:26:37 +0100
  • Re: Mainboard with Serverworks HE Chipset Wed, 17 Jan 2001 22:49:37 +0100
  • Mainboard with Serverworks HE Chipset Wed, 17 Jan 2001 00:33:09 +0100 (MET)
• Matti Aarnio
  • Re: Linux not adhering to BIOS Drive boot order? Thu, 18 Jan 2001 22:53:16 +0200
  • Re: Linux not adhering to BIOS Drive boot order? Wed, 17 Jan 2001 22:32:06 +0200
  • Re: detecting bounced mails Wed, 17 Jan 2001 13:10:16 +0200
  • Re: Mainboard with Serverworks HE Chipset Wed, 17 Jan 2001 10:14:50 +0200
  • Re: MTRR type AMD Duron/intel ? Mon, 15 Jan 2001 22:01:25 +0200
  • Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? Mon, 15 Jan 2001 17:36:07 +0200
• MEHTA,HIREN
  • RE: Problems in 2.4 kernel Wed, 17 Jan 2001 12:49:58 -0500
• Micah Gorrell
  • Hi memory support in 2.4 not working correctly. Wed, 17 Jan 2001 10:51:25 -0700
• Michael D. Crawford
  • Where to get reiserfs-utils? Wed, 17 Jan 2001 02:52:50 +0000
  • Re: Can't compile shmem.c in 2.4.0-ac9 Wed, 17 Jan 2001 00:33:09 +0000
  • Can't compile shmem.c in 2.4.0-ac9 Tue, 16 Jan 2001 23:07:48 +0000
  • Doc bug? Is Sangoma S514 PCI WAN card supported? Tue, 16 Jan 2001 03:29:23 +0000
  • Article: Using test suites to test the new kernel Mon, 15 Jan 2001 00:43:27 +0000
• Michael J. Declerck
  • *** ANNOUNCEMENT *** LVM 0.9.1 beta2 available at www.sistina.com Thu, 18 Jan 2001 12:43:35 -0800
• Michael Lindner
  • Re: PROBLEM: select() on TCP socket sleeps for 1 tick even if data Sat, 20 Jan 2001 12:26:41 -0500
  • Re: PROBLEM: select() on TCP socket sleeps for 1 tick even if data Sat, 20 Jan 2001 02:46:28 -0500
  • Re: PROBLEM: select() on TCP socket sleeps for 1 tick even if data Fri, 19 Jan 2001 23:37:22 -0500
  • Re: PROBLEM: select() on TCP socket sleeps for 1 tick even if data Fri, 19 Jan 2001 21:30:45 -0500
  • PROBLEM: select() on TCP socket sleeps for 1 tick even if data available Fri, 19 Jan 2001 15:47:12 -0500
• Michael Meissner
  • Re: Linux not adhering to BIOS Drive boot order? Wed, 17 Jan 2001 12:22:34 -0500
  • Re: Linux not adhering to BIOS Drive boot order? Tue, 16 Jan 2001 19:42:10 -0500
  • Re: Linux not adhering to BIOS Drive boot order? Tue, 16 Jan 2001 16:23:15 -0500
  • Re: Linux not adhering to BIOS Drive boot order? Tue, 16 Jan 2001 15:37:57 -0500
• Michael Palme
  • krnl newbie: problems with EXPORT_SYMBOL() Wed, 17 Jan 2001 19:18:40 +0100 (MET)
• Michael Peddemors
  • Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? Sun, 14 Jan 2001 19:43:34 -0800
• Michael Rothwell
  • 2.2.18 and mkraid Fri, 19 Jan 2001 17:18:01 -0500
  • Re: named streams, extended attributes, and posix Fri, 19 Jan 2001 11:13:37 -0500
  • Re: named streams, extended attributes, and posix Fri, 19 Jan 2001 11:04:41 -0500
  • Re: named streams, extended attributes, and posix Fri, 19 Jan 2001 10:44:57 -0500
  • Re: named streams, extended attributes, and posix Fri, 19 Jan 2001 09:39:12 -0500
  • (no subject) Fri, 19 Jan 2001 09:33:40 -0500
  • Re: named streams, extended attributes, and posix Tue, 16 Jan 2001 20:40:27 -0800
• Mikael Pettersson
  • Re: [PATCH] enable K7 nmi watchdog Mon, 15 Jan 2001 21:26:45 +0100 (MET)
• Mike A. Harris
  • Re: Incorrect module init message.. Fri, 19 Jan 2001 17:46:07 -0500 (EST)
  • more via-rhine problems. Thu, 18 Jan 2001 14:16:56 -0500 (EST)
  • Re: eth1: Transmit timed out, status 0000, PHY status 0000 (fwd) Wed, 17 Jan 2001 18:25:12 -0500 (EST)
  • Incorrect module init message.. Wed, 17 Jan 2001 04:09:15 -0500 (EST)
  • Re: 2.0.37 crashes immediately Tue, 16 Jan 2001 23:08:24 -0500 (EST)
  • Re: eth1: Transmit timed out, status 0000, PHY status 0000 Tue, 16 Jan 2001 21:04:42 -0500 (EST)
  • Re: eth1: Transmit timed out, status 0000, PHY status 0000 Sun, 14 Jan 2001 16:04:31 -0500 (EST)
  • eth1: Transmit timed out, status 0000, PHY status 0000 Sun, 14 Jan 2001 01:31:03 -0500 (EST)
  • Re: [PROBLEM]: Strange network problems with 2.4.0 and 3c59x.o Sat, 13 Jan 2001 20:03:25 -0500 (EST)
• Mike Castle
  • Re: Documenting stat(2) Thu, 18 Jan 2001 17:00:23 -0800
• Mike Dresser
  • Re: PROBLEM: 128M memory OK, but with 192M sound card es1391 trouble Thu, 18 Jan 2001 09:40:56 -0500
• Mike Galbraith
  • Re: PROBLEM: 128M memory OK, but with 192M sound card es1391 trouble Thu, 18 Jan 2001 19:14:44 +0100 (CET)
  • Re: mmap()/VM problems in 2.4.0 Tue, 16 Jan 2001 08:06:58 +0100 (CET)
  • Re: mmap()/VM problems in 2.4.0 Mon, 15 Jan 2001 21:49:16 +0100 (CET)
  • Re: Loopback almost-freeze? Mon, 15 Jan 2001 07:40:51 +0100 (CET)
• Mike Glover
  • block size for quotas? Fri, 19 Jan 2001 02:02:43 -0800
• Mike Kravetz
  • Re: multi-queue scheduler update Fri, 19 Jan 2001 15:35:21 -0800
  • Re: [Lse-tech] Re: multi-queue scheduler update Fri, 19 Jan 2001 14:18:44 -0800
  • Re: [Lse-tech] Re: multi-queue scheduler update Fri, 19 Jan 2001 12:49:21 -0800
  • Re: [Lse-tech] Re: multi-queue scheduler update Fri, 19 Jan 2001 12:32:30 -0800
  • Re: [Lse-tech] Re: multi-queue scheduler update Fri, 19 Jan 2001 09:11:04 -0800
  • Re: [Lse-tech] Re: multi-queue scheduler update Thu, 18 Jan 2001 17:34:35 -0800
  • Re: multi-queue scheduler update Thu, 18 Jan 2001 17:23:44 -0800
  • Re: [Lse-tech] Re: multi-queue scheduler update Thu, 18 Jan 2001 16:52:25 -0800
  • multi-queue scheduler update Thu, 18 Jan 2001 15:53:11 -0800
• Mike Porter
  • RE: Linux not adhering to BIOS Drive boot order? Wed, 17 Jan 2001 10:33:06 -0500 (EST)
• Miles Lane
  • Is anyone working on kernel support for IEEE-1355? -- http://www.1355.org/ Mon, 15 Jan 2001 17:01:25 -0800
• Mitchell Blank Jr
  • Re: O_ANY [was: Re: 'native files', 'object fingerprints' [was: sendpath()]] Tue, 16 Jan 2001 05:00:04 -0800
• mkloppstech@freenet.de
  • oops, signal 11 Sat, 20 Jan 2001 13:46:50 +0100 (CET)
  • oops, continued Sat, 20 Jan 2001 14:47:18 +0100 (CET)
  • Re: matroxfb Sat, 20 Jan 2001 01:20:48 +0100 (CET)
  • oops Fri, 19 Jan 2001 19:00:31 +0100 (CET)
• Mo McKinlay
  • Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? Sat, 20 Jan 2001 21:10:33 +0000 (UTC)
  • Re: named streams, extended attributes, and posix Fri, 19 Jan 2001 16:33:51 +0000 (UTC)
  • Re: named streams, extended attributes, and posix Fri, 19 Jan 2001 16:07:47 +0000 (UTC)
  • Re: named streams, extended attributes, and posix Fri, 19 Jan 2001 15:49:00 +0000 (UTC)
  • Re: named streams, extended attributes, and posix Fri, 19 Jan 2001 15:20:44 +0000 (UTC)
  • Re: named streams, extended attributes, and posix Fri, 19 Jan 2001 14:59:45 +0000 (UTC)
  • Re: named streams, extended attributes, and posix Thu, 18 Jan 2001 21:30:10 +0000 (UTC)
  • Re: named streams, extended attributes, and posix Wed, 17 Jan 2001 00:37:49 +0000 (UTC)
• Mogens Kjaer
  • Re: nfs client problem in kernel 2.4.0 Thu, 18 Jan 2001 17:52:21 +0100
  • Re: nfs client problem in kernel 2.4.0 Thu, 18 Jan 2001 13:32:08 +0100
  • Re: nfs client problem in kernel 2.4.0 Wed, 17 Jan 2001 07:53:16 +0100
  • nfs client problem in kernel 2.4.0 Tue, 16 Jan 2001 16:21:07 +0100
• Nathan Hand
  • [PATCH] ewrk3 update for 2.4 Wed, 17 Jan 2001 21:40:47 +1100
• Nathan Thompson
  • Re: Problem: Blank screen in X after heavy disk access (2.4 only) Tue, 16 Jan 2001 16:43:29 -0500
• Neil Brown
  • Re: 2.4.1-pre7 raid5syncd oops Wed, 17 Jan 2001 14:21:51 +1100 (EST)
  • Re: FS corruption on 2.4.0-ac8 Tue, 16 Jan 2001 12:00:57 +1100 (EST)
• Nenad Corbic
  • Re: Doc bug? Is Sangoma S514 PCI WAN card supported? Tue, 16 Jan 2001 10:59:31 -0500
• Nick Urbanik
  • Re: rsync + ssh fail on raid; okay on 2.2.x Sat, 20 Jan 2001 19:48:59 +0800
  • Re: rsync + ssh fail on raid; okay on 2.2.x Fri, 19 Jan 2001 07:32:10 +0800
  • rsync + ssh fail on raid; okay on 2.2.x Thu, 18 Jan 2001 23:02:08 +0800
• Nigel Gamble
  • Re: Latency: allowing resheduling while holding spin_locks Sat, 13 Jan 2001 13:56:18 -0800 (PST)
• Nils Rennebarth
  • Re: More filesystem corruption under 2.4.1-pre8 and SW Raid5 Fri, 19 Jan 2001 13:02:16 +0100
• octave klaba
  • oops 2.2.18 Tue, 16 Jan 2001 21:29:23 +0100
• Olaf Hering
  • up_read/up_write redefinitions in asm/semaphore.h and linux/usbdevice_fs.h Tue, 16 Jan 2001 04:45:04 +0100
• Oliver Teuber
  • PROBLEM: 2.4.0/smp damaged my filesystems (raid-ext2/ext2) Wed, 17 Jan 2001 21:47:42 +0100
• Olivier Galibert
  • Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)]] Thu, 18 Jan 2001 19:27:58 -0500
  • Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? Wed, 17 Jan 2001 21:34:59 -0500
• Otto Meier
  • Serious file system corruption with RAID5+SMP and kernels above 2.4.0 Sat, 20 Jan 2001 17:23:27 +0100
• Padraig Brady
  • Re: Documenting stat(2) Thu, 18 Jan 2001 11:53:32 +0000
  • Re: Relative CPU time limit Wed, 17 Jan 2001 19:09:22 +0000
• paradox3
  • *Very* weird behavior from 2.2.14 Mon, 15 Jan 2001 02:37:28 -0500
• Patrick
  • Re: Kernel oops in tcp_ipv4.c Sun, 14 Jan 2001 20:05:05 +0000
  • Re: Kernel oops in tcp_ipv4.c Sun, 14 Jan 2001 13:23:32 +0000
• Patrick Caulfield
  • Re: [linux-lvm] Re: *** ANNOUNCEMENT *** LVM 0.9.1 beta1 available at www.sistina.com Tue, 16 Jan 2001 08:51:18 +0000
• Patrik Hagglund
  • SCHED_FIFO/SCHED_RR in 2.4 vs 2.2 Wed, 17 Jan 2001 15:21:31 +0100
• Paul Bristow
  • PCMCIA problem loading ide-floppy from ide_cs Wed, 17 Jan 2001 22:37:23 +0100
  • [PATCH] ide-floppy ATAPI format capability (official) Mon, 15 Jan 2001 00:12:37 +0100
  • [PATCH] ide-floppy in 2.4.0 catches up to 2.2.18 Mon, 15 Jan 2001 00:02:38 +0100
  • ide-floppy [Fwd: Updated ATAPI FORMAT_UNIT patch.] Sat, 13 Jan 2001 23:43:18 +0100
• Paul Flinders
  • Re: ide.2.4.1-p3.01112001.patch Mon, 15 Jan 2001 10:29:18 GMT
• Paul Hubbard
  • Re: 4G SGI quad Xeon -memory-related slowdowns Wed, 17 Jan 2001 12:19:16 -0600
  • 4G SGI quad Xeon - memory-related slowdowns Mon, 15 Jan 2001 14:59:27 -0600
• Paul Mackerras
  • Re: [PATCH] fix for ppp_async lockup in 2.4.0 Mon, 15 Jan 2001 17:56:37 +1100 (EST)
  • [PATCH] fix for ppp_async lockup in 2.4.0 Mon, 15 Jan 2001 17:54:58 +1100 (EST)
• Pavel Machek
  • Re: 'native files', 'object fingerprints' [was: sendpath()] Sat, 1 Jan 2000 02:02:20 +0000
  • Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? Sat, 1 Jan 2000 02:10:33 +0000
  • Re: Incorrect module init message.. Sat, 1 Jan 2000 05:06:12 +0000
  • Re: HP Pavilion 8290 HANGS on boot 2.4/2.4-test9 Tue, 16 Jan 2001 12:18:45 +0100
  • Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? Tue, 16 Jan 2001 15:41:16 +0100
  • Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? Tue, 16 Jan 2001 00:16:33 +0100
• Pete Toscano
  • Re: VIA chipset discussion Wed, 17 Jan 2001 17:40:06 -0500
• Peter Horton
  • Re: Via apollo KX133 ide bug in 2.4.x Sat, 20 Jan 2001 20:56:08 +0000
  • Re: Via apollo KX133 ide bug in 2.4.x Thu, 20 Jan 2000 08:38:12 +0000
  • 2.4.1-pre8 and Athlon Wed, 17 Jan 2001 11:42:11 +0000
• Peter Samuelson
  • Re: Linux not adhering to BIOS Drive boot order? Thu, 18 Jan 2001 12:14:39 -0600 (CST)
  • Re: Linux not adhering to BIOS Drive boot order? Thu, 18 Jan 2001 06:50:12 -0600
  • Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? Thu, 18 Jan 2001 06:17:37 -0600
  • Re: named streams, extended attributes, and posix Wed, 17 Jan 2001 19:03:50 -0600 (CST)
  • Re: .br blacklisted ? Wed, 17 Jan 2001 02:37:16 -0600
  • Re: Linux not adhering to BIOS Drive boot order? Tue, 16 Jan 2001 20:14:01 -0600
  • Re: named streams, extended attributes, and posix Tue, 16 Jan 2001 20:05:05 -0600 (CST)
  • Re: named streams, extended attributes, and posix Tue, 16 Jan 2001 18:28:06 -0600
  • Re: Linux not adhering to BIOS Drive boot order? Tue, 16 Jan 2001 16:51:54 -0600
  • Re: O_ANY [was: Re: 'native files', 'object fingerprints' [was: sendpath()]] Tue, 16 Jan 2001 06:13:42 -0600
  • Re: modules, insmod and multiple object files Tue, 16 Jan 2001 06:04:49 -0600
  • Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? Tue, 16 Jan 2001 05:56:48 -0600
• Petr Matula
  • Re: int. assignment on SMP + ServerWorks chipset Thu, 18 Jan 2001 09:58:10 +0100
  • Re: int. assignment on SMP + ServerWorks chipset Thu, 18 Jan 2001 08:43:40 +0100
  • Re: int. assignment on SMP + ServerWorks chipset Wed, 17 Jan 2001 18:53:12 +0100
  • Re: int. assignment on SMP + ServerWorks chipset Wed, 17 Jan 2001 18:50:47 +0100
• Petr Vandrovec
  • Re: matroxfb Fri, 19 Jan 2001 20:35:58 MET-1
  • Re: VIA chipset discussion Thu, 18 Jan 2001 10:18:50 MET-1
  • Re: oops in 2.4.1-pre8 Thu, 18 Jan 2001 10:06:36 MET-1
  • Re: [linux-fbdev] Re: console spin_lock Wed, 17 Jan 2001 18:02:21 MET-1
  • Re: Killing process with SIGKILL and ncpfs Wed, 17 Jan 2001 17:07:08 MET-1
  • Killing process with SIGKILL and ncpfs Wed, 17 Jan 2001 13:07:29 MET-1
  • Re: G400 behavior different, 2.2.18->2.4.0 Tue, 16 Jan 2001 23:27:02 MET-1
  • Re: G400 behavior different, 2.2.18->2.4.0 (was: matroxfb o Tue, 16 Jan 2001 22:40:51 MET-1
  • Re: Oops with 4GB memory setting in 2.4.0 stable Tue, 16 Jan 2001 22:29:30 MET-1
  • Re: matroxfb on 2.4.0 / PCI: Failed to allocate... Tue, 16 Jan 2001 19:31:33 MET-1
  • Re: matroxfb on 2.4.0 / PCI: Failed to allocate... Tue, 16 Jan 2001 17:56:34 MET-1
  • Re: Oops with 4GB memory setting in 2.4.0 stable Tue, 16 Jan 2001 13:33:46 MET-1
  • Re: QUESTION: Network hangs with BP6 and 2.4.x kernels, har Mon, 15 Jan 2001 18:45:06 MET-1
  • Re: [PATCH] enable K7 nmi watchdog Mon, 15 Jan 2001 04:00:29 +0100
• Petru Paler
  • Re: 2.4.0-pre3+zerocopy: weird messages Sun, 14 Jan 2001 20:08:09 +0200
  • Re: 2.4.0-pre3+zerocopy: weird messages Sun, 14 Jan 2001 15:12:57 +0200
  • Re: 2.4.0-pre3+zerocopy: weird messages Sun, 14 Jan 2001 14:10:03 +0200
  • Re: 2.4.0-pre3+zerocopy: weird messages Sun, 14 Jan 2001 13:28:45 +0200
  • Re: 2.4.0-pre3+zerocopy: weird messages Sun, 14 Jan 2001 12:45:49 +0200
  • 2.4.0-pre3+zerocopy: weird messages Sun, 14 Jan 2001 12:11:05 +0200
  • Re: [PATCH] sparc64 compile fix Sun, 14 Jan 2001 11:32:27 +0200
• Pierre Rousselet
  • Re: 2.4.0-x features ? Tue, 16 Jan 2001 23:18:57 +0100
  • Re: 2.4.0-x features ? Tue, 16 Jan 2001 23:18:57 +0100
  • Re: 2.4.0-x features ? Tue, 16 Jan 2001 22:50:43 +0100
  • 2.4.0-x features ? Mon, 15 Jan 2001 06:19:44 +0100
  • 2.4.0-ac9 Pentium-III not stable Sun, 14 Jan 2001 09:36:35 +0100
• Pine.HPX.4.10.10101171041430.18039-100000@stud3.tuwien.ac.at
  • Pine.HPX.4.10.10101171041430.18039-100000@stud3.tuwien.ac.at Pine.HPX.4.10.10101171041430.18039-100000@stud3.tuwien.ac.at
• Ragnar Hojland Espinosa
  • Re: Warnings on compiling 2.4.1-pre8 Sat, 20 Jan 2001 15:22:29 +0100
• Rainer Mager
  • RE: Oops with 4GB memory setting in 2.4.0 stable Thu, 18 Jan 2001 08:59:01 +0900
  • RE: Oops with 4GB memory setting in 2.4.0 stable Wed, 17 Jan 2001 07:42:13 +0900
  • RE: Oops with 4GB memory setting in 2.4.0 stable Tue, 16 Jan 2001 09:21:39 +0900
  • RE: Oops with 4GB memory setting in 2.4.0 stable Tue, 16 Jan 2001 08:45:25 +0900
  • Oops with 4GB memory setting in 2.4.0 stable Tue, 16 Jan 2001 08:31:22 +0900
• Rajiv Majumdar
  • detecting bounced mails Wed, 17 Jan 2001 16:33:08 +0530
• Ralf Baechle
  • Re: Caches, page coloring, virtual indexed caches, and more Tue, 16 Jan 2001 02:58:48 -0200
  • Re: Caches, page coloring, virtual indexed caches, and more Mon, 15 Jan 2001 15:41:24 -0200
  • Re: Caches, page coloring, virtual indexed caches, and more Mon, 15 Jan 2001 09:54:32 -0200
  • Re: Subtle MM bug Mon, 15 Jan 2001 00:56:10 -0200
  • Re: Subtle MM bug Mon, 15 Jan 2001 00:53:15 -0200
• Rasmus Andersen
  • [PATCH] make drivers/scsi/sgiwd93.c check some more return codes (240p3) Wed, 17 Jan 2001 23:26:53 +0100
  • [PATCH] make drivers/scsi/mvme147.c care about (some) return codes (240p3) Wed, 17 Jan 2001 23:23:20 +0100
  • [PATCH] make drivers/scsi/dec_esp.c check request_irq return code (240p3) Wed, 17 Jan 2001 23:18:52 +0100
  • [PATCH] make drivers/scsi/blz1230.c check request_irq return (240p3) Wed, 17 Jan 2001 23:13:53 +0100
  • Re: [PATCH] make drivers/scsi/atari_scsi.c check request_irq (240p3) Tue, 16 Jan 2001 21:57:24 +0100
  • Re: [PATCH] make drivers/scsi/atari_scsi.c check request_irq (240p3) Sun, 14 Jan 2001 22:45:31 +0100
  • Re: [PATCH] make drivers/scsi/a3000.c check request_irq (240p3) Sun, 14 Jan 2001 21:00:55 +0100
  • Re: [PATCH] make drivers/scsi/atari_scsi.c check request_irq (240p3) Sun, 14 Jan 2001 20:35:09 +0100
  • [PATCH] make drivers/scsi/atari_scsi.c check request_irq (240p3) Sun, 14 Jan 2001 19:53:23 +0100
  • [PATCH] make drivers/scsi/a3000.c check request_irq (240p3) Sun, 14 Jan 2001 19:49:35 +0100
  • [PATCH] limit mmap_cache nulling (2.2.19-7) Sun, 14 Jan 2001 14:16:55 +0100
  • [PATCH] drivers/net/yellowfin.c zero initialization cleanup (2.4.0p3) Sun, 14 Jan 2001 13:16:09 +0100
• Richard B. Johnson
  • Linux 2.0.4 has FS corruption (not IDE) Wed, 17 Jan 2001 15:39:23 -0500 (EST)
  • Re: lance.c @ 100Mbit Tue, 16 Jan 2001 17:49:01 -0500 (EST)
  • Update on RTS/CTS serial problem with 2.4.0 Tue, 16 Jan 2001 15:23:19 -0500 (EST)
  • Re: Slot Number Question Mon, 15 Jan 2001 20:15:23 -0500 (EST)
  • Re: Slot Number Question Mon, 15 Jan 2001 15:22:58 -0500 (EST)
  • Turn OFF flow-control on a serial link?? Mon, 15 Jan 2001 09:18:38 -0500 (EST)
• Richard Torkar
  • Re: Problems in 2.4 kernel Wed, 17 Jan 2001 10:20:14 +0100 (CET)
• richard.morgan9
  • Re: eth1: Transmit timed out, status 0000, PHY status 0000 Tue, 16 Jan 2001 22:40:24 -0000
• Rick Jones
  • Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)]] Fri, 19 Jan 2001 13:20:59 -0800
  • Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)]] Fri, 19 Jan 2001 11:07:56 -0800
  • Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)]] Thu, 18 Jan 2001 16:59:26 -0800
  • Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)]] Thu, 18 Jan 2001 14:49:05 -0800
  • Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? Thu, 18 Jan 2001 11:51:41 -0800
  • Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)]] Thu, 18 Jan 2001 10:29:04 -0800
  • Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)]] Thu, 18 Jan 2001 10:24:48 -0800
  • Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)]] Thu, 18 Jan 2001 10:20:16 -0800
  • Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)]] Wed, 17 Jan 2001 14:17:36 -0800
  • Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)]] Wed, 17 Jan 2001 12:57:42 -0800
  • Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)]] Wed, 17 Jan 2001 12:03:03 -0800
  • [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)] Tue, 16 Jan 2001 15:13:06 -0800
• Rick Richardson
  • kmalloc() of 4MB causes "kernel BUG at slab.c:1542!" Wed, 17 Jan 2001 13:54:20 -0600
• Rik van Riel
  • Re: [RFC] generic IO write clustering Sat, 20 Jan 2001 13:58:38 +1100 (EST)
  • Re: Subtle MM bug Thu, 18 Jan 2001 22:48:26 +1100 (EST)
  • Re: Subtle MM bug Thu, 18 Jan 2001 12:32:01 +1100 (EST)
  • Re: Relative CPU time limit Thu, 18 Jan 2001 12:29:52 +1100 (EST)
  • Re: What happened to your kernel changelogs? Thu, 18 Jan 2001 12:26:02 +1100 (EST)
  • Re: Subtle MM bug Wed, 17 Jan 2001 19:46:44 +1100 (EST)
  • Re: VM subsystem bug in 2.4.0 ? Wed, 17 Jan 2001 19:33:23 +1100 (EST)
  • Re: Subtle MM bug Thu, 18 Jan 2001 01:26:04 +1100 (EST)
  • Re: Subtle MM bug Thu, 18 Jan 2001 01:28:13 +1100 (EST)
  • Re: [PLEASE-TESTME] Zerocopy networking patch, 2.4.0-1 Thu, 18 Jan 2001 01:05:43 +1100 (EST)
  • Re: mmap()/VM problem in 2.4.0 Thu, 18 Jan 2001 08:15:50 +1100 (EST)
  • Re: .br blacklisted ? Wed, 17 Jan 2001 16:36:21 +1100 (EST)
  • Re: [PLEASE-TESTME] Zerocopy networking patch, 2.4.0-1 Wed, 17 Jan 2001 16:16:35 +1100 (EST)
  • Re: 2.4.0-vmbigpatch compile problem Wed, 17 Jan 2001 15:59:38 +1100 (EST)
  • Re: Subtle MM bug Wed, 17 Jan 2001 15:48:39 +1100 (EST)
• Rob Landley
  • Re: qlogicfc.c hard lockups in 2.4.0 - solved? Wed, 17 Jan 2001 05:04:15 -0800 (PST)
  • Re: qlogicfc.c hard lockups in 2.4.0 Wed, 17 Jan 2001 03:17:27 -0800 (PST)
  • qlogicfc.c hard lockups in 2.4.0 Tue, 16 Jan 2001 08:15:22 -0800 (PST)
• Robert Kaiser
  • Re: 2.4 on Cobalt hardware Fri, 19 Jan 2001 17:20:00 +0100
  • (no subject) Fri, 19 Jan 2001 14:37:02 +0100
  • [SOLVED + PATCH] Re: Anybody got 2.4.0 running on a 386 ? Mon, 15 Jan 2001 19:38:05 +0100
• Robert Reither
  • Problems with bigblock support of fat Mon, 15 Jan 2001 20:06:35 +0100 (MET)
• Rodney M. Jokerst
  • Re: Problem: Blank screen in X after heavy disk access (2.4 only) Tue, 16 Jan 2001 16:01:20 -0600 (CST)
  • Problem: Blank screen in X after heavy disk access (2.4 only) Tue, 16 Jan 2001 15:11:01 -0600 (CST)
• Roeland Th. Jansen
  • Re: .br blacklisted ? Wed, 17 Jan 2001 09:06:10 +0000
  • Re: QUESTION: Network hangs with BP6 and 2.4.x kernels, har Mon, 15 Jan 2001 18:42:33 +0000
  • Re: QUESTION: Network hangs with BP6 and 2.4.x kernels, hardware Mon, 15 Jan 2001 14:36:15 +0000
  • Re: QUESTION: Network hangs with BP6 and 2.4.x kernels, hardware related? Sun, 14 Jan 2001 00:13:58 +0000
• Roger Larsson
  • Re: Latency: allowing resheduling while holding spin_locks Mon, 15 Jan 2001 23:02:00 +0100
  • Re: [Marcel Weber <mmweber@ncpro.com>] re:Adaptec AIC7xxx version 6.08BETA release Mon, 15 Jan 2001 22:34:38 +0100
• roger@kea.grace.cri.nz
  • Re: [OT]: Linux v.2.4.0 and Netscape 4.76? Wed, 17 Jan 2001 14:22:05 -0500 (EST)
  • Re: Linux v.2.4.0 and Netscape 4.76? Wed, 17 Jan 2001 14:00:57 -0500 (EST)
  • Linux v.2.4.0 and Netscape 4.76? Wed, 17 Jan 2001 06:36:56 -0500 (EST)
• Rogerio Brito
  • Re: VIA chipset discussion Fri, 19 Jan 2001 04:42:13 -0200
  • Re: VIA chipset discussion Thu, 18 Jan 2001 02:04:08 -0200
• Rogier Wolff
  • Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? Fri, 19 Jan 2001 18:23:06 +0100 (MET)
  • Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd) Fri, 19 Jan 2001 11:58:03 +0100 (MET)
  • Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? Thu, 18 Jan 2001 09:23:15 +0100 (MET)
• Roman Zippel
  • Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? Sat, 20 Jan 2001 22:20:57 +0100 (MET)
  • Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? Fri, 19 Jan 2001 11:13:35 +0100 (MET)
  • Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? Fri, 19 Jan 2001 01:18:01 +0100 (MET)
  • Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? Thu, 18 Jan 2001 19:58:11 +0100 (MET)
  • Re: console spin_lock Wed, 17 Jan 2001 19:22:36 +0100 (MET)
• Ronny Buchmann
  • Re: bug (isdn-subsystem?) in 2.4.0 Tue, 16 Jan 2001 20:49:43 +0100
  • bug (isdn-subsystem?) in 2.4.0 Mon, 15 Jan 2001 19:51:09 +0100
• root
  • PROBLEM: 2.4.1-pre7 hard freeze Tue, 16 Jan 2001 20:47:16 +0100
• rtviado
  • ip_conntrack: maximum limit of 16368 entries exceeded Tue, 16 Jan 2001 14:48:40 +0800 (PHT)
• Russell King
  • Re: Inefficient PCI DMA usage (was: [experimental patch] UHCI updates) Sat, 20 Jan 2001 08:28:20 +0000 (GMT)
  • Re: console spin_lock Thu, 18 Jan 2001 21:50:15 +0000 (GMT)
  • Re: Linux not adhering to BIOS Drive boot order? Wed, 17 Jan 2001 23:19:23 +0000 (GMT)
• Russell Leighton
  • Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? Thu, 18 Jan 2001 06:04:17 -0500
• Rusty Russell
  • Re: ip_conntrack: maximum limit of 16368 entries exceeded Wed, 17 Jan 2001 13:13:28 +1100
  • Re: Unresolved symbols Sun, 14 Jan 2001 23:34:28 +1100
• safemode
  • Re: Via apollo KX133 ide bug in 2.4.x Sat, 20 Jan 2001 16:32:36 -0500
  • Via apollo KX133 ide bug in 2.4.x Fri, 19 Jan 2001 19:33:21 -0500
• Sajeev
  • Problems in 2.4 kernel Wed, 17 Jan 2001 14:42:18 +0530
• Salvador Ortiz Garcia
  • 2.4.0 - lseek on /proc broken? [with patch] Tue, 16 Jan 2001 00:53:47 -0600 (EST)
• Sam Varshavchik
  • Re: [PATCH] ide-floppy ATAPI format capability (official) Sun, 14 Jan 2001 19:18:35 -0500 (EST)
• sawa
  • Problems of at1700.c Sun, 14 Jan 2001 20:19:40 +0900
• Scott A. Sibert
  • Re: NMI Watchdog detected LOCKUP on CPU0 Thu, 18 Jan 2001 12:38:56 -0500
  • NMI Watchdog detected LOCKUP on CPU0 Thu, 18 Jan 2001 11:20:16 -0500
  • Re: oops in 2.4.1-pre8 Thu, 18 Jan 2001 11:02:52 -0500
  • oops in 2.4.1-pre8 Wed, 17 Jan 2001 16:47:58 -0500
• Shane Shrybman
  • Re: Problem: Blank screen in X after heavy disk access (2.4 only) Tue, 16 Jan 2001 22:27:14 -0500 (EST)
• Shawn Starr
  • Re: Kernel 2.4.x and 2.4.1-preX - Higher latency then 2.2.x kernels? Sat, 20 Jan 2001 15:16:32 -0500
  • Kernel 2.4.x and 2.4.1-preX - Higher latency then 2.2.x kernels? Sat, 20 Jan 2001 14:50:16 -0500
  • Re: [BUG]: 2.4.1-pre8: Wierd lockup with /proc based functions (?) Fri, 19 Jan 2001 17:31:47 -0500
  • [BUG]: 2.4.1-pre8: Wierd lockup with /proc based functions (?) Fri, 19 Jan 2001 02:34:31 -0500
  • Re: [DISCUSSION]: 2.4.1-pre8: Detection of CD-ROM/CD-R/CD-RW drives Part Wed, 17 Jan 2001 17:26:26 -0500
  • [DISCUSSION]: 2.4.1-pre8: Detection of CD-ROM/CD-R/CD-RW drives Wed, 17 Jan 2001 17:22:26 -0500
  • Re: [QUESTION]: Applying patches ontop of patches (2.4.1pre7 Wed, 17 Jan 2001 16:16:32 -0500
  • [QUESTION]: Applying patches ontop of patches (2.4.1pre7 to 2.4.1pre8) Wed, 17 Jan 2001 14:34:50 -0500
  • Re: Compiling 2.4.1-preX series - Confirmed - PGCC sucks Wed, 17 Jan 2001 14:08:42 -0500
  • Re: Compiling 2.4.1-preX series Tue, 16 Jan 2001 21:21:12 -0500
• Simon Huggins
  • Re: eepro cmd_wait Thu, 18 Jan 2001 13:42:50 +0100
• Simon Liu
  • How do I compile a PPPoE client right into the kernel? Sat, 20 Jan 2001 16:44:08 +1100
• snpe
  • Ibcs2 or abi for kernel 2.4 Thu, 18 Jan 2001 00:18:35 +0100
• Stefan Ring
  • Re: PROBLEM: 128M memory OK, but with 192M sound card es1391 trouble Thu, 18 Jan 2001 16:58:30 +0100 (MET)
  • Re: PROBLEM: 128M memory OK, but with 192M sound card es1391 trouble Thu, 18 Jan 2001 11:02:19 +0100 (MET)
  • Re: 2.0.37 crashes immediately Wed, 17 Jan 2001 10:43:13 +0100 (MET)
  • Re: 2.0.37 crashes immediately Wed, 17 Jan 2001 10:00:31 +0100 (MET)
  • 2.0.37 crashes immediately Wed, 17 Jan 2001 00:35:39 +0100 (MET)
• Stephan Henningsen
  • Oops 0000 Tue, 16 Jan 2001 15:46:17 +0100 (CET)
• Stephane Jourdois
  • Re: Where to get reiserfs-utils? Wed, 17 Jan 2001 15:00:23 +0100
• Stephen Clark
  • Re: ide.2.4.1-p3.01112001.patch Mon, 15 Jan 2001 08:06:05 -0500
• Stephen Clouse
  • 2.4.0 oops bdflush Sat, 13 Jan 2001 20:18:03 -0600
• Stephen Frost
  • Re: Updated zerocopy patches on kernel.org Mon, 15 Jan 2001 15:11:16 -0500
• Stephen Kitchener
  • Re: Scanning problems - machine lockups Sat, 20 Jan 2001 15:54:22 +0000
• Steve Hill
  • Re: your mail Fri, 19 Jan 2001 14:37:42 +0000 (GMT)
  • 2.4 on Cobalt hardware Fri, 19 Jan 2001 13:23:12 +0000 (GMT)
• Steve VanDevender
  • Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? Tue, 16 Jan 2001 23:31:32 -0800
• Steven Cole
  • Re: Linux 2.4.0-ac10 build errors Fri, 19 Jan 2001 19:33:21 -0700
  • Re: 2.4.1pre8 slowdown on dbench tests Thu, 18 Jan 2001 15:52:01 -0700
  • Re: 2.4.1pre8 slowdown on dbench tests Thu, 18 Jan 2001 15:52:01 -0700
  • Re: 2.4.1-pre7 build error. Mon, 15 Jan 2001 21:22:11 -0700
  • [PATCH] 2.4.0-ac9 fix for mm/shmem.c build error without CONFIG_SWAPFS enabled Sun, 14 Jan 2001 17:24:18 -0700
  • Re: Linux 2.4.0-ac9 Sat, 13 Jan 2001 20:47:34 -0700
  • Re: Linux 2.4.0-ac9 Sat, 13 Jan 2001 18:40:40 -0700
• Steven Ellmore
  • typo in buffer_busy macro in fs/buffer.c ?? Fri, 19 Jan 2001 01:11:14 +0000
• Steven Walter
  • Weird (apparently FPU-related) bugs in 2.4.0 Sun, 14 Jan 2001 18:08:16 -0600
• Svein Erik Brostigen
  • 2.4.1-pre8, webbrowsers and proxies... Wed, 17 Jan 2001 03:12:33 -0500
• Sven Koch
  • Re: [QUESTION]: Applying patches ontop of patches (2.4.1pre7 to Wed, 17 Jan 2001 21:32:30 +0100 (CET)
  • Re: ip_conntrack: maximum limit of 16368 entries exceeded Tue, 16 Jan 2001 14:44:32 +0100 (CET)
• Szabolcs Szakacsits
  • Re: 2.4.1pre8 slowdown on dbench tests Fri, 19 Jan 2001 07:49:37 +0200 (MET DST)
  • Re: 2.4.1pre8 slowdown on dbench tests Fri, 19 Jan 2001 04:23:25 +0200 (MET DST)
  • Re: 2.4.1pre8 slowdown on dbench tests Thu, 18 Jan 2001 22:18:38 +0200 (MET DST)
• Terrence Martin
  • Re: File System Corruption with 2.2.18 Thu, 18 Jan 2001 10:15:59 -0700
  • Re: File System Corruption with 2.2.18 Wed, 17 Jan 2001 11:53:36 -0700
  • File System Corruption with 2.2.18 Wed, 17 Jan 2001 10:48:50 -0700
• Thomas Dodd
  • Re: need help raid and 2.4.0 Wed, 17 Jan 2001 13:01:44 -0600
• Tigran Aivazian
  • Re: 2.4.0 bug: file /proc/dri 4 times in ls listing Tue, 16 Jan 2001 09:29:32 +0000 (GMT)
  • Re: 2.4.0 bug: file /proc/dri 4 times in ls listing Tue, 16 Jan 2001 09:26:50 +0000 (GMT)
• Tim Fletcher
  • Re: Linux not adhering to BIOS Drive boot order? Thu, 18 Jan 2001 19:49:36 +0000 (GMT)
  • Re: Linux not adhering to BIOS Drive boot order? Thu, 18 Jan 2001 14:03:23 +0000 (GMT)
  • Re: Linux not adhering to BIOS Drive boot order? Thu, 18 Jan 2001 11:35:57 +0000 (GMT)
  • Re: Linux not adhering to BIOS Drive boot order? Thu, 18 Jan 2001 00:59:22 +0000 (GMT)
  • Re: File System Corruption with 2.2.18 Thu, 18 Jan 2001 00:39:31 +0000 (GMT)
  • Re: Linux not adhering to BIOS Drive boot order? Thu, 18 Jan 2001 00:14:42 +0000 (GMT)
  • Re: File System Corruption with 2.2.18 Wed, 17 Jan 2001 23:57:23 +0000 (GMT)
• Tim Hockin
  • Re: int. assignment on SMP + ServerWorks chipset Mon, 15 Jan 2001 23:35:16 -0600 (CST)
  • IDE not fully found (2.4.0) Mon, 15 Jan 2001 20:58:06 -0600 (CST)
• Tim Moore
  • Re: 2.2.18 and mkraid Fri, 19 Jan 2001 15:42:46 -0800
• Tim Walberg
  • Re: ERR in /proc/interrupts Thu, 18 Jan 2001 16:10:00 -0600
• Tim Waugh
  • Re: [QUESTION]: Applying patches ontop of patches (2.4.1pre7 to 2.4.1pre8) Wed, 17 Jan 2001 20:46:42 +0000
  • Re: lp with kernel 2.2.18 Sun, 14 Jan 2001 12:07:59 +0000
• Tim Wright
  • Re: [Lse-tech] Re: multi-queue scheduler update Fri, 19 Jan 2001 09:06:03 -0800
  • Re: Mainboard with Serverworks HE Chipset Thu, 18 Jan 2001 14:50:01 -0800
  • Re: [linux-audio-dev] low-latency scheduling patch for 2.4.0 Mon, 15 Jan 2001 11:46:25 -0800
• TimO
  • Re: ide.2.4.1-p3.01112001.patch Sat, 13 Jan 2001 20:41:00 -0700
• Timur Tabi
  • Re: ERR in /proc/interrupts Thu, 18 Jan 2001 16:41:55 -0600
  • Re: ERR in /proc/interrupts Thu, 18 Jan 2001 16:21:58 -0600
  • Re: kmalloc() of 4MB causes "kernel BUG at slab.c:1542!" Wed, 17 Jan 2001 14:39:57 -0600
  • Re: Linux not adhering to BIOS Drive boot order? Tue, 16 Jan 2001 15:04:01 -0600
  • Re: Linux not adhering to BIOS Drive boot order? Tue, 16 Jan 2001 12:22:56 -0600
• Tobias Ringstrom
  • [OT] Re: rsync + ssh fail on raid; okay on 2.2.x Thu, 18 Jan 2001 15:45:57 +0100 (CET)
  • What happened to your kernel changelogs? Wed, 17 Jan 2001 15:26:35 +0100 (CET)
  • Re: MTRR type AMD Duron/intel ? Mon, 15 Jan 2001 20:01:56 +0100 (CET)
  • Re: MTRR type AMD Duron/intel ? Mon, 15 Jan 2001 19:42:16 +0100 (CET)
  • Re: ide that *does* work well with 2.4.0? Mon, 15 Jan 2001 18:04:00 +0100 (CET)
  • Re: 2.4 ate my filesystem on rw-mount, getting closer Sun, 14 Jan 2001 18:59:57 +0100 (CET)
  • Re: 2.4 ate my filesystem on rw-mount, getting closer Sun, 14 Jan 2001 17:37:29 +0100 (CET)
  • Re: 2.4 ate my filesystem on rw-mount, getting closer Sun, 14 Jan 2001 09:45:09 +0100 (CET)
  • Re: IDE DMA problem in 2.4.0 Sun, 14 Jan 2001 08:44:59 +0100 (CET)
  • Re: 2.4 ate my filesystem on rw-mount, getting closer Sat, 13 Jan 2001 23:36:13 +0100 (CET)
• Todd M. Roy
  • Re: [lvm-devel] Re: lvm 0.9.1-beta1 still segfaults vgexport Mon, 15 Jan 2001 06:23:35 -0500
  • lvm 0.9.1-beta1 still segfaults vgexport Sun, 14 Jan 2001 09:31:29 -0500
• Tom Eastep
  • TOD clock slows on active 2.4 NFS client Wed, 17 Jan 2001 13:01:07 -0800 (PST)
• Tom Leete
  • Re: 2.4.1-pre8 and Athlon Wed, 17 Jan 2001 08:35:59 -0500
• Ton Hospel
  • Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? Wed, 17 Jan 2001 08:09:35 +0000 (UTC)
  • Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? Wed, 17 Jan 2001 06:56:09 +0000 (UTC)
• Tony Gale
  • Re: IP defrag (was RE: ipchains blocking port 65535) Wed, 17 Jan 2001 17:44:30 -0000 (GMT)
  • IP defrag (was RE: ipchains blocking port 65535) Wed, 17 Jan 2001 17:15:54 -0000 (GMT)
  • RE: ipchains blocking port 65535 Wed, 17 Jan 2001 14:50:10 -0000 (GMT)
• Tony Parsons
  • Re: ide.2.4.1-p3.01112001.patch Sun, 14 Jan 2001 03:53 +0000 (GMT)
• Torrey Hoffman
  • RE: Is there a Crystal 4299 sound driver? Fri, 19 Jan 2001 09:47:00 -0800
  • Is there a Crystal 4299 sound driver? Thu, 18 Jan 2001 17:47:55 -0800
• Trever Adams
  • Re: Total loss with 2.4.0 (release) Mon, 15 Jan 2001 21:50:29 GMT
• Trevor Hemsley
  • [PATCH] i91uscsi.c misreads BIOS settings Thu, 18 Jan 2001 23:12:18 +0000
  • Initio 9x00 SCSI driver status Mon, 15 Jan 2001 23:31:29 +0000
• Tristan Greaves
  • RE: Is sendfile all that sexy? Mon, 15 Jan 2001 13:45:40 -0000
• Trond Myklebust
  • Re: nfs client problem in kernel 2.4.0 18 Jan 2001 17:10:58 +0100
  • Re: nfs client problem in kernel 2.4.0 16 Jan 2001 17:04:43 +0100
  • Re: nfs client problem in kernel 2.4.0 16 Jan 2001 16:53:25 +0100
  • Re: Spinlocking patch for in xprt.c 14 Jan 2001 19:45:20 +0100
• Tuukka Toivonen
  • patch: enabling RDPMC: bit 8 in CR4 (PCE) Thu, 18 Jan 2001 17:38:20 +0200
• tytso@valinux.com
  • Re: Locking problem in 2.2.18/19-pre7? (fs/inode.c and fs/dcache.c) Tue, 16 Jan 2001 12:10:31 -0800
  • Locking problem in 2.2.18/19-pre7? (fs/inode.c and fs/dcache.c) Tue, 16 Jan 2001 11:04:45 -0800
• Udo A. Steinberg
  • [OOPS] with 2.2.18 Wed, 17 Jan 2001 21:16:04 +0100
  • Process hung in "D" state with 2.2.18 Tue, 16 Jan 2001 15:11:08 +0100
• Ulrich Kunitz
  • 2.4.0 i386: Why free_xxx_slow() instead free_xxx_fast()? Sat, 20 Jan 2001 16:33:41 +0100
  • [PATCH] two comment typos, kernel 2.4.0 Sat, 20 Jan 2001 16:26:05 +0100
• Urban Widmark
  • [patch] smbfs cache rewrite for 2.4.1-pre Fri, 19 Jan 2001 23:27:08 +0100 (CET)
  • Re: oops in 2.4.1-pre8 Thu, 18 Jan 2001 10:49:06 +0100 (CET)
  • RE: Oops with 4GB memory setting in 2.4.0 stable Thu, 18 Jan 2001 01:30:11 +0100 (CET)
  • Re: oops in 2.4.1-pre8 Wed, 17 Jan 2001 23:24:05 +0100 (CET)
  • Re: eth1: Transmit timed out, status 0000, PHY status 0000 Tue, 16 Jan 2001 23:59:33 +0100 (CET)
  • Re: Oops with 4GB memory setting in 2.4.0 stable Tue, 16 Jan 2001 23:38:34 +0100 (CET)
  • Re: Oops with 4GB memory setting in 2.4.0 stable Tue, 16 Jan 2001 21:17:37 +0100 (CET)
  • Re: Oops with 4GB memory setting in 2.4.0 stable Tue, 16 Jan 2001 09:40:47 +0100 (CET)
  • Re: eth1: Transmit timed out, status 0000, PHY status 0000 Sun, 14 Jan 2001 11:40:57 +0100 (CET)
• Val Henson
  • [PATCH] rrunner.c Tue, 16 Jan 2001 12:52:21 -0700
• Venkatesh Ramamurthy
  • Linux MegaRAID Driver Version 1.14b Release Thu, 18 Jan 2001 18:58:22 -0500
  • RE: Linux not adhering to BIOS Drive boot order? Tue, 16 Jan 2001 17:54:36 -0500
  • RE: Linux not adhering to BIOS Drive boot order? Tue, 16 Jan 2001 15:35:25 -0500
  • RE: Linux not adhering to BIOS Drive boot order? Tue, 16 Jan 2001 15:14:22 -0500
  • RE: Linux not adhering to BIOS Drive boot order? Tue, 16 Jan 2001 12:39:25 -0500
  • RE: Linux not adhering to BIOS Drive boot order? Tue, 16 Jan 2001 11:56:13 -0500
  • RE: Linux not adhering to BIOS Drive boot order? Tue, 16 Jan 2001 11:51:38 -0500
  • RE: Linux not adhering to BIOS Drive boot order? Tue, 16 Jan 2001 11:46:43 -0500
  • RE: Linux not adhering to BIOS Drive boot order? Tue, 16 Jan 2001 11:43:29 -0500
  • RE: Linux not adhering to BIOS Drive boot order? Tue, 16 Jan 2001 11:35:36 -0500
  • RE: Linux not adhering to BIOS Drive boot order? Tue, 16 Jan 2001 11:31:25 -0500
  • RE: Linux not adhering to BIOS Drive boot order? Tue, 16 Jan 2001 11:19:34 -0500
  • Linux not adhering to BIOS Drive boot order? Tue, 16 Jan 2001 10:49:05 -0500
• Ville Herva
  • Re: File System Corruption with 2.2.18 Thu, 18 Jan 2001 10:52:01 +0200
  • Re: File System Corruption with 2.2.18 Thu, 18 Jan 2001 10:38:09 +0200
• Vlad Bolkhovitine
  • Re: mmap()/VM problems in 2.4.0 Tue, 16 Jan 2001 14:43:01 +0800
  • Re: mmap()/VM problems in 2.4.0 Mon, 15 Jan 2001 17:42:08 +0800
  • Re: mmap()/VM problem in 2.4.0 Mon, 15 Jan 2001 13:19:08 +0800
• Vladimir V. Klenov
  • missing check after kmalloc in drivers/video/sbus.c and not only Fri, 19 Jan 2001 19:59:41 +0300
  • missing closing bracket in arch/arm/mach-sa1100/arch.c Thu, 18 Jan 2001 11:34:54 +0300
• Vojtech Pavlik
  • Re: [preview] Latest AMD & VIA IDE drivers with UDMA100 support Sat, 20 Jan 2001 21:56:41 +0100
  • [preview] Latest AMD & VIA IDE drivers with UDMA100 support Fri, 19 Jan 2001 16:56:10 +0100
  • Re: VIA chipset discussion Fri, 19 Jan 2001 15:53:33 +0100
  • Re: File System Corruption with 2.2.18 Wed, 17 Jan 2001 20:03:49 +0100
  • Re: File System Corruption with 2.2.18 Wed, 17 Jan 2001 19:46:06 +0100
  • Re: File System Corruption with 2.2.18 Wed, 17 Jan 2001 19:32:11 +0100
  • Re: [preview] VIA IDE driver v3.11 with vt82c686b UDMA100 support Wed, 17 Jan 2001 16:03:40 +0100
  • Re: ide.2.4.1-p3.01112001.patch Sun, 14 Jan 2001 23:39:07 +0100
  • Re: 2.4 ate my filesystem on rw-mount, getting closer Sun, 14 Jan 2001 23:32:08 +0100
  • Re: 2.4 ate my filesystem on rw-mount, getting closer Sun, 14 Jan 2001 10:48:02 +0100
  • Re: ide.2.4.1-p3.01112001.patch Sun, 14 Jan 2001 09:55:43 +0100
  • Re: ide.2.4.1-p3.01112001.patch Sun, 14 Jan 2001 09:46:02 +0100
  • Re: 2.4 ate my filesystem on rw-mount, getting closer Sun, 14 Jan 2001 09:44:47 +0100
• W. Michael Petullo
  • Lucent Microelectronics Venus Modem, serial 5.05, and Linux 2.4.0 Sun, 14 Jan 2001 20:10:45 +0100
• Wayne.Brown@altec.com
  • Re: linmodem???? Mon, 15 Jan 2001 10:38:15 -0600
  • Re: linmodem???? Mon, 15 Jan 2001 08:45:00 -0600
• Werner Almesberger
  • Re: Linux not adhering to BIOS Drive boot order? Wed, 17 Jan 2001 21:46:50 +0100
  • Re: Linux not adhering to BIOS Drive boot order? Wed, 17 Jan 2001 20:50:07 +0100
  • Re: Linux not adhering to BIOS Drive boot order? Wed, 17 Jan 2001 20:22:22 +0100
  • Re: 2.4.0 + iproute2 Wed, 17 Jan 2001 18:04:33 +0100
• Widmann Thomas
  • Re: PROBLEM: aic7xxx hangs 2.4.0 with SMP Sun, 14 Jan 2001 19:43:43 +0100
• William Taber
  • fs/readdir.c:fillonedir() vs. fs/readdir.c:filldir() Fri, 19 Jan 2001 17:37:38 -0500 (EST)
• Xavier Bestel
  • Re: Linux not adhering to BIOS Drive boot order? 18 Jan 2001 14:01:42 +0100
• Xuan Baldauf
  • Re: Relative CPU time limit Wed, 17 Jan 2001 21:39:20 +0100
  • Relative CPU time limit Wed, 17 Jan 2001 19:33:23 +0100
• Zach Brown
  • Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)]] Thu, 18 Jan 2001 12:49:28 -0500
  • Re: [PATCH] maestro3 oops + fix (for ac9!) Tue, 16 Jan 2001 19:39:11 -0500
• Zdenek Kabelac
  • Re: QUESTION: Network hangs with BP6 and 2.4.x kernels, hardware Mon, 15 Jan 2001 16:15:17 GMT
• Zlatko Calusic
  • Re: Subtle MM bug 17 Jan 2001 19:53:31 +0100
  • Re: mmap()/VM problems in 2.4.0 15 Jan 2001 21:31:56 +0100
• ©[
  @ÄØÿ¿8þÿ¿Andrea Arcangeli
  • Newsletter Sun, 14 Jan 2001 23:36:41 -0500
• ©[
  @ÄØÿ¿8þÿ¿Andrew Morton
  • [PATCH] emu10k1 missing unlock's Wed, 17 Jan 2001 14:47:03 +0100 (CET)
• ©[
  @ÄØÿ¿8þÿ¿Jeff Garzik
  • Overriding BIOS settings with kernel 2.4.0 Wed, 17 Jan 2001 11:03:54 +0100 (CET)
• ©[
  @ÄØÿ¿8þÿ¿Jorge Nerin
  • News Sun, 14 Jan 2001 21:16:50 -0500
• ©[
  @ÄØÿ¿8þÿ¿Michael Peddemors
  • News Sun, 14 Jan 2001 21:43:06 -0500
• ©[
  @ÄØÿ¿8þÿ¿Robert Kaiser
  • Re: [Lse-tech] Re: multi-queue scheduler update Fri, 19 Jan 2001 11:33:34 -0500 (EST)
• ©[
  @ÄØÿ¿8þÿ¿Szabolcs Szakacsits
  • [PATCH] via82cxxx_audio Thu, 18 Jan 2001 21:23:50 +0100 (CET)
• ©[
  @ÄØÿ¿8þÿ¿Tigran Aivazian
  • Re: [PATCH] plan9 partition support Tue, 16 Jan 2001 16:35:11 +0700 (JAVT)
• ©[
  @ÄØÿ¿8þÿ¿©[
  @ÄØÿ¿8þÿ¿Andrew Morton
  • [PATCH] emu10k1 missing unlock's Wed, 17 Jan 2001 14:49:54 +0100 (CET)

Last message date: Sat 20 Jan 2001 - 23:37:12 EET
Archived on: Sat Jan 20 2001 - 23:37:16 EET

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ]