RE: Linux not adhering to BIOS Drive boot order?

[Venkatesh Ramamurthy]

> Why is this a SCSI ML problem?  The problem is that the OS can't figure
> out 
> where to mount root from.  Sounds like an OS problem.
> I think the file system label is the leading candidate to solve this.  One
> 
> really does not care if the root disk is called /dev/sda or /dev/fred.
> All 
> one cares is that you can boot your system and the right disks are
> mounted.  
> What I have seen so far with the fs label this either does solve this
> today or 
> it can solve this.  I notice today on some systems the entries in
> /etc/fstab 
> already are "deviceless" in that it does not have the disk/partition but 
> simply the disk label.
> 
> Can lilo use a label for the root disk also?  I have not looked into that
> yet. 
>  If it does not can it?  When I noticed the use of the label in /etc/fstab
> my 
> first thought was "alright, someone is solving this problem."  I have not 
> taken the time - not a burning issue with me right now - to see if this is
> all 
> done yet though.
> 
> Keep in mind that the example where /dev/sda is where root lies is that
> "easy" 
> case.  The hard case is what happens if someone installs on /dev/sdg.  Now
> 
> they boot up with a disk array turned off.  Is the mid-layer going to
> figure 
> out that what is now /dev/sda suppose to be /dev/sdg?  Or they install to 
> /dev/sdb and /dev/sda goes bad so they pull it out?
	[Venkatesh Ramamurthy]   If we can truly go for label based mouting
and lilo'ing this would solve the problem. Anybody doing this?