Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)]]

[Ingo Molnar]

On Thu, 18 Jan 2001, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:

> > {
> >         int val = 1;
> >         setsockopt(req->sock, IPPROTO_TCP, TCP_CORK,
> > 			(char *)&val,sizeof(val));
> >         val = 0;
> >         setsockopt(req->sock, IPPROTO_TCP, TCP_CORK,
> > 			(char *)&val,sizeof(val));
> > }
> >
> > differ from what you posted. It does the same in my opinion. Maybe we are
> > not talking about the same thing?
>
> The above is equivalent to SIOCPUSH _only_ if the caller wasn't using either
> TCP_NODELAY or TCP_CORK.

why? I can restore whatever state i want, the above is just a mechanizm to
force the push.

	Ingo