Re: [CHECKER] 8 more potential locking problems

Alan Cox (alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk)
Thu, 22 Mar 2001 23:01:41 +0000 (GMT)

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Alan Cox: "Re: supermount ?"
Previous message: Grover, Andrew: "RE: Incorrect mdelay() results on Power Managed Machines x86"

> We modified our compiler extension for checking lock consistency and
> found 8 more potential errors.

All 8 are real, all 8 fixed in my tree.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Alan Cox: "Re: supermount ?"
Previous message: Grover, Andrew: "RE: Incorrect mdelay() results on Power Managed Machines x86"