Re: supermount ?

[Alan Cox]

> Supermount sounds to me like a very important part of linux, at least for us 
> who like our cds/dvds/etc. to work as easily as in fx. windows. For linux to 
> be popular among "normal" users, it should be present at every system with 
> local removable drives. So, my question is; why isn't supermount a standard 
> part of the kernel, or at least a module ?

Because it wants rewriting as a clean file system using the 2.4 dcache and
layering itself above the real fs. In theory the infrastructure for this is
all there. 

Alan