Re: [PATCH] loop.c - part 1 of many

viro@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk
Mon, 23 Jun 2003 02:47:36 +0100

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Rusty Russell: "Re: [PATCH] workqueue.c subtle fix and core extraction"
Previous message: Andries.Brouwer@cwi.nl: "[PATCH] loop.c - part 1 of many"
In reply to: Andries.Brouwer@cwi.nl: "[PATCH] loop.c - part 1 of many"
Next in thread: Christoph Hellwig: "Re: [PATCH] loop.c - part 1 of many"

On Mon, Jun 23, 2003 at 03:27:51AM +0200, Andries.Brouwer@cwi.nl wrote:

> -static int figure_loop_size(struct loop_device *lo)
> +static int
> +figure_loop_size(struct loop_device *lo)

Please, don't. See recent flamewar re conversion from K&R style -
splitting declaration before function name is a Bad Thing(tm).
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Rusty Russell: "Re: [PATCH] workqueue.c subtle fix and core extraction"
Previous message: Andries.Brouwer@cwi.nl: "[PATCH] loop.c - part 1 of many"
In reply to: Andries.Brouwer@cwi.nl: "[PATCH] loop.c - part 1 of many"
Next in thread: Christoph Hellwig: "Re: [PATCH] loop.c - part 1 of many"