Re: bad: scheduling while atomic!

Russell King (rmk@arm.linux.org.uk)
Sun, 15 Jun 2003 18:17:03 +0100

On Sun, Jun 15, 2003 at 06:14:38PM +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
> On Sun, 2003-06-15 at 14:29, Russell King wrote:
> > It would be useful if we could balance the spin_locks with the
> > spin_unlocks. 8)
>
> I can see how that could be considered appropriate. There are a handful
> of other such trivia in CVS which want to go to Linus shortly -- I
> assume that includes your afs partitioning fix?

Yes, although I was considering sending that one myself. If you're due
to do another sync up, feel free to include that.

-- 
Russell King (rmk@arm.linux.org.uk)                The developer of ARM Linux
             http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/personal/aboutme.html


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/