Re: bad: scheduling while atomic!

David Woodhouse (dwmw2@infradead.org)
Sun, 15 Jun 2003 20:33:29 +0100

On Sun, 2003-06-15 at 18:17, Russell King wrote:
> Yes, although I was considering sending that one myself. If you're due
> to do another sync up, feel free to include that.

Well, given the 'NFTL aborts if add_mtd_blktrans functions exists,
rather calling it and aborting only it it returns non-zero' bug, I
suppose I am due such ;)

-- 
dwmw2


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/