Re: linux/bug.h and asm/bug.h

Russell King (rmk@arm.linux.org.uk)
Mon, 4 Nov 2002 12:51:15 +0000

On Mon, Nov 04, 2002 at 01:41:48PM +0100, Ralf Baechle wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 04, 2002 at 01:22:45PM +1100, Rusty Russell wrote:
> > As the number of bug-related macros grows, this makes sense.
> >
> > 1) Introduce linux/bug.h and #include it from linux/kernel.h so noone
> > breaks.
> > 2) Move BUG() macro from asm*/page.h to asm*/bug.h, and #include it.
>
> Great, people were talking about the mess caused by this just last night.
> Just one request, move the BUG_ON definition into <asm/bug.h> also. This
> permits the use of conditional trap instructions for those architecture
> that have them.

I'm a little peeved since everyone's likes this from Rusty, but ignored
exactly the same thing from me. Sigh, life is cruel some times.

Message-Id: E18289f-0007tm-00@flint.arm.linux.org.uk
Subject: [PATCH] 2.5.43-bug
Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2002 11:45:27 +0100

-- 
Russell King (rmk@arm.linux.org.uk)                The developer of ARM Linux
             http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/personal/aboutme.html


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/