idle=poll needed??

Reed, Timothy A (timothy.a.reed@lmco.com)
Mon, 04 Nov 2002 07:51:38 -0500

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Russell King: "Re: linux/bug.h and asm/bug.h"
Previous message: Alan Cox: "Re: Abbott and Costello meet Crunch Time -- Penultimate 2.5 merge"

All,
We currently have setup, Dual P4-Xeon 2.2G machines running 2.4.19,
with 2GB of RAM.
Is there any performance reasons to keep the idle=poll in the append
line? I have not seen any degraded performance with the option, but some of
our subs are having performance issues with it in.

TIA,
Timothy Reed
Software Engineer \ Systems Administrator
Lockheed Martin - NE & SS Syracuse
Email: timothy.a.reed@lmco.com

The Box Said "Requires Windows 95 or Better", so I installed Linux!

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Russell King: "Re: linux/bug.h and asm/bug.h"
Previous message: Alan Cox: "Re: Abbott and Costello meet Crunch Time -- Penultimate 2.5 merge"