Re: [PATCH] linux-2.5.40_timer-changes_A3 (3/3 - integration)

[Greg KH]

On Wed, Oct 02, 2002 at 11:12:34PM -0700, john stultz wrote:
> Linus, All,
> 
>         This is the final part 3 of 3 of my timer-change patch. Part 3
> integrates the moved code (from part 2) into the new infrastructure
> (from part 1). 

Minor, minor comments:

> diff -Nru a/arch/i386/kernel/timer_pit.c b/arch/i386/kernel/timer_pit.c
> --- a/arch/i386/kernel/timer_pit.c	Wed Oct  2 22:38:24 2002
> +++ b/arch/i386/kernel/timer_pit.c	Wed Oct  2 22:38:24 2002
> @@ -1,3 +1,41 @@
> +/*
> + * This code largely moved from arch/i386/kernel/time.c.
> + * See comments there for proper credits.
> + */
> +
> +#include <linux/spinlock.h>
> +#include <linux/module.h>
> +#include <linux/device.h>
> +#include <asm/timer.h>
> +#include <asm/io.h>
> +
> +/* fwd declarations */

These don't have to be forward declarations, do they?
And can they be static?

> +int init_pit(void);
> +void mark_offset_pit(void);
> +unsigned long get_offset_pit(void);
> +
> +/* tsc timer_opts struct */
> +struct timer_opts timer_pit = {
> +	init: init_pit, 
> +	mark_offset: mark_offset_pit, 
> +	get_offset: get_offset_pit
> +};
> +
> +
> +extern spinlock_t i8259A_lock;
> +extern spinlock_t i8253_lock;
> +#include "do_timer.h"

Shouldn't these 3 lines be above the "/* fwd declarations */" line?

Same minor comments for timer_tsc.c

thanks,

greg k-h