Re: 2.4 mm trouble [possible lru race]
Jens Axboe (axboe@suse.de)
Tue, 1 Oct 2002 19:31:19 +0200
On Tue, Oct 01 2002, Daniel Phillips wrote:
> On Tuesday 01 October 2002 18:56, Rik van Riel wrote:
> > On Tue, 1 Oct 2002, Daniel Phillips wrote:
> > > On Tuesday 01 October 2002 16:20, Richard.Zidlicky@stud.informatik.uni-erlangen.de wrote:
> >
> > > > no preempt or anything fancy, m68k vanila 2.4.19 (well almost).
> > >
> > > Vanilla would be CONFIG_SMP=y, is that what you have?
> >
> > Somehow I doubt Linux supports m68k SMP machines ;)
>
> CONFIG_SMP=y works perfectly well on single cpu machines - it forces
> the spinlocks to actually exist. It's not supposed to change any
> behaviour, but you never know. Behaviour is obviously changing here.
Again, m68k was the target.
--
Jens Axboe
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/