This has changed a little. You may want to have a look at the
updated yet unfinished version of that ancient document:
ftp://icaftp.epfl.ch/pub/people/almesber/junk/tc-04FEB2001-0.tar.gz
(file tc/tc.ps)
Be warned that this "updated version" is for 2.4.0, so it's not
all that up to date anymore. But then, the traffic control code
hasn't changed very much in 2.4.
> 1. buffering at driver level: large buffering at driver level may
> negate the effect of the scheduler by delaying higher priority
> packets. ALTQ uses a token bucket regulator after the scheduler to
> counter this problem. however i've been unable to find something
> similar or any comment on this issue with regards to linux.
You could use something acting as a shaper (i.e. CBQ or HTB)
as the root qdisc, then cram all the other queuing inside it.
> 2. timer granularity issues: a driver will only interrupt after
> its buffer gets emptied. however the scheduler may be invoked in
> between by trigerring it on events like packet enqueue, expiry of
> watchdog timers, etc. In case of timer expiry events, the timer
> granularity remains 10 ms, so wont this lead to a bursty dequeue
> on the next timer tick?
Yes, it does :-( Increasing HZ helps a little, and so do the
opportunistic checks (i.e. trying to dequeue whenever we're
handling an interrupt anyway). Unfortunately, the latter don't
improve worst-case burstiness, which is an issue if the next
network element in the path happens to be particularly picky.
- Werner
-- _________________________________________________________________________ / Werner Almesberger, Buenos Aires, Argentina wa@almesberger.net / /_http://www.almesberger.net/____________________________________________/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/