Dave Jones wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 03, 2002 at 01:29:55AM +1000, gerg wrote:
> > Yep, there sure is some crap in there :-)
> > Obviously left over from the original copy out
> > from arch/i386/config.in.
> >
> > I have cleaned all that silly stuff out for the
> > next patch.
>
> With the silly nits like that aside, it leaves just the
> more serious 'issues' such as those brought up by Willy
> earlier.
>
> The whole idea of a seperate mmnommu (or was it nommumm/ ?)
> directory seemed a bit odd-looking too. (Asides from the
> horrible name)
It surely is a horrible name :-)
> I didn't check the code in detail, but
> is there really that little that can be shared between
> the regular mm/ ?
No, there is actually a lot in common. Probably something
like 70%. This is really a question of organization.
I would much prefer to see the non-mmu support in with mm.
But it would mean a few #ifdef's in there to allow for
the differences.
Regards
Greg
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Greg Ungerer -- Chief Software Wizard EMAIL: gerg@snapgear.com
Snapgear Pty Ltd PHONE: +61 7 3279 1822
825 Stanley St, FAX: +61 7 3279 1820
Woolloongabba, QLD, 4102, Australia WEB: www.snapgear.com
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/