Re: 2.5.28 and partitions

Alexander Viro (viro@math.psu.edu)
Thu, 1 Aug 2002 17:08:50 -0400 (EDT)


On Thu, 1 Aug 2002, Thunder from the hill wrote:

> Hi,
>
> On Thu, 1 Aug 2002, Alexander Viro wrote:
> > More powerful?
>
> Well, compared to ASCII: it's unlikely that you meet a j letter or a \033
> in the size string.

Huh??? That's a new meaning of "powerful"... If you mean "more compact"
I would certainly agree (base-10 instead of base-256), but if _that_ becomes
a problem with partition tables... IIRC, OP proposed 4096 bytes for table.

Again, if somebody really can't check if array of characters is a valid
representation of integer or can't implement conversion of known valid
one to its value... What the devil are you doing here?

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/