Re: [PATCH] solved APM bug with -rc5

[Willy Tarreau]

On Thu, Aug 01, 2002 at 11:16:23PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
> On Thu, 2002-08-01 at 21:35, Willy TARREAU wrote:
> > +	while (cpu_number_map(smp_processor_id()) != 0) {
> > +		schedule();
> > +	}
 
> What guarantees that loop will ever exit ?

none, as in the already existing other implementation. But at least, I'd
prefer an infinite loop instead of some random code being executed without
noticing it.

Do you know a better way of doing that ? The other implementation
used a fake thread which also did a schedule(). I wonder if this
is to make the scheduler work a bit more so that we get more
chances to swap the CPU.

Cheers,
Willy