Re: [PATCH] spinlock.h cleanup

Linus Torvalds (torvalds@transmeta.com)
Mon, 29 Jul 2002 17:26:41 -0700 (PDT)

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: J.A. Magallon: "Re: oopsen with rc3-aa3"
Previous message: Robert Love: "Re: [PATCH] spinlock.h cleanup"
In reply to: Robert Love: "[PATCH] spinlock.h cleanup"

On 29 Jul 2002, Robert Love wrote:
>
> Tested on UP, SMP, and preempt. Object code is unchanged. Patch is
> against 2.5-bk but should apply to 2.5.29. Please, apply.

Hmm.. Why did you remove the gcc workaround? Are all gcc's > 2.95 known to
be ok wrt empty initializers?

Linus

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: J.A. Magallon: "Re: oopsen with rc3-aa3"
Previous message: Robert Love: "Re: [PATCH] spinlock.h cleanup"
In reply to: Robert Love: "[PATCH] spinlock.h cleanup"