Re: [PATCH] spinlock.h cleanup

Robert Love (rml@tech9.net)
29 Jul 2002 17:30:52 -0700


On Mon, 2002-07-29 at 17:26, Linus Torvalds wrote:

> Hmm.. Why did you remove the gcc workaround? Are all gcc's > 2.95 known to
> be ok wrt empty initializers?

I hope so, we only check for gcc < 2.0.

If I recall correctly, the fix was for older egcs compilers.

Robert Love

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/