Right, so we keep the basic indiret access functions, and add the taskfile
ones on top for performances, that's what you mean ?
>> Right. We could go the darwin (apple) way and have taskfile_load/store
>> functions doing the entire registers controlled by a bitmask of which
>> registers has to be touched. it has a cost (testing each bit and
>> conditionally branching, which can suck hard) but probably less than
>
>Get yourself a conditional move instruction 8)
Hehe, let's make an ARM/PPC hybrid ;)
>> an indirect function call which isn't predictable.
>
>Or you have a small set of such functions for the critical paths - ie doing
>actual block I/O which pass the set of values required to do that operation
>and do the stores. What are the performance critical paths
>
> Begin a disk write
> Begin a disk read
> PIO transfer in
> PIO transfer out
> End a disk I/O fastpaths (no error case)
>
> Maybe ATAPI command writes ?
>
>beyond that I doubt the rest are critical
Well, I would normally agree with the above... except that IDE is so full of
corner cases that I don't want to see dealt with in each host controller
driver...
Ben.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/