> Did you forget return values? Or perhaps just redeclare those...
> Also i don't quite understand the new status reporting you're doing, mind
> just explaining it to me a bit? The previous code would tell you wether
> the watchdog is enabled/disabled so you can tell wether the timeout period
> has passed.
Oops, yea, I forgot return values. I'll fix that up. I got rid of
sc1200wdt_status because it returns bit 1, which is defined as WDIOF_OVERHEAT
I suppose it would be possible to return WDIOF_KEEPALIVEPING instead.
So something like if(ret & 0x01) return WDIOF_KEEPALIVEPING;?
Regards,
Rob Radez
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/