Re: Event logging vs enhancing printk

[Martin J. Bligh]

>   If you want buffering you can add it on a case-by-case basis, but in
> general I don't believe you do want a delay, because the output might be
> lost on a dying system. Prink works like output to stderr, character
> buffered. I would think a change to anything this fundimental would be a
> Linus decision, but I think it's correct as is.

OK, now try to read the panic output when two cpus panic at once ;-)
Been there, sworn vehemently at that ...

There's no point in logging messages if you can't read them afterwards.
I think 99.99% of such cases would not involve printk printing half
a buffered line, then dying, though I admit it's technically possible.

Of course, we could just do this buffering for the event logging half
of the subsystem if people really object. Personally, I think it's a
win to fix printk whilst we're at it, but a half-fix is always an 
option.

M.