Re: Linux 2.4.18 - Full tarball is OK

[David Rees]

On Mon, Feb 25, 2002 at 09:49:58PM +0000, Chris Funderburg wrote:
> 
> FYI - The full tarball already has the missing patch...
> 
> So, I think, it's only patch-2.4.18 that has the problem...

Uh, no, it doesn't.  Using linux-2.4.18.tar.bz2 dated Feb 25, 2002 11:40am:

diff -urN linux-2.4.18-rc4/Makefile linux-2.4.18/Makefile
--- linux-2.4.18-rc4/Makefile	Mon Feb 25 14:35:52 2002
+++ linux-2.4.18/Makefile	Mon Feb 25 11:37:52 2002
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
 VERSION = 2
 PATCHLEVEL = 4
 SUBLEVEL = 18
-EXTRAVERSION = -rc4
+EXTRAVERSION =
 
 KERNELRELEASE=$(VERSION).$(PATCHLEVEL).$(SUBLEVEL)$(EXTRAVERSION)
 
diff -urN linux-2.4.18-rc4/fs/binfmt_elf.c linux-2.4.18/fs/binfmt_elf.c
--- linux-2.4.18-rc4/fs/binfmt_elf.c	Mon Feb 25 14:35:55 2002
+++ linux-2.4.18/fs/binfmt_elf.c	Mon Feb 25 11:38:08 2002
@@ -564,9 +564,6 @@
 			// printk(KERN_WARNING "ELF: Ambiguous type, using
ELF\n");
 			interpreter_type = INTERPRETER_ELF;
 		}
-	} else {
-		/* Executables without an interpreter also need a
personality  */
-		SET_PERSONALITY(elf_ex, ibcs2_interpreter);
 	}
 
 	/* OK, we are done with that, now set up the arg stuff,