Re: Linux 2.4.18 - Full tarball is OK

H. Peter Anvin (hpa@zytor.com)
25 Feb 2002 14:40:31 -0800


Followup to: <Pine.LNX.4.33L.0202251931360.7820-100000@imladris.surriel.com>
By author: Rik van Riel <riel@conectiva.com.br>
In newsgroup: linux.dev.kernel
>
> On Mon, 25 Feb 2002, Alan Cox wrote:
>
> > If so Marcelo can you put up 2.4.18-fixed patch and a borked-fixed diff ?
> That would break hpa's incremental diff patches.
> If somebody needs 2.4.18 + fix, they can just run 2.4.18-rc4.
>

Since the tarball apparently is OK and it's only the patch that's
different, just re-create the patch, put it in the proper place, and
make sure the file date on the patch is different; the incremental
diff will be regenerated to match.

-hpa

-- 
<hpa@transmeta.com> at work, <hpa@zytor.com> in private!
"Unix gives you enough rope to shoot yourself in the foot."
http://www.zytor.com/~hpa/puzzle.txt	<amsp@zytor.com>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/