Re: [PATCH] Lightweight userspace semaphores...

Alan Cox (alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk)
Mon, 25 Feb 2002 17:42:59 +0000 (GMT)


> Are we sure that forcing semaphore overhead to the size of a page is a
> good idea? I'd much rather see a sleep/wakeup mechanism akin to wait
> queues be exported by the kernel so that userspace can implement a rich
> set of locking functions on top of that in whatever shared memory is
> being used.

The shared memory side of it has to be page sized. It doesn't mean you have
to have 1 semaphore per page but it does mean you have to allocate in page
sized chunks for mmu granularity

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/