Re: thread_info implementation

David S. Miller (davem@redhat.com)
Mon, 11 Feb 2002 17:41:02 -0800 (PST)

From: David Mosberger <davidm@hpl.hp.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2002 17:36:48 -0800

Umh, perhaps because it adds one level of indirection to every access
of "current"??

Ummm, which is totally cached and therefore costs nothing?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/