Re: thread_info implementation

David Mosberger (davidm@hpl.hp.com)
Mon, 11 Feb 2002 17:53:12 -0800


>>>>> On Mon, 11 Feb 2002 17:41:02 -0800 (PST), "David S. Miller" <davem@redhat.com> said:

David> From: David Mosberger <davidm@hpl.hp.com> Date: Mon, 11
David> Feb 2002 17:36:48 -0800

David> Umh, perhaps because it adds one level of indirection to
David> every access of "current"??

DaveM> Ummm, which is totally cached and therefore costs nothing?

Loads are certainly not free on many CPU models. This is made worse
by the fact that C alias analysis has to be so pessimistic, especially
given that the kernel is compiled with -fno-strict-aliasing.

--david
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/