Re: [RFC] klibc requirements

Erik Andersen (andersen@codepoet.org)
Wed, 9 Jan 2002 07:57:23 -0700

On Wed Jan 09, 2002 at 02:23:46PM +0100, Juan Quintela wrote:
> I can think of that in a fast thought:
>
> - if fsck.* can be there, it will make fs nice, just now they have to
> be able to fsck a ro root fs.

That would be a nice addition.

> - I suppose that you can put here also the raid autodetect code and
> things like that.
> - you also need a very small minishell, something like nash (that
> cames with mkinitrd will suffice).

busybox lash
http://busybox.net/cgi-bin/cvsweb/busybox/shell/lash.c?rev=1.142&content-type=text/vnd.viewcvs-markup
or busybox msh or busybox ash if you need something thats
all posix compliant.

> - as I suppose that you have supposed insmod is essential :)

busybox insmod

> - you already put there IP autoconfiguration.

udhcp

-Erik

--
Erik B. Andersen             http://codepoet-consulting.com/
--This message was written using 73% post-consumer electrons--
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/