Re: [RFC] klibc requirements

[Erik Andersen]

On Wed Jan 09, 2002 at 03:15:14PM +0100, Felix von Leitner wrote:
> Thus spake Greg KH ([e-mail]):
> > > > 	- portable, runs on all platforms that the kernel currently
> > > > 	  works on, but doesn't have to run on any non-Linux based OS.
> > You didn't address this.  What are the future plans of porting dietLibc
> > to the platforms that are not currently supported by it (but are by
> > Linux)?
> 
> We will attempt to port the diet libc to every Linux platform that we
> have access to.  I won't go out and buy hardware to port my software to,
> so if anyone needs the diet libc ported somewhere, I need an account on
> a test box somewhere.
> 
> We are currently missing sh-linux, ia64-linux and m68k-linux and
> probably a few architectures that I have never heard of ;)

uClibc runs on both sh and ,68k, so the only arch missing 
coverage with either dietlibc or uClibc seems to be ia64.

 -Erik

--
Erik B. Andersen             http://codepoet-consulting.com/
--This message was written using 73% post-consumer electrons--