Re: [2.4.17/18pre] VM and swap - it's really unusable

Dieter =?ISO-8859-15?q?N=FCtzel?= (Dieter.Nuetzel@hamburg.de)
Tue, 8 Jan 2002 04:02:44 +0100

Is it possible to decide, now what should go into 2.4.18 (maybe -pre3) -aa or
-rmap?
Andrew Morten`s read-latency.patch is a clear winner for me, too.
What about 00_nanosleep-5 and bootmem?
The O(1) scheduler?
Maybe preemption? It is disengageable so nobody should be harmed but we get
the chance for wider testing.

Any comments?

Thanks,
Dieter

-- 
Dieter Nützel
Graduate Student, Computer Science


University of Hamburg
Department of Computer Science
@home: Dieter.Nuetzel@hamburg.de
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/