Re: Linux 2.2.20pre10

[D. Stimits]

bill davidsen wrote:
> 
> In article <[e-mail]>
> [e-mail] wrote:
> | > This would then presumably lead to password protected access for US kernel
> | > developers that need to know? And some kind of NDA?
> |
> | US kernel developers cannot be told. Period.
> |
> | > 'IANAL', and neither are you, are you sure this sillyness is necessary?
> |
> | Its based directly on legal opinion.
> 
>   And who will be maintaining the world and us-castrated kernel source?
> I can't imagine anything worse for the security of this country than not
> allow computer users access to security issues.

See:
http://www.newsforge.com/article.pl?sid=01/10/19/1546246&mode=thread
http://www.petitiononline.com/SSSCA/petition.html
http://216.110.42.179/docs/hollings.090701.html

Then complain to Senators Hollings and Stevens; they haven't heard of
the Constitution, maybe someone could remind them.

D. Stimits, [e-mail]

> 
> --
> bill davidsen <[e-mail]>
>   His first management concern is not solving the problem, but covering
> his ass. If he lived in the middle ages he'd wear his codpiece backward.
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to [e-mail]
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/