Re: VM

Mike Fedyk (mfedyk@matchmail.com)
Mon, 22 Oct 2001 11:00:58 -0700

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Per Jessen: "Re: Linux 2.2.20pre10"
Previous message: Rob Turk: "Re: Linux 2.2.20pre10"
In reply to: Alan Cox: "Re: VM"
Next in thread: J . A . Magallon: "Re: VM"

On Mon, Oct 22, 2001 at 03:02:49PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
> > I have never done this comparison myself, but I was wondering how ugly
> > it would be if stable versions of Andrea's and Rik's VMs were both
> > available in your/Linus' kernel as compile-time options. Assuming that
> > each provides better performance under certain conditions, wouldn't
>
> Too ugly for words.

Though, if it's done from the start of 2.5, it could be very possible. Is
there a way to make it non-ugly?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Per Jessen: "Re: Linux 2.2.20pre10"
Previous message: Rob Turk: "Re: Linux 2.2.20pre10"
In reply to: Alan Cox: "Re: VM"
Next in thread: J . A . Magallon: "Re: VM"