Re: No 100 HZ timer !

Oliver Xymoron (oxymoron@waste.org)
Thu, 2 Aug 2001 17:09:04 -0500 (CDT)


On Thu, 2 Aug 2001, george anzinger wrote:

> I guess I am confused. How is it that raising HZ improves throughput?
> And was that before or after the changes in the time slice routines that
> now scale with HZ and before were fixed? (That happened somewhere
> around 2.2.14 or 2.2.16 or so.)

My guess is that processes that are woken up for whatever reason get to
run sooner, reducing latency, and thereby increasing throughput when not
compute-bound. Presumably this was with shorter time slices.

--
 "Love the dolphins," she advised him. "Write by W.A.S.T.E.."

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/