> Gosh, here's an idea: if there is no memory left and someone
> malloc()s some more, have malloc() fail? Kill the process that
> required the memory? I can't believe the attitude I am hearing.
> Userland processes should be able to go around doing whaever the
> fuck they want and the box should stay alive.
If you have a proposal on what to do when both ram
and swap fill up and you need more memory, please
let me know.
Until then, we'll kill processes when we exhaust
both memory and swap ;)
cheers,
Rik
-- Executive summary of a recent Microsoft press release: "we are concerned about the GNU General Public License (GPL)"
http://www.surriel.com/ http://www.conectiva.com/ http://distro.conectiva.com/
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/